80a5e59 [qa] Attach node index to test_node AssertionError and print messages (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
In the midst of fighting with https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12873 it became apparent that there're a number of assertions and print statements which are emitted by test nodes but don't identify the node in question. This change makes debugging a bit easier by adding identifying information to non-logger test_node-related error messages.
Tree-SHA512: 7cc86f2c81f4b3fdba15ec9a2d21a84c4b083629e845e82288087c3affbbdc5c68e74067621856cc97fe84fbc8cb4f5ca4977a51ef381e5d74515df8eb001239
1f83839 [wallet] [tests] Test disallowed multiwallet params (John Newbery)
3476e3c [wallet] Fix zapwallettxes/multiwallet interaction. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
`-zapwallettxes` should be disallowed when starting bitcoin in multiwallet mode.
There's code in `WalletInit::ParameterInteraction()` to disallow `-zapwallettxes` when running in multiwallet mode. This code functioned as expected when passing the parameter `-zapwallettxes=1`, but not when passing the parameter `-zapwallettxes` (ie without the value specified). Fix that and add a test.
The new test in the
_[wallet] [tests] Test disallowed multiwallet params_ commit reproduces the bug and should fail against master.
Fixes#12505
Tree-SHA512: 6cd921717e9c7d2773ca84c946c310c2adec8430e37cbecdb33a620f510db3058a72bd328411812ba415111bc52a3367b332c9d15a37a92ccfd7ae785d2f32ab
e87fefc test: Add rpc_bind test to default-run tests (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Skip the parts that cannot be run on the host due to lack of IPv6 support or a second interface to bind on, and warn appropriately.
Without no strong requirements (besides being Linux only, which will skip the test) left, add this test to the default in test_runner.
~~(the non-IPv6 parts of the two dual-IPv4/6 tests could also be enabled, but first going to look what Travis does here to see if there wasn't another reason it was disabled)~~ done, it only makes sense for the first
Tree-SHA512: 724259b14f59dccc7e61ef071359336adb0f76a63db392b6ce6940e21c8ee0470c35374e82970681261685ef299cd70b0c1372598cea85d341f64c2c40ea28ee
c1d742025c [tests] Fix feature_block flakiness (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
feature_block.py occasionally fails on Travis. I believe this is due to
a a race condition when reconnecting to bitcoind after a subtest that
expects disconnection. If the test runs ahead and sends the INV for the
subsequent test before we've received the initial sync getheaders, then
we may end up sending two headers messages - one as a response to the
initial sync getheaders and one in response to the INV getheaders. If
both of those headers fail validation with a DoS score of 50 or higher,
then we'll unexpectedly be disconnected.
There is only one validation failure that has a DoS score bewteen 50 and
100, which is high-hash. That's why the test is failing immediately
after the "Reject a block with invalid work" subtest.
Fix is to wait for the initial getheaders from the peer before we
start populating our blockstore. That way we won't have any invalid
headers to respond to it with.
Tree-SHA512: dc17d795fcfaf0f8c0bf1e9732b5e11fbc8febbfafba4c231b7c13a5404a2c297dcd703a7a75bc7f353c893e12efc87f424f2201abd47ba5268af32d4d2e841f
feature_block.py occasionally fails on Travis. I believe this is due to
a a race condition when reconnecting to bitcoind after a subtest that
expects disconnection. If the test runs ahead and sends the INV for the
subsequent test before we've received the initial sync getheaders, then
we may end up sending two headers messages - one as a response to the
initial sync getheaders and one in response to the INV getheaders. If
both of those headers fail validation with a DoS score of 50 or higher,
then we'll unexpectedly be disconnected.
There is only one validation failure that has a DoS score bewteen 50 and
100, which is high-hash. That's why the test is failing immediately
after the "Reject a block with invalid work" subtest.
Fix is to wait for the initial getheaders from the peer before we
start populating our blockstore. That way we won't have any invalid
headers to respond to it with.
Such outputs can still be watched, and signed for, but they aren't treated as valid payments.
That means they won't cause transactions to appear in listtransactions, their outputs to be
shown under listunspent, or affect balances.
