0d101a340c test: Add test for maxtxfee option (MarcoFalke)
177550101b wallet: Remove unreachable code in CreateTransaction (MarcoFalke)
5c1b9714cb wallet: Fix -maxtxfee check by moving it to CWallet::CreateTransaction (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Follow up to #16257, this PR makes `bumpfee` aware of `-maxtxfee`.
It also prevents dangling locked unspents when calling `fundrawtransaction` - because the previous check was after `LockCoin`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
re-ACK 0d101a340c, only change is small test fixup
Tree-SHA512: 3464b24ae7cd4e72ed41438c6661828ba1304af020f05da62720b23668ae734e16cf47c6d97e150cc84ef631ee099b16fc786c858f3d089905845437338fd512
7195fa792f test: Tool wallet test coverage for unexpected writes to wallet (Jon Atack)
3bf2b3a37b test: Split tool_wallet.py test into subtests (Jon Atack)
1eb13f09a9 test: Add log messages to test/functional/tool_wallet.py (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
This pull request adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608 and serve as a benchmark for fixing the issue:
- Wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- Wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
Goals:
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix. Add debug-level logging for sanity checking and commented-out assertions to be uncommented when fixing the issue. Add the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
2. Add info log messages as there are currently none in the test file.
3. Split the tests out to separate functions as per review feedback.
Thanks to Marco Falke for pointing me in the right direction.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
code review ACK 7195fa792f
Tree-SHA512: 16a41cce989c8f819cf5b02c6cf8ea84653ede2738fb402f6c36cf4dc075b424dff3e2c73a1cfa1ec9c75f614675baecc71e588845a2596db06ba0957db2df7b
This commit adds test coverage in `test/functional/tool_wallet.py` to reproduce unexpected writes to the wallet as described in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15608:
- wallet tool `info` unexpectedly writes to the wallet file if the wallet file permissions are read/write.
- wallet tool `info` raises with "Error loading . Is wallet being used by another process?" if the wallet file permissions are read-only.
1. Reproduce the reported issue, define the current unexpected behavior, and add test coverage to guide a future fix in the form of commented-out assertions to be uncommented when testing/fixing.
2. Provisionally extend the same coverage to the wallet tool create test and the getwalletinfo test as regression tests while fixing the issue.
3. Add some logging for sanity checking.
------
Changes after rebase:
5. Make wallet_path an instance method instead of a function in tool_wallet.py as per Marco Falke review suggestion.
6. Assert wallet permissions instead of logging them in tool_wallet.py. This ran into an issue with Appveyor keeping permissions at 666 so allowed for 666 as a workaround.
7. Change the added logging from info to debug level.
8. More helpful assertions order in tool_wallet.py#assert_tool_output. This change makes #assert_tool_output raise "Error loading wallet.dat. Is wallet being used by another process?" rather than a less-helpful message when debugging the read-only wallet permissions issue.
91cc18f602 [docs] Add release notes for PR 15427 (John Newbery)
3b11420b3c [RPC] add new utxoupdatepsbt arguments to the CRPCCommand and CPRCConvertParam tables (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
The new `descriptors` argument was not added to the CRPCCommand and CPRCCvertParam tables, meaning that it couldn't be used with bitcoin-cli or named arguments.
Before this PR:
```
> bitcoin-cli utxoupdatepsbt 'cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' "[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
error code: -3
error message:
Expected type array, got string
> bitcoin-cli --named utxoupdatepsbt psbt='cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' descriptors="[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
error code: -8
error message:
Unknown named parameter descriptors
```
After this PR:
```
bitcoin-cli utxoupdatepsbt 'cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' "[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==
bitcoin-cli --named utxoupdatepsbt psbt='cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==' descriptors="[{\"desc\":\"sh(wpkh([bd50871a/0h/0h/0h]03895c66337b38699bfafff1084ad35bc347fac4f4e5e5fe5eb7dd81155280db53))\"}]"
cHNidP8BAFMCAAAAAYCdwVRx2X3o4KHx5tAMsN1ddp51MbfWsietjfMbl5HtAAAAAAD/////AQDh9QUAAAAAF6kUW+rtEOi4nk9rpw2F5XZl1dd8ehGHAAAAAAAAAA==
```
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 91cc18f.
fanquake:
re-ACK 91cc18f602
Tree-SHA512: 279b2339a5cac17e363002e4ab743e251d6757c904c89f1970575bdce18d4f63d5e13507e171bf2bdc1bf6dd457db345a4b11b15d4ff71b96c2fedc4ffe52b23
The new `descriptors` argument needs to be added to the Command and
ConvertParams tables to by usable as a named argument and by
bitcoin-cli.
