be67831 Make DummySignatureCreator a singleton (Pieter Wuille)
190b8d2 Make BaseSignatureCreator a pure interface (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
* Removes the `m_provider` field from `BaseSignatureCreator`. Instead both a `SigningProvider` (which provides keys and scripts) and a `BaseSignatureCreator` (which implements the transaction-specific (or other) signing logic) are passed into and down in `ProduceSignature`, making the two concepts orthogonal.
* Makes `BaseSignatureCreator` a pure interface without constructor, making it easier to implement new derivations of it (for example for message signing).
* As `DummySignatureCreator` now becomes a stateless object, turn it into a singleton `DUMMY_SIGNATURE_CREATOR`.
Tree-SHA512: 5f1f4512e4ea7d02a31df7b9ede55008efa716c5b74a2630ca1c2fc6599584d8bf5f5641487266127f4b3788033803539fbd22b03ef1219c83c10da2d3da3dcd
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
c198dc00e1 [Doc] Clarify the meaning of fee delta not being a fee rate in prioritisetransaction RPC (Jan Čapek)
Pull request description:
Hi,
I have faced some confusion among our developers considering this being a fee rate. Would you consider including this tiny doc update?
Best regards,
Jan Capek
Tree-SHA512: cd0560540418e53c5c19ceab2d5aca229f4ef6b788b9543695742522e1c63a7f2cce2574b47fead098a106da2f77e297f0c728474565f6259b50d62369bbe7da
fafcad3 doc: Add testmempoolaccept to release-notes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Some fixups for #11742:
* Add release notes for the new rpc
* Fix a typo in the original pull
* Make the mempool reference passed to `CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache` const, since that function is called before we return from ATMP and we must not modify the mempool.
Tree-SHA512: 72c459ba69f7698a69c91d2592f10f7fb1864846c7d8c525050d48286f92ba5ec5fe554c54235b52fbd9a8f00226c526ad84584641ec39084e1a1310a261510d
a5bca13 Bugfix: Include <memory> for std::unique_ptr (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Not sure why all these includes were missing, but it's breaking builds for some users:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652142
(Added to all files with a reference to `std::unique_ptr`)
Tree-SHA512: 8a2c67513ca07b9bb52c34e8a20b15e56f8af2530310d9ee9b0a69694dd05e02e7a3683f14101a2685d457672b56addec591a0bb83900a0eb8e2a43d43200509
b55555d rpc: Add testmempoolaccept (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To check if a single raw transaction makes it into the current transaction pool, one had to call `sendrawtransaction`. However, on success, this adds the transaction to the mempool with no easy way to undo.
The call `testmempoolaccept` is introduced to provide a way to solely check the result without changing the mempool state.
Tree-SHA512: 5afd9311190135cee8fc1f229c7d39bf893f1028f29e28d34f70df820198ff97b4bf86b41cbbd6e6c36a5c30073cefa92d541c74a4939c7a2a6fa283dfd41b63
cb1e319 Bugfix: RPC: savemempool: Don't save until LoadMempool() is finished (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12142
The tests are a little bit slow, mempool_persist.py goes from about 20 s to about 120 s in my hardware.
Perhaps there's a better way to test this.
Tree-SHA512: 9e6c24b32a9cf3774e8f0bd81c035b0deb53fba5ac3eb2532d85900579d21cef8a1135b75a4fa0a9d883e3822eb35e7d4b47a0838abf99789039205041962629
4d74c78 Add username and ip logging for RPC method requests (Gabriel Davidian)
Pull request description:
Adds username and IP logging (if enabled via -logips command) to RPC method request logging.
This closes#12223
Tree-SHA512: a441228e80ea6884ec379c66e949d86df3689770f1b3c3608015cf5a36d2dfb38051298a7f6ea6dfdfbf0b3b6c896e414c8dc54e9833bb73dd65bdb1832f4395
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)):
>
> The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations:
>
> * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer.
> * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes.
> * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible.
>
> The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions).
Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
d2527bd Rename wallet_accounts.py test (Russell Yanofsky)
045eeb8 Rename account to label where appropriate (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Rename account to label where appropriate
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the implementation of address labels in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the way and letting that change focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions (transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
---
There is a rebased version of #7729 atop this PR at https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/label, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729#issuecomment-338417139.
Tree-SHA512: b3f934e612922d6290f50137f8ba71ddfaea4485713c7d97e89400a8b73b09b254f9186dffa462c77f5847721f5af9852b5572ade5443d8ee95dd150b3edb7ff
499d95e27 Add static_assert to prevent VARINT(<signed value>) (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Using VARINT with signed types is dangerous because negative values will appear to serialize correctly, but then deserialize as positive values mod 128.
This commit changes the VARINT macro to trigger a compile error by default if called with an signed value, and it updates existing broken uses of VARINT to pass a special flag that lets them keep working with no changes in behavior.
There is some discussion about this issue here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9693#issuecomment-278701473. I think another good change along these lines would be to make `GetSizeOfVarInt` and `WriteVarInt` throw exceptions if they are passed numbers less than 0 to serialize. But unlike this change, that would be a change in runtime behavior, and need more consideration.
Tree-SHA512: 082c65598cfac6dc1da042bdb47dbc9d5d789fc849fe52921cc238578588f4e5ff976c8b4b2ce42cb75290eb14f3b42ea76e26202c223c5b2aa63ef45c2ea3cc
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the
implementation of address labels in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the
way and letting it focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to
addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions
(transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts
with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
7ef46d063a Remove redundant includes. Conform to header include guidelines. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
From the header include guidelines ([developer-notes.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#source-code-organization)):
> "One exception is that a `.cpp` file does not need to re-include the includes already included in its corresponding `.h` file."
Covered in this PR:
* `rpc/util.h` includes `pubkey.h` + `utilstrencodings.h`. `rpc/util.cpp` includes `rpc/util.h`.
* `util.h` includes `fs.h`. `util.cpp` includes `util.h`.
Tree-SHA512: a38d9ecefd8165ad151c1ffde52cfbac968526c49db2080988bf6e6a3daa2ebeceb34d08f817e275edf7c650bf3155de01369bfb352522f8e0ae136b2289b194
Using VARINT with signed types is dangerous because negative values will appear
to serialize correctly, but then deserialize as positive values mod 128.
This commit changes the VARINT macro to trigger an error by default if called
with an signed value, and updates broken uses of VARINT to pass a special flag
that lets them keep working with no change in behavior.
92fabcd44 Add LookupBlockIndex function (João Barbosa)
43a32b739 Add missing cs_lock in CreateWalletFromFile (João Barbosa)
f814a3e8f Fix cs_main lock in LoadExternalBlockFile (João Barbosa)
c651df8b3 Lock cs_main while loading block index in AppInitMain (João Barbosa)
02de6a6bc Assert cs_main is held when accessing mapBlockIndex (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Replace all `mapBlockIndex` lookups with the new `LookupBlockIndex()`. In some cases it avoids a second lookup.
Tree-SHA512: ca31118f028a19721f2191d86f2dd398144d04df345694575a64aeb293be2f85785201480c3c578a0ec99690516205708558c0fd4168b09313378fd4e60a8412
fac70134a rpc: Update createrawtransaction examples (MarcoFalke)
fa06dfce0 [rpc] createrawtransaction: Accept sorted outputs (MarcoFalke)
8acd25d85 rpc: Allow typeAny in RPCTypeCheck (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The second parameter of the `createrawtransaction` is a dictionary of the outputs. This comes with at least two drawbacks:
* In case of duplicate keys, either of them might silently disappear, with no user feedback at all. A user needs to make other mistakes, but this could eventually lead to abnormal tx fees.
* A dictionary does not guarantee that keys are sorted. Again, a user needs to keep this in mind, as it could eventually lead to excessive tx fees.
Even though my scenario of loss-of-funds is unlikely to happen, I see it as a inconvenience that should be fixed.
