Although this code is no longer ever sent back after removing safe mode,
it would be unwise to remove it from the header.
For one, it would be bad to accidentally re-use the number.
Also some API documentation / bindings are directly generated from the .h
file - this is why the "Aliases for backward compatibility" are there. We don't
want to break code that relies on this error code existing, even if it's never
generated.
So keep it around but move it to a reserved section.
41ff967 list the types of scripts we should consider for a witness program (fivepiece)
4f933b3 p2wpkh, p2wsh and p2sh-nested scripts in decodescript (fivepiece)
Pull request description:
Attempts to address #12244 . `p2wsh` addresses are returned only for scripts that are neither `p2sh` nor any witness program.
Tree-SHA512: eb47f094c1a4c2ad2bcf27a8032307e43cf787d50bf739281aeb4101d97316a2f307b05118bf138298c937fa34e15f91436443a9b313f809fad2c43e94cd1831
7de1de7 Add new fee structure with all sub-fields denominated in BTC (mryandao)
Pull request description:
the denomination for `fee` is current in btc while the other such as `decendentFee` and `ancestorFee` are in satoshis.
Tree-SHA512: e428f6dca1d339f89ab73e38ce5903f5465c46b159069d9bcc3f8b1140fe6657fa49a11abe0088e9f7ba9999f64af72a349a4735bf5eaa61b8e4a185b23543f3
Now that the transaction index is updated asynchronously, in order to
preserve the current behavior of public interfaces, the code blocks
until the transaction index is caught up with the current state of the
blockchain.
0851a75 rpc: Interrupt block generation on shutdown request (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
With this simple change, after running `bitcoin-cli -regtest generate 100000`, it is possible to interrupt `bitcoind` cleanly without waiting for the generation to complete.
Tree-SHA512: f0f7cdde242e595cfdaea31ae8bddbc25933621b63f639e813d272c2b00ce2ef52f0c14ae44954ba8c49f0fc846bcc3bfd5419e52b3347a68bb0341ce6b02d26
4a6c0e3dcf Modernize best block mutex/cv/hash variable naming (Pieter Wuille)
45dd135039 Fix csBestBlock/cvBlockChange waiting in rpc/mining (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This is an alternative to #11694.
It reintroduces a uint256 variable with the best block hash, protected by csBestBlock, and only updated while holding it.
Also rename the involved variable to modern guidelines, as there are very few uses.
Tree-SHA512: 826a86c7d3cee7fe49f99f4398ae99e81cb0563197eaeba77306a3ca6072b67cdb932bc35720fc0f99c2a57b218efa029d0b8bdfb240591a629b2e90efa3199d
be67831 Make DummySignatureCreator a singleton (Pieter Wuille)
190b8d2 Make BaseSignatureCreator a pure interface (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
* Removes the `m_provider` field from `BaseSignatureCreator`. Instead both a `SigningProvider` (which provides keys and scripts) and a `BaseSignatureCreator` (which implements the transaction-specific (or other) signing logic) are passed into and down in `ProduceSignature`, making the two concepts orthogonal.
* Makes `BaseSignatureCreator` a pure interface without constructor, making it easier to implement new derivations of it (for example for message signing).
* As `DummySignatureCreator` now becomes a stateless object, turn it into a singleton `DUMMY_SIGNATURE_CREATOR`.
Tree-SHA512: 5f1f4512e4ea7d02a31df7b9ede55008efa716c5b74a2630ca1c2fc6599584d8bf5f5641487266127f4b3788033803539fbd22b03ef1219c83c10da2d3da3dcd
Add label API to wallet RPC.
This is one step towards #3816 ("Remove bolt-on account system") although it doesn't
actually remove anything yet.
These initially mirror the account functions, with the following differences:
- These functions aren't DEPRECATED in the help
- Help mentions 'label' instead of accounts. In the language used, labels are
associated with addresses, instead of addresses associated with labels. (unlike
with accounts.)
- Labels have no balance
- No balances in `listlabels`
- `listlabels` has no minconf or watchonly argument
- Like in the GUI, labels can be set on any address, not just receiving addreses
- Unlike accounts, labels can be deleted.
Being unable to delete them is a common annoyance (see #1231).
Currently only by reassigning all addresses using `setlabel`, but an explicit
call `deletelabel` which assigns all address to the default label may make
sense.
