a5bca13 Bugfix: Include <memory> for std::unique_ptr (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Not sure why all these includes were missing, but it's breaking builds for some users:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652142
(Added to all files with a reference to `std::unique_ptr`)
Tree-SHA512: 8a2c67513ca07b9bb52c34e8a20b15e56f8af2530310d9ee9b0a69694dd05e02e7a3683f14101a2685d457672b56addec591a0bb83900a0eb8e2a43d43200509
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)):
>
> The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations:
>
> * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer.
> * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes.
> * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible.
>
> The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions).
Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
Using VARINT with signed types is dangerous because negative values will appear
to serialize correctly, but then deserialize as positive values mod 128.
This commit changes the VARINT macro to trigger an error by default if called
with an signed value, and updates broken uses of VARINT to pass a special flag
that lets them keep working with no change in behavior.
92fabcd44 Add LookupBlockIndex function (João Barbosa)
43a32b739 Add missing cs_lock in CreateWalletFromFile (João Barbosa)
f814a3e8f Fix cs_main lock in LoadExternalBlockFile (João Barbosa)
c651df8b3 Lock cs_main while loading block index in AppInitMain (João Barbosa)
02de6a6bc Assert cs_main is held when accessing mapBlockIndex (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Replace all `mapBlockIndex` lookups with the new `LookupBlockIndex()`. In some cases it avoids a second lookup.
Tree-SHA512: ca31118f028a19721f2191d86f2dd398144d04df345694575a64aeb293be2f85785201480c3c578a0ec99690516205708558c0fd4168b09313378fd4e60a8412
1dfb4e7d7 [Tests] Check output of parent/child tx list from getrawmempool, getmempooldescendants, getmempoolancestors, and REST interface (Conor Scott)
fc44cb108 [RPC] Add list of child transactions to verbose output of getrawmempool (Conor Scott)
Pull request description:
`bitcoin-cli getrawmempool true` only lists a transaction's parents in the `depends` field. This change adds a `spentby` field to the json response, which lists the transaction's children in the mempool.
Currently the only way to find child transactions is to use `getrawmempool` or make another call to `getmempooldescendants` and search the response for transactions that list the parent_txid in the `depends` list, which is inefficient.
This change allows direct lookup of children.
Example Output
```
"9a9b5733c0d89f207908cfa3fe17809bee71f629aa095c9f8754524e29e98ba4": {
...other geterawmempool data...
"wtxid": "9a9b5733c0d89f207908cfa3fe17809bee71f629aa095c9f8754524e29e98ba4",
"depends": [
"bdd92851d5766a42aeb62af667bb422a116cab4e032bba5e3dd6efe5b4b40aa0"
],
"spentby": [
"dc5d3ec388a9121421208738a041ac30a22163bc2e17758f2275b6c51a15ba7b"
]
},
```
Tree-SHA512: 83da7d421c9799a40ef65af3b7fdb586d6d87385f3f2ede3afd2c311725444b858f9d91cc110422a0fa31905779934fee07211ca6fe6b746792b83692c94b3ce
bb00c95 Consistently use FormatStateMessage in RPC error output (Ben Woosley)
8b8a1c4 Add test for 'mempool min fee not met' rpc error (Ben Woosley)
c04e0f6 Fix 'mempool min fee not met' debug output (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Output the value that is tested, rather than the unmodified fee value.
Prompted by looking into: #11955
Tree-SHA512: fc0bad47d4af375d208f657a6ccbad6ef7f4e2989ae2ce1171226c22fa92847494a2c55cca687bd5a1548663ed3313569bcc31c00d53c0c193a1b865dd8a7657
aad3090 [rpc] Adding ::minRelayTxFee amount to getmempoolinfo and updating mempoolminfee help description (Jeff Rade)
Pull request description:
These are RPC document changes from #11475 which is now merged. Took into consideration comments from #11475 and #6941 for this PR.
