be67831 Make DummySignatureCreator a singleton (Pieter Wuille)
190b8d2 Make BaseSignatureCreator a pure interface (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
* Removes the `m_provider` field from `BaseSignatureCreator`. Instead both a `SigningProvider` (which provides keys and scripts) and a `BaseSignatureCreator` (which implements the transaction-specific (or other) signing logic) are passed into and down in `ProduceSignature`, making the two concepts orthogonal.
* Makes `BaseSignatureCreator` a pure interface without constructor, making it easier to implement new derivations of it (for example for message signing).
* As `DummySignatureCreator` now becomes a stateless object, turn it into a singleton `DUMMY_SIGNATURE_CREATOR`.
Tree-SHA512: 5f1f4512e4ea7d02a31df7b9ede55008efa716c5b74a2630ca1c2fc6599584d8bf5f5641487266127f4b3788033803539fbd22b03ef1219c83c10da2d3da3dcd
cab0824 Logprint the start of a rescan (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Right now, there is no log entry when a rescan starts which is confusing especially when a "still rescanning" log entry appears after the log-update timeout of 60s or when user manually aborts the rescan.
This PR adds a log entry when a rescan starts.
Tree-SHA512: 8712605af6fd60950bf3904cfb586da6022e44b3da6f3155fe4f02aae16df6044bc504b3d48945ea6d7fe768f0c6cb3282a2e2251d14bf3b7f1dcbd12568b05e
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
d207207 [logging] add lint-logs.sh to check for newline termination. (John Newbery)
5c21e6c [logging] Comment all continuing logs. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Check that all calls to LogPrintf() are terminated by a newline,
except those that are explicitly marked as 'continued' logs.
Tree-SHA512: fe5162b2b2df1e8a4c807da87584fa9af97a6b8377e4090fe0caa136d90bf29a487a123cde94569bdce7101fee3478196d99aa13f1212e24bfe5f41c773604fc
Most logs should terminated with a '\n'. Some logs
are built up over multiple calls to logPrintf(), so
do not need a newline terminater. Comment all of
these 'continued' logs as a linter hing.
Log messages should terminate with a '\n', or the following log will be
written to the same line without a timestamp. Fix a couple of cases
where the message is not terminated with a \n.
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)):
>
> The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations:
>
> * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer.
> * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes.
> * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible.
>
> The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions).
Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
2fb9c1e shuffle selected coins before transaction finalization (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
Currently inputs are ordered based on COutPoint ordering, which while doesn't leak additional internal wallet state, likely further fingerprints the wallet as a Core wallet to observers.
Note: This slightly changed behavior of `fundrawtransaction` in that the newly-appended inputs will now be shuffled rather than in outpoint-order. This does not break API compatibility.
Simple shuffling of the coins being returned will hopefully allow the wallet to blend in a bit more, in lieu of additional data to find what other wallets are doing, or another standard, ala @gmaxwell's suggested of ordering via scriptPubKey.
Tree-SHA512: 70689a6eccf9fa7fc6e3d884f2eba4b482446a1e6128beff7a98f446d0c60f7966c5a6c55e9b0b3d73a9b539ce54889a26c7efe78ab7f34af386d5e4f3fa6df2
d2527bd Rename wallet_accounts.py test (Russell Yanofsky)
045eeb8 Rename account to label where appropriate (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Rename account to label where appropriate
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the implementation of address labels in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the way and letting that change focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions (transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
---
There is a rebased version of #7729 atop this PR at https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/label, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729#issuecomment-338417139.
Tree-SHA512: b3f934e612922d6290f50137f8ba71ddfaea4485713c7d97e89400a8b73b09b254f9186dffa462c77f5847721f5af9852b5572ade5443d8ee95dd150b3edb7ff
081bf54 Test that BnB is not used when there are preset inputs (Andrew Chow)
6ef9982 Actually disable BnB when there are preset inputs (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
We don't want to use BnB when there are preset inputs because there
is some weirdness with making that work with using the KnapsackSolver
as the fallback. Currently we say that we haven't used bnb when
there are preset inputs, but we don't actually disable BnB. This fixes
that.
I thought this was done originally. I guess it got lost in a rebase somewhere.
Tree-SHA512: 9792c0cdd0736866bddbed20f10b8050104955dc589fba49a0bd61a582ba491c921af2cdcc2269678b7b69275dad5fcf89c71b75c28733c7bacbe52e55891b9c
4d9b4256d8 Fix typos (Dimitris Apostolou)
Pull request description:
Unfortunately I messed up my repo while trying to squash #12593 so I created a PR with just the correct fixes.