Thanks to Pierre Rochard for test fixes.
c198dc00e1 [Doc] Clarify the meaning of fee delta not being a fee rate in prioritisetransaction RPC (Jan Čapek)
Pull request description:
Hi,
I have faced some confusion among our developers considering this being a fee rate. Would you consider including this tiny doc update?
Best regards,
Jan Capek
Tree-SHA512: cd0560540418e53c5c19ceab2d5aca229f4ef6b788b9543695742522e1c63a7f2cce2574b47fead098a106da2f77e297f0c728474565f6259b50d62369bbe7da
fafcad3 doc: Add testmempoolaccept to release-notes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Some fixups for #11742:
* Add release notes for the new rpc
* Fix a typo in the original pull
* Make the mempool reference passed to `CheckInputsFromMempoolAndCache` const, since that function is called before we return from ATMP and we must not modify the mempool.
Tree-SHA512: 72c459ba69f7698a69c91d2592f10f7fb1864846c7d8c525050d48286f92ba5ec5fe554c54235b52fbd9a8f00226c526ad84584641ec39084e1a1310a261510d
a5bca13 Bugfix: Include <memory> for std::unique_ptr (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
Not sure why all these includes were missing, but it's breaking builds for some users:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652142
(Added to all files with a reference to `std::unique_ptr`)
Tree-SHA512: 8a2c67513ca07b9bb52c34e8a20b15e56f8af2530310d9ee9b0a69694dd05e02e7a3683f14101a2685d457672b56addec591a0bb83900a0eb8e2a43d43200509
b55555d rpc: Add testmempoolaccept (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
To check if a single raw transaction makes it into the current transaction pool, one had to call `sendrawtransaction`. However, on success, this adds the transaction to the mempool with no easy way to undo.
The call `testmempoolaccept` is introduced to provide a way to solely check the result without changing the mempool state.
Tree-SHA512: 5afd9311190135cee8fc1f229c7d39bf893f1028f29e28d34f70df820198ff97b4bf86b41cbbd6e6c36a5c30073cefa92d541c74a4939c7a2a6fa283dfd41b63
cb1e319 Bugfix: RPC: savemempool: Don't save until LoadMempool() is finished (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/12142
The tests are a little bit slow, mempool_persist.py goes from about 20 s to about 120 s in my hardware.
Perhaps there's a better way to test this.
Tree-SHA512: 9e6c24b32a9cf3774e8f0bd81c035b0deb53fba5ac3eb2532d85900579d21cef8a1135b75a4fa0a9d883e3822eb35e7d4b47a0838abf99789039205041962629
4d74c78 Add username and ip logging for RPC method requests (Gabriel Davidian)
Pull request description:
Adds username and IP logging (if enabled via -logips command) to RPC method request logging.
This closes#12223
Tree-SHA512: a441228e80ea6884ec379c66e949d86df3689770f1b3c3608015cf5a36d2dfb38051298a7f6ea6dfdfbf0b3b6c896e414c8dc54e9833bb73dd65bdb1832f4395
1f45e21 scripted-diff: Convert 11 enums into scoped enums (C++11) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Rationale (from Bjarne Stroustrup's ["C++11 FAQ"](http://www.stroustrup.com/C++11FAQ.html#enum)):
>
> The enum classes ("new enums", "strong enums") address three problems with traditional C++ enumerations:
>
> * conventional enums implicitly convert to int, causing errors when someone does not want an enumeration to act as an integer.
> * conventional enums export their enumerators to the surrounding scope, causing name clashes.
> * the underlying type of an enum cannot be specified, causing confusion, compatibility problems, and makes forward declaration impossible.
>
> The new enums are "enum class" because they combine aspects of traditional enumerations (names values) with aspects of classes (scoped members and absence of conversions).
Tree-SHA512: 9656e1cf4c3cabd4378c7a38d0c2eaf79e4a54d204a3c5762330840e55ee7e141e188a3efb2b4daf0ef3110bbaff80d8b9253abf2a9b015cdc4d60b49ac2b914
d2527bd Rename wallet_accounts.py test (Russell Yanofsky)
045eeb8 Rename account to label where appropriate (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Rename account to label where appropriate
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the implementation of address labels in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the way and letting that change focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions (transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
---
There is a rebased version of #7729 atop this PR at https://github.com/ryanofsky/bitcoin/commits/pr/label, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729#issuecomment-338417139.
Tree-SHA512: b3f934e612922d6290f50137f8ba71ddfaea4485713c7d97e89400a8b73b09b254f9186dffa462c77f5847721f5af9852b5572ade5443d8ee95dd150b3edb7ff
499d95e27 Add static_assert to prevent VARINT(<signed value>) (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Using VARINT with signed types is dangerous because negative values will appear to serialize correctly, but then deserialize as positive values mod 128.
