5eb20f81d9 Consistently use ParseHashV to validate hash inputs in rpc (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
these alternative calls.
Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
"must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
"must be hexadecimal string (not X)" in that case.
Split from #13420
Tree-SHA512: f0786b41c0d7793ff76e4b2bb35547873070bbf7561d510029e8edb93f59176277efcd4d183b3185532ea69fc0bbbf3dbe9e19362e8017007ae9d51266cd78ae
1f87c372b5 Simplify comparison in rpc_blockchain.py. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
The test for `gettxoutsetinfo` in `rpc_blockchain.py` verifies that the result is the same as before after invalidating and reconsidering a block. The comparison has to exclude the `disk_size` field, though, as it is not deterministic.
Instead of comparing all the other fields for equality, this change explicitly removes the `disk_size` field and then compares the full objects. This makes the intent more explicit (compare everything except for `disk_size`, not compare just a given list of fields) and also the code simpler.
Tree-SHA512: 3c376a8836b62988fb2f0117c9ca65de64a33bf3cd4980a123de30bf5e7b7a48eda477b25e03d672ff076e205c698e83432469156caa0f0f3ebbb0480f0dd77d
The test for gettxoutsetinfo in rpc_blockchain.py verifies that the
result is the same as before after invalidating and reconsidering a
block. The comparison has to exclude the 'disk_size' field, though, as
it is not deterministic.
Instead of comparing all the other fields for equality, this change
explicitly removes the 'disk_size' field and then compares the full
objects. This makes the intent more explicit (compare everything except
for disk_size, not compare just a given list of fields) and also the
code simpler.
fa5587fe71 qa: wait_for_verack by default (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This removes the need to do so manually every time a connection is added.
Tree-SHA512: a46c92cb4df41e30778b42b9fd3dcbd8d2d82aa7503d1213cb1c1165034f648d8caee01c292e2d87d05b0f71696996eef5be8a753f35ab49e5f66b0e3bf29f21
ParseHashV validates the length and encoding of the string and throws
an informative RPC error on failure, which is as good or better than
these alternative calls.
Note I switched ParseHashV to check string length first, because
IsHex tests that the length is even, and an error like:
"must be of length 64 (not 63, for X)" is much more informative than
"must be hexadecimal string (not X)"
f98b54352 Only call NotifyBlockTip when the active chain changes (James O'Beirne)
152b7fb25 [tests] Add a (failing) test for waitforblockheight (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is a subset of the more controversial https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12407, but this also adds a test demonstrating the bug.
In InvalidateBlock, we're calling NotifyBlockTip with the now-invalid block's prev regardless of what chain the ancestor block is on. This could create numerous issues, but it at least screws up `waitforblockheight` (or anything else relying on `rpc/blockchain.cpp:latestblock`) when InvalidateBlock is called on a block not in chainActive, which can happen via RPC.
Only call NotifyBlockTip when the block being marked invalid is on the active chain.
Tree-SHA512: 9a54fe5e8c7eb489daf5df4483c0986129e871e2ca931a456ba869ecb5d5a8d4f7bd27ccc9e711e9292c9ed79ddef896c85d0e81fc76883503e327995b0e914f