Also update the test to use named arguments to test this.
fab0c820fa rpc: Clarify that block count means height excl genesis (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
There is a common misconception that the block count returned by the blockchain rpcs includes the genesis block. See for example the discussion in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16292#issuecomment-506303256.
However, it really returns the height, which is `0` for the genesis block.
So clarify that and also remove the misleading "longest blockchain" comment.
Finally, fix the wallet test that incorrectly used this rpc.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
utACK fab0c820fa
promag:
ACK fab0c82, sorry for the misconception.
Tree-SHA512: 0d087cbb628d3866352bca6420402f392e6a997e579941701a408a7fca355d84645045661f39b022e4479cc07f85a6cddaa9095b6fd9911b245692482420a5e4
8a6810d0d2 Add a 'logpath' field to getrpcinfo (darosior)
Pull request description:
as discussed in #15438
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Tested ACK 8a6810d0d2
Tree-SHA512: 752c7d90f670677c8144efb338c5c97c2264f85f1e65e031fd5a44f04230b6eafbabd0f634db263eb42c25642ecc1c4b1b602d4735e3fab07ec00b566134ddab
01174596e6 signrawtransactionwithkey: report error when missing redeemScript/witnessScript param (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Adding support for "witnessScript" as an alternative to "redeemScript" when using "signrawtransactionwithkey" meant that the `RPCTypeCheckObj()` call in `SignTransaction` can't error out just because either parameter is missing -- it's only a problem if both are missing, which isn't a state `RPCTypeCheckObj()` tests for. This results in the regression described in #16249. This patch adds some code to test for this case and give a similar error, namely:
error code: -8
error message:
Missing redeemScript/witnessScript
Fixes: #16249
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
utACK 01174596e6
promag:
ACK 01174596e. Could also write test without `dict`/`del`:
Tree-SHA512: cf51346b7dea551b7f18f2a93c2a336a293b2535c62c03a5263cd2be8c58cf0cc302891da659c167e88ad1a68a756472c3c07e99f71627c61d32886fc5a3a353
26fe9b9909 Add support for descriptors to utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
3135c1a2d2 Abstract out UpdatePSBTOutput from FillPSBT (Pieter Wuille)
fb90ec3c33 Abstract out EvalDescriptorStringOrObject from scantxoutset (Pieter Wuille)
eaf4f88734 Abstract out IsSegWitOutput from utxoupdatepsbt (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This adds a descriptors argument to the `utxoupdatepsbt` RPC. This means:
* Input and output scripts and keys will be filled in when known.
* P2SH-witness inputs will be filled in from the UTXO set when a descriptor is provided that shows they're spending segwit outputs.
This also moves some (newly) shared code to separate functions: `UpdatePSBTOutput` (an analogue to `SignPSBTInput`), `IsSegWitOutput`, and `EvalDescriptorStringOrObject` (implementing the string or object notation parsing used in `scantxoutset`).
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 26fe9b9909
laanwj:
utACK 26fe9b9909 (will hold merging until response to promag's comments)
promag:
ACK 26fe9b9, checked refactors and tests look comprehensive. Still missing a release note but can be added later.
Tree-SHA512: 1d833b7351b59d6c5ded6da399ff371a8a2a6ad04c0a8f90e6e46105dc737fa6f2740b1e5340280d59e01f42896c40b720c042f44417e38dfbee6477b894b245
276972cb95 wallet_bumpfee.py: Make sure coin selection produces change (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
I was hitting the case where change-less transactions were being made.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
utACK 276972cb95
Tree-SHA512: e2b7a50363daddd3ee749cacfc9d3d685a6c0c7e3e48118bb60131d205bf83ea06cdd66b69dfa3bd4dbb3bbf2b5b673d7225171486ae72fc762e5dabe2c01ef5
806b0052c3 [wallet] abort when attempting to fund a transaction above maxtxfee (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
`FundTransaction` calls `GetMinimumFee` which, when the fee rate is absurdly high, quietly reduces the fee to `-maxtxfee`.
Becaue an absurdly high fee rate is usually the result of a fat finger, aborting seems safer behavior.
