LFUDA changes #47
|
|
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ func peerCmd(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
|
|||
err = db.Connect(globalConfig.DBConn)
|
||||
checkErr(err)
|
||||
|
||||
combo := store.NewDBBackedStore(s3, db)
|
||||
combo := store.NewDBBackedStore(s3, db, false)
|
||||
peerServer = peer.NewServer(combo)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -16,25 +16,28 @@ import (
|
|||
"github.com/lbryio/reflector.go/reflector"
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/reflector.go/store"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/stream"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/c2h5oh/datasize"
|
||||
log "github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
|
||||
"github.com/spf13/cast"
|
||||
"github.com/spf13/cobra"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
tcpPeerPort int
|
||||
http3PeerPort int
|
||||
receiverPort int
|
||||
metricsPort int
|
||||
disableUploads bool
|
||||
disableBlocklist bool
|
||||
proxyAddress string
|
||||
proxyPort string
|
||||
proxyProtocol string
|
||||
useDB bool
|
||||
cloudFrontEndpoint string
|
||||
reflectorCmdDiskCache string
|
||||
reflectorCmdMemCache int
|
||||
tcpPeerPort int
|
||||
http3PeerPort int
|
||||
receiverPort int
|
||||
metricsPort int
|
||||
disableUploads bool
|
||||
disableBlocklist bool
|
||||
proxyAddress string
|
||||
proxyPort string
|
||||
proxyProtocol string
|
||||
useDB bool
|
||||
cloudFrontEndpoint string
|
||||
reflectorCmdDiskCache string
|
||||
bufferReflectorCmdDiskCache string
|
||||
reflectorCmdMemCache int
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
func init() {
|
||||
|
|
@ -55,7 +58,9 @@ func init() {
|
|||
cmd.Flags().BoolVar(&disableBlocklist, "disable-blocklist", false, "Disable blocklist watching/updating")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().BoolVar(&useDB, "use-db", true, "whether to connect to the reflector db or not")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().StringVar(&reflectorCmdDiskCache, "disk-cache", "",
|
||||
"enable disk cache, setting max size and path where to store blobs. format is 'MAX_BLOBS:CACHE_PATH'")
|
||||
"enable disk cache, setting max size and path where to store blobs. format is 'sizeGB:CACHE_PATH'")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().StringVar(&bufferReflectorCmdDiskCache, "buffer-disk-cache", "",
|
||||
"enable buffer disk cache, setting max size and path where to store blobs. format is 'sizeGB:CACHE_PATH'")
|
||||
cmd.Flags().IntVar(&reflectorCmdMemCache, "mem-cache", 0, "enable in-memory cache with a max size of this many blobs")
|
||||
rootCmd.AddCommand(cmd)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -122,11 +127,21 @@ func setupStore() store.BlobStore {
|
|||
log.Fatalf("protocol is not recognized: %s", proxyProtocol)
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
s3Store := store.NewS3Store(globalConfig.AwsID, globalConfig.AwsSecret, globalConfig.BucketRegion, globalConfig.BucketName)
|
||||
var s3Store *store.S3Store
|
||||
if conf != "none" {
|
||||
s3Store = store.NewS3Store(globalConfig.AwsID, globalConfig.AwsSecret, globalConfig.BucketRegion, globalConfig.BucketName)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if cloudFrontEndpoint != "" {
|
||||
s = store.NewCloudFrontRWStore(store.NewCloudFrontROStore(cloudFrontEndpoint), s3Store)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cfs := store.NewCloudFrontROStore(cloudFrontEndpoint)
|
||||
if s3Store != nil {
|
||||
s = store.NewCloudFrontRWStore(cfs, s3Store)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
s = cfs
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else if s3Store != nil {
|
||||
s = s3Store
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
log.Fatalf("this configuration does not include a valid upstream source")
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -138,7 +153,7 @@ func setupStore() store.BlobStore {
|
|||
log.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
s = store.NewDBBackedStore(s, db)
|
||||
s = store.NewDBBackedStore(s, db, false)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return s
|
||||
|
|
@ -147,7 +162,10 @@ func setupStore() store.BlobStore {
|
|||
func wrapWithCache(s store.BlobStore) store.BlobStore {
|
||||
wrapped := s
|
||||
|
||||
diskCacheMaxSize, diskCachePath := diskCacheParams()
|
||||
diskCacheMaxSize, diskCachePath := diskCacheParams(reflectorCmdDiskCache)
|
||||
//we are tracking blobs in memory with a 1 byte long boolean, which means that for each 2MB (a blob) we need 1Byte
|
||||
// so if the underlying cache holds 10MB, 10MB/2MB=5Bytes which is also the exact count of objects to restore on startup
|
||||
realCacheSize := float64(diskCacheMaxSize) / float64(stream.MaxBlobSize)
|
||||
if diskCacheMaxSize > 0 {
|
||||
err := os.MkdirAll(diskCachePath, os.ModePerm)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
|
@ -156,7 +174,21 @@ func wrapWithCache(s store.BlobStore) store.BlobStore {
|
|||
wrapped = store.NewCachingStore(
|
||||
"reflector",
|
||||
wrapped,
|
||||
store.NewLRUStore("peer_server", store.NewDiskStore(diskCachePath, 2), diskCacheMaxSize),
|
||||
store.NewLFUDAStore("hdd", store.NewDiskStore(diskCachePath, 2), realCacheSize),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
diskCacheMaxSize, diskCachePath = diskCacheParams(bufferReflectorCmdDiskCache)
|
||||
realCacheSize = float64(diskCacheMaxSize) / float64(stream.MaxBlobSize)
|
||||
if diskCacheMaxSize > 0 {
|
||||
err := os.MkdirAll(diskCachePath, os.ModePerm)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
wrapped = store.NewCachingStore(
|
||||
"reflector",
|
||||
wrapped,
|
||||
store.NewLFUDAStore("nvme", store.NewDiskStore(diskCachePath, 2), realCacheSize),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -164,32 +196,36 @@ func wrapWithCache(s store.BlobStore) store.BlobStore {