Biggest change here is when calling `getmempoolinfo`, will now show the `minrelaytxfee` in the JSON reponse (see below):
```
$ bitcoin-cli getmempoolinfo
{
"size": 50,
"bytes": 13102,
"usage": 70480,
"maxmempool": 300000000,
"mempoolminfee": 0.00001000,
"minrelaytxfee": 0.00001000
}
```
Fixes#8953
Tree-SHA512: 5ca583961365ee1cfe6e0d19afb0b41d542e179efee3b3c5f3fcf7d3ebca9cc3eedfd1434a0da40c5eed84fba98b35646fda201e6e61c689b58bee9cbea44b9e
3e1ee31 [Tests] Adding unit tests for GetDifficulty in blockchain.cpp. (sean)
Pull request description:
blockchain.cpp has low unit test coverage. This commit is intended
to start improving its code coverage to reasonable levels. One or more
follow up commits will complete the task that this commit is starting
(though the usefulness of this commit is not dependent upon later
commits).
Note that these tests were not written based upon a specification of how
GetDifficulty *should* work, but rather how it actually *does* work. As
a result, if there are any bugs in the current GetDifficulty
implementation, these unit tests serve to lock them in rather than
expose them.
-- Why has blockchain.cpp been modified if this is a unit testing change?
Since the existing GetDifficulty function relies on a global variable,
chainActive, it was not suitable for unit testing purposes. Both the
existing GetDifficulty function and the unit tests now call through to
a new, more modular version of GetDifficulty that can work on any chain,
not just chainActive.
-- Why does blockchain_tests.cpp directly include blockchain.cpp instead
of blockchain.h?
While the new GetDifficulty function's signature is arguably better than
the old one's, it still isn't great, and doesn't seem to warrant inclusion
as part of the blockchain.h API, especially since only test code is
directly using it. If a better way of exposing the new GetDifficulty
function to unit tests exists, please mention it and the commit will be
updated accordingly.
-- Why is the test fixture named blockchain_difficulty_tests rather than
blockchain_tests?
The Bitcoin Core policy for naming unit test files is to match the the
file under test ("blockchain" becomes "blockchain_tests"). While this
commit complies with that, blockchain.cpp is a massive file, such that
having all of the unit tests in one file will tend towards disorder.
Since there will be a lot more tests added to this file, the intention
is to divide up different types of tests into different test fixtures
within the same file.
Tree-SHA512: a7dda9c2a9414d4819b4d2911f5637891dc19cecbecfc1463846161d2a78793151927a5ab911c69a5d3013f7668e75a1d78a65667cb9d83910cda439cbe84d62
e4d0af4 Loop through the bip9 soft fork deployments instead of hard coding (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of hard coding which deployment statistics should be listed in the `getblockchaininfo` output, loop through the available deployments (except testdummy) when displaying their deployment info.
Tree-SHA512: 87e503bcf5e0fd379940d5e53320b9cbb4b47d647c66246d46f47c09a941f135e6ce1e8b75dad441ed4c22c3f41992dfde7717414be1d71c771d4ff8fe0e1936
blockchain.cpp has low unit test coverage. This commit is intended
to start improving its code coverage to reasonable levels. One or more
follow up commits will complete the task that this commit is starting
(though the usefulness of this commit is not dependent upon later
commits).
Note that these tests were not written based upon a specification of how
GetDifficulty *should* work, but rather how it actually *does* work. As
a result, if there are any bugs in the current GetDifficulty
implementation, these unit tests serve to lock them in rather than
expose them.
-- Why has blockchain.cpp been modified if this is a unit testing change?
Since the existing GetDifficulty function relies on a global variable,
chainActive, it was not suitable for unit testing purposes. Both the
existing GetDifficulty function and the unit tests now call through to
a new, more modular version of GetDifficulty that can work on any chain,
not just chainActive.
-- Why does blockchain_tests.cpp directly include blockchain.cpp instead
of blockchain.h?