8b56fc0b91 [qa] Test that v0 segwit outputs can't be spent pre-activation (Suhas Daftuar)
ccb8ca42a4 Always enforce SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS with P2SH (Suhas Daftuar)
5c31b20a35 [qa] Remove some pre-activation segwit tests (Suhas Daftuar)
95749a5836 Separate NULLDUMMY enforcement from SEGWIT enforcement (Suhas Daftuar)
ce650182f4 Use P2SH consensus rules for all blocks (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
As discussed at the IRC meeting back in October (https://botbot.me/freenode/bitcoin-core-dev/2017-10-12/?msg=92231929&page=2), I had looked into the feasibility of enforcing P2SH and SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS back to the genesis block.
The P2SH change is pretty straightforward -- there was only one historical block on mainnet that violated the rule, so I carved out an exception to it, similar to the way we have exceptions for the BIP30 violators.
The segwit change is not entirely as clear. The code changes themselves are relatively straightforward: we can just always turn on SCRIPT_VERIFY_WITNESS whenever P2SH is active. However conceptually, this amounts to splitting up BIP141 into two parts, the part that implements new script rules, and the part that handles witness commitments in blocks.
Arguably though the script rules are really defined in BIP 143 anyway, and so this really amounts to backdating BIP 143 -- script rules for v0 segwit outputs -- back to genesis. So maybe conceptually this isn't so bad...
I don't feel strongly about this change in either direction; I started working on it because I was searching for a way to simplify the way we understand and implement the consensus rules around segwit, but I'm not yet sure whether I think this achieves anything toward that goal.
ping @TheBlueMatt
Tree-SHA512: 73551d4a983eb9792c7ac67f56005822528ac4d1fd52c27cee6d305ebee953f69687ef4ddee8bdc0fec77f77e6b5a9d669750793efee54c076533a095e233042
9e50c337c Note new weight field in release-notes. (Matt Corallo)
d0d9112b7 Test new weight field in p2p_segwit (Matt Corallo)
2874709a9 Expose a transaction's weight via RPC (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This seems like an obvious oversight.
Tree-SHA512: defd047de34fb06a31f589e1a4eef68fcae85095cc67b7c8fb434237bb40300d7f3f97e852d3e7226330e26b96943846b7baf6da0cfc79db8d56e9c1f7848ad9
All account RPC methods are now deprecated and can only be called if
bitcoind has been started with the -deprecatedrpc=accounts switch.
Affected RPC methods are:
- getaccount
- getaccountaddress
- getaddressesbyaccount
- getreceivedbyaccount
- listaccouts
- listreceivedbyaccount
- move
- setaccount
c25321f Add config changes to release notes (Anthony Towns)
5e3cbe0 [tests] Unit tests for -testnet/-regtest in [test]/[regtest] sections (Anthony Towns)
005ad26 ArgsManager: special handling for -regtest and -testnet (Anthony Towns)
608415d [tests] Unit tests for network-specific config entries (Anthony Towns)
68797e2 ArgsManager: Warn when ignoring network-specific config setting (Anthony Towns)
d1fc4d9 ArgsManager: limit some options to only apply on mainnet when in default section (Anthony Towns)
8a9817d [tests] Use regtest section in functional tests configs (Anthony Towns)
30f9407 [tests] Unit tests for config file sections (Anthony Towns)
95eb66d ArgsManager: support config file sections (Anthony Towns)
4d34fcc ArgsManager: drop m_negated_args (Anthony Towns)
3673ca3 ArgsManager: keep command line and config file arguments separate (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
The weekly meeting on [2017-12-07](http://www.erisian.com.au/meetbot/bitcoin-core-dev/2017/bitcoin-core-dev.2017-12-07-19.00.log.html) discussed allowing options to bitcoin to have some sensitivity to what network is in use. @theuni suggested having sections in the config file:
<cfields> an alternative to that would be sections in a config file. and on the
cmdline they'd look like namespaces. so, [testnet] port=5. or -testnet::port=5.
This approach is (more or less) supported by `boost::program_options::detail::config_file_iterator` -- when it sees a `[testnet]` section with `port=5`, it will treat that the same as "testnet.port=5". So `[testnet] port=5` (or `testnet.port=5` without the section header) in bitcoin.conf and `-testnet.port=5` on the command line.