Before:
```
bitcoin-cli walletcreatefundedpsbt '[]' '[{"tb1q...": 0.01}]' 0 '{"feeRate": 10}' true
{
"psbt": "cHNidP8...gAA=",
"fee": 0.10000000,
"changepos": 1
}
```
After:
```
bitcoin-cli walletcreatefundedpsbt '[]' '[{"tb1q...": 0.01}]' 0 '{"feeRate": 10}' true
error code: -25
error message:
Fee exceeds maximum configured by -maxtxfee
```
QT still checks the max fee rate as expected:
<img width="566" alt="Schermafbeelding 2019-06-20 om 19 52 00" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10217/59888424-a2aa7100-9395-11e9-8ae6-8a3c1f7de585.png">
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK 806b0052c3
Tree-SHA512: bee95811711cdab100b614d2347921407af3b400aea613ca156953ed3f60b924ad29a1d335bd0e240c0b7c0fbb360226bab03294d226a5560cdf2a3f21e6d406
FundTransaction calls GetMinimumFee which, when the fee rate is absurdly high, quietly reduced the fee to -maxtxfee. Becaue an absurdly high fee rate is usually the result of a fat finger, aborting seems safer behavior.
71d0344cf2 docs: release note wording (Karl-Johan Alm)
3d2ff37913 wallet/rpc: use static help text (Karl-Johan Alm)
53c3c1ea9e wallet/rpc/getbalances: add entry for 'mine.used' balance in results (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This addresses a few remaining issues pointed out in #13756:
* First commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r284907468
* Second commit addresses https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/13756#discussion_r294868973
Ping jnewbery and achow101 as they pointed out these issues.
ACKs for commit 71d034:
jnewbery:
ACK 71d0344cf2
meshcollider:
re-utACK 71d0344cf2
Tree-SHA512: 5e28822af0574ad07dbbed21aa2fe7866bf5770b4c0a1c150ad0da8af3152bcfb7170330a7497fa500326c594740ecf63733cf58325821e2811d7b911d5783a0
a49503402b Make and get the multisig redeemscript and destination in one function instead of two (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
`CreateMultisigRedeemscript()` is changed to `AddAndGetMultisigDestination()` so that the process of constructing the redeemScript and then getting the `CTxDestination` are done in the same function. This allows that function to see what the keys in the multisig are so that the correct address type is returned from `AddAndGetDestinationForScript()`.
This only effects the `createmultisig` and `addmultisigaddress` RPCs and does not change signing logic as #16022 does.
Alternative to #16022 and #16012Fixes#16011
ACKs for commit a49503:
Tree-SHA512: 5b0154a714deea3b2cc3a54beb420c95eeeacf4ca30c40ca80940d9d640f8b03611b0fc14c2f0710bfd8a79e8d27ad7d9ae380b4b83d52b40ab201624f2a63f0
fa7dd88b71 test: Add test for unknown args (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Currently uncovered.
Further reading:
* https://marcofalke.github.io/btc_cov/total.coverage/src/util/system.cpp.gcov.html
* Fail on unknown config file options #15021
ACKs for commit fa7dd8:
promag:
ACK fa7dd88b71, tests looks good to me.
hebasto:
ACK fa7dd88b71, I have tested the code.
Tree-SHA512: 86ab370ce8e85925f945a52e81457b5678d71bbabcef01205a97782b780003f363552e0bad1ff678bccc784f82c6b511c3b88de3f8f25f62b0b713c387950564
Instead of creating a redeemScript with CreateMultisigRedeemscript and
then getting the destination with AddAndGetDestinationForScript, do
both in the same function.
CreateMultisigRedeemscript is changed to AddAndGetMultisigDestination.
It creates the redeemScript and returns it via an output parameter. Then
it calls AddAndGetDestinationForScript to add the destination to the
keystore and get the proper destination.
This allows us to inspect the public keys in the redeemScript before creating
the destination so that the correct destination is used when uncompressed
pubkeys are in the multisig.
e91f0a7af2 doc: Remove travis badge from readme (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The readme(s) are shipped in the released source-code archive, in which case the travis badge is useless since it doesn't link to the travis result of the correct commit/tag/branch. GitHub embeds the correct links for each tag or commit that ci ran on, so we don't need this link in the readme.