While the new GetDifficulty function's signature is arguably better than
the old one's, it still isn't great, and doesn't seem to warrant inclusion
as part of the blockchain.h API, especially since only test code is
directly using it. If a better way of exposing the new GetDifficulty
function to unit tests exists, please mention it and the commit will be
updated accordingly.
-- Why is the test fixture named blockchain_difficulty_tests rather than
blockchain_tests?
The Bitcoin Core policy for naming unit test files is to match the the
file under test ("blockchain" becomes "blockchain_tests"). While this
commit complies with that, blockchain.cpp is a massive file, such that
having all of the unit tests in one file will tend towards disorder.
Since there will be a lot more tests added to this file, the intention
is to divide up different types of tests into different test fixtures
within the same file.
11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery)
bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers.
First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870
> ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow...
This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take:
1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information.
2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD
3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information.
I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed!
@sdaftuar @laanwj
Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
07704c1 Add some tests for getchaintxstats (Akio Nakamura)
3336676 Fix getchaintxstats() (Akio Nakamura)
Pull request description:
1. calculate nblocks more adaptive.
-> set default nblocks to min (blocks for 1 month, target block's height - 1)
-> before PR: if not specify nblocks-parameter, illegal parameter error will happen when target block height is below nblocks.
2. correct error message.
-> nblocks accepts [1 .. block's height -1] . so add a word "-1".
3. add check 0-divide.
-> if nTimeDiff = 0 then use UniValue(UniValue::VNULL) and returns {... "txrate": null} .
-> before PR: if nTimeDiff = 0 then returns {... "txrate":} and bitcoin-cli cannot handle the response.
Tree-SHA512: e1962ce7bb05a5bc7dec03eb04a8e7578f50fdb68927fcfc0a2232905ef4d679293eee148ebe0866682d209a8c458d21fbe71715e7311adb81f37089aae1ed93
c00199244 Fix potential null dereferences (MeshCollider)
Pull request description:
Picked up by the static analyzer [Facebook Infer](http://fbinfer.com/) which I was playing around with for another research project. Just adding some asserts before dereferencing potentially null pointers.
Tree-SHA512: 9c01dab2d21bce75c7c7ef867236654ab538318a1fb39f96f09cdd2382a05be1a6b2db0a1169a94168864e82ffeae0686a383db6eba799742bdd89c37ac74397
1aa97ee08 Add savemempool RPC (Lawrence Nahum)
467cbbcbf Add return value to DumpMempool (Lawrence Nahum)
Pull request description:
Adds a simple parameterless rpc command to dump the mempool.
Rationale:
Sometimes there can be a crash for whatever reason (bug, power loss, etc) causing the mempool.dat file to not be saved.
This change allows to script/cron the rpc call to have more regular saves to the file as well as cli/ad-hoc.
This should solve issue https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/11086
Tree-SHA512: e856ae9777425a4521279c9b58e69285d8e374790bebefd3284cf91931eac0e456f86224f427a087a01bf70440bf6e439fa02c8a34940eb1046ae473e98b6aaa
617c459c6 qa: rpc test for wtxid in mempool entry (Suhas Daftuar)
7e5d5965d RPC: add wtxid to mempool entry output (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
We already cache this information in the mempool, so including it in the output of rpc calls is basically free.
Tree-SHA512: 2757e1bfca028103937e4b76ce1a5d805846bad5d3d9dd631dcc5f87721bcc0e9d19e437e02053ef1dd3b38b503f0fca8c0b8492cac37dfbd70256a3665f704c
47ba2c312 Fix currency/fee-rate unit string in the help text (Akio Nakamura)
Pull request description:
1. The RPC help text should use the constant `CURRENCY_UNIT` defined in `policy/feerate.cpp` instead of the literal `'BTC'`.
In the following 2 RPC commands, `'BTC'` is written directly in the help text.
This commit changes them to use that constant.
1) `estimatesmartfee`
2) `estimaterawfee`
2. Some RPC command use `'satoshis'` as the unit.
It should be written as `'satoshis'` instead of `'Satoshis'` in the RPC help text.
