Fix incorrect usage of the claim index #197
3 changed files with 132 additions and 20 deletions
|
@ -606,12 +606,12 @@ void CClaimTrie::addToClaimIndex(const std::string& name, const CClaimValue& cla
|
|||
{
|
||||
CClaimIndexElement element = { name, claim };
|
||||
LogPrintf("%s: ClaimIndex[%s] updated %s\n", __func__, claim.claimId.GetHex(), name);
|
||||
|
||||
db.Write(std::make_pair(CLAIM_BY_ID, claim.claimId), element);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void CClaimTrie::removeFromClaimIndex(const CClaimValue& claim)
|
||||
{
|
||||
LogPrintf("%s: ClaimIndex[%s] removed\n", __func__, claim.claimId.GetHex());
|
||||
db.Erase(std::make_pair(CLAIM_BY_ID, claim.claimId));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -620,9 +620,14 @@ bool CClaimTrie::getClaimById(const uint160 claimId, std::string& name, CClaimVa
|
|||
CClaimIndexElement element;
|
||||
if (db.Read(std::make_pair(CLAIM_BY_ID, claimId), element))
|
||||
{
|
||||
name = element.name;
|
||||
claim = element.claim;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
if (element.claim.claimId == claimId) {
|
||||
name = element.name;
|
||||
claim = element.claim;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LogPrintf("%s: ClaimIndex[%s] returned unmatched claimId %s when looking for %s\n",
|
||||
__func__, claimId.GetHex(), element.claim.claimId.GetHex(), name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1357,7 +1362,6 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::insertClaimIntoTrie(const std::string& name, CClaimValue c
|
|||
{
|
||||
fChanged = true;
|
||||
currentNode->insertClaim(claim);
|
||||
No. No.
|
||||
base->addToClaimIndex(name, claim);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -1369,6 +1373,7 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::insertClaimIntoTrie(const std::string& name, CClaimValue c
|
|||
if (currentTop != currentNode->claims.front())
|
||||
fChanged = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (fChanged)
|
||||
{
|
||||
for (std::string::const_iterator itCur = name.begin(); itCur != name.end(); ++itCur)
|
||||
|
@ -1432,8 +1437,6 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::removeClaimFromTrie(const std::string& name, const COutPoi
|
|||
CClaimValue currentTop = currentNode->claims.front();
|
||||
|
||||
success = currentNode->removeClaim(outPoint, claim);
|
||||
base->removeFromClaimIndex(claim);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!currentNode->claims.empty())
|
||||
{
|
||||
supportMapEntryType node;
|
||||
|
@ -1612,6 +1615,8 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::undoSpendClaim(const std::string& name, const COutPoint& o
|
|||
{
|
||||
nameOutPointType entry(name, claim.outPoint);
|
||||
addToExpirationQueue(claim.nHeight + base->nExpirationTime, entry);
|
||||
CClaimIndexElement element = {name, claim};
|
||||
claimsToAdd.push_back(element);
|
||||
return insertClaimIntoTrie(name, claim, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
|
@ -1630,7 +1635,8 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::addClaimToQueues(const std::string& name, CClaimValue& cla
|
|||
itQueueNameRow->second.push_back(outPointHeightType(claim.outPoint, claim.nValidAtHeight));
|
||||
nameOutPointType expireEntry(name, claim.outPoint);
|
||||
addToExpirationQueue(claim.nHeight + base->nExpirationTime, expireEntry);
|
||||
base->addToClaimIndex(name, claim);
|
||||
CClaimIndexElement element = {name, claim};
|
||||
claimsToAdd.push_back(element);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1669,8 +1675,6 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::removeClaimFromQueue(const std::string& name, const COutPo
|
|||
std::swap(claim, itQueue->second);
|
||||
itQueueNameRow->second.erase(itQueueName);
|
||||
itQueueRow->second.erase(itQueue);
|
||||
|
||||
base->removeFromClaimIndex(claim);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1707,6 +1711,7 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::removeClaim(const std::string& name, const COutPoint& outP
|
|||
nValidAtHeight = claim.nValidAtHeight;
|
||||
int expirationHeight = nHeight + base->nExpirationTime;
|
||||
removeFromExpirationQueue(name, outPoint, expirationHeight);
|
||||
claimsToDelete.insert(claim);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return removed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2154,6 +2159,7 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::incrementBlock(insertUndoType& insertUndo, claimQueueRowTy
|
|||
{
|
||||
CClaimValue claim;
|
||||
assert(removeClaimFromTrie(itEntry->name, itEntry->outPoint, claim, true));
|
||||
claimsToDelete.insert(claim);
|
||||
expireUndo.push_back(std::make_pair(itEntry->name, claim));
|
||||
LogPrintf("Expiring claim %s: %s, nHeight: %d, nValidAtHeight: %d\n", claim.claimId.GetHex(), itEntry->name, claim.nHeight, claim.nValidAtHeight);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2405,6 +2411,8 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::decrementBlock(insertUndoType& insertUndo, claimQueueRowTy
|
|||
for (claimQueueRowType::iterator itExpireUndo = expireUndo.begin(); itExpireUndo != expireUndo.end(); ++itExpireUndo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
insertClaimIntoTrie(itExpireUndo->first, itExpireUndo->second, false);
|
||||
CClaimIndexElement element = {itExpireUndo->first, itExpireUndo->second};
|
||||
claimsToAdd.push_back(element);
|
||||
itExpireRow->second.push_back(nameOutPointType(itExpireUndo->first, itExpireUndo->second.outPoint));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2531,6 +2539,18 @@ bool CClaimTrieCache::flush()
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (dirty())
|
||||
getMerkleHash();
|
||||
|
||||
if (!claimsToDelete.empty()) {
|
||||
for (claimIndexClaimListType::iterator it = claimsToDelete.begin(); it != claimsToDelete.end(); ++it)