The other aspect to this question is possibly limiting some options so that there is no possibility of accidental cross-contamination across networks. For example, if you're using a particular wallet.dat on mainnet, you may not want to accidentally use the same wallet on testnet and risk reusing keys.
I've set this up so that the `-addnode` and `-wallet` options are `NETWORK_ONLY`, so that if you have a bitcoin.conf:
wallet=/secret/wallet.dat
upnp=1
and you run `bitcoind -testnet` or `bitcoind -regtest`, then the `wallet=` setting will be ignored, and should behave as if your bitcoin.conf had specified:
upnp=1
[main]
wallet=/secret/wallet.dat
For any `NETWORK_ONLY` options, if you're using `-testnet` or `-regtest`, you'll have to add the prefix to any command line options. This was necessary for `multiwallet.py` for instance.
I've left the "default" options as taking precedence over network specific ones, which might be backwards. So if you have:
maxmempool=200
[regtest]
maxmempool=100
your maxmempool will still be 200 on regtest. The advantage of doing it this way is that if you have `[regtest] maxmempool=100` in bitcoin.conf, and then say `bitcoind -regtest -maxmempool=200`, the same result is probably in line with what you expect...
The other thing to note is that I'm using the chain names from `chainparamsbase.cpp` / `ChainNameFromCommandLine`, so the sections are `[main]`, `[test]` and `[regtest]`; not `[mainnet]` or `[testnet]` as might be expected.
Thoughts? Ping @MeshCollider @laanwj @jonasschnelli @morcos
Tree-SHA512: f00b5eb75f006189987e5c15e154a42b66ee251777768c1e185d764279070fcb7c41947d8794092b912a03d985843c82e5189871416995436a6260520fb7a4db
Future commits will deprecate the accounts RPC methods, arguments and
return objects. Set the -deprecatedrpc=accounts switch now so tests
don't break in intermediate commits.
9db48c5634 tests: Remove redundant bytes² (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This is a follow-up to #12993. As @jnewbery noted `bytes()` is idempotent.
Tree-SHA512: 0eb25e0c2c46f9abaac30f964c5eb422bece1414c840a717d86794424294cb19d995a6db7c8df2a2f4ec84776b05274a637f2c111738f397051f510e57184752
Skip the parts that cannot be run on the host due to lack
of IPv6 support or a second interface to bind on, and warn
appropriately.
Without no strong requirements (besides being Linux only, in which case
the test is skipped) left, just add this test to the default in
test_runner.
Includes suggested changes by John Newbery.
41ba061 [docs] Add release notes for wallet 'label' API. (John Newbery)
189e0ef [wallet] [rpc] introduce 'label' API for wallet (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Tree-SHA512: 45cc313c68ad529ce3a15c02181d2ab0083a7e14fe824e2cde34972713fecce512e3d4b9aa46db5355f2baa857c44b234d4fe9709225bc23c7ebbc0e03febbf5
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
f526046 adapt bumpfee change discard test to be more strict and add note on p2sh discrep (Gregory Sanders)
5805d6f feebumper: discard change outputs below discard rate (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
The "discard rate" is the concept we use to ensure the wallet isnt creating not so useful just-above-relay dust.
Outside of bumpfee previous to this PR, and manually creating such an output, the wallet will never make change outputs of that size, preferring to send them to fees instead.
"Worst case" for the user is that users pay a slightly higher feerate than they were expecting, which is already a possibility with relay dust.
Tree-SHA512: dd69351810dc1709437602e7db1be46e4e905ccd8e16d03952de8b4c1fdbf9cb7e6c99968930896baf6b5c7cb005a03ec0506a2669d22e21e32982e60329606b
75d0e4c544 [qa] Delete cookie file before starting node (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
When a node is restarted during a test after an unclean shutdown (such
as with -dbcrashratio), it's possible an old cookie file was left
behind. This can cause a race condition when restarting the node, where
the test framework might try to connect using credentials from the
old cookie file, just as the node will generate new credentials and
overwrite the old file.
Delete any such cookie file if present prior to startup.