Tree-SHA512: 295d77b51bd2a9381f1802c263de7ffb2edd670d9647391e32f9a414705b3c8b483bb0e469a9b85ab6a70919ea13397fa8dfda2aea7a398b64b187f178fe6a06
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the
implementation of address labels in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the
way and letting it focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to
addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions
(transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts
with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
We don't want to use BnB when there are preset inputs because there
is some weirdness with making that work with using the KnapsackSolver
as the fallback. Currently we say that we haven't used bnb when
there are preset inputs, but we don't actually disable BnB. This fixes
that.
73b5bf2cb Add a test to make sure that negative effective values are filtered (Andrew Chow)
76d2f068a Benchmark BnB in the worst case where it exhausts (Andrew Chow)
6a34ff533 Have SelectCoinsMinConf and SelectCoins use BnB or Knapsack and use it (Andrew Chow)
fab04887c Add a GetMinimumFeeRate function which is wrapped by GetMinimumFee (Andrew Chow)
cd927ff32 Move original knapsack solver tests to coinselector_tests.cpp (Andrew Chow)
fb716f7b2 Move current coin selection algorithm to coinselection.{cpp,h} (Andrew Chow)
4566ab75f Add tests for the Branch and Bound algorithm (Andrew Chow)
4b2716da4 Remove coinselection.h -> wallet.h circular dependency (Andrew Chow)
7d77eb1a5 Use a struct for output eligibility (Andrew Chow)
ce7435cf1 Move output eligibility to a separate function (Andrew Chow)
0185939be Implement Branch and Bound coin selection in a new file (Andrew Chow)
f84fed8eb Store effective value, fee, and long term fee in CInputCoin (Andrew Chow)
12ec29d3b Calculate and store the number of bytes required to spend an input (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This is an implementation of the [Branch and Bound coin selection algorithm written by Murch](http://murch.one/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/erhardt2016coinselection.pdf) (@xekyo). I have it set so this algorithm will run first and if it fails, it will fall back to the current coin selection algorithm. The coin selection algorithms and tests have been refactored to separate files instead of having them all in wallet.cpp.
I have added some tests for the new algorithm and a test for all of coin selection in general. However, more tests may be needed, but I will need help with coming up with more test cases.
This PR uses some code borrowed from #10360 to use effective values when selecting coins.
Tree-SHA512: b0500f406bf671e74984fae78e2d0fbc5e321ddf4f06182c5855e9d1984c4ef2764c7586d03e16fa4b578c340b21710324926f9ca472d5447a0d1ed43eb4357e
b4bc32a451 [wallet] Get rid of CWalletTx default constructor (Russell Yanofsky)
a128bdc9e1 [wallet] Construct CWalletTx objects in CommitTransaction (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Two commits:
- `Construct CWalletTx objects in CommitTransaction` moves a bunch of CWalletTx initialization into CWallet::CommitTransaction to dedup some code and avoid future inconsistencies in how wallet transactions are created.
- `Get rid of CWalletTx default constructor` does what is described and eliminates the possibility of empty transaction entries being inadvertently created by mapWallet[hash] accesses.
Both of these changes were originally part of #9381
Tree-SHA512: af3841c4f0539e0662d81b33c5369fc70aa06ddde1c59cb00fb21c9e4c7d9ff47f1edc5040cb463af1333838802c56b3ef875b939e2b804ee45b8e0294a4371c
92fabcd44 Add LookupBlockIndex function (João Barbosa)
43a32b739 Add missing cs_lock in CreateWalletFromFile (João Barbosa)
f814a3e8f Fix cs_main lock in LoadExternalBlockFile (João Barbosa)
c651df8b3 Lock cs_main while loading block index in AppInitMain (João Barbosa)
02de6a6bc Assert cs_main is held when accessing mapBlockIndex (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Replace all `mapBlockIndex` lookups with the new `LookupBlockIndex()`. In some cases it avoids a second lookup.
Tree-SHA512: ca31118f028a19721f2191d86f2dd398144d04df345694575a64aeb293be2f85785201480c3c578a0ec99690516205708558c0fd4168b09313378fd4e60a8412
Allows SelectCoinsMinConf and SelectCoins be able to switch between
using BnB or Knapsack for choosing coins.
Has SelectCoinsMinConf do the preprocessing necessary to support either
BnB or Knapsack. This includes calculating the filtering the effective
values for each input.
Uses BnB in CreateTransaction to find an exact match for the output.
If BnB fails, it will fallback to the Knapsack solver.
Moves the current coin selection algorithm out of SelectCoinsMinConf
and puts it in coinselection.{cpp,h}. The new function, KnapsackSolver,
instead of taking a vector of COutputs, will take a vector of CInputCoins
that is prepared by SelectCoinsMinConf.