|
||||
base->removeFromClaimIndex(*it);
|
||||
claimsToDelete.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!claimsToAdd.empty()) {
|
||||
for (claimIndexElementListType::iterator it = claimsToAdd.begin(); it != claimsToAdd.end(); ++it)
|
||||
base->addToClaimIndex(it->name, it->claim);
|
||||
claimsToAdd.clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool success = base->update(cache, cacheHashes, cacheTakeoverHeights, getBestBlock(), claimQueueCache, claimQueueNameCache, expirationQueueCache, nCurrentHeight, supportCache, supportQueueCache, supportQueueNameCache, supportExpirationQueueCache);
|
||||
if (success)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -283,6 +283,9 @@ typedef std::map<std::string, CClaimTrieNode*, nodenamecompare> nodeCacheType;
|
|||
|
||||
typedef std::map<std::string, uint256> hashMapType;
|
||||
|
||||
typedef std::set<CClaimValue> claimIndexClaimListType;
|
||||
typedef std::vector<CClaimIndexElement> claimIndexElementListType;
|
||||
|
||||
struct claimsForNameType
|
||||
{
|
||||
std::vector<CClaimValue> claims;
|
||||
|
@ -546,6 +549,8 @@ protected:
|
|||
mutable std::map<std::string, int> cacheTakeoverHeights;
|
||||
mutable int nCurrentHeight; // Height of the block that is being worked on, which is
|
||||
// one greater than the height of the chain's tip
|
||||
mutable claimIndexElementListType claimsToAdd;
|
||||
mutable claimIndexClaimListType claimsToDelete;
|
||||
|
||||
uint256 hashBlock;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3032,5 +3032,92 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(bogus_claimtrie_hash_test)
|
|||
delete pblockTemp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* tests for CClaimTrie::getClaimById basic consistency checks
|
||||
*/
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(get_claim_by_id_test_2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
const std::string name = "test";
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx1 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), name, "one", 1);
|
||||
uint160 claimId = ClaimIdHash(tx1.GetHash(), 0);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction txx = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), name, "one", 1);
|
||||
uint160 claimIdx = ClaimIdHash(txx.GetHash(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
|
||||
CClaimValue claimValue;
|
||||
std::string claimName;
|
||||
pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId, claimName, claimValue);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId);
|
||||
|
||||
CMutableTransaction txa = fixture.Spend(tx1);
|
||||
CMutableTransaction txb = fixture.Spend(txx);
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId, claimName, claimValue));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(!pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimIdx, claimName, claimValue));
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.DecrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId, claimName, claimValue);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId);
|
||||
|
||||
// this test fails
|
||||
pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimIdx, claimName, claimValue);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimIdx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(get_claim_by_id_test_3)
|
||||
{
|
||||
ClaimTrieChainFixture fixture;
|
||||
pclaimTrie->setExpirationTime(5);
|
||||
const std::string name = "test";
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx1 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), name, "one", 1);
|
||||
uint160 claimId = ClaimIdHash(tx1.GetHash(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
|
||||
CClaimValue claimValue;
|
||||
std::string claimName;
|
||||
pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId, claimName, claimValue);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId);
|
||||
// make second claim with activation delay 1
|
||||
CMutableTransaction tx2 = fixture.MakeClaim(fixture.GetCoinbase(), name, "one", 2);
|
||||
uint160 claimId2 = ClaimIdHash(tx2.GetHash(), 0);
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
// second claim is not activated yet, but can still access by claim id
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(is_best_claim(name, tx1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId2, claimName, claimValue));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId2);
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
// second claim has activated
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(is_best_claim(name, tx2));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId2, claimName, claimValue));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId2);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.DecrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
// second claim has been deactivated via decrement
|
||||
// should still be accesible via claim id
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(is_best_claim(name, tx1));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId2, claimName, claimValue));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId2);
|
||||
|
||||
fixture.IncrementBlocks(1);
|
||||
// second claim should have been re activated via increment
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(is_best_claim(name, tx2));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(pclaimTrie->getClaimById(claimId2, claimName, claimValue));
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimName == name);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(claimValue.claimId == claimId2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END()
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
Is this working around a problem in the base class? Why not fix it there?