Tree-SHA512: ae1e8bf8fd20e07c32b0715025693bb28b0e3dd34f328cae4346abf579b0c97b5db1c02782e1c46b7a3b6058d268b6d46b668e847658a6eed0be857ffb0d65dc
fab9095d40 qa: Windows fixups for functional tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Just two minor fixups to have less errors when the tests run on native windows.
* Strip whitespace from lines when reading from a notification file
* Instead of clumsily creating a file with weird permissions, just create a folder for the same effect in `mempool_persist.py`
Tree-SHA512: 48a8b439f14ab9b44c5cd228cd03105e8613e703e3c2951cdf724931bc95172a9ad9bfe69fc23e73dd91b058c1352263c0ac6e8de2ceb0ebf804c8ff52bba394
If a cookie file exists in a datadir prior to node startup, it must have
been leftover from a prior unclean shutdown. As bitcoind will overwrite
it anyway, delete it before starting up to prevent the test framework
from inadvertently trying to connect using stale credentials.
c9cce0a Tests: Add Metaclass for BitcoinTestFramework (Will Ayd)
Pull request description:
BitcoinTestFramework instructs developers in its docstring to override
`set_test_params` and `run_test` in subclasses while being sure NOT to
override `__init__` and `main` . This change adds a metaclass to ensure
that developers adhere to that protocol, raising a ``TypeError`` in
instances where they have not.
closes#12835
Tree-SHA512: 5a47a7ead1f18361138cad4374747c4a8f29d25506f7b2c2a8c1c966a0b65e5ccf7317f9a078df8680fdab5d3fb71fee46a159c9f381878a3683c1e9f874abbe
2b2b96cd45 Use std::bind instead of boost::bind to re-lock the wallet (Suhas Daftuar)
662d19ff72 [rpcwallet] Clamp walletpassphrase value at 100M seconds (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Larger values seem to trigger a bug on macos+libevent (resulting in the rpc server stopping).
Tree-SHA512: 890f3b641f6c586e2f8f629a9d23bca6ceb8b237b285561aad488cb7adf941a21177d3129d0c2b8293c0a673cd8e401957dbe2b6b3b7c8c4e991bb411d260102
e36a0c0 [qa] Ensure bitcoind processes are cleaned up when tests end (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
When tests fail (such as due to a bug in the test, race condition, etc), it's possible that we could follow code paths that bypass our normal node shutdown that occurs in `TestNode.stop_node`. Add a destructor to `TestNode` that cleans this up.
Tree-SHA512: 72e04bc21462ebd0cb346fd1fe0540da454acfbad41923a0b06ea2317e9045b68e58f9adb02d8200891aca89a9d03a022eb72282aeb31a3b3afe7c6843a4b450
8dd547d82b Adding logging for loop iteration level in p2p_sendheaders.py (ccdle12)
Pull request description:
PR for #12453
New contributor looking at mainly the 'good first issues'.
From my understanding of the issue:
* Track the iteration level of loop when test fails in Travis CI
Further clarification on the issue would be greatly appreciated to narrow down what can be fixed or updated.
Tree-SHA512: 228524aad54c09979d990a0fc6818e13a11e1ab5e78b606b892e897bba7b1e09bf25447feb631049e45ac017eeb61fbf1c1f11e8bd5103648f976a05099ba9f9
55efc1f [tests] simplify binary and hex response parsing in interface_rest.py (Roman Zeyde)
ade5964 [tests] only use 2 nodes in interface_rest.py (John Newbery)
ad00fbe [tests] refactor interface_rest.py to avoid code repetition (John Newbery)
7a3181a [tests] Make json request building more consistent in interface_rest.py (John Newbery)
3fd4490 [tests] improve logging and documentation in interface_rest.py (John Newbery)
abf190e [tests] fix flake8 warnings in interface_rest.py test (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Following the comment at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12717#pullrequestreview-106189117.
Tree-SHA512: b55560f0d8f3069584f5a2398285483a0a23514b2b2bd2c1ced2db1cb30dc24f60f720d0fa4de30259f7918d3178d94680ae9321649544d1d04d687a2e672559
self.nodes[0] creates an address which is watch-only-shared with self.nodes[3]. If nodes[0] spends the associated UTXO during any of its sends later, the watchonly test will fail, as nodes[3] now has insufficient funds.
