364bae5 qa: Pad scriptPubKeys to get minimum sized txs (MarcoFalke)
7485488 Policy to reject extremely small transactions (Johnson Lau)
0f8719b Add transaction tests for constant scriptCode (Johnson Lau)
9dabfe4 Add constant scriptCode policy in non-segwit scripts (Johnson Lau)
Pull request description:
This disables `OP_CODESEPARATOR` in non-segwit scripts (even in an unexecuted branch), and makes a positive `FindAndDelete` result invalid. This ensures that the `scriptCode` serialized in `SignatureHash` is always the same as the script passing to the `EvalScript`.
Tree-SHA512: a0552cb920294d130251c48053fa2ff1fbdd26332e62b52147d918837852750f0ce35ce2cd1cbdb86588943312f8154ccb4925e850dbb7c2254bc353070cd5f8
Since 265d7c44b1, when wait_until() fails,
an error message is logged to the test framework log. This means that if
wait_until() is called inside a try-except with the expectation that it
will fail, a spurious error message is logged.
wait_until() shouldn't be called with the expectation of failure. Fix
that in p2p_segwit.py.
8b56fc0b91 [qa] Test that v0 segwit outputs can't be spent pre-activation (Suhas Daftuar)
ccb8ca42a4 Always enforce SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS with P2SH (Suhas Daftuar)
5c31b20a35 [qa] Remove some pre-activation segwit tests (Suhas Daftuar)
95749a5836 Separate NULLDUMMY enforcement from SEGWIT enforcement (Suhas Daftuar)
ce650182f4 Use P2SH consensus rules for all blocks (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
As discussed at the IRC meeting back in October (https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2017-10-12/?msg=92231929&page=2), I had looked into the feasibility of enforcing P2SH and SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS back to the genesis block.
The P2SH change is pretty straightforward -- there was only one historical block on mainnet that violated the rule, so I carved out an exception to it, similar to the way we have exceptions for the BIP30 violators.
The segwit change is not entirely as clear. The code changes themselves are relatively straightforward: we can just always turn on SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS whenever P2SH is active. However conceptually, this amounts to splitting up BIP141 into two parts, the part that implements new script rules, and the part that handles witness commitments in blocks.
Arguably though the script rules are really defined in BIP 143 anyway, and so this really amounts to backdating BIP 143 -- script rules for v0 segwit outputs -- back to genesis. So maybe conceptually this isn't so bad...
I don't feel strongly about this change in either direction; I started working on it because I was searching for a way to simplify the way we understand and implement the consensus rules around segwit, but I'm not yet sure whether I think this achieves anything toward that goal.
ping @TheBlueMatt
Tree-SHA512: 73551d4a983eb9792c7ac67f56005822528ac4d1fd52c27cee6d305ebee953f69687ef4ddee8bdc0fec77f77e6b5a9d669750793efee54c076533a095e233042
9e50c337c Note new weight field in release-notes. (Matt Corallo)
d0d9112b7 Test new weight field in p2p_segwit (Matt Corallo)
2874709a9 Expose a transaction's weight via RPC (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This seems like an obvious oversight.
Tree-SHA512: defd047de34fb06a31f589e1a4eef68fcae85095cc67b7c8fb434237bb40300d7f3f97e852d3e7226330e26b96943846b7baf6da0cfc79db8d56e9c1f7848ad9
4d9b4256d8 Fix typos (Dimitris Apostolou)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately I messed up my repo while trying to squash #12593 so I created a PR with just the correct fixes.
Tree-SHA512: 295d77b51bd2a9381f1802c263de7ffb2edd670d9647391e32f9a414705b3c8b483bb0e469a9b85ab6a70919ea13397fa8dfda2aea7a398b64b187f178fe6a06
Several test scripts define a subclass of P2PInterface called TestNode.
This commit renames those to TestP2PConn since we already have a
TestNode class in the test framework.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
sed -i s/TestNode/TestP2PConn/ test/functional/*py test/functional/test_framework/comptool.py
_END VERIFY SCRIPT-
