Previously if an existing watch only key was reimported with a new timestamp,
the new timestamp would not be saved in the key metadata, and would not be used
to update the wallet nTimeFirstKey value (which could cause rescanning to start
at the wrong point and miss transactions).
Issue was pointed out by Jonas Schnelli <dev@jonasschnelli.ch> in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9108#issuecomment-279715550
ad1ae7a Check and enable -Wshadow by default. (Pavel Janík)
9de90bb Do not shadow variables (gcc set) (Pavel Janík)
Tree-SHA512: 9517feb423dc8ddd63896016b25324673bfbe0bffa97f22996f59d7a3fcbdc2ebf2e43ac02bc067546f54e293e9b2f2514be145f867321e9031f895c063d9fb8
d678771 Wallet: Sanitise -wallet parameter (Luke Dashjr)
9756be3 Wallet/RPC: Use filename rather than CWallet pointer, for lockwallet RPCRunLater job name (Luke Dashjr)
86be48a More tightly couple EnsureWalletIsAvailable with GetWalletForJSONRPCRequest where appropriate (Luke Dashjr)
a435632 Move wallet RPC declarations to rpcwallet.h (Luke Dashjr)
ad15734 RPC: Pass on JSONRPCRequest metadata (URI/user/etc) for "help" method (Luke Dashjr)
bf8a04a Reformat touched lines with C++11 (Luke Dashjr)
2e518e3 Move nWalletUnlockTime to CWallet::nRelockTime, and name timed task unique per CWallet (Luke Dashjr)
d77ad6d RPC: Do all wallet access through new GetWalletForJSONRPCRequest (Luke Dashjr)
eca550f RPC/Wallet: Pass CWallet as pointer to helper functions (Luke Dashjr)
Tree-SHA512: bfd592da841693390e16f83b451503eb5cedb71208089aa32b3fc45e973555584a3ed7696dd239f6409324464d565dacf0f3d0e36e8e13ae6a7843848465f960
6485466 test: Report InitBlockIndex result (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Tree-SHA512: 8e1408aa8d56ec1873190f886af24aa68b0555ec4996b2b8a5a39a51ded58c8fba5843c07881ed33ab6dcb00e62c2322bcf2a6fb8f1083f77e0d93e7295ab938
7ed143c Add test for CWalletTx::GetImmatureCredit() returning stale values. (Russell Yanofsky)
Tree-SHA512: c95088ed6dfc5a0774ddaa2fe14ac0a9ebd830922a4d77100ec3d51fdeb6df40ad97de4f2ea970ed0f4122dcc0022ee1d43ab3c7188becd7f90c1c6af0ed39b7
If InitBlockIndex fails, then it will segfault later. Same for the later
ActivateBestChain. BOOST_REQUIRE the result, so that an error will be
reported and the test case aborted.
7e6dcd9 random: Add fallback if getrandom syscall not available (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
7cad849 sanity: Move OS random to sanity check function (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
aa09ccb squashme: comment that NUM_OS_RANDOM_BYTES should not be changed lightly (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
224e6eb util: Specific GetOSRandom for Linux/FreeBSD/OpenBSD (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Tree-SHA512: 9fd408b1316c69de86674f342339b2f89192fd317c8c036b5df4320f828fa263c7966146bfc1904c51137ee4a26e4cb0f560b2cd05e18cde4d808b9b92ad15c4
8c156b7 Bugfix: Only install manpages for built programs (Luke Dashjr)
Tree-SHA512: f4c40910b257274a05d9c842b9adb5d9d01df7dd2d34a18bd2d98c78810dc3ed98ed12c08c55352e36a845f06ddb1efba9d4ecf5f1123d2c58406a5ecf589836
Change ScanForWalletTransactions return value so it is possible to distinguish
scans that skip reading every block (due to the nTimeFirstKey optimization)
from scans that fail while reading the chainActive.Tip() block. Return value is
now non-null in the non-failing case.
This change doesn't affect any user-visible behavior, it is only an internal
API improvement. The only code currently using the ScanForWalletTransactions
return value is in importmulti, and importmulti always calls
ScanForWalletTransactions with a pindex pointing to the first block in
chainActive whose block time is >= (nLowestTimestamp - 7200), while
ScanForWalletTransactions would only return null without reading blocks when
pindex and every block after it had a block time < (nTimeFirstKey - 7200).
These conditions could never happen at the same time because nTimeFirstKey <=
nLowestTimestamp.
I'm planning to make a more substantial API improvement in the future (making
ScanForWalletTransactions private and exposing a higher level rescan method to
RPC code), but Matt Corallo <git@bluematt.me> pointed out this odd behavior
introduced by e2e2f4c "Return errors from importmulti if complete rescans are
not successful" yesterday, so I'm following up now to get rid of badness
introduced by that merge.
ld64 is threaded, and uses a worker for each CPU to parse input files. But
there's a bug in the parser causing dependencies to be calculated differently
based on which files have already been parsed.
As a result, builders with more CPUs are more likely to see non-determinism.
This looks to have been fixed in a newer version of ld64, so just disable
threading for now. There's no noticible slowdown.
Prior to this commit pindexRescan was initialized to a chainActive.Tip().
However, the value of pindexRescan set at time of initialization was never
read before pindexRescan was being set to either chainActive.Genesis()
(case 1), FindForkInGlobalIndex(chainActive, locator) (case 2) or
chainActive.Genesis() (case 3). Thus, the initialization was redundant.
This commit a.) removes the redundant initialization and b.) simplifies
this logic so that pindexRescan is initialized to chainActive.Genesis()
(case 1 and 3), and set to FindForkInGlobalIndex(chainActive, locator)
(case 2) as needed.
a4b02f4 Add Pieter's old signed commits to revsig-commits (Matt Corallo)
Tree-SHA512: 614a0a41b6995d2c36cd0e2363aeee8b7494112586d0c3cfc10bdf725b0752ede279ec9a55de2769461edcbea0220dd482c4bbd989fa17142c59a0bf622c42e4
In the case that the branch ...
if (itInFlight != mapBlocksInFlight.end() && itInFlight->second.first == nodeid) {
... is taken, there was prior to this commit an implicit assumption that
MarkBlockAsInFlight(...) was being called with its fifth and optional
argument (pit) being present (and non-NULL).
fa32a16 travis: Verify commits only for one target (MarcoFalke)
Tree-SHA512: 4c08a4e74d476facf6049a6935535afd6c6cbafe808ad42aee055bcfab23fbe1e368f2479ab59a7cb8c0c93a3f0732b2d0d7d34ef137a979fc5916e6063c7fb3
19cafc6 test: Replace remaining sprintf with snprintf (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
0a17714 uint256: replace sprintf with HexStr and reverse-iterator (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Tree-SHA512: 2ba1dd4d25e1cbfff4d67b2f483448aa7c34ab5c799cddd48ba5826e5fa6df425abe35e244aaf4c52db9fccfb4d2a25a14bb4597bf9d1fce95991f270da6bb26
83ac719 Change bitcoin address in RPC helpaddress to an invalid address, so people don't accidentally send coins there (like I did). (Marijn Stollenga)
Tree-SHA512: ca1163466a149d567b97efbfcfa8fdfe2d474245b4dd5a1a92555b4e87f8e99df5fee4cd79ef1ce6a98db2337846af78f37c2e6b31d02008b11fa0e151ce6590