This commit changes the VARINT macro to trigger a compile error by default if called with an signed value, and it updates existing broken uses of VARINT to pass a special flag that lets them keep working with no changes in behavior.
There is some discussion about this issue here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9693#issuecomment-278701473. I think another good change along these lines would be to make `GetSizeOfVarInt` and `WriteVarInt` throw exceptions if they are passed numbers less than 0 to serialize. But unlike this change, that would be a change in runtime behavior, and need more consideration.
Tree-SHA512: 082c65598cfac6dc1da042bdb47dbc9d5d789fc849fe52921cc238578588f4e5ff976c8b4b2ce42cb75290eb14f3b42ea76e26202c223c5b2aa63ef45c2ea3cc
This change only updates strings and adds RPC aliases, but should simplify the
implementation of address labels in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7729, by getting renaming out of the
way and letting it focus on semantics.
The difference between accounts and labels is that labels apply only to
addresses, while accounts apply to both addresses and transactions
(transactions have "from" and "to" accounts). The code associating accounts
with transactions is clumsy and unreliable so we would like get rid of it.
7ef46d063a Remove redundant includes. Conform to header include guidelines. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
From the header include guidelines ([developer-notes.md](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/developer-notes.md#source-code-organization)):
> "One exception is that a `.cpp` file does not need to re-include the includes already included in its corresponding `.h` file."
Covered in this PR:
* `rpc/util.h` includes `pubkey.h` + `utilstrencodings.h`. `rpc/util.cpp` includes `rpc/util.h`.
* `util.h` includes `fs.h`. `util.cpp` includes `util.h`.
Tree-SHA512: a38d9ecefd8165ad151c1ffde52cfbac968526c49db2080988bf6e6a3daa2ebeceb34d08f817e275edf7c650bf3155de01369bfb352522f8e0ae136b2289b194
Using VARINT with signed types is dangerous because negative values will appear
to serialize correctly, but then deserialize as positive values mod 128.
This commit changes the VARINT macro to trigger an error by default if called
with an signed value, and updates broken uses of VARINT to pass a special flag
that lets them keep working with no change in behavior.
92fabcd44 Add LookupBlockIndex function (João Barbosa)
43a32b739 Add missing cs_lock in CreateWalletFromFile (João Barbosa)
f814a3e8f Fix cs_main lock in LoadExternalBlockFile (João Barbosa)
c651df8b3 Lock cs_main while loading block index in AppInitMain (João Barbosa)
02de6a6bc Assert cs_main is held when accessing mapBlockIndex (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Replace all `mapBlockIndex` lookups with the new `LookupBlockIndex()`. In some cases it avoids a second lookup.
Tree-SHA512: ca31118f028a19721f2191d86f2dd398144d04df345694575a64aeb293be2f85785201480c3c578a0ec99690516205708558c0fd4168b09313378fd4e60a8412
fac70134a rpc: Update createrawtransaction examples (MarcoFalke)
fa06dfce0 [rpc] createrawtransaction: Accept sorted outputs (MarcoFalke)
8acd25d85 rpc: Allow typeAny in RPCTypeCheck (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The second parameter of the `createrawtransaction` is a dictionary of the outputs. This comes with at least two drawbacks:
* In case of duplicate keys, either of them might silently disappear, with no user feedback at all. A user needs to make other mistakes, but this could eventually lead to abnormal tx fees.
* A dictionary does not guarantee that keys are sorted. Again, a user needs to keep this in mind, as it could eventually lead to excessive tx fees.
Even though my scenario of loss-of-funds is unlikely to happen, I see it as a inconvenience that should be fixed.
Tree-SHA512: cd562f34f7f9f79c7d3433805971325c388c2035611be283980f4049066a622df4f0afdc11d7ac96662260ec0115147cb65e1ab5268f5a1b063242f3fe425f77
f08761371 Add tests of listreceivedbyaddress address filtering (Jeremy Rubin)
8ee08120d Add address filtering to listreceivedbyaddress (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
Supersede https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/9503 created by @JeremyRubin , I will maintain it.
Tree-SHA512: 2accaed493b7e1c2eb5cb5270180f100f8c718b6585b9574f294191c318dc622a79e42ac185300f291f82d3b2a6f1c00850b6b17e4ff2dbab94d71df695acbfe
