Currently it's possible to accidentally type e.g.
bitcoin-cli -getinfo getbalance
and get an answer which can be confusing; the trialing arguments are
just ignored.
To avoid this, throw an error if the user provides arguments to
`-getinfo`.
28f8b66 Diagnose unsuitable outputs in lockunspent(). (Eelis)
Pull request description:
Fixes#2667.
This is a simplified version of pull request #3574, which was abandoned by its author.
I added some tests as well.
Tree-SHA512: e63e00dec8b1b232079380183805cb0b0b18c78ea6bea769837949aab984689d7f68b2ccfe66b1873517b040b9e616ce0eb058575c3d4382aa8c26eebcf1f14e
069215e Initialize recently introduced non-static class member lastCycles to zero in constructor (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Initialize recently introduced non-static class member `lastCycles` to zero in constructor.
`lastCycles` was introduced in 3532818746 which was merged into master yesterday.
Friendly ping @laanwj :-)
Tree-SHA512: cb93b6a8f6e2e3b06cd05a635da95c84f3df64c21fc23fe82f98306ea571badc32040315b563e46ddb5203128226bc334269acd497beead5a5777c434060fd85
This makes all include paths in the GUI absolute.
Many changes are involved as every single source file in
src/qt/ assumes to be able to use relative includes.
aed1d90ac [wallet] Change feebumper from class to functions (Russell Yanofsky)
37bdcca3c [refactor] Make feebumper namespace (Russell Yanofsky)
7c4f00919 [trivial] Rename feebumper variables according to project code style (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Make feebumper methods static and remove stored state in the class.
Having the results of feebumper calls persist in an object makes process
separation between Qt and wallet awkward, because it means the feebumper object
either has to be serialized back and forth between Qt and wallet processes
between fee bump calls, or that the feebumper object needs to stay alive in the
wallet process with an object reference passed back to Qt. It's simpler just to
have fee bumper calls return their results immediately instead of storing them
in an object with an extended lifetime.
In addition to making feebumper methods static, also:
- Move LOCK calls from Qt code to feebumper
- Move TransactionCanBeBumped implementation from Qt code to feebumper
- Rename CFeeBumper class to FeeBumper (every CFeeBumper reference had to be
updated in this PR anyway so this doesn't increase the size of the diff)
This change was originally part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10244
Tree-SHA512: bf75e0c741b4e9c8912e66cc1dedf0ff715f77ea65fc33f7020d97d9099b0f6448f5852236dac63eea649de7d6fc03b0b21492e2c5140fb7560a39cf085506fd
89f0312 Remove redundant pwallet nullptr check (Matt Corallo)
c4784b5 Add a dev notes document describing the new wallet RPC blocking (Matt Corallo)
3ea8b75 Give ZMQ consistent order with UpdatedBlockTip on scheduler thread (Matt Corallo)
cb06edf Fix wallet RPC race by waiting for callbacks in sendrawtransaction (Matt Corallo)
e545ded Also call other wallet notify callbacks in scheduler thread (Matt Corallo)
17220d6 Use callbacks to cache whether wallet transactions are in mempool (Matt Corallo)
5d67a78 Add calls to CWallet::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain() in RPCs (Matt Corallo)
5ee3172 Add CWallet::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain() (Matt Corallo)
0b2f42d Add CallFunctionInQueue to wait on validation interface queue drain (Matt Corallo)
2b4b345 Add ability to assert a lock is not held in DEBUG_LOCKORDER (Matt Corallo)
0343676 Call TransactionRemovedFromMempool in the CScheduler thread (Matt Corallo)
a7d3936 Add a CValidationInterface::TransactionRemovedFromMempool (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Based on #10179, this effectively reverts #9583, regaining most of the original speedups of #7946.
This concludes the work of #9725, #10178, and #10179.
See individual commit messages for more information.
Tree-SHA512: eead4809b0a75d1fb33b0765174ff52c972e45040635e38cf3686cef310859c1e6b3c00e7186cbd17374c6ae547bfbd6c1718fe36f26c76ba8a8b052d6ed7bc9
63c2d83 Explicitly state assumption that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr in ConsiderEviction (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Explicitly state assumption that `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr` in `ConsiderEviction(…)`.
Static analyzer (and humans!) will see the null-check in ...
```
else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && ...
```
... and infer that `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header` might be set to `nullptr` when reaching `else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout > 0 && time_in_seconds > state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout)` and thus flag `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()` as a potential null pointer dereference.
This commit makes the tacit assumption of `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr` explicit.
Code introduced in 5a6d00c6de ("Permit disconnection of outbound peers on bad/slow chains") which was merged into master four days ago.
Friendly ping @sdaftuar :-)
Tree-SHA512: 32e5631025b7ba7556a02c89d040fbe339c482a03f28d0dbc9871c699e1f8ac867619b89c5fd41fdcfcf0dc4d7c859295b26ccd988572145cc244261aec18ce9
927f4ff5a GUI: Receive: Remove option to reuse a previous address (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
This was justified by the need to "resent" an invoice, but now that we have the request history, that need should be gone.