Changes CInputCoin to coinselection and to use CTransactionRef in
order to avoid a circular dependency. Also moves other coin selection
specific variables out of wallet.h to coinselectoin.h
No change in behavior in the normal case. But buggy mapWallet lookups with
invalid txids will now throw exceptions instead of inserting dummy entries into
the map, and potentially causing segfaults and other failures.
This also makes it a compiler error to use the mapWallet[hash] syntax which
could create dummy entries.
Construct CWalletTx objects in CWallet::CommitTransaction, instead of having
callers do it. This ensures CWalletTx objects are constructed in a uniform way
and all fields are set.
This also makes it possible to avoid confusing and wasteful CWalletTx copies in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9381
There is no change in behavior.
be8ab7d08 Create new wallet databases as directories rather than files (Russell Yanofsky)
26c06f24e Allow wallet files not in -walletdir directory (Russell Yanofsky)
d8a99f65e Allow wallet files in multiple directories (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
This change consists of three commits:
* The first commit is a pure refactoring that removes the restriction that two wallets can only be opened at the same time if they are contained in the same directory.
* The second commit removes the restriction that `-wallet` filenames can only refer to files in the `-walletdir` directory.
* The third commit makes second commit a little safer by changing bitcoin to create wallet databases as directories rather than files, so they can be safely backed up.
All three commits should be straightforward:
* The first commit adds around 20 lines of new code and then updates a bunch of function signatures (generally updating them to take plain fs::path parameters, instead of combinations of strings, fs::paths, and objects like CDBEnv and CWalletDBWrapper).
* The second commit removes two `-wallet` filename checks and adds some test cases to the multiwallet unit test.
* The third commit just changes the mapping from specified wallet paths to bdb environment & data paths.
---
**Note:** For anybody looking at this PR for the first time, I think you can skip the comments before _20 Nov_ and start reading at https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/11687#issuecomment-345625565. Comments before _20 Nov_ were about an earlier version of the PR that didn't include the third commit, and then confusion from not seeing the first commit.
Tree-SHA512: 00bbb120fe0df847cf57014f75f1f7f1f58b0b62fa0b3adab4560163ebdfe06ccdfff33b4231693f03c5dc23601cb41954a07bcea9a4919c8d42f7d62bcf6024
92f1f8b31 Split off key_io_tests from base58_tests (Pieter Wuille)
119b0f85e Split key_io (address/key encodings) off from base58 (Pieter Wuille)
ebfe217b1 Stop using CBase58Data for ext keys (Pieter Wuille)
32e69fa0d Replace CBitcoinSecret with {Encode,Decode}Secret (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This PR contains some of the changes left as TODO in #11167 (and built on top of that PR). They are not intended for backporting.
This removes the `CBase58`, `CBitcoinSecret`, `CBitcoinExtKey`, and `CBitcoinExtPubKey` classes, in favor of simple `Encode`/`Decode` functions. Furthermore, all Bitcoin-specific logic (addresses, WIF, BIP32) is moved to `key_io.{h,cpp}`, leaving `base58.{h,cpp}` as a pure utility that implements the base58 encoding/decoding logic.
Tree-SHA512: a5962c0ed27ad53cbe00f22af432cf11aa530e3efc9798e25c004bc9ed1b5673db5df3956e398ee2c085e3a136ac8da69fe7a7d97a05fb2eb3be0b60d0479655
This change should make it easier for users to make complete backups of wallets
because they can now just back up the specified `-wallet=<path>` path directly,
instead of having to back up the specified path as well as the transaction log
directory (for incompletely flushed wallets).
Another advantage of this change is that if two wallets are located in the same
directory, they will now use their own BerkeleyDB environments instead using a
shared environment. Using a shared environment makes it difficult to manage and
back up wallets separately because transaction log files will contain a mix of
data from all wallets in the environment.
Remove requirement that two wallet files can only be opened at the same time if
they are contained in the same directory.
This change mostly consists of updates to function signatures (updating
functions to take fs::path arguments, instead of combinations of strings,
fs::path, and CDBEnv / CWalletDBWrapper arguments).
New global variables were introduced in #11882 and not setting them causes:
wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp(638): error in "ListCoins": check wallet->CreateTransaction({recipient}, wtx, reservekey, fee, changePos, error, dummy) failed
wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp(679): error in "ListCoins": check list.begin()->second.size() == 2 failed [1 != 2]
wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp(686): error in "ListCoins": check available.size() == 2 failed [1 != 2]
wallet/test/wallet_tests.cpp(705): error in "ListCoins": check list.begin()->second.size() == 2 failed [1 != 2]
It's possible to reproduce the failure reliably by running:
src/test/test_bitcoin --log_level=test_suite --run_test=wallet_tests/ListCoins
Failures happen nondeterministically because boost test framework doesn't run
tests in a specified order, and tests that run previously can set the global
variables and mask the bug.