Note that this also adds a new find_vout_for_address function to the test framework.
Based on suggestion by Pieter Wuille <pieter.wuille@gmail.com> at
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output
type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This
change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool indicate parse failure, and a
new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty
string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This
simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes.
It's noted in the release notes.
BitcoinTestFramework instructs developers in its docstring to override
`set_test_params` and `run_test` in subclasses while being sure NOT to
override `__init__` and `main` . This change adds a metaclass to ensure
that developers adhere to that protocol, raising a ``TypeError`` in
instances where they have not.
closes#12835
9c92c8c827 [tests] Remove Comparison Test Framework (John Newbery)
e80c640d78 [tests] Remove bip9-softforks.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Builds on #11772, #11773 and #11817. Please review those PRs first.
Final step in #10603.
- First commit removes bip9-softforks.py. bip9-sofforks.py was intended to be a generic test for versionbits deployments. However, it only tests CSV activation and was not updated to test segwit activation. CSV activation is tested by bip68-112-113-p2p.py, so this test is duplicated effort. Rather than try to update it to use the BitcoinTestFramework, just remove it. (see https://github.com/btcdrak/bitcoin/pull/8 for previous discussion around the redundancy of bip9-softforks.py)
- Second commit removes the now unused BitcoinComparisonFramework class and the comptool and blockstore modules.
Tree-SHA512: 4bb7196d521048b3b8ba95c87dde73005a1ac73d29ccbb869f11ce9a71089686e7eacd7335337853041dfbd3a5b110172b105adbada58779814d4db22b1376f5
faace13868 qa: Match full plain text by default (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Instead of escaping all full plain text error strings, just compare their strings by default.
Tree-SHA512: 42e28f55105eb947ac6af6ce4056f0ec0f701d85f1c2a38b35ab777bbdf2296bdb79639c345621b8adc03a98b28c7630ded9a67b8b04a48e2c3a49d598ecdcd7
Changing logs to debug level and format of statment to j == ...
Updating debug statements to include comments when checking for iteration level of i and j
Removing comments above log prints in Part 3
Removing unwanted file
Added log prints in loops in p2p_sendheaders
The new P2PDataStore class was sending full blocks in headers messages,
which meant that calls to send_blocks_and_test() would blow up memory if
called with a large number of blocks. Fix that by only sending headers
in headers messages.
bip9-sofforks.py was intended to be a generic test for versionbits
deployments. However, it only tests CSV activation and was not updated
to test segwit activation. CSV activation is tested by
bip68-112-113-p2p.py, so this test is duplicated effort.
Rather than try to update it to use the BitcoinTestFramework, just
remove it.
b55555d rpc: Add testmempoolaccept (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To check if a single raw transaction makes it into the current transaction pool, one had to call `sendrawtransaction`. However, on success, this adds the transaction to the mempool with no easy way to undo.
The call `testmempoolaccept` is introduced to provide a way to solely check the result without changing the mempool state.
Tree-SHA512: 5afd9311190135cee8fc1f229c7d39bf893f1028f29e28d34f70df820198ff97b4bf86b41cbbd6e6c36a5c30073cefa92d541c74a4939c7a2a6fa283dfd41b63
ea04bf7862 Enable flake8 warning F841 ("local variable 'foo' is assigned to but never used") (practicalswift)
169f3e8637 Remove assigned but never used local variables (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Remove assigned but never used local variables. Enable Travis checking for unused local variables.
Tree-SHA512: d6052ec9044c5d1f03d874ea3c8addd5a156779213ef9200f89d3ae53230f2fd1691aff405c3dae14178e5ef09912c4432e92f606ef4a5220ed9daa140cdee81
63048ec73d [tests] Test starting bitcoind with -h and -version (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Test that starting bitcoind/bitcoin-qt with `-h` and `-version` works as expected.
Prompted by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10762#commitcomment-28345993, which is a nullpointer dereference triggered by starting bitcoin-qt with `-h`.