ACKs for commit e91f0a:
hebasto:
ACK e91f0a7af2
Tree-SHA512: 860435a58b38a9bd0bc62a1e74b3a63c138c9a2f09008a090d5ecc7fd86fa908d2e5eda41d16606507a238d9488fa5323405364a9556b670684a2e4838aead2d
5ebc6b0eb2 bitcoind: update -avoidpartialspends description to account for auto-enable for avoid_reuse wallets (Karl-Johan Alm)
ada258f8c8 doc: release notes for avoid_reuse (Karl-Johan Alm)
27669551da wallet: enable avoid_partial_spends by default if avoid_reuse is set (Karl-Johan Alm)
8f2e208f7c test: add test for avoidreuse feature (Karl-Johan Alm)
0bdfbd34cf wallet/rpc: add 'avoid_reuse' option to RPC commands (Karl-Johan Alm)
f904723e0d wallet/rpc: add setwalletflag RPC and MUTABLE_WALLET_FLAGS (Karl-Johan Alm)
8247a0da3a wallet: enable avoid_reuse feature (Karl-Johan Alm)
eec15662fa wallet: avoid reuse flags (Karl-Johan Alm)
58928098c2 wallet: make IsWalletFlagSet() const (Karl-Johan Alm)
129a5bafd9 wallet: rename g_known_wallet_flags constant to KNOWN_WALLET_FLAGS (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Add a new wallet flag called `avoid_reuse` which, when enabled, will keep track of when a specific destination has been spent from, and will actively "blacklist" any new UTXOs which send to an already-spent-from destination.
This improves privacy, as a payer could otherwise begin tracking a payee's wallet by regularly peppering a known UTXO with dust outputs, which would then be scooped up and used in payments by the payee, allowing the payer to map out (1) the inputs owned by the payee and (2) the destinations to which the payee is making payments.
This replaces #10386 and together with the (now merged) #12257 it addresses #10065 in full. The concerns raised in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10386#issuecomment-302361381 are also addressed due to #12257.
~~Note: this builds on top of #15780.~~ (merged)
ACKs for commit 5ebc6b:
jnewbery:
ACK 5ebc6b0eb
laanwj:
Concept and code-review ACK 5ebc6b0eb2
meshcollider:
Code review ACK 5ebc6b0eb2
achow101:
ACK 5ebc6b0eb2 modulo above nits
Tree-SHA512: fdef45826af544cbbb45634ac367852cc467ec87081d86d08b53ca849e588617e9a0a255b7e7bb28692d15332de58d6c3d274ac003355220e4213d7d9070742e
faa2a47cd7 logging: Add threadsafety comments (MarcoFalke)
0b282f9b00 Log early messages with -printtoconsole (Anthony Towns)
412987430c Replace OpenDebugLog() with StartLogging() (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
Early log messages are dropped on the floor and they'd never make it to the console or debug log. This can be tested by running the test included in this pull request without re-compiling the `bitcoind`.
Fix that by buffering early messages and flushing them as soon as all logging options have been initialized and logging has been started.
This pull request is identical to "Log early messages with -printtoconsole" (#13088) by **ajtowns**, with the following changes:
* Rebased
* Added docstrings for `m_buffering` and `StartLogging`
* Switch `CCriticalSection` (aka `RecursiveMutex`) to just `Mutex` in the last commit
* Added tests
Fixes#16098Fixes#13157Closes#13088
ACKs for commit faa2a4:
ajtowns:
utACK faa2a47cd7
hebasto:
ACK faa2a47cd7
kristapsk:
ACK faa2a47cd7 (ran added functional test before / after recompiling, didn't do additional testing)
Tree-SHA512: 685e2882642fe2a43ce171d42862582dadb840d03cda8236a994322c389ca2a1f3f431b179b2726c155c61793543bb340c568a5455d97f8b83bc7d307a85d387
8053e5cdad Remove -mempoolreplacement to prevent needless block prop slowness. (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
At this point there is no reasonable excuse to disable opt-in RBF,
and, unlike when this option was added, there are now significant
issues created when disabling it (in the form of compact block
reconstruction failures). Further, it breaks a lot of modern wallet
behavior.
This removes an option that is:
* (a) only useful when a large portion of (other) miners enforce it as well
* (b) is detrimental to everyone (income for miners, RBF notifications for others) who uses it individually otherwise
* (c) is effectively unused
* (d) is often confused with disabling RBF (rather than just remaining stubbornly unaware of it while the rest of the network lets it through)
ACKs for commit 8053e5:
practicalswift:
utACK 8053e5cdad
promag:
Deprecation would save from unlikely rantings, still ACK 8053e5c.
jtimon:
utACK 8053e5cdad
ajtowns:
ACK 8053e5cdad -- quick code review, checked tests work
MarcoFalke:
ACK 8053e5cdad
Tree-SHA512: 01aee8905b2487fc38a3a86649d422d2d2345bc60f878889ebda4b8680783e1f1a97c2000c27ef086719501be2abc2911b2039a259a5e5c04f3b24ff02b0427e
fa499b5f02 rpc: bugfix: Properly use iswitness in converttopsbt (MarcoFalke)
fa5c5cd141 rpc: Switch touched RPCs to IsValidNumArgs (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When a serialized transaction has inputs, there is no risk in only trying to deserialize it with witness allowed. (This is how all transactions from p2p are deserialized.) In fact, it would avoid a common issue where a transaction with inputs can be deserialized in two ways:
* Fixes#12989
* Fixes#15872
* Fixes#15701
* Fixes#13738
* ...