So, this commit fixes this typo in `getblocktemplate`.
Tree-SHA512: d0bd1cd90560e59bf456b076b958a2a1c998f85a7e65aeb6b2abcaba18919a3ae62f7c3909210461084c1a3275a35b6ba3ea3ec8f5cce33702ffe383c9e84bce
ec6902d0e rpc: Push down safe mode checks (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This contains most of the changes of #10563 "remove safe mode" by @achow101, but doesn't remove the safe mode yet, but put an `ObserveSafeMode()` check in (all 23) individual calls which used to have okSafeMode=false.
This cleans up the ugly "okSafeMode" flag from the dispatch tables, which is not a concern for the RPC server.
Extra-author: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
Tree-SHA512: eee0f251fe2f38f122e7391e3c4e98d6a1e2757f3b718d6b560ad835ae94f11490865a0aef893e90b5fe298165932c8dd8298224173ac2677a5245cd532bac6e
1. The RPC help text should use the constant CURRENCY_UNIT defined in
policy/feerate.cpp instead of the literal 'BTC'. In the following
2 RPC commands, 'BTC' is written directly in the help text.
1) estimatesmartfee
2) estimaterawfee
And also, for these help strings, the notation
'fee-per-kilobyte (in BTC)' is somewhat ambiguous.
To write more precisely, this commit changes to 'fee rate in BTC/kB'
with using the constant CURRENCY_UNIT.
2. Some RPC command use 'satoshis' as the unit. It should be written
as 'satoshis' instead of 'Satoshis' in the RPC help text.
So, this commit fixes this typo in getblocktemplate.
3. The phrase that '... feerate (BTC per KB) ...' is used to explain
the fee rate in the help text of following 2 RPC commands.
1) getmempoolinfo
2) fundrawtransaction
But they are different from other similar help text of the RPCs.
And also, 'KB' implies Kibibyte (2^10 byte).
To unify and to clarify, this commit changes these phrase to
'... fee rate in BTC/kB ...'.
(BTC references the constant 'CURRENCY_UNIT')
This contains most of the changes of 10563 "remove safe mode", but doesn't
remove the safe mode yet, but put an `ObserveSafeMode()` check in
individual calls with okSafeMode=false.
This cleans up the ugly "okSafeMode" flag from the dispatch tables,
which is not a concern for the RPC server.
Extra-author: Wladimir J. van der Laan <laanwj@gmail.com>
6d2d2eb49 RPC: gettxout: Slightly improve doc and tests (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Slightly related to https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10822 in the sense that I felt the documentation and testing wasn't as good as it could be while writing it.
Ping @sipa since we discussed this on IRC.
Tree-SHA512: a0b3ffdac65245a0429e772fc2d8bcc1e829b02c70fb2af6ee0b7578cae46683f6c51a824b4d703d4dc3f99b6f03a658d6bbc818bf32981516f24124249a211d
1. Calculate nblocks more adaptive.
If not specify nblocks-parameter, illegal parameter error
will happen when target block height is below blocks for 1 month.
To avoid this error, set default nblocks to
min(blocks for 1 month, target block's height - 1)
And allowing 0 so that this RPC works good even if target block is
genesis block or 1st block.
2. Correct error message.
nblocks accepts [0 .. block's height -1] . so fix as following:
"Invalid block count: should be between 0 and the block's height - 1"
3. Add check 0-divide.
If nTimeDiff = 0 then returns {... "txrate":} and
bitcoin-cli cannot handle the response.
To avoid this error, do not return "txrate" if nTimeDiff = 0.
4. Add following 3 elements to the return object.
1) 'window_block_count' : Size of the window in number of blocks.
2) 'window_tx_count' : The number of transactions in the window.
3) 'window_interval' : The elapsed time in the window.
They clarify how 'txrate' is calculated. 2) and 3) are returned
only if 'window_block_count' is a positive value.
5. Improve help text for 'time' as following.
'The timestamp for the final block in the window in UNIX format.