|
|||
wrapped = store.NewCachingStore(
|
||||
"reflector",
|
||||
wrapped,
|
||||
store.NewLRUStore("peer_server", store.NewMemStore(), reflectorCmdMemCache),
|
||||
store.NewLRUStore("mem", store.NewMemStore(), reflectorCmdMemCache),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return wrapped
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func diskCacheParams() (int, string) {
|
||||
if reflectorCmdDiskCache == "" {
|
||||
func diskCacheParams(diskParams string) (int, string) {
|
||||
if diskParams == "" {
|
||||
return 0, ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
parts := strings.Split(reflectorCmdDiskCache, ":")
|
||||
parts := strings.Split(diskParams, ":")
|
||||
if len(parts) != 2 {
|
||||
log.Fatalf("--disk-cache must be a number, followed by ':', followed by a string")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
maxSize := cast.ToInt(parts[0])
|
||||
if maxSize <= 0 {
|
||||
log.Fatalf("--disk-cache max size must be more than 0")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
diskCacheSize := parts[0]
|
||||
path := parts[1]
|
||||
if len(path) == 0 || path[0] != '/' {
|
||||
log.Fatalf("--disk-cache path must start with '/'")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return maxSize, path
|
||||
var maxSize datasize.ByteSize
|
||||
err := maxSize.UnmarshalText([]byte(diskCacheSize))
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Fatal(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if maxSize <= 0 {
|
||||
log.Fatal("--disk-cache size must be more than 0")
|
||||
}
|
||||
return int(maxSize), path
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ func startCmd(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
|
|||
err := db.Connect(globalConfig.DBConn)
|
||||
checkErr(err)
|
||||
s3 := store.NewS3Store(globalConfig.AwsID, globalConfig.AwsSecret, globalConfig.BucketRegion, globalConfig.BucketName)
|
||||
comboStore := store.NewDBBackedStore(s3, db)
|
||||
comboStore := store.NewDBBackedStore(s3, db, false)
|
||||
|
||||
conf := prism.DefaultConf()
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ func uploadCmd(cmd *cobra.Command, args []string) {
|
|||
|
||||
st := store.NewDBBackedStore(
|
||||
store.NewS3Store(globalConfig.AwsID, globalConfig.AwsSecret, globalConfig.BucketRegion, globalConfig.BucketName),
|
||||
db)
|
||||
db, false)
|
||||
|
||||
uploader := reflector.NewUploader(db, st, uploadWorkers, uploadSkipExistsCheck, uploadDeleteBlobsAfterUpload)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
12
go.mod
|
|
@ -5,13 +5,15 @@ replace github.com/btcsuite/btcd => github.com/lbryio/lbrycrd.go v0.0.0-20200203
|
|||
require (
|
||||
github.com/armon/go-metrics v0.0.0-20190430140413-ec5e00d3c878 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go v1.16.11
|
||||
github.com/bparli/lfuda-go v0.3.1
|
||||
github.com/btcsuite/btcd v0.0.0-20190824003749-130ea5bddde3
|
||||
github.com/btcsuite/btcutil v0.0.0-20190425235716-9e5f4b9a998d
|
||||
github.com/c2h5oh/datasize v0.0.0-20200825124411-48ed595a09d2
|
||||
github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.1
|
||||
github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.4.1
|
||||
github.com/golang/protobuf v1.4.2
|
||||
github.com/google/btree v1.0.0 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/google/gops v0.3.7
|
||||
github.com/google/gops v0.3.7 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/gorilla/mux v1.7.4
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-msgpack v0.5.5 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.4
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,14 +26,15 @@ require (
|
|||
github.com/lbryio/lbry.go v1.1.2 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2 v2.6.1-0.20200901175808-73382bb02128
|
||||
github.com/lbryio/types v0.0.0-20191228214437-05a22073b4ec
|
||||
github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go v0.18.1
|
||||
github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go v0.19.3
|
||||
github.com/phayes/freeport v0.0.0-20171002185219-e27662a4a9d6
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.2
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.3
|
||||
github.com/sirupsen/logrus v1.4.2
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.4.1
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.4.1 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/spf13/cast v1.3.0
|
||||
github.com/spf13/cobra v0.0.3
|
||||
github.com/spf13/pflag v1.0.3 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/spf13/viper v1.7.1 // indirect
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/testify v1.4.0
|
||||
github.com/volatiletech/null v8.0.0+incompatible
|
||||
go.uber.org/atomic v1.5.1
|
||||
|
|
@ -40,7 +43,6 @@ require (
|
|||
golang.org/x/sync v0.0.0-20190911185100-cd5d95a43a6e
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191227053925-7b8e75db28f4 // indirect
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.2 // indirect
|
||||
gotest.tools v2.2.0+incompatible
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
go 1.15
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
168
go.sum
|
|
@ -2,16 +2,31 @@ cloud.google.com/go v0.26.0/go.mod h1:aQUYkXzVsufM+DwF1aE+0xfcU+56JwCaLick0ClmMT
|
|||