Tree-SHA512: cd562f34f7f9f79c7d3433805971325c388c2035611be283980f4049066a622df4f0afdc11d7ac96662260ec0115147cb65e1ab5268f5a1b063242f3fe425f77
f08761371 Add tests of listreceivedbyaddress address filtering (Jeremy Rubin)
8ee08120d Add address filtering to listreceivedbyaddress (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Supersede https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9503 created by @JeremyRubin , I will maintain it.
Tree-SHA512: 2accaed493b7e1c2eb5cb5270180f100f8c718b6585b9574f294191c318dc622a79e42ac185300f291f82d3b2a6f1c00850b6b17e4ff2dbab94d71df695acbfe
92f1f8b31 Split off key_io_tests from base58_tests (Pieter Wuille)
119b0f85e Split key_io (address/key encodings) off from base58 (Pieter Wuille)
ebfe217b1 Stop using CBase58Data for ext keys (Pieter Wuille)
32e69fa0d Replace CBitcoinSecret with {Encode,Decode}Secret (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR contains some of the changes left as TODO in #11167 (and built on top of that PR). They are not intended for backporting.
This removes the `CBase58`, `CBitcoinSecret`, `CBitcoinExtKey`, and `CBitcoinExtPubKey` classes, in favor of simple `Encode`/`Decode` functions. Furthermore, all Bitcoin-specific logic (addresses, WIF, BIP32) is moved to `key_io.{h,cpp}`, leaving `base58.{h,cpp}` as a pure utility that implements the base58 encoding/decoding logic.
Tree-SHA512: a5962c0ed27ad53cbe00f22af432cf11aa530e3efc9798e25c004bc9ed1b5673db5df3956e398ee2c085e3a136ac8da69fe7a7d97a05fb2eb3be0b60d0479655
1dfb4e7d7 [Tests] Check output of parent/child tx list from getrawmempool, getmempooldescendants, getmempoolancestors, and REST interface (Conor Scott)
fc44cb108 [RPC] Add list of child transactions to verbose output of getrawmempool (Conor Scott)
Pull request description:
`bitcoin-cli getrawmempool true` only lists a transaction's parents in the `depends` field. This change adds a `spentby` field to the json response, which lists the transaction's children in the mempool.
Currently the only way to find child transactions is to use `getrawmempool` or make another call to `getmempooldescendants` and search the response for transactions that list the parent_txid in the `depends` list, which is inefficient.
This change allows direct lookup of children.
Example Output
```
"9a9b5733c0d89f207908cfa3fe17809bee71f629aa095c9f8754524e29e98ba4": {
...other geterawmempool data...
"wtxid": "9a9b5733c0d89f207908cfa3fe17809bee71f629aa095c9f8754524e29e98ba4",
"depends": [
"bdd92851d5766a42aeb62af667bb422a116cab4e032bba5e3dd6efe5b4b40aa0"
],
"spentby": [
"dc5d3ec388a9121421208738a041ac30a22163bc2e17758f2275b6c51a15ba7b"
]
},
```
Tree-SHA512: 83da7d421c9799a40ef65af3b7fdb586d6d87385f3f2ede3afd2c311725444b858f9d91cc110422a0fa31905779934fee07211ca6fe6b746792b83692c94b3ce
From the header include guidelines (developer-notes.md):
"One exception is that a `.cpp` file does not need to re-include the
includes already included in its corresponding `.h` file."
* rpc/util.h includes pubkey.h + utilstrencodings.h. rpc/util.cpp includes rpc/util.h.
* util.h includes fs.h. util.cpp includes util.h.
Splits signrwatransaction into a wallet version (signrawtransactionwithwallet) and
non-wallet version (signrawtransactionwithkey). signrawtransaction is marked as DEPRECATED
and will call the right signrawtransaction* command as per the parameters in order to
maintain compatibility.
Updated signrawtransactions test to use new RPCs
Moves the parts of validateaddress which require the wallet into getaddressinfo
which is part of the wallet RPCs. Mark those parts of validateaddress which
require the wallet as deprecated.
Validateaddress will call getaddressinfo
for the data that both share for right now.
Moves IsMine functions to libbitcoin_common and then links libbitcoin_wallet
before libbitcoin_common in order to prevent linker errors since IsMine is no
longer used in libbitcoin_server.
