LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity

Use fully static linkage #364

Closed
bvbfan wants to merge 78 commits from static_link into master
pull from: static_link
merge into: LBRYCommunity:master
Conversation 2 Commits 78 Files changed 312 +8 -4
1 changed files with 8 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 1a67d18df4 - Show all commits

12
src/claimtrie.cpp
View file

@ -437,7 +437,8 @@ uint256 CClaimTrieCacheBase::recursiveComputeMerkleHash(const std::string& name,
if (child.hash->IsNull()) {
*child.hash = recursiveComputeMerkleHash(child.name, child.takeoverHeight, checkOnly);
}
LogPrint(BCLog::CLAIMS, "Using hash of %s (%s): %s, takeover: %d\n", child.name, HexStr(child.name), (*child.hash).GetHex(), child.takeoverHeight);
if (!checkOnly)
LogPrint(BCLog::CLAIMS, "Using hash of %s (%s): %s, takeover: %d\n", child.name, HexStr(child.name), (*child.hash).GetHex(), child.takeoverHeight);
completeHash(*child.hash, child.name, pos);
vchToHash.push_back(child.name[pos]);
vchToHash.insert(vchToHash.end(), child.hash->begin(), child.hash->end());
@ -618,7 +619,7 @@ bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::addSupport(const std::string& name, const COutPoint& o
return true;
}
bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::removeClaim(const uint160& claimId, const COutPoint& outPoint, std::string& nodeName, int& validHeight)
bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::removeClaim(const uint160& claimId, const COutPoint& outPoint, std::string& nodeName, int& validHeight)
{
if (!transacting) { transacting = true; db << "begin"; }
@ -638,7 +639,10 @@ bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::addSupport(const std::string& name, const COutPoint& o
return false;
db << "UPDATE nodes SET hash = NULL WHERE name = ?" << nodeName;
if (nNextHeight < Params().GetConsensus().nMaxTakeoverWorkaroundHeight) {
// we should extend removal workaround since we have situation
// when node should be deleted from cache but instead it's keept
// because it's a parent one and should not be effectively erased
if (nNextHeight < Params().GetConsensus().nMaxTakeoverWorkaroundHeight || true) {
auto workaroundQuery = db << "SELECT nodeName FROM claims WHERE nodeName LIKE ?1 "
"AND validHeight < ?2 AND expirationHeight >= ?2 ORDER BY nodeName LIMIT 1"
<< nodeName + "%" << nNextHeight;
@ -1183,7 +1187,7 @@ bool CClaimTrieCacheBase::incrementBlock(insertUndoType& insertUndo, claimUndoTy
getTakeoverQuery << nameWithTakeover >> std::tie(existingHeight, existingID);
getTakeoverQuery++; // reset it
auto hasBeenSetBefore = existingID != nullptr && !existingID->IsNull();
auto hasBeenSetBefore = existingID && !existingID->IsNull();
auto takeoverHappening = !hasCandidate || (hasBeenSetBefore && *existingID != candidateValue.claimId);
if (takeoverHappening && activateAllFor(insertUndo, insertSupportUndo, nameWithTakeover))
hasCandidate = getInfoForName(nameWithTakeover, candidateValue, 1);