cloud.google.com/go v0.31.0/go.mod h1:aQUYkXzVsufM+DwF1aE+0xfcU+56JwCaLick0ClmMTw=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.34.0/go.mod h1:aQUYkXzVsufM+DwF1aE+0xfcU+56JwCaLick0ClmMTw=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.37.0/go.mod h1:TS1dMSSfndXH133OKGwekG838Om/cQT0BUHV3HcBgoo=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.38.0/go.mod h1:990N+gfupTy94rShfmMCWGDn0LpTmnzTp2qbd1dvSRU=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.44.1/go.mod h1:iSa0KzasP4Uvy3f1mN/7PiObzGgflwredwwASm/v6AU=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.44.2/go.mod h1:60680Gw3Yr4ikxnPRS/oxxkBccT6SA1yMk63TGekxKY=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.45.1/go.mod h1:RpBamKRgapWJb87xiFSdk4g1CME7QZg3uwTez+TSTjc=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go v0.46.3/go.mod h1:a6bKKbmY7er1mI7TEI4lsAkts/mkhTSZK8w33B4RAg0=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go/bigquery v1.0.1/go.mod h1:i/xbL2UlR5RvWAURpBYZTtm/cXjCha9lbfbpx4poX+o=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go/datastore v1.0.0/go.mod h1:LXYbyblFSglQ5pkeyhO+Qmw7ukd3C+pD7TKLgZqpHYE=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go/firestore v1.1.0/go.mod h1:ulACoGHTpvq5r8rxGJ4ddJZBZqakUQqClKRT5SZwBmk=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go/pubsub v1.0.1/go.mod h1:R0Gpsv3s54REJCy4fxDixWD93lHJMoZTyQ2kNxGRt3I=
|
||||
cloud.google.com/go/storage v1.0.0/go.mod h1:IhtSnM/ZTZV8YYJWCY8RULGVqBDmpoyjwiyrjsg+URw=
|
||||
dmitri.shuralyov.com/app/changes v0.0.0-20180602232624-0a106ad413e3/go.mod h1:Yl+fi1br7+Rr3LqpNJf1/uxUdtRUV+Tnj0o93V2B9MU=
|
||||
dmitri.shuralyov.com/gpu/mtl v0.0.0-20190408044501-666a987793e9/go.mod h1:H6x//7gZCb22OMCxBHrMx7a5I7Hp++hsVxbQ4BYO7hU=
|
||||
dmitri.shuralyov.com/html/belt v0.0.0-20180602232347-f7d459c86be0/go.mod h1:JLBrvjyP0v+ecvNYvCpyZgu5/xkfAUhi6wJj28eUfSU=
|
||||
dmitri.shuralyov.com/service/change v0.0.0-20181023043359-a85b471d5412/go.mod h1:a1inKt/atXimZ4Mv927x+r7UpyzRUf4emIoiiSC2TN4=
|
||||
dmitri.shuralyov.com/state v0.0.0-20180228185332-28bcc343414c/go.mod h1:0PRwlb0D6DFvNNtx+9ybjezNCa8XF0xaYcETyp6rHWU=
|
||||
git.apache.org/thrift.git v0.0.0-20180902110319-2566ecd5d999/go.mod h1:fPE2ZNJGynbRyZ4dJvy6G277gSllfV2HJqblrnkyeyg=
|
||||
github.com/BurntSushi/toml v0.3.1 h1:WXkYYl6Yr3qBf1K79EBnL4mak0OimBfB0XUf9Vl28OQ=
|
||||
github.com/BurntSushi/toml v0.3.1/go.mod h1:xHWCNGjB5oqiDr8zfno3MHue2Ht5sIBksp03qcyfWMU=
|
||||
github.com/BurntSushi/xgb v0.0.0-20160522181843-27f122750802/go.mod h1:IVnqGOEym/WlBOVXweHU+Q+/VP0lqqI8lqeDx9IjBqo=
|
||||
github.com/DataDog/datadog-go v2.2.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:LButxg5PwREeZtORoXG3tL4fMGNddJ+vMq1mwgfaqoQ=
|
||||
github.com/OneOfOne/xxhash v1.2.2/go.mod h1:HSdplMjZKSmBqAxg5vPj2TmRDmfkzw+cTzAElWljhcU=
|
||||
github.com/StackExchange/wmi v0.0.0-20170410192909-ea383cf3ba6e/go.mod h1:3eOhrUMpNV+6aFIbp5/iudMxNCF27Vw2OZgy4xEx0Fg=
|
||||
github.com/aead/siphash v1.0.1/go.mod h1:Nywa3cDsYNNK3gaciGTWPwHt0wlpNV15vwmswBAUSII=
|
||||
github.com/alecthomas/template v0.0.0-20160405071501-a0175ee3bccc/go.mod h1:LOuyumcjzFXgccqObfd/Ljyb9UuFJ6TxHnclSeseNhc=
|
||||
github.com/alecthomas/units v0.0.0-20151022065526-2efee857e7cf/go.mod h1:ybxpYRFXyAe+OPACYpWeL0wqObRcbAqCMya13uyzqw0=
|
||||
github.com/anmitsu/go-shlex v0.0.0-20161002113705-648efa622239/go.mod h1:2FmKhYUyUczH0OGQWaF5ceTx0UBShxjsH6f8oGKYe2c=
|
||||
github.com/armon/circbuf v0.0.0-20150827004946-bbbad097214e/go.mod h1:3U/XgcO3hCbHZ8TKRvWD2dDTCfh9M9ya+I9JpbB7O8o=
|
||||
github.com/armon/go-metrics v0.0.0-20180917152333-f0300d1749da/go.mod h1:Q73ZrmVTwzkszR9V5SSuryQ31EELlFMUz1kKyl939pY=
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,7 +39,12 @@ github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go v1.16.11 h1:g/c7gJeVyHoXCxM2fddS85bPGVkBF8s2q8t3fyEleg
|
|||
github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go v1.16.11/go.mod h1:KmX6BPdI08NWTb3/sm4ZGu5ShLoqVDhKgpiN924inxo=
|
||||
github.com/beorn7/perks v0.0.0-20180321164747-3a771d992973 h1:xJ4a3vCFaGF/jqvzLMYoU8P317H5OQ+Via4RmuPwCS0=
|
||||
github.com/beorn7/perks v0.0.0-20180321164747-3a771d992973/go.mod h1:Dwedo/Wpr24TaqPxmxbtue+5NUziq4I4S80YR8gNf3Q=
|
||||
github.com/beorn7/perks v1.0.0 h1:HWo1m869IqiPhD389kmkxeTalrjNbbJTC8LXupb+sl0=
|
||||
github.com/beorn7/perks v1.0.0/go.mod h1:KWe93zE9D1o94FZ5RNwFwVgaQK1VOXiVxmqh+CedLV8=
|
||||
github.com/bgentry/speakeasy v0.1.0/go.mod h1:+zsyZBPWlz7T6j88CTgSN5bM796AkVf0kBD4zp0CCIs=
|
||||
github.com/bketelsen/crypt v0.0.3-0.20200106085610-5cbc8cc4026c/go.mod h1:MKsuJmJgSg28kpZDP6UIiPt0e0Oz0kqKNGyRaWEPv84=
|
||||
github.com/bparli/lfuda-go v0.3.1 h1:nO9Szo627RC8/z+R+MMPBItNwHCOonchmpjQuQi8jVY=
|
||||
github.com/bparli/lfuda-go v0.3.1/go.mod h1:BR5a9lwlqRqnPhU3F5ojFK3VhTKg8iFVtJJKgZBQhAo=
|
||||
github.com/bradfitz/go-smtpd v0.0.0-20170404230938-deb6d6237625/go.mod h1:HYsPBTaaSFSlLx/70C2HPIMNZpVV8+vt/A+FMnYP11g=
|
||||
github.com/btcsuite/btclog v0.0.0-20170628155309-84c8d2346e9f h1:bAs4lUbRJpnnkd9VhRV3jjAVU7DJVjMaK+IsvSeZvFo=
|
||||
github.com/btcsuite/btclog v0.0.0-20170628155309-84c8d2346e9f/go.mod h1:TdznJufoqS23FtqVCzL0ZqgP5MqXbb4fg/WgDys70nA=
|
||||
|
|
@ -39,17 +59,26 @@ github.com/btcsuite/websocket v0.0.0-20150119174127-31079b680792 h1:R8vQdOQdZ9Y3
|
|||
github.com/btcsuite/websocket v0.0.0-20150119174127-31079b680792/go.mod h1:ghJtEyQwv5/p4Mg4C0fgbePVuGr935/5ddU9Z3TmDRY=
|
||||
github.com/btcsuite/winsvc v1.0.0/go.mod h1:jsenWakMcC0zFBFurPLEAyrnc/teJEM1O46fmI40EZs=
|
||||
github.com/buger/jsonparser v0.0.0-20181115193947-bf1c66bbce23/go.mod h1:bbYlZJ7hK1yFx9hf58LP0zeX7UjIGs20ufpu3evjr+s=
|
||||
github.com/c2h5oh/datasize v0.0.0-20200825124411-48ed595a09d2 h1:t8KYCwSKsOEZBFELI4Pn/phbp38iJ1RRAkDFNin1aak=
|
||||
github.com/c2h5oh/datasize v0.0.0-20200825124411-48ed595a09d2/go.mod h1:S/7n9copUssQ56c7aAgHqftWO4LTf4xY6CGWt8Bc+3M=
|
||||
github.com/cespare/xxhash v1.1.0/go.mod h1:XrSqR1VqqWfGrhpAt58auRo0WTKS1nRRg3ghfAqPWnc=
|
||||
github.com/cheekybits/genny v1.0.0 h1:uGGa4nei+j20rOSeDeP5Of12XVm7TGUd4dJA9RDitfE=
|
||||
github.com/cheekybits/genny v1.0.0/go.mod h1:+tQajlRqAUrPI7DOSpB0XAqZYtQakVtB7wXkRAgjxjQ=
|
||||
github.com/circonus-labs/circonus-gometrics v2.3.1+incompatible/go.mod h1:nmEj6Dob7S7YxXgwXpfOuvO54S+tGdZdw9fuRZt25Ag=
|
||||
github.com/circonus-labs/circonusllhist v0.1.3/go.mod h1:kMXHVDlOchFAehlya5ePtbp5jckzBHf4XRpQvBOLI+I=
|
||||
github.com/client9/misspell v0.3.4/go.mod h1:qj6jICC3Q7zFZvVWo7KLAzC3yx5G7kyvSDkc90ppPyw=
|
||||
github.com/coreos/bbolt v1.3.2/go.mod h1:iRUV2dpdMOn7Bo10OQBFzIJO9kkE559Wcmn+qkEiiKk=
|
||||
