892eff05f1 Add documentation of struct PSBTAnalysis et al (Glenn Willen)
ef22fe8c1f Refactor analyzepsbt for use outside RPC code (Glenn Willen)
afd20a25f2 Move PSBT decoding functions from core_io to psbt.cpp (Glenn Willen)
Pull request description:
Refactor the analyzepsbt RPC into (1) an AnalyzePSBT function, which returns
its output as a new strongly-typed PSBTAnalysis struct, and (2) a thin wrapper
which converts the struct into a UniValue for RPC use.
----
As with my previous refactoring PR, I need this because I am creating a dependency on this code from the GUI. Per discussion in #bitcoin-core-dev on IRC, since we don't want to create a dependency on UniValue in anything outside RPC, I introduced some new structs to hold the info we get when analyzing a PSBT. For the field types, I used whatever types are already used internally for this data (e.g. CAmount, CFeeRate, CKeyID), and only convert to int/string etc. in the wrapper.
@achow101, maybe take the first look? :-)
ACKs for commit 892eff:
sipa:
utACK 892eff05f1
achow101:
utACK 892eff05f1
ryanofsky:
utACK 892eff05f1. Just small cleanups since the last review: removing unneeded include, forward decl, adding const ref
Tree-SHA512: eb278b0a82717ebc3eb0c08dc5bb4eefb996a317a6a3a8ecf51cd88110ddbb188ad3482cdd9563e557995e73aca5a282c1f6e352bc598155f1203b7b46fe5dee
fa8548c5d1 net: Remove unused unsanitized user agent string CNode::strSubVer (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I fail to see a use case for this unsanitized byte array. In fact this can easily be confused with `cleanSubVer` and be displayed to the user (or logged) by a simple typo that is hard to find in review.
Further reading: https://btcinformation.org/en/developer-reference#version
ACKs for commit fa8548:
promag:
utACK fa8548c, good catch.
practicalswift:
utACK fa8548c5d1
sipa:
utACK fa8548c5d1
Tree-SHA512: 3c3ff1504d1583ad099df9a6aa761458a82ec48a58ef7aaa9b5679a5281dd1b59036ba2932ed708488951a565b669a3083ef70be5a58472ff8677b971162ae2f
fabfb79673 doc: Add release notes for 15596 (MarcoFalke)
fac1a0fe54 wallet: Remove unused GetLegacyBalance (MarcoFalke)
faa3a246e8 scripted-diff: wallet: Rename pcoin to wtx (MarcoFalke)
fae5f874d5 rpc: Document that minconf is an ignored dummy value (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Other RPCs such as `sendtoaddress` don't have this option at all and `sendmany` should by default spend from (lets say) our change.
ACKs for commit fabfb7:
jnewbery:
utACK fabfb79673
ryanofsky:
utACK fabfb79673. Nice writeup! Release notes are only change since previous review.
Tree-SHA512: 2526ead2330be7c2beb78b96bc5e55440566c4a3a809bbbd66f5c9fc517f6890affa5d14005dc102644d49679a374510f9507255e870cf88aaa63e429beef658
ac67582ff7 depends: latest rapidcheck, use INSTALL_ALL_EXTRAS (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This updates RapidCheck to the latest version available from https://github.com/emil-e/rapidcheck.
RapidCheck now uses the new `RC_INSTALL_ALL_EXTRAS` option, to install the extra `boost_test` packages, which should unblock progress in #14430.
ACKs for commit ac6758:
MarcoFalke:
utACK ac67582ff7
Tree-SHA512: a4a4ef0ec09cf61cdc0de241703f5f8e98f6fa92f4024a0fbbf4d4ef91d9d3bc8d662c55d896aced8de68aa9429728b2bc5001c91c6f92d63d60c47f5adf41a0
ea1a2d8794 [wallet] Remove ResendWalletTransactionsBefore (John Newbery)
f5162458cd [rpc] remove resendwallettransactions RPC (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Remove resendwallettransactions RPC method
This RPC was added for testing wallet rebroadcasts. Since we now have a real test for wallet rebroadcasts, it's no longer needed.
The call in wallet_basic.py can be removed because wallet_resendwallettransactions.py tests wallet rebroadcast.
ACKs for commit ea1a2d:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK ea1a2d8794
promag:
utACK ea1a2d8.
Tree-SHA512: 48245d947be1a2d2b8c30d2946105818c454a03b70b63534ecadf2144da64dafe1c9527ea670a5f4d1acd05ccdfc6c9be43ca636ee2ba58a8b7a7b2fc7bc88fd
Remove tests of:
- compactblock behavior in a simulated pre-segwit version of bitcoind
This should have been removed a long time ago, as it is not generally
necessary for us to test the behavior of old nodes (except perhaps if we
want to test that upgrading from an old node to a new one behaves properly)
- compactblock behavior during segwit upgrade (ie verifying that network
behavior before and after activation was as expected)
This is unnecessary to test now that segwit activation has already happened.
Includes changes by John Newbery.
866c8058a7 Interrupt orphan processing after every transaction (Pieter Wuille)
6e051f3d32 [MOVEONLY] Move processing of orphan queue to ProcessOrphanTx (Pieter Wuille)
9453018fdc Simplify orphan processing in preparation for interruptibility (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
As individual orphan transactions can be relatively expensive to handle, it's undesirable to process all of them (max 100) as soon as the parent becomes available, as it pegs the net processing the whole time.