On master, this test passes when run over bitcoind, but fails when running over bitcoin-qt. I used xvfb as a virtual frame buffer to test:
```
BITCOIND=/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/src/qt/bitcoin-qt xvfb-run ./feature_help.py --nocleanup
2018-03-30T17:09:37.767000Z TestFramework (INFO): Initializing test directory /tmp/user/1000/testdi4dre13
2018-03-30T17:09:37.767000Z TestFramework (INFO): Start bitcoin with -h for help text
2018-03-30T17:09:37.841000Z TestFramework (ERROR): Assertion failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 126, in main
self.run_test()
File "./feature_help.py", line 25, in run_test
assert_equal(ret_code, 0)
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/util.py", line 39, in assert_equal
raise AssertionError("not(%s)" % " == ".join(str(arg) for arg in (thing1, thing2) + args))
AssertionError: not(-11 == 0)
2018-03-30T17:09:37.842000Z TestFramework (INFO): Stopping nodes
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./feature_help.py", line 42, in <module>
HelpTest().main()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 149, in main
self.stop_nodes()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_framework.py", line 273, in stop_nodes
node.stop_node()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 141, in stop_node
self.stop()
File "/home/ubuntu/bitcoin/test/functional/test_framework/test_node.py", line 87, in __getattr__
assert self.rpc_connected and self.rpc is not None, "Error: no RPC connection"
AssertionError: Error: no RPC connection
```
Passes for bitcoind and bitcoin-qt when run on #12836.
Longer term, we should consider running functional tests over bitcoin-qt in one of the Travis jobs.
Tree-SHA512: 0c2f40f3d5f0e78c3a1b07dbee8fd383eebab27ed0bf2a98a5b9cc66613dbd7b70e363c56163a37e02f68ae7ff7b3ae1769705d0e110ca68a00f8693315730a4
12982682a6 [tests] Change feature_csv_activation.py to use BitcoinTestFramework (John Newbery)
db7ffb9d1b [tests] Move utility functions in feature_csv_activation.py out of class. (John Newbery)
0842edf9ee [tests] Remove nested loops from feature_csv_activation.py (John Newbery)
2e511d5424 [tests] improve logging in feature_csv_activation.py (John Newbery)
6f7f5bc002 [tests] fix flake8 nits in feature_csv_activation.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Next step in #10603.
- first four commits tidy up bip68-112-113-p2p.py
- fifth commit removes usage of ComparisonTestFramework
Tree-SHA512: 34466be12280096ad92ac842f9c594ae40c19be9b4edc73c1e37964d03d55f4e75b80cea50c9940404096effc23705671503a883a7b7773b5866a29f653ba710
5a67c0524e [tests] Fix intermittent rpc_net.py failure. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
rpc_net.py would intermittently fail on Travis, probably
due to assuming that two consecutive RPC calls were atomic.
Fix this by trying the test up to three times and only failing
if all three attempts fail.
fixes#11778
Tree-SHA512: f2f5047e05114ad2110377e6221ce057680c240952971fb33863834587d2250896c6b697ba27eef739cd0ab23faf47dfae8cafadc9833cbfab5a6f7e36dae5e2
8394300859 [Tests] fix a typo in TestNode.assert_start_raises_init_error() (Roman Zeyde)
Pull request description:
`self.wait_util_stopped()` should be `self.wait_until_stopped()`.
Also, use a specific Exception subclass for indicating node failure to start (instead of using `AssetionError` and an `except Exception` clause).
Following https://travis-ci.org/bitcoin/bitcoin/jobs/359066226#L2726 and depending on #12806 (which fixes the root cause of the Travis test failure).
Tree-SHA512: 7bd5a95586a412472ef9dffdb086789d7275ddaf862724e21cebb3418d0c97e6d89b4d1a58375e42114060d028403d6eab89e3a1e9a833ffe8dadf3439ab1fe2
265d7c4 [tests] Improve assert message when wait_until() fails (John Newbery)
ebf053a [tests] Change feature_block.py to use BitcoinTestFramework (John Newbery)
fc02c12 [tests] Add logging to feature_block.py (John Newbery)
3898c4f [tests] Tidy up feature_block.py (John Newbery)
5cd01d2 [tests] Fix flake8 warnings in feature_block.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Next step in #10603.
- first three commits tidy up feature_block.py
- fourth commit removes usage of ComparisonTestFramework
Longer term, it would be better to separate net_processing testing from validation testing, but I think this is still a useful PR, since it moves us away from the comparison test framework.