github.com/coreos/etcd v3.3.13+incompatible/go.mod h1:uF7uidLiAD3TWHmW31ZFd/JWoc32PjwdhPthX9715RE=
|
||||
github.com/coreos/go-semver v0.3.0/go.mod h1:nnelYz7RCh+5ahJtPPxZlU+153eP4D4r3EedlOD2RNk=
|
||||
github.com/coreos/go-systemd v0.0.0-20181012123002-c6f51f82210d/go.mod h1:F5haX7vjVVG0kc13fIWeqUViNPyEJxv/OmvnBo0Yme4=
|
||||
github.com/coreos/go-systemd v0.0.0-20190321100706-95778dfbb74e/go.mod h1:F5haX7vjVVG0kc13fIWeqUViNPyEJxv/OmvnBo0Yme4=
|
||||
github.com/coreos/pkg v0.0.0-20180928190104-399ea9e2e55f/go.mod h1:E3G3o1h8I7cfcXa63jLwjI0eiQQMgzzUDFVpN/nH/eA=
|
||||
github.com/davecgh/go-spew v0.0.0-20171005155431-ecdeabc65495/go.mod h1:J7Y8YcW2NihsgmVo/mv3lAwl/skON4iLHjSsI+c5H38=
|
||||
github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.0/go.mod h1:J7Y8YcW2NihsgmVo/mv3lAwl/skON4iLHjSsI+c5H38=
|
||||
github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.1 h1:vj9j/u1bqnvCEfJOwUhtlOARqs3+rkHYY13jYWTU97c=
|
||||
github.com/davecgh/go-spew v1.1.1/go.mod h1:J7Y8YcW2NihsgmVo/mv3lAwl/skON4iLHjSsI+c5H38=
|
||||
github.com/dgrijalva/jwt-go v3.2.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:E3ru+11k8xSBh+hMPgOLZmtrrCbhqsmaPHjLKYnJCaQ=
|
||||
github.com/dgryski/go-sip13 v0.0.0-20181026042036-e10d5fee7954/go.mod h1:vAd38F8PWV+bWy6jNmig1y/TA+kYO4g3RSRF0IAv0no=
|
||||
github.com/dustin/go-humanize v1.0.0/go.mod h1:HtrtbFcZ19U5GC7JDqmcUSB87Iq5E25KnS6fMYU6eOk=
|
||||
github.com/fatih/color v1.7.0/go.mod h1:Zm6kSWBoL9eyXnKyktHP6abPY2pDugNf5KwzbycvMj4=
|
||||
github.com/fatih/structs v1.1.0/go.mod h1:9NiDSp5zOcgEDl+j00MP/WkGVPOlPRLejGD8Ga6PJ7M=
|
||||
|
|
@ -64,23 +93,31 @@ github.com/ghodss/yaml v1.0.0/go.mod h1:4dBDuWmgqj2HViK6kFavaiC9ZROes6MMH2rRYeME
|
|||
github.com/gliderlabs/ssh v0.1.1/go.mod h1:U7qILu1NlMHj9FlMhZLlkCdDnU1DBEAqr0aevW3Awn0=
|
||||
github.com/go-errors/errors v1.0.1 h1:LUHzmkK3GUKUrL/1gfBUxAHzcev3apQlezX/+O7ma6w=
|
||||
github.com/go-errors/errors v1.0.1/go.mod h1:f4zRHt4oKfwPJE5k8C9vpYG+aDHdBFUsgrm6/TyX73Q=
|
||||
github.com/go-gl/glfw v0.0.0-20190409004039-e6da0acd62b1/go.mod h1:vR7hzQXu2zJy9AVAgeJqvqgH9Q5CA+iKCZ2gyEVpxRU=
|
||||
github.com/go-ini/ini v1.38.2/go.mod h1:ByCAeIL28uOIIG0E3PJtZPDL8WnHpFKFOtgjp+3Ies8=
|
||||
github.com/go-ini/ini v1.48.0 h1:TvO60hO/2xgaaTWp2P0wUe4CFxwdMzfbkv3+343Xzqw=
|
||||
github.com/go-ini/ini v1.48.0/go.mod h1:ByCAeIL28uOIIG0E3PJtZPDL8WnHpFKFOtgjp+3Ies8=
|
||||
github.com/go-kit/kit v0.8.0/go.mod h1:xBxKIO96dXMWWy0MnWVtmwkA9/13aqxPnvrjFYMA2as=
|
||||
github.com/go-logfmt/logfmt v0.3.0/go.mod h1:Qt1PoO58o5twSAckw1HlFXLmHsOX5/0LbT9GBnD5lWE=
|
||||
github.com/go-logfmt/logfmt v0.4.0/go.mod h1:3RMwSq7FuexP4Kalkev3ejPJsZTpXXBr9+V4qmtdjCk=
|
||||
github.com/go-ole/go-ole v1.2.1/go.mod h1:7FAglXiTm7HKlQRDeOQ6ZNUHidzCWXuZWq/1dTyBNF8=
|
||||
github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation v3.5.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:gsEKFIVnabGBt6mXmxK0MoFy+cZoTJY6mu5Ll3LVLBU=
|
||||
github.com/go-ozzo/ozzo-validation v3.6.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:gsEKFIVnabGBt6mXmxK0MoFy+cZoTJY6mu5Ll3LVLBU=
|
||||
github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.4.1 h1:g24URVg0OFbNUTx9qqY1IRZ9D9z3iPyi5zKhQZpNwpA=
|
||||
github.com/go-sql-driver/mysql v1.4.1/go.mod h1:zAC/RDZ24gD3HViQzih4MyKcchzm+sOG5ZlKdlhCg5w=
|
||||
github.com/go-stack/stack v1.8.0/go.mod h1:v0f6uXyyMGvRgIKkXu+yp6POWl0qKG85gN/melR3HDY=
|
||||
github.com/gofrs/uuid v3.2.0+incompatible h1:y12jRkkFxsd7GpqdSZ+/KCs/fJbqpEXSGd4+jfEaewE=
|
||||
github.com/gofrs/uuid v3.2.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:b2aQJv3Z4Fp6yNu3cdSllBxTCLRxnplIgP/c0N/04lM=
|
||||
github.com/gogo/protobuf v1.1.1/go.mod h1:r8qH/GZQm5c6nD/R0oafs1akxWv10x8SbQlK7atdtwQ=
|
||||
github.com/gogo/protobuf v1.2.1/go.mod h1:hp+jE20tsWTFYpLwKvXlhS1hjn+gTNwPg2I6zVXpSg4=
|
||||
github.com/golang/glog v0.0.0-20160126235308-23def4e6c14b/go.mod h1:SBH7ygxi8pfUlaOkMMuAQtPIUF8ecWP5IEl/CR7VP2Q=
|
||||
github.com/golang/groupcache v0.0.0-20190129154638-5b532d6fd5ef/go.mod h1:cIg4eruTrX1D+g88fzRXU5OdNfaM+9IcxsU14FzY7Hc=
|
||||
github.com/golang/groupcache v0.0.0-20190702054246-869f871628b6/go.mod h1:cIg4eruTrX1D+g88fzRXU5OdNfaM+9IcxsU14FzY7Hc=
|
||||
github.com/golang/groupcache v0.0.0-20191027212112-611e8accdfc9/go.mod h1:cIg4eruTrX1D+g88fzRXU5OdNfaM+9IcxsU14FzY7Hc=
|
||||
github.com/golang/lint v0.0.0-20180702182130-06c8688daad7/go.mod h1:tluoj9z5200jBnyusfRPU2LqT6J+DAorxEvtC7LHB+E=
|
||||
github.com/golang/mock v1.1.1/go.mod h1:oTYuIxOrZwtPieC+H1uAHpcLFnEyAGVDL/k47Jfbm0A=
|
||||
github.com/golang/mock v1.2.0/go.mod h1:oTYuIxOrZwtPieC+H1uAHpcLFnEyAGVDL/k47Jfbm0A=
|
||||
github.com/golang/mock v1.3.1/go.mod h1:sBzyDLLjw3U8JLTeZvSv8jJB+tU5PVekmnlKIyFUx0Y=
|
||||
github.com/golang/mock v1.4.0 h1:Rd1kQnQu0Hq3qvJppYSG0HtP+f5LPPUiDswTLiEegLg=
|
||||
github.com/golang/mock v1.4.0/go.mod h1:UOMv5ysSaYNkG+OFQykRIcU/QvvxJf3p21QfJ2Bt3cw=
|
||||
github.com/golang/mock v1.4.4 h1:l75CXGRSwbaYNpl/Z2X1XIIAMSCquvXgpVZDhwEIJsc=
|
||||
|
|
@ -109,10 +146,15 @@ github.com/google/go-github v17.0.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:zLgOLi98H3fifZn+44m+u
|
|||
github.com/google/go-querystring v1.0.0/go.mod h1:odCYkC5MyYFN7vkCjXpyrEuKhc/BUO6wN/zVPAxq5ck=
|
||||
github.com/google/gops v0.3.7 h1:KtVAagOM0FIq+02DiQrKBTnLhYpWBMowaufcj+W1Exw=
|
||||
github.com/google/gops v0.3.7/go.mod h1:bj0cwMmX1X4XIJFTjR99R5sCxNssNJ8HebFNvoQlmgY=
|
||||
github.com/google/martian v2.1.0+incompatible h1:/CP5g8u/VJHijgedC/Legn3BAbAaWPgecwXBIDzw5no=
|
||||
github.com/google/martian v2.1.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:9I4somxYTbIHy5NJKHRl3wXiIaQGbYVAs8BPL6v8lEs=
|
||||
github.com/google/pprof v0.0.0-20181206194817-3ea8567a2e57/go.mod h1:zfwlbNMJ+OItoe0UupaVj+oy1omPYYDuagoSzA8v9mc=
|
||||
github.com/google/pprof v0.0.0-20190515194954-54271f7e092f/go.mod h1:zfwlbNMJ+OItoe0UupaVj+oy1omPYYDuagoSzA8v9mc=
|
||||
github.com/google/renameio v0.1.0/go.mod h1:KWCgfxg9yswjAJkECMjeO8J8rahYeXnNhOm40UhjYkI=
|
||||