Tree-SHA512: 4ade4eb84a21bbbd8dcc3a2c9580d416e113284b5bdf350c22051c233101fe0ee31659c54a7a46e7136f9c999acb61efbbb3f97aeb2fa7b2b1e1daec02ca0837
5e0ba8f8c [wallet] getreceivedbyaddress should return error if address is not mine (John Newbery)
ea0cd24f7 [tests] Tidy up receivedby.py (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Two commits:
- First commit tidies up the `receivedby.py` test (and speeds it up by factor of two)
- Second commit changes getreceivedbyaddress to return error if the address is not found in wallet, and adds test to `receivedby.py`
Tree-SHA512: e41342dcbd037a6b440cbe4ecd3b8ed589e18e477333f0d866f3564e948e0f5231e497d5ffb66da4e6680eb772d9f0cf839125098bb68b92d04a5ee35c6c0a81
11413646b [trivial] (whitespace only) fix getblockchaininfo alignment (John Newbery)
bd9c18171 [rpc] Add initialblockdownload to getblockchaininfo (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Exposing whether the node is in IBD would help for testing, and may be useful in general, particularly for developers.
First discussed in #10357 here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/10357#pullrequestreview-59963870
> ... we could simplify this (and possibly other) tests by just adding a way to know if a node is in IBD. I'd like to do that, but I'm not sure it makes sense to complicate this PR with discussion over how that information should be made available. Eg it's not clear to me that the notion of being in IBD is worth exposing to the casual user, versus a hidden rpc call or something, since the definition has changed over time, and may continue to change in the future. But I still do agree that at least for testing purposes it would be far simpler to expose the field somehow...
This PR currently implements the simplest way of doing this: adding an `initialblockdownload` field to `getblockchaininfo`. Other approaches we could take:
1. add a new debug RPC method that exposes `IBD` and potentially other information.
2. add a parameter to `getblockchaininfo`, eg `debug_info`, which would cause it to return debug information including IBD
3. add a query string to the url `?debug=true` which would cause RPCs to return additional debug information.
I quite like the idea of (3). Feedback on these and other approaches very much welcomed!
@sdaftuar @laanwj
Tree-SHA512: a6dedd47f8c9bd38769cc597524466250041136feb33500644b9c48d0ffe4e3eeeb2587b5bbc6420364ebdd2667df807fbb50416f9a7913bbf11a14ea86dc0d4
Change feebumper from a stateful class into a namespace of stateless
functions.
Having the results of feebumper calls persist in an object makes process
separation between Qt and wallet awkward, because it means the feebumper object
either has to be serialized back and forth between Qt and wallet processes
between fee bump calls, or that the feebumper object needs to stay alive in the
wallet process with an object reference passed back to Qt. It's simpler just to
have fee bumper calls return their results immediately instead of storing them
in an object with an extended lifetime.
In addition to making feebumper stateless, also:
- Move LOCK calls from Qt code to feebumper
- Move TransactionCanBeBumped implementation from Qt code to feebumper
Future commit will remove the FeeBumper class. This commit simply places
everything into a feebumper namespace, and changes the enum class name
from BumpeFeeResult to feebumper::Result.
Future PRs will completely refactor this translation unit and touch all
this code so we rename the variables to follow project stlye guidelines
in this preparation commit.
Don't use m_ prefixes for member variables since we're going to remove
the class entirely in the next commits.
203a4aa31 Fix CTxMemPoolEntry::UpdateAncestorState: modifySigOps param type int -> int64_t (donaloconnor)
Pull request description:
CTxMemPoolEntry::CTxMemPoolEntry's modifySigOps parameter is int while update_ancestor_state::modifySigOpsCost is int64_t. This issue was raised in #11165. It looks like the function paramaters were not changed in commit 72abd2c
This will avoid unexpected truncation of int64_t -> int
Tree-SHA512: 314c703f217e104336456859066d18fb0d12c4f9f32835e17490a6f29eb05951184095039e4e57edacef8ad35dd75c6d97d9af656a52209dd0c3779b4ffa0914
5b9748f97 Small refactor of CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite() (Dan Raviv)
Pull request description:
`std::unordered_map::erase( const_iterator pos )` returns an iterator to the element following the removed one. Use that to optimize (probably minor-performance-wise, and definitely code-structure-wise) the implementation of `CCoinsViewCache::BatchWrite()`.
Tree-SHA512: 00abc838ad91771cfcddd45688841c9414869b75289d09b483a7f0ba835614fe189e9c8aca8a80e3de78ee397ec14083ae52e2e92b7863b3b6eb0d0cb892c9dd
d052e3847 [qt] Add use available balance in send coins dialog (CryptAxe)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #11098 to handle #11033 where a new button `Use available balance` is added to each entry. When activated, the available balance is calculated by using the coin control (if any) and then it's subtracted the remaining recipient amounts. If this amount is positive then the `Subtract fee from amount` is automatically selected.
