According to the [boost::asio documentation](http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_55_0/doc/html/boost_asio/reference/basic_socket_acceptor/async_accept/overload2.html),
the function signature of the handler must be:
void handler(
const boost::system::error_code& error // Result of operation.
);
We were binding *all* the arguments, instead of all but the error,
resulting in nullary function that never got the error. Fix this
by adding an input argument substitution.
21bf3d2 Add tests for BoostAsioToCNetAddr (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
fdbd707 Remove unused function WildcardMatch (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
ee21912 rpc: Use netmasks instead of wildcards for IP address matching (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
e16be73 net: Add CSubNet class for subnet matching (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
d864275 Use new function parseint32 in SplitHostPort (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
0d4ea1c util: add parseint32 function with strict error reporting (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
397668e Deduplicate uint* comparison operator logic (Pieter Wuille)
df9eb5e Move {Get,Set}Compact from bignum to uint256 (Pieter Wuille)
a703150 Add multiplication and division to uint160/uint256 (Pieter Wuille)
4d480c8 Exception instead of assigning 0 in case of wrong vector length (Pieter Wuille)
eb2cbd7 Deduplicate shared code between uint160 and uint256 (Pieter Wuille)
`-rpcallowip` currently has a wacky wildcard-based format. After this
commit it will accept the more standard format, for example:
- Ranges with netmask 127.0.0.0/255.255.255.0, ::/0
- Ranges with cidr 12.3.4.5/24, 12:34:56:78:9a:bc:de:00/112
- Loose IPs ::1, 127.0.0.1
Trying to use the old *?-based format will result in an error message at
launch.
None of the current integer parsing functions in util
check whether the result is valid and fits in the range
of the type. This is required for less sloppy error reporting.
787ee0c Check redeemScript size does not exceed 520 byte limit (Peter Todd)
4d79098 Increase IsStandard() scriptSig length (Peter Todd)
f80cffa Do not trigger a DoS ban if SCRIPT_VERIFY_NULLDUMMY fails (Peter Todd)
6380180 Add rejection of non-null CHECKMULTISIG dummy values (Peter Todd)
29c1749 Let tx (in)valid tests use any SCRIPT_VERIFY flag (Peter Todd)
68f7d1d Create (MANDATORY|STANDARD)_SCRIPT_VERIFY_FLAGS constants (Peter Todd)
Help text appears to have been copy/pasted from getrawtransaction,
so it erroneously asked for a txid where rawtransaction hex should appear.
Remove lines which were copy/pasted from getrawtransaction but which
aren't displayed by decoderawtransaction.
Rebased-By: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Rebased-From: 5cc0133 80c521e
Github-Pull: #4106
redeemScripts >520bytes can't be spent due to the
MAX_SCRIPT_ELEMENT_SIZE limit; previously the addmultisigaddress and
createmultisig RPC calls would let you violate that limit unknowingly.
Also made the wallet code itself check the redeemScript prior to adding
it to the wallet, which in the (rare) instance that a user has added an
invalid oversized redeemScript to their wallet causes an error on
startup. The affected key isn't added to the wallet; other keys are
unaffected.
Removes the limits on number of pubkeys for P2SH CHECKMULTISIG outputs.
Previously with the 500 byte scriptSig limit there were odd restrictions
where even a 1-of-12 P2SH could be spent in a standard transaction(1),
yet multisig scriptPubKey's requiring more signatures quickly ran out of
scriptSig space.
From a "stuff-data-in-the-blockchain" point of view not much has changed
as with the prior commit now only allowing the dummy value to be null
the newly allowed scriptSig space can only be used for signatures. In
any case, just using more outputs is trivial and doesn't cost much.
1) See 779b519480d8c5346de6e635119c7ee772e97ec872240c45e558f582a37b4b73
Mined by BTC Guild.
This is a source of transaction mutability as the dummy value was
previously not checked and could be modified to something other than the
usual OP_0 value.
- replaces checks in SendCoinsDialog::handlePaymentRequest() that belong
to PaymentServer (normal URIs are special cased, as only an isValid
check is done on BTC addresses)
- prevents the client to handle payment requests that do not match the
clients network and shows an error instead (mainly a problem with
drag&drop payment requests onto the client window)
- includes some small comment changes also