github.com/googleapis/gax-go v2.0.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:SFVmujtThgffbyetf+mdk2eWhX2bMyUtNHzFKcPA9HY=
|
||||
github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2 v2.0.3/go.mod h1:LLvjysVCY1JZeum8Z6l8qUty8fiNwE08qbEPm1M08qg=
|
||||
github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2 v2.0.4/go.mod h1:0Wqv26UfaUD9n4G6kQubkQ+KchISgw+vpHVxEJEs9eg=
|
||||
github.com/googleapis/gax-go/v2 v2.0.5/go.mod h1:DWXyrwAJ9X0FpwwEdw+IPEYBICEFu5mhpdKc/us6bOk=
|
||||
github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs v0.0.0-20181017120253-0766667cb4d1/go.mod h1:wJfORRmW1u3UXTncJ5qlYoELFm8eSnnEO6hX4iZ3EWY=
|
||||
github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs v0.0.0-20181103185306-d547d1d9531e/go.mod h1:wJfORRmW1u3UXTncJ5qlYoELFm8eSnnEO6hX4iZ3EWY=
|
||||
github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs v0.0.0-20190915194858-d3ddacdb130f h1:TyqzGm2z1h3AGhjOoRYyeLcW4WlW81MDQkWa+rx/000=
|
||||
|
|
@ -129,11 +171,19 @@ github.com/gorilla/schema v1.0.2/go.mod h1:kgLaKoK1FELgZqMAVxx/5cbj0kT+57qxUrAlI
|
|||
github.com/gorilla/websocket v1.2.0/go.mod h1:E7qHFY5m1UJ88s3WnNqhKjPHQ0heANvMoAMk2YaljkQ=
|
||||
github.com/gorilla/websocket v1.4.1 h1:q7AeDBpnBk8AogcD4DSag/Ukw/KV+YhzLj2bP5HvKCM=
|
||||
github.com/gorilla/websocket v1.4.1/go.mod h1:YR8l580nyteQvAITg2hZ9XVh4b55+EU/adAjf1fMHhE=
|
||||
github.com/gorilla/websocket v1.4.2 h1:+/TMaTYc4QFitKJxsQ7Yye35DkWvkdLcvGKqM+x0Ufc=
|
||||
github.com/gorilla/websocket v1.4.2/go.mod h1:YR8l580nyteQvAITg2hZ9XVh4b55+EU/adAjf1fMHhE=
|
||||
github.com/gregjones/httpcache v0.0.0-20180305231024-9cad4c3443a7/go.mod h1:FecbI9+v66THATjSRHfNgh1IVFe/9kFxbXtjV0ctIMA=
|
||||
github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-middleware v1.0.0/go.mod h1:FiyG127CGDf3tlThmgyCl78X/SZQqEOJBCDaAfeWzPs=
|
||||
github.com/grpc-ecosystem/go-grpc-prometheus v1.2.0/go.mod h1:8NvIoxWQoOIhqOTXgfV/d3M/q6VIi02HzZEHgUlZvzk=
|
||||
github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway v1.5.0/go.mod h1:RSKVYQBd5MCa4OVpNdGskqpgL2+G+NZTnrVHpWWfpdw=
|
||||
github.com/grpc-ecosystem/grpc-gateway v1.9.0/go.mod h1:vNeuVxBJEsws4ogUvrchl83t/GYV9WGTSLVdBhOQFDY=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/consul/api v1.1.0/go.mod h1:VmuI/Lkw1nC05EYQWNKwWGbkg+FbDBtguAZLlVdkD9Q=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/consul/sdk v0.1.1/go.mod h1:VKf9jXwCTEY1QZP2MOLRhb5i/I/ssyNV1vwHyQBF0x8=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/errwrap v1.0.0 h1:hLrqtEDnRye3+sgx6z4qVLNuviH3MR5aQ0ykNJa/UYA=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/errwrap v1.0.0/go.mod h1:YH+1FKiLXxHSkmPseP+kNlulaMuP3n2brvKWEqk/Jc4=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp v0.5.0/go.mod h1:JpRdi6/HCYpAwUzNwuwqhbovhLtngrth3wmdIIUrZ80=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-cleanhttp v0.5.1/go.mod h1:JpRdi6/HCYpAwUzNwuwqhbovhLtngrth3wmdIIUrZ80=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-immutable-radix v1.0.0 h1:AKDB1HM5PWEA7i4nhcpwOrO2byshxBjXVn/J/3+z5/0=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-immutable-radix v1.0.0/go.mod h1:0y9vanUI8NX6FsYoO3zeMjhV/C5i9g4Q3DwcSNZ4P60=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-msgpack v0.5.3/go.mod h1:ahLV/dePpqEmjfWmKiqvPkv/twdG7iPBM1vqhUKIvfM=
|
||||
|
|
@ -142,6 +192,7 @@ github.com/hashicorp/go-msgpack v0.5.5/go.mod h1:ahLV/dePpqEmjfWmKiqvPkv/twdG7iP
|
|||
github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror v1.0.0 h1:iVjPR7a6H0tWELX5NxNe7bYopibicUzc7uPribsnS6o=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-multierror v1.0.0/go.mod h1:dHtQlpGsu+cZNNAkkCN/P3hoUDHhCYQXV3UM06sGGrk=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-retryablehttp v0.5.3/go.mod h1:9B5zBasrRhHXnJnui7y6sL7es7NDiJgTc6Er0maI1Xs=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-rootcerts v1.0.0/go.mod h1:K6zTfqpRlCUIjkwsN4Z+hiSfzSTQa6eBIzfwKfwNnHU=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddr v1.0.0 h1:GeH6tui99pF4NJgfnhp+L6+FfobzVW3Ah46sLo0ICXs=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-sockaddr v1.0.0/go.mod h1:7Xibr9yA9JjQq1JpNB2Vw7kxv8xerXegt+ozgdvDeDU=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go-syslog v1.0.0/go.mod h1:qPfqrKkXGihmCqbJM2mZgkZGvKG1dFdvsLplgctolz4=
|
||||
|
|
@ -150,12 +201,13 @@ github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid v1.0.1 h1:fv1ep09latC32wFoVwnqcnKJGnMSdBanPczbHAYm1
|
|||
github.com/hashicorp/go-uuid v1.0.1/go.mod h1:6SBZvOh/SIDV7/2o3Jml5SYk/TvGqwFJ/bN7x4byOro=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/go.net v0.0.1/go.mod h1:hjKkEWcCURg++eb33jQU7oqQcI9XDCnUzHA0oac0k90=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.0/go.mod h1:/m3WP610KZHVQ1SGc6re/UDhFvYD7pJ4Ao+sR/qLZy8=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.3 h1:YPkqC67at8FYaadspW/6uE0COsBxS2656RLEr8Bppgk=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.3/go.mod h1:iADmTwqILo4mZ8BN3D2Q6+9jd8WM5uGBxy+E8yxSoD4=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.1/go.mod h1:/m3WP610KZHVQ1SGc6re/UDhFvYD7pJ4Ao+sR/qLZy8=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.4 h1:YDjusn29QI/Das2iO9M0BHnIbxPeyuCHsjMW+lJfyTc=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru v0.5.4/go.mod h1:iADmTwqILo4mZ8BN3D2Q6+9jd8WM5uGBxy+E8yxSoD4=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/hcl v0.0.0-20180404174102-ef8a98b0bbce h1:xdsDDbiBDQTKASoGEZ+pEmF1OnWuu8AQ9I8iNbHNeno=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/hcl v0.0.0-20180404174102-ef8a98b0bbce/go.mod h1:oZtUIOe8dh44I2q6ScRibXws4Ajl+d+nod3AaR9vL5w=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/hcl v1.0.0 h1:0Anlzjpi4vEasTeNFn2mLJgTSwt0+6sfsiTG8qcWGx4=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/hcl v1.0.0/go.mod h1:E5yfLk+7swimpb2L/Alb/PJmXilQ/rhwaUYs4T20WEQ=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/logutils v1.0.0/go.mod h1:QIAnNjmIWmVIIkWDTG1z5v++HQmx9WQRO+LraFDTW64=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/mdns v1.0.0/go.mod h1:tL+uN++7HEJ6SQLQ2/p+z2pH24WQKWjBPkE0mNTz8vQ=