When a serialized transaction has no inputs, there is no risk in only trying to deserialze it with witness disallowed. (A transaction without inputs can't have corresponding witness data)
ACKs for commit fa499b:
meshcollider:
utACK fa499b5f02
ryanofsky:
utACK fa499b5f02. Changes since last review: consolidating commits and making iswitness documentation the same across methods.
PastaPastaPasta:
utACK fa499b5f02
Tree-SHA512: a64423a3131f3f0222a40da557c8b590c9ff01b45bcd40796f77a1a64ae74c6680a6be9d01ece95c492dfbcc7e2810409d2c2b336c2894af00bb213972fc85c6
fa1d766717 tests: Make msg_block a witness block (MarcoFalke)
fa52eb55c9 test: Remove True argument to CBlock::serialize (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Unnamed arguments are confusing as to what they mean without looking up the function signature.
Since segwit is active by default in regtest, and all blocks are serialized with witness (#15664), remove the argument `with_witness=True` from all calls to `CBlock::serialize` and `BlockTransactions::serialize`.
ACKs for commit fa1d76:
laanwj:
code-review ACK fa1d766717
Tree-SHA512: 2c550646f99c9ca86a223ca988c61a730f5e6646807adeaa7174fb2424a32cea3fef8bcd3e0b12e162e7ff192877d0c02fd0654df6ee1a9b821b065707c2dcbc
At this point there is no reasonable excuse to disable opt-in RBF,
and, unlike when this option was added, there are now significant
issues created when disabling it (in the form of compact block
reconstruction failures). Further, it breaks a lot of modern wallet
behavior.
fa47330397 test: Speed up cache creation (MarcoFalke)
fa6ad7a5ec test: Bump MAX_NODES to 12 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
When testing a combination of settings that affect the datadir (e.g. prune, blockfilter, ...) we may need a lot of datadirs.
Bump the maximum number of nodes proactively from 8 to 12, so that caches get populated with 12 node dirs, as opposed to 8.
Also, add an assert that the list of deterministic keys is exactly the number of max nodes (and not more than that.
Also, create the cache faster.
ACKs for commit fa4733:
laanwj:
utACK fa47330397
Tree-SHA512: 9803c765ed52d344102f5a3bce57b05d88a7429dcb05ed66ed6c881fda8d87c2834d02d21b95fe9f39c0efe3b8527e13cf94f006588cde22e8c2cd50b2d517a6
0784af16ef remove parameters -addresstype=legacy in rpc_rawtransaction test (LongShao007)
a65dafa8f1 replace tx hash with txid in test rawtransaction (LongShao007)
Pull request description:
The transaction hash is different from txid for witness transactions, so we should use txid instead of hash.
ACKs for commit 0784af:
Tree-SHA512: 98b699eb5f25c3a603b11eb7072efe9bc69c0c0ecc7f996405de31bc45d92105970e09fd8e4f75b42a46498817f596d36d9b28eae7d24e63a4f2f2abfcee0eab
fa2b52af32 Disallow extended encoding for non-witness transactions (take 3) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
(previous title "p2p: Disallow extended encoding for non-witness transactions (take 3)")
Remote peers can send us illegally encoded txs and thus have us write to stderr. Fix that by not writing to stderr.
This is a follow up to the previous (incomplete) attempts at this:
* Disallow extended encoding for non-witness transactions #14039
* Add test for superfluous witness record in deserialization #15893
ACKs for commit fa2b52:
laanwj:
utACK fa2b52af32
ryanofsky:
utACK fa2b52af32. Would change title to something like "Avoid logging transaction decode errors to stderr" instead of "Disallow extended encoding for non-witness transactions." The current title is confusing because this PR isn't really allowing or disallowing anything, just logging the condition differently. "Disallow" also seems to contradict the "Allow exceptions from..." comments in the actual code.
Tree-SHA512: c66990e69b432d00dc1c5510bf976a1188664d0890a32d1e5c6459094e7e27da82a5d227627afcbc203676f5540eec74b7d9b1d71d2c62d3b2069e1781824b4d