Change this by interrupting orphan handling after every transactions, and continue in the next processing slot of the peer that gave us the parent - similar to how getdata processing works now. Messages from other peers arriving in the mean time are processed normally, but other messages from the peer that gave us the parent have to wait until all orphan processing is done.
ACKs for commit 866c80:
sdaftuar:
ACK 866c8058a7
MarcoFalke:
utACK 866c8058a7
promag:
utACK 866c805. Verified refactor in 9453018fdc and moved code in 6e051f3d32. Not so sure about change in 866c8058a7 just because I'm not familiar with net processing.
Tree-SHA512: d8e8a1ee5f2999446cdeb8fc9756ed9c24f3d5cd769a7774ec4c317fc8d463fdfceec88de97266f389b715a5dfcc2b0a3abaa573955ea451786cc43b870e8cde
afc06fc868 rpc: Fix help text for signtransactionwithXXX (Torkel Rogstad)
Pull request description:
This PR fixes the help text for the `signrawtransactionwithwallet` and `signrawtransactionwithkey` RPC calls. They both marked the `amount` field in the UTXO dependencies as required. This field is omitted in the [`rpc_rawtransaction.py` test](8a8b03ecd2/test/functional/rpc_rawtransaction.py (L155)) and [`successful_signing_test`](8a8b03ecd2/test/functional/rpc_signrawtransaction.py (L42)) in `rpc_signrawtransaction.py`.
ACKs for commit afc06f:
promag:
utACK afc06fc.
MarcoFalke:
utACK afc06fc868
Tree-SHA512: 7847844ca38d8033fef2f5255700d21487d78a63ecee8b80362fa28fadfafc80ba29a89f38d7ebb3a1be4c7d47ff6c338f67afec9ee22bf065fb352bb3d03d3a
1111f0718a test: .style.yapf: Set column_limit=160 (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The current style is pep8, as suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/test/functional/README.md#style-guidelines.
generated with
```
$ yapf --version
yapf 0.24.0
$ yapf --style-help --style=pep8 > .style.yapf
```
However, we don't use the column_limit of 79 right now. Practically it is somewhere between 120-240.
Some stats:
```
column_limit=120: 115 files changed, 2423 insertions(+), 1408 deletions(-)
column_limit=160: 108 files changed, 1563 insertions(+), 1247 deletions(-)
column_limit=200: 104 files changed, 1255 insertions(+), 1178 deletions(-)
ACKs for commit 1111f0:
practicalswift:
utACK 1111f0718a agree with @ryanofsky
ryanofsky:
utACK 1111f0718a
Tree-SHA512: 1ce0da83b917496f4ea7d1af31b624517a78998a10091b6ba611737f2c819fa3cda1786307f15d20131a00fd95232818e3d1108950dd12b60c4674eaa447839f
This RPC was added for testing wallet rebroadcasts. Since we now have a
real test for wallet rebroadcasts, it's no longer needed.
The call in wallet_basic.py can be removed because
wallet_resendwallettransactions.py tests wallet rebroadcast.
2a1408c3ec Comment for seemingly duplicate LIBBITCOIN_SERVER (Peter Bushnell)
Pull request description:
Added a comment to explain the addition of LIBBITCOIN_SERVER twice in bitcoind_LDADD which seems incorrect at a glance until the behaviour of Linux linkers is understood.
ACKs for commit 2a1408:
practicalswift:
ACK 2a1408c3ec
MarcoFalke:
ACK 2a1408c
fanquake:
utACK 2a1408c
ryanofsky:
utACK 2a1408c3ec
Tree-SHA512: dd2a7f61d53ce8882a56c831c32e1f48e9eab741ef21361f195c38bb455abdc4bc524d3b44b6f69c7498898cd871a23c39d215de28db3b20ef5fd2135d5e136a
03d6d23810 [tests] make pruning test faster (John Newbery)
1c29ac40fb [tests] style fixes in feature_pruning.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This commit makes the pruning.py much faster.
Key insights to do this:
- pruning.py doesn't care what kind of transactions make up the big
blocks that are pruned in the test. Instead of making blocks with
several large, expensive to construct and validate transactions,
instead make the large blocks contain a single coinbase transaction with
a huge OP_RETURN txout.
- avoid stop-starting nodes where possible.
ACKs for commit 03d6d2:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 03d6d23810
Tree-SHA512: 511642ce0fa294319dce3486fe06d75970d8ab66deda7f692be081d3056b4ce5b4cf91a7b5762eefbba224ba6c848750016454ff1e5d564acc507b1c41213628
This commit makes the pruning.py much faster.
Key insights to do this:
- pruning.py doesn't care what kind of transactions make up the big
blocks that are pruned in the test. Instead of making blocks with
several large, expensive to construct and validate transactions,
instead make the large blocks contain a single coinbase transaction with
a huge OP_RETURN txout.
- avoid stop-starting nodes where possible.
This test could probably be made even faster by using the P2P interface
for submitting blocks instead of the submitblock RPC.