|
||||
github.com/hashicorp/memberlist v0.1.3/go.mod h1:ajVTdAv/9Im8oMAAj5G31PhhMCZJV2pPBoIllUwCN7I=
|
||||
|
|
@ -179,6 +231,7 @@ github.com/johntdyer/slack-go v0.0.0-20180213144715-95fac1160b22/go.mod h1:u0Jo4
|
|||
github.com/johntdyer/slackrus v0.0.0-20170926115001-3992f319fd0a/go.mod h1:j1kV/8f3jowErEq4XyeypkCdvg5EeHkf0YCKCcq5Ybo=
|
||||
github.com/johntdyer/slackrus v0.0.0-20180518184837-f7aae3243a07 h1:+kBG/8rjCa6vxJZbUjAiE4MQmBEBYc8nLEb51frnvBY=
|
||||
github.com/johntdyer/slackrus v0.0.0-20180518184837-f7aae3243a07/go.mod h1:j1kV/8f3jowErEq4XyeypkCdvg5EeHkf0YCKCcq5Ybo=
|
||||
github.com/jonboulle/clockwork v0.1.0/go.mod h1:Ii8DK3G1RaLaWxj9trq07+26W01tbo22gdxWY5EU2bo=
|
||||
github.com/jrick/logrotate v1.0.0/go.mod h1:LNinyqDIJnpAur+b8yyulnQw/wDuN1+BYKlTRt3OuAQ=
|
||||
github.com/json-iterator/go v1.1.6/go.mod h1:+SdeFBvtyEkXs7REEP0seUULqWtbJapLOCVDaaPEHmU=
|
||||
github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report v0.0.0-20190106144839-af01ea7f8024/go.mod h1:6v2b51hI/fHJwM22ozAgKL4VKDeJcHhJFhtBdhmNjmU=
|
||||
|
|
@ -186,17 +239,20 @@ github.com/jteeuwen/go-bindata v3.0.7+incompatible/go.mod h1:JVvhzYOiGBnFSYRyV00
|
|||
github.com/jtolds/gls v4.2.1+incompatible/go.mod h1:QJZ7F/aHp+rZTRtaJ1ow/lLfFfVYBRgL+9YlvaHOwJU=
|
||||
github.com/jtolds/gls v4.20.0+incompatible h1:xdiiI2gbIgH/gLH7ADydsJ1uDOEzR8yvV7C0MuV77Wo=
|
||||
github.com/jtolds/gls v4.20.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:QJZ7F/aHp+rZTRtaJ1ow/lLfFfVYBRgL+9YlvaHOwJU=
|
||||
github.com/julienschmidt/httprouter v1.2.0/go.mod h1:SYymIcj16QtmaHHD7aYtjjsJG7VTCxuUUipMqKk8s4w=
|
||||
github.com/kardianos/osext v0.0.0-20170510131534-ae77be60afb1 h1:PJPDf8OUfOK1bb/NeTKd4f1QXZItOX389VN3B6qC8ro=
|
||||
github.com/kardianos/osext v0.0.0-20170510131534-ae77be60afb1/go.mod h1:1NbS8ALrpOvjt0rHPNLyCIeMtbizbir8U//inJ+zuB8=
|
||||
github.com/karrick/godirwalk v1.16.1 h1:DynhcF+bztK8gooS0+NDJFrdNZjJ3gzVzC545UNA9iw=
|
||||
github.com/karrick/godirwalk v1.16.1/go.mod h1:j4mkqPuvaLI8mp1DroR3P6ad7cyYd4c1qeJ3RV7ULlk=
|
||||
github.com/keybase/go-ps v0.0.0-20161005175911-668c8856d999/go.mod h1:hY+WOq6m2FpbvyrI93sMaypsttvaIL5nhVR92dTMUcQ=
|
||||
github.com/kisielk/errcheck v1.1.0/go.mod h1:EZBBE59ingxPouuu3KfxchcWSUPOHkagtvWXihfKN4Q=
|
||||
github.com/kisielk/gotool v1.0.0/go.mod h1:XhKaO+MFFWcvkIS/tQcRk01m1F5IRFswLeQ+oQHNcck=
|
||||
github.com/kkdai/bstream v0.0.0-20161212061736-f391b8402d23/go.mod h1:J+Gs4SYgM6CZQHDETBtE9HaSEkGmuNXF86RwHhHUvq4=
|
||||
github.com/konsorten/go-windows-terminal-sequences v1.0.1/go.mod h1:T0+1ngSBFLxvqU3pZ+m/2kptfBszLMUkC4ZK/EgS/cQ=
|
||||
github.com/konsorten/go-windows-terminal-sequences v1.0.2 h1:DB17ag19krx9CFsz4o3enTrPXyIXCl+2iCXH/aMAp9s=
|
||||
github.com/konsorten/go-windows-terminal-sequences v1.0.2/go.mod h1:T0+1ngSBFLxvqU3pZ+m/2kptfBszLMUkC4ZK/EgS/cQ=
|
||||
github.com/kr/fs v0.1.0/go.mod h1:FFnZGqtBN9Gxj7eW1uZ42v5BccTP0vu6NEaFoC2HwRg=
|
||||
github.com/kr/logfmt v0.0.0-20140226030751-b84e30acd515/go.mod h1:+0opPa2QZZtGFBFZlji/RkVcI2GknAs/DXo4wKdlNEc=
|
||||
github.com/kr/pretty v0.1.0 h1:L/CwN0zerZDmRFUapSPitk6f+Q3+0za1rQkzVuMiMFI=
|
||||
github.com/kr/pretty v0.1.0/go.mod h1:dAy3ld7l9f0ibDNOQOHHMYYIIbhfbHSm3C4ZsoJORNo=
|
||||
github.com/kr/pty v1.1.1/go.mod h1:pFQYn66WHrOpPYNljwOMqo10TkYh1fy3cYio2l3bCsQ=
|
||||
|
|
@ -222,8 +278,8 @@ github.com/lbryio/types v0.0.0-20191009145016-1bb8107e04f8/go.mod h1:CG3wsDv5BiV
|
|||
github.com/lbryio/types v0.0.0-20191228214437-05a22073b4ec h1:2xk/qg4VTOCJ8RzV/ED5AKqDcJ00zVb08ltf9V+sr3c=
|
||||
github.com/lbryio/types v0.0.0-20191228214437-05a22073b4ec/go.mod h1:CG3wsDv5BiVYQd5i1Jp7wGsaVyjZTJshqXeWMVKsISE=
|
||||
github.com/lib/pq v1.1.1/go.mod h1:5WUZQaWbwv1U+lTReE5YruASi9Al49XbQIvNi/34Woo=
|
||||
github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go v0.18.1 h1:DMR7guC0NtVS8zNZR3IO7NARZvZygkSC56GGtC6cyys=
|
||||
github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go v0.18.1/go.mod h1:yXttHsSNxQi8AWijC/vLP+OJczXqzHSOcJrM5ITUlCg=
|
||||
github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go v0.19.3 h1:eCDQqvGBB+kCTkA0XrAFtNe81FMa0/fn4QSoeAbmiF4=
|
||||
github.com/lucas-clemente/quic-go v0.19.3/go.mod h1:ADXpNbTQjq1hIzCpB+y/k5iz4n4z4IwqoLb94Kh5Hu8=
|
||||
github.com/lunixbochs/vtclean v1.0.0/go.mod h1:pHhQNgMf3btfWnGBVipUOjRYhoOsdGqdm/+2c2E2WMI=
|
||||
github.com/lusis/go-slackbot v0.0.0-20180109053408-401027ccfef5/go.mod h1:c2mYKRyMb1BPkO5St0c/ps62L4S0W2NAkaTXj9qEI+0=
|
||||
github.com/lusis/slack-test v0.0.0-20180109053238-3c758769bfa6/go.mod h1:sFlOUpQL1YcjhFVXhg1CG8ZASEs/Mf1oVb6H75JL/zg=
|
||||
|
|
@ -231,13 +287,15 @@ github.com/lyoshenka/bencode v0.0.0-20180323155644-b7abd7672df5 h1:mG83tLXWSRdcX
|
|||
github.com/lyoshenka/bencode v0.0.0-20180323155644-b7abd7672df5/go.mod h1:H0aPCWffGOaDcjkw1iB7W9DVLp6GXmfcJY/7YZCWPA4=
|
||||
github.com/magiconair/properties v1.8.0 h1:LLgXmsheXeRoUOBOjtwPQCWIYqM/LU1ayDtDePerRcY=
|
||||
github.com/magiconair/properties v1.8.0/go.mod h1:PppfXfuXeibc/6YijjN8zIbojt8czPbwD3XqdrwzmxQ=
|
||||
github.com/magiconair/properties v1.8.1 h1:ZC2Vc7/ZFkGmsVC9KvOjumD+G5lXy2RtTKyzRKO2BQ4=
|
||||
github.com/magiconair/properties v1.8.1/go.mod h1:PppfXfuXeibc/6YijjN8zIbojt8czPbwD3XqdrwzmxQ=
|
||||
github.com/mailru/easyjson v0.0.0-20190312143242-1de009706dbe/go.mod h1:C1wdFJiN94OJF2b5HbByQZoLdCWB1Yqtg26g4irojpc=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qpack v0.2.0 h1:/r1rhZoOmgxVKBqPNnYilZBDEyw+6OUHCbBzA5jc2y0=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qpack v0.2.0/go.mod h1:F7Gl5L1jIgN1D11ucXefiuJS9UMVP2opoCp2jDKb7wc=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qpack v0.2.1 h1:jvTsT/HpCn2UZJdP+UUB53FfUUgeOyG5K1ns0OJOGVs=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qpack v0.2.1/go.mod h1:F7Gl5L1jIgN1D11ucXefiuJS9UMVP2opoCp2jDKb7wc=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qtls v0.10.0 h1:ECsuYUKalRL240rRD4Ri33ISb7kAQ3qGDlrrl55b2pc=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qtls v0.10.0/go.mod h1:UvMd1oaYDACI99/oZUYLzMCkBXQVT0aGm99sJhbT8hs=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qtls-go1-15 v0.1.0 h1:i/YPXVxz8q9umso/5y474CNcHmTpA+5DH+mFPjx6PZg=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qtls-go1-15 v0.1.0/go.mod h1:GyFwywLKkRt+6mfU99csTEY1joMZz5vmB1WNZH3P81I=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qtls-go1-15 v0.1.1 h1:LIH6K34bPVttyXnUWixk0bzH6/N07VxbSabxn5A5gZQ=
