LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity
The blockchain that provides the digital content namespace for the LBRY protocol
16994 commits 22 branches 42 tags 99 MiB
C++ 66.5%
Python 15.1%
C 12.7%
M4 2.1%
Makefile 1.2%
Other 2.3%
Find a file
Wladimir J. van der Laan 487dcbe80c
Merge #13002: Do not treat bare multisig outputs as IsMine unless watched 
7d0f80b Use anonymous namespace instead of static functions (Pieter Wuille)
b61fb71 Mention removal of bare multisig IsMine in release notes (Pieter Wuille)
9c2a8b8 Do not treat bare multisig as IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
08f3228 Optimization: only test for witness scripts at top level (Pieter Wuille)
3619735 Track difference between scriptPubKey and P2SH execution in IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
ac6ec62 Switch to a private version of SigVersion inside IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
19fc973 Do not expose SigVersion argument to IsMine (Pieter Wuille)
fb1dfbb Remove unused IsMine overload (Pieter Wuille)
952d821 Make CScript -> CScriptID conversion explicit (Pieter Wuille)

Pull request description:

  Currently our wallet code will treat bare multisig outputs (meaning scriptPubKeys with multiple public keys + `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` operator in it) as ours without the user asking for it, as long as all private keys in it are in our wallet.

  This is a pointless feature. As it only works when all private keys are in one place, it's useless compared to single key outputs (P2PK, P2PKH, P2WPKH, P2SH-P2WPKH), and worse in terms of space, cost, UTXO size, and ability to test (due to lack of address format for them).

  Furthermore, they are problematic in that producing a list of all `scriptPubKeys` we accept is not tractable (it involves all combinations of all public keys that are ours). In further wallet changes I'd like to move to a model where all scriptPubKeys that are treated as ours are explicit, rather than defined by whatever keys we have. The current behavior of the wallet is very hard to model in such a design, so I'd like to get rid of it.

  I think there are two options:
  * Remove it entirely (do not ever accept bare multisig outputs as ours, unless watched)
  * Only accept bare multisig outputs in situations where the P2SH version of that output would also be acceptable

  This PR implements the first option. The second option was explored in #12874.

Tree-SHA512: 917ed45b3cac864cee53e27f9a3e900390c576277fbd6751b1250becea04d692b3b426fa09065a3399931013bd579c4f3dbeeb29d51d19ed0c64da75d430ad9a
2018-04-26 20:10:12 +02:00
.github Make default issue text all comments to make issues more readable 2017-11-16 11:50:56 -05:00
.tx tx: Update transifex slug for 0.16 2018-01-24 16:35:40 +01:00
build-aux/m4 ax_boost_{chrono,unit_test_framework}.m4: take changes from upstream 2018-03-15 19:59:11 +01:00
contrib Merge #12972: Add python3 script shebang lint 2018-04-16 16:03:22 -04:00
depends Merge #12715: depends: Add 'make clean' rule 2018-04-18 11:28:05 +02:00
doc Merge #13002: Do not treat bare multisig outputs as IsMine unless watched 2018-04-26 20:10:12 +02:00
share [tests] Make rpcauth.py testable and add unit tests 2018-04-24 11:41:20 -07:00
src Merge #13002: Do not treat bare multisig outputs as IsMine unless watched 2018-04-26 20:10:12 +02:00
test Merge #13002: Do not treat bare multisig outputs as IsMine unless watched 2018-04-26 20:10:12 +02:00
.gitattributes Separate protocol versioning from clientversion 2014-10-29 00:24:40 -04:00
.gitignore [build] .gitignore: add QT Creator artifacts 2017-12-22 12:37:00 +01:00
.travis.yml Add shell script linting: Check for shellcheck warnings in shell scripts 2018-04-11 15:41:18 +02:00
autogen.sh Add MIT license to autogen.sh and share/genbuild.sh 2016-09-21 23:01:36 +00:00
configure.ac test: add rpcauth-test to AC_CONFIG_LINKS to fix out-of-tree make check 2018-04-25 16:37:10 +02:00
CONTRIBUTING.md Docs: Improve documentation on standard communication channels 2018-03-22 12:58:57 -07:00
COPYING [Trivial] Update license year range to 2018 2018-01-01 04:33:09 +09:00
INSTALL.md Update INSTALL landing redirection notice for build instructions. 2016-10-06 12:27:23 +13:00
libbitcoinconsensus.pc.in Unify package name to as few places as possible without major changes 2015-12-14 02:11:10 +00:00
Makefile.am [tests] Make rpcauth.py testable and add unit tests 2018-04-24 11:41:20 -07:00
README.md Docs: Improve documentation on standard communication channels 2018-03-22 12:58:57 -07:00

README.md

Bitcoin Core integration/staging tree

Build Status

https://bitcoincore.org

What is Bitcoin?

Bitcoin is an experimental digital currency that enables instant payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network. Bitcoin Core is the name of open source software which enables the use of this currency.

For more information, as well as an immediately useable, binary version of the Bitcoin Core software, see https://bitcoin.org/en/download, or read the original whitepaper.

License

Bitcoin Core is released under the terms of the MIT license. See COPYING for more information or see https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

Development Process

The master branch is regularly built and tested, but is not guaranteed to be completely stable. Tags are created regularly to indicate new official, stable release versions of Bitcoin Core.

The contribution workflow is described in CONTRIBUTING.md.

Testing

Testing and code review is the bottleneck for development; we get more pull requests than we can review and test on short notice. Please be patient and help out by testing other people's pull requests, and remember this is a security-critical project where any mistake might cost people lots of money.

Automated Testing

Developers are strongly encouraged to write unit tests for new code, and to submit new unit tests for old code. Unit tests can be compiled and run (assuming they weren't disabled in configure) with: make check. Further details on running and extending unit tests can be found in /src/test/README.md.

There are also regression and integration tests, written in Python, that are run automatically on the build server. These tests can be run (if the test dependencies are installed) with: test/functional/test_runner.py

The Travis CI system makes sure that every pull request is built for Windows, Linux, and OS X, and that unit/sanity tests are run automatically.

Manual Quality Assurance (QA) Testing

Changes should be tested by somebody other than the developer who wrote the code. This is especially important for large or high-risk changes. It is useful to add a test plan to the pull request description if testing the changes is not straightforward.

Translations

Changes to translations as well as new translations can be submitted to Bitcoin Core's Transifex page.

Translations are periodically pulled from Transifex and merged into the git repository. See the translation process for details on how this works.

Important: We do not accept translation changes as GitHub pull requests because the next pull from Transifex would automatically overwrite them again.

Translators should also subscribe to the mailing list.