Comparing to #11098, this has the advantage to avoid the fair amount division over the recipients and allows to fine adjust the amounts in multiple iterations.
Started from @CryptAxe commit 89e9eda to credit some code.
<img width="965" alt="screen shot 2017-09-13 at 01 32 44" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3534524/30354518-e1bee31c-9824-11e7-9354-300aa63cdfd0.png">
<img width="964" alt="screen shot 2017-09-13 at 01 44 57" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3534524/30354598-5731ac9c-9825-11e7-9d5f-8781988ed219.png">
Tree-SHA512: 01d20c13fd8b6c2a0ca1d74d3a9027c6922e6dccd3b08e59d5a72636be7072ed5eca7ebc5d431299497dd3374e83753220ad4174d8bc46dadb4b2f54973036a5
Static analyzer (and humans!) will see ...
```
else if (state.m_chain_sync.m_timeout == 0 || (state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header != nullptr && ...
```
... and infer that state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header might be set to nullptr,
and thus flag `state.m_chain_sync.m_work_header->GetBlockHash().ToString()`
as a potential null pointer dereference.
This commit makes the tacit assumption (m_work_header != nullptr) explicit.
Code introduced in 5a6d00 ("Permit disconnection of outbound peers on
bad/slow chains") which was merged into master four days ago.
620bae3 Require a steady clock for bench with at least micro precision (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Using a non-steady high_precision_clock by default is definitely not what we want, and in practice steady_clock has more than enough precision. Should double-check that travis passes on this one to make sure we actually have at least microsecond precision on all platforms.
Tree-SHA512: 54a4af3b6addca9897e8ab04694f9461343691b475ca3ed2368595c37520612e284969be94a8ee3d7c66d16532f7bb16b6ad80284cbc153653e8ef2d56696e9d
a357293 Use MakeUnique<Db>(...) (practicalswift)
3e09b39 Use MakeUnique<T>(...) instead of std::unique_ptr<T>(new T(...)) (practicalswift)
8617989 Add MakeUnique (substitute for C++14 std::make_unique) (practicalswift)
d223bc9 Use unique_ptr for pcoinscatcher/pcoinsdbview/pcoinsTip/pblocktree (practicalswift)
b45c597 Use unique_ptr for pdbCopy (Db) and fix potential memory leak (practicalswift)
29ab96d Use unique_ptr for dbenv (DbEnv) (practicalswift)
f72cbf9 Use unique_ptr for pfilter (CBloomFilter) (practicalswift)
8ccf1bb Use unique_ptr for sem{Addnode,Outbound} (CSemaphore) (practicalswift)
73db063 Use unique_ptr for upnp_thread (boost::thread) (practicalswift)
0024531 Use unique_ptr for dbw (CDBWrapper) (practicalswift)
fa6d122 Use unique_ptr:s for {fee,short,long}Stats (TxConfirmStats) (practicalswift)
5a6f768 Use unique_ptr for httpRPCTimerInterface (HTTPRPCTimerInterface) (practicalswift)
860e912 Use unique_ptr for pwalletMain (CWallet) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Use `std::unique_ptr` (C++11) where possible.
Rationale:
1. Avoid resource leaks (specifically: forgetting to `delete` an object created using `new`)
2. Avoid undefined behaviour (specifically: double `delete`:s)
**Note to reviewers:** Please let me know if I've missed any obvious `std::unique_ptr` candidates. Hopefully this PR should cover all the trivial cases.
Tree-SHA512: 9fbeb47b800ab8ff4e0be9f2a22ab63c23d5c613a0c6716d9183db8d22ddbbce592fb8384a8b7874bf7375c8161efb13ca2197ad6f24b75967148037f0f7b20c
dd9bb25 Fix code style in keystore.cpp/crypter.cpp (Jonas Schnelli)
208fda6 CCrypter: move relevant implementation out of the header (Jonas Schnelli)
3155fd2 CKeystore: move relevant implementation out of the header (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Tree-SHA512: 4ce73cca5609199b74b8ff2614ee2b6af949545a1332a3a0135c6453c98665d2b0da171c1e390c9a2aec6b12b7fad931ec90084bb7c2defe243786bfc70daf60
725b79a [test] Verify node doesn't send headers that haven't been fully validated (Russell Yanofsky)
3788a84 Do not send (potentially) invalid headers in response to getheaders (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Nowhere else in the protocol do we send headers which are for
blocks we have not fully validated except in response to getheaders
messages with a null locator. On my public node I have not seen any
such request (whether for an invalid block or not) in at least two
years of debug.log output, indicating that this should have minimal
impact.
Tree-SHA512: c1f6e0cdcdfb78ea577d555f9b3ceb1b4b60eff4f6cf313bfd8b576c9562d797bea73abc23f7011f249ae36dd539c715f3d20487ac03ace60e84e1b77c0c1e1a