|
||||
github.com/marten-seemann/qtls-go1-15 v0.1.1/go.mod h1:GyFwywLKkRt+6mfU99csTEY1joMZz5vmB1WNZH3P81I=
|
||||
github.com/mattn/go-colorable v0.0.9/go.mod h1:9vuHe8Xs5qXnSaW/c/ABM9alt+Vo+STaOChaDxuIBZU=
|
||||
github.com/mattn/go-isatty v0.0.3/go.mod h1:M+lRXTBqGeGNdLjl/ufCoiOlB5xdOkqRJdNxMWT7Zi4=
|
||||
github.com/mattn/go-sqlite3 v1.10.0/go.mod h1:FPy6KqzDD04eiIsT53CuJW3U88zkxoIYsOqkbpncsNc=
|
||||
|
|
@ -247,6 +305,8 @@ github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday v1.0.1/go.mod h1:hsXNsILzKxV+sX77C5b8FSuKF00v
|
|||
github.com/miekg/dns v1.0.14 h1:9jZdLNd/P4+SfEJ0TNyxYpsK8N4GtfylBLqtbYN1sbA=
|
||||
github.com/miekg/dns v1.0.14/go.mod h1:W1PPwlIAgtquWBMBEV9nkV9Cazfe8ScdGz/Lj7v3Nrg=
|
||||
github.com/mitchellh/cli v1.0.0/go.mod h1:hNIlj7HEI86fIcpObd7a0FcrxTWetlwJDGcceTlRvqc=
|
||||
github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir v1.0.0/go.mod h1:SfyaCUpYCn1Vlf4IUYiD9fPX4A5wJrkLzIz1N1q0pr0=
|
||||
github.com/mitchellh/go-testing-interface v1.0.0/go.mod h1:kRemZodwjscx+RGhAo8eIhFbs2+BFgRtFPeD/KE+zxI=
|
||||
github.com/mitchellh/gox v0.4.0/go.mod h1:Sd9lOJ0+aimLBi73mGofS1ycjY8lL3uZM3JPS42BGNg=
|
||||
github.com/mitchellh/iochan v1.0.0/go.mod h1:JwYml1nuB7xOzsp52dPpHFffvOCDupsG0QubkSMEySY=
|
||||
github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure v0.0.0-20160808181253-ca63d7c062ee/go.mod h1:FVVH3fgwuzCH5S8UJGiWEs2h04kUh9fWfEaFds41c1Y=
|
||||
|
|
@ -255,6 +315,7 @@ github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure v1.1.2 h1:fmNYVwqnSfB9mZU6OS2O6GsXM+wcskZDuKQz
|
|||
github.com/mitchellh/mapstructure v1.1.2/go.mod h1:FVVH3fgwuzCH5S8UJGiWEs2h04kUh9fWfEaFds41c1Y=
|
||||
github.com/modern-go/concurrent v0.0.0-20180306012644-bacd9c7ef1dd/go.mod h1:6dJC0mAP4ikYIbvyc7fijjWJddQyLn8Ig3JB5CqoB9Q=
|
||||
github.com/modern-go/reflect2 v1.0.1/go.mod h1:bx2lNnkwVCuqBIxFjflWJWanXIb3RllmbCylyMrvgv0=
|
||||
github.com/mwitkow/go-conntrack v0.0.0-20161129095857-cc309e4a2223/go.mod h1:qRWi+5nqEBWmkhHvq77mSJWrCKwh8bxhgT7d/eI7P4U=
|
||||
github.com/neelance/astrewrite v0.0.0-20160511093645-99348263ae86/go.mod h1:kHJEU3ofeGjhHklVoIGuVj85JJwZ6kWPaJwCIxgnFmo=
|
||||
github.com/neelance/sourcemap v0.0.0-20151028013722-8c68805598ab/go.mod h1:Qr6/a/Q4r9LP1IltGz7tA7iOK1WonHEYhu1HRBA7ZiM=
|
||||
github.com/nlopes/slack v0.5.0/go.mod h1:jVI4BBK3lSktibKahxBF74txcK2vyvkza1z/+rRnVAM=
|
||||
|
|
@ -262,6 +323,7 @@ github.com/nlopes/slack v0.6.0 h1:jt0jxVQGhssx1Ib7naAOZEZcGdtIhTzkP0nopK0AsRA=
|
|||
github.com/nlopes/slack v0.6.0/go.mod h1:JzQ9m3PMAqcpeCam7UaHSuBuupz7CmpjehYMayT6YOk=
|
||||
github.com/nxadm/tail v1.4.4 h1:DQuhQpB1tVlglWS2hLQ5OV6B5r8aGxSrPc5Qo6uTN78=
|
||||
github.com/nxadm/tail v1.4.4/go.mod h1:kenIhsEOeOJmVchQTgglprH7qJGnHDVpk1VPCcaMI8A=
|
||||
github.com/oklog/ulid v1.3.1/go.mod h1:CirwcVhetQ6Lv90oh/F+FBtV6XMibvdAFo93nm5qn4U=
|
||||
github.com/onsi/ginkgo v1.6.0/go.mod h1:lLunBs/Ym6LB5Z9jYTR76FiuTmxDTDusOGeTQH+WWjE=
|
||||
github.com/onsi/ginkgo v1.7.0/go.mod h1:lLunBs/Ym6LB5Z9jYTR76FiuTmxDTDusOGeTQH+WWjE=
|
||||
github.com/onsi/ginkgo v1.10.2/go.mod h1:lLunBs/Ym6LB5Z9jYTR76FiuTmxDTDusOGeTQH+WWjE=
|
||||
|
|
@ -290,16 +352,30 @@ github.com/pmezard/go-difflib v1.0.0 h1:4DBwDE0NGyQoBHbLQYPwSUPoCMWR5BEzIk/f1lZb
|
|||
github.com/pmezard/go-difflib v1.0.0/go.mod h1:iKH77koFhYxTK1pcRnkKkqfTogsbg7gZNVY4sRDYZ/4=
|
||||
github.com/posener/complete v1.1.1/go.mod h1:em0nMJCgc9GFtwrmVmEMR/ZL6WyhyjMBndrE9hABlRI=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.8.0/go.mod h1:7SWBe2y4D6OKWSNQJUaRYU/AaXPKyh/dDVn+NZz0KFw=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.1/go.mod h1:7SWBe2y4D6OKWSNQJUaRYU/AaXPKyh/dDVn+NZz0KFw=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.2 h1:awm861/B8OKDd2I/6o1dy3ra4BamzKhYOiGItCeZ740=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.2/go.mod h1:OsXs2jCmiKlQ1lTBmv21f2mNfw4xf/QclQDMrYNZzcM=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.3 h1:9iH4JKXLzFbOAdtqv/a+j8aewx2Y8lAjAydhbaScPF8=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_golang v0.9.3/go.mod h1:/TN21ttK/J9q6uSwhBd54HahCDft0ttaMvbicHlPoso=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_model v0.0.0-20180712105110-5c3871d89910 h1:idejC8f05m9MGOsuEi1ATq9shN03HrxNkD/luQvxCv8=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_model v0.0.0-20180712105110-5c3871d89910/go.mod h1:MbSGuTsp3dbXC40dX6PRTWyKYBIrTGTE9sqQNg2J8bo=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_model v0.0.0-20190129233127-fd36f4220a90 h1:S/YWwWx/RA8rT8tKFRuGUZhuA90OyIBpPCXkcbwU8DE=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/client_model v0.0.0-20190129233127-fd36f4220a90/go.mod h1:xMI15A0UPsDsEKsMN9yxemIoYk6Tm2C1GtYGdfGttqA=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/common v0.0.0-20180801064454-c7de2306084e/go.mod h1:daVV7qP5qjZbuso7PdcryaAu0sAZbrN9i7WWcTMWvro=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/common v0.0.0-20181113130724-41aa239b4cce/go.mod h1:daVV7qP5qjZbuso7PdcryaAu0sAZbrN9i7WWcTMWvro=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/common v0.0.0-20181126121408-4724e9255275 h1:PnBWHBf+6L0jOqq0gIVUe6Yk0/QMZ640k6NvkxcBf+8=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/common v0.0.0-20181126121408-4724e9255275/go.mod h1:daVV7qP5qjZbuso7PdcryaAu0sAZbrN9i7WWcTMWvro=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/common v0.4.0 h1:7etb9YClo3a6HjLzfl6rIQaU+FDfi0VSX39io3aQ+DM=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/common