Tree-SHA512: d0bb3ad22ad0aa1222877f4212bff075f9ce358e99c69c26d9913e4b346d931b8380e744434a9f6f37812c352cdaa75791691565bfeb18afcb619c06c6ca32a3
b466f6b [Tests] Use blockmaxweight where tests previously had blockmaxsize (Conor Scott)
Pull request description:
Fix for #12768: `-blockmaxsize` has been removed, but some tests were using this feature, so update with `-blockmaxweight`
Tree-SHA512: 5f6d643daee43366c6e61f4154a3920efb4cef1455e483575cf19b0f95bc6e56668360c1562fa18f85b336e48f64e482bd29b1ecb227d7c78c4344d7f5d32ed3
rpc_net.py would intermittently fail on Travis, probably
due to assuming that two consecutive RPC calls were atomic.
Fix this by only testing that amounts are bounded above and
below rather than equal.
adc2586 doc: Refer to witness reserved value as spec. in the BIP (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
BIP141 refers to the coinbase's input's witness that consists of a single 32-byte array as "witness reserved value".
This updates the code to follow the BIP
Tree-SHA512: 49c9463519bd11b9ff322eeecd638f7627aa8efdfb869f8549f9a160ff34281e1b5a0b9d83545a692de6f5ff795055292c423403b0f3ce7597e3f32273cf1deb
d71bedb qa: Fix function names in feature_blocksdir (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This fixes the test failure on master:
```
AttributeError: 'BlocksdirTest' object has no attribute 'assert_start_raises_init_error'
```
Tree-SHA512: d96a9b707a9b4fb8752b15f28dae02c60c25cbec21dca5f3ee62e2717c6a49951533c24b52ed0d6e99c5a964ef2c3e90fdc58a9104122714ae9874e121955df6
a192636 -blocksdir: keep blockindex leveldb database in datadir (Jonas Schnelli)
f38e4fd QA: Add -blocksdir test (Jonas Schnelli)
386a6b6 Allow to optional specify the directory for the blocks storage (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Since the actual block files taking up more and more space, it may be desirable to have them stored in a different location then the data directory (use case: SSD for chainstate, etc., HD for blocks).
This PR adds a `-blocksdir` option that allows one to keep the blockfiles and the blockindex external from the data directory (instead of creating symlinks).
I fist had an option to keep the blockindex within the datadir, but seems to make no sense since accessing the index will (always) lead to access (r/w) the block files.
Tree-SHA512: f8b9e1a681679eac25076dc30e45e6e12d4b2d9ac4be907cbea928a75af081dbcb0f1dd3e97169ab975f73d0bd15824c00c2a34638f3b284b39017171fce2409
4757c04 [config] Remove blockmaxsize option (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The blockmaxsize option was marked as deprecated in V0.15.1, and code
was added to convert provided blockmaxsize into blockmaxweight. However,
this code was incorrectly implemented, and blockmaxsize was silently
ignored.
No users have complained about blockmaxsize being ignored, so just
remove it in V0.17.
Fixes#12640
cc @ajtowns
Tree-SHA512: 968d71d37bf175c5a02539ddec289a12586f886e1dfe64c1d9aa5e39db48d06d21665153824fac3b11503a55f0812d2f1115a2d726aafd37b76ed629ec0aa671
d2527bd Rename wallet_accounts.py test (Russell Yanofsky)
045eeb8 Rename account to label where appropriate (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Rename account to label where appropriate
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the implementation of address labels in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the way and letting that change focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions (transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
---
There is a rebased version of #7729 atop this PR at https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/label, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729#issuecomment-338417139.
Tree-SHA512: b3f934e612922d6290f50137f8ba71ddfaea4485713c7d97e89400a8b73b09b254f9186dffa462c77f5847721f5af9852b5572ade5443d8ee95dd150b3edb7ff
The blockmaxsize option was marked as deprecated in V0.15.1, and code
was added to convert provided blockmaxsize into blockmaxweight. However,
this code was incorrectly implemented, and blockmaxsize was silently
ignored.
No users have complained about blockmaxsize being ignored, so just
remove it in V0.17.