v0.4.0/go.mod h1:TNfzLD0ON7rHzMJeJkieUDPYmFC7Snx/y86RQel1bk4=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.0-20180725123919-05ee40e3a273/go.mod h1:c3At6R/oaqEKCNdg8wHV1ftS6bRYblBhIjjI8uT2IGk=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.0-20181005140218-185b4288413d/go.mod h1:c3At6R/oaqEKCNdg8wHV1ftS6bRYblBhIjjI8uT2IGk=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.0-20181204211112-1dc9a6cbc91a h1:9a8MnZMP0X2nLJdBg+pBmGgkJlSaKC2KaQmTCk1XDtE=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.0-20181204211112-1dc9a6cbc91a/go.mod h1:c3At6R/oaqEKCNdg8wHV1ftS6bRYblBhIjjI8uT2IGk=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.0-20190507164030-5867b95ac084 h1:sofwID9zm4tzrgykg80hfFph1mryUeLRsUfoocVVmRY=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/procfs v0.0.0-20190507164030-5867b95ac084/go.mod h1:TjEm7ze935MbeOT/UhFTIMYKhuLP4wbCsTZCD3I8kEA=
|
||||
github.com/prometheus/tsdb v0.7.1/go.mod h1:qhTCs0VvXwvX/y3TZrWD7rabWM+ijKTux40TwIPHuXU=
|
||||
github.com/rogpeppe/fastuuid v0.0.0-20150106093220-6724a57986af/go.mod h1:XWv6SoW27p1b0cqNHllgS5HIMJraePCO15w5zCzIWYg=
|
||||
github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal v1.3.0/go.mod h1:M8bDsm7K2OlrFYOpmOWEs/qY81heoFRclV5y23lUDJ4=
|
||||
github.com/rubenv/sql-migrate v0.0.0-20170330050058-38004e7a77f2/go.mod h1:WS0rl9eEliYI8DPnr3TOwz4439pay+qNgzJoVya/DmY=
|
||||
github.com/russross/blackfriday v1.5.2/go.mod h1:JO/DiYxRf+HjHt06OyowR9PTA263kcR/rfWxYHBV53g=
|
||||
github.com/ryanuber/columnize v0.0.0-20160712163229-9b3edd62028f/go.mod h1:sm1tb6uqfes/u+d4ooFouqFdy9/2g9QGwK3SQygK0Ts=
|
||||
|
|
@ -348,10 +424,15 @@ github.com/smartystreets/assertions v1.0.1/go.mod h1:kHHU4qYBaI3q23Pp3VPrmWhuIUr
|
|||
github.com/smartystreets/goconvey v0.0.0-20181108003508-044398e4856c/go.mod h1:XDJAKZRPZ1CvBcN2aX5YOUTYGHki24fSF0Iv48Ibg0s=
|
||||
github.com/smartystreets/goconvey v0.0.0-20190731233626-505e41936337 h1:WN9BUFbdyOsSH/XohnWpXOlq9NBD5sGAB2FciQMUEe8=
|
||||
github.com/smartystreets/goconvey v0.0.0-20190731233626-505e41936337/go.mod h1:syvi0/a8iFYH4r/RixwvyeAJjdLS9QV7WQ/tjFTllLA=
|
||||
github.com/smartystreets/goconvey v1.6.4 h1:fv0U8FUIMPNf1L9lnHLvLhgicrIVChEkdzIKYqbNC9s=
|
||||
github.com/smartystreets/goconvey v1.6.4/go.mod h1:syvi0/a8iFYH4r/RixwvyeAJjdLS9QV7WQ/tjFTllLA=
|
||||
github.com/soheilhy/cmux v0.1.4/go.mod h1:IM3LyeVVIOuxMH7sFAkER9+bJ4dT7Ms6E4xg4kGIyLM=
|
||||
github.com/sourcegraph/annotate v0.0.0-20160123013949-f4cad6c6324d/go.mod h1:UdhH50NIW0fCiwBSr0co2m7BnFLdv4fQTgdqdJTHFeE=
|
||||
github.com/sourcegraph/syntaxhighlight v0.0.0-20170531221838-bd320f5d308e/go.mod h1:HuIsMU8RRBOtsCgI77wP899iHVBQpCmg4ErYMZB+2IA=
|
||||
github.com/spaolacci/murmur3 v0.0.0-20180118202830-f09979ecbc72/go.mod h1:JwIasOWyU6f++ZhiEuf87xNszmSA2myDM2Kzu9HwQUA=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.1.1 h1:Lt3ihYMlE+lreX1GS4Qw4ZsNpYQLxIXKBTEOXm3nt6I=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.1.1/go.mod h1:j4pytiNVoe2o6bmDsKpLACNPDBIoEAkihy7loJ1B0CQ=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.1.2/go.mod h1:j4pytiNVoe2o6bmDsKpLACNPDBIoEAkihy7loJ1B0CQ=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.4.1 h1:asw9sl74539yqavKaglDM5hFpdJVK0Y5Dr/JOgQ89nQ=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/afero v1.4.1/go.mod h1:Ai8FlHk4v/PARR026UzYexafAt9roJ7LcLMAmO6Z93I=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/cast v1.2.0/go.mod h1:r2rcYCSwa1IExKTDiTfzaxqT2FNHs8hODu4LnUfgKEg=
|
||||
|
|
@ -361,18 +442,25 @@ github.com/spf13/cobra v0.0.3 h1:ZlrZ4XsMRm04Fr5pSFxBgfND2EBVa1nLpiy1stUsX/8=
|
|||
github.com/spf13/cobra v0.0.3/go.mod h1:1l0Ry5zgKvJasoi3XT1TypsSe7PqH0Sj9dhYf7v3XqQ=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman v0.0.0-20180109140146-7c0cea34c8ec h1:2ZXvIUGghLpdTVHR1UfvfrzoVlZaE/yOWC5LueIHZig=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman v0.0.0-20180109140146-7c0cea34c8ec/go.mod h1:cQK4TGJAtQXfYWX+Ddv3mKDzgVb68N+wFjFa4jdeBTo=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman v1.0.0 h1:XHEdyB+EcvlqZamSM4ZOMGlc93t6AcsBEu9Gc1vn7yk=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/jwalterweatherman v1.0.0/go.mod h1:cQK4TGJAtQXfYWX+Ddv3mKDzgVb68N+wFjFa4jdeBTo=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/pflag v1.0.1/go.mod h1:DYY7MBk1bdzusC3SYhjObp+wFpr4gzcvqqNjLnInEg4=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/pflag v1.0.3 h1:zPAT6CGy6wXeQ7NtTnaTerfKOsV6V6F8agHXFiazDkg=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/pflag v1.0.3/go.mod h1:DYY7MBk1bdzusC3SYhjObp+wFpr4gzcvqqNjLnInEg4=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/viper v1.0.2 h1:Ncr3ZIuJn322w2k1qmzXDnkLAdQMlJqBa9kfAH+irso=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/viper v1.0.2/go.mod h1:A8kyI5cUJhb8N+3pkfONlcEcZbueH6nhAm0Fq7SrnBM=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/viper v1.7.1 h1:pM5oEahlgWv/WnHXpgbKz7iLIxRf65tye2Ci+XFK5sk=
|
||||
github.com/spf13/viper v1.7.1/go.mod h1:8WkrPz2fc9jxqZNCJI/76HCieCp4Q8HaLFoCha5qpdg=
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/objx v0.1.0/go.mod h1:HFkY916IF+rwdDfMAkV7OtwuqBVzrE8GR6GFx+wExME=
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/objx v0.1.1/go.mod h1:HFkY916IF+rwdDfMAkV7OtwuqBVzrE8GR6GFx+wExME=
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/testify v1.2.2/go.mod h1:a8OnRcib4nhh0OaRAV+Yts87kKdq0PP7pXfy6kDkUVs=
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/testify v1.3.0/go.mod h1:M5WIy9Dh21IEIfnGCwXGc5bZfKNJtfHm1UVUgZn+9EI=
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/testify v1.4.0 h1:2E4SXV/wtOkTonXsotYi4li6zVWxYlZuYNCXe9XRJyk=
|
||||
github.com/stretchr/testify v1.4.0/go.mod h1:j7eGeouHqKxXV5pUuKE4zz7dFj8WfuZ+81PSLYec5m4=
|
||||
github.com/subosito/gotenv v1.2.0 h1:Slr1R9HxAlEKefgq5jn9U+DnETlIUa6HfgEzj0g5d7s=
|
||||
github.com/subosito/gotenv v1.2.0/go.mod h1:N0PQaV/YGNqwC0u51sEeR/aUtSLEXKX9iv69rRypqCw=
|
||||
github.com/tarm/serial v0.0.0-20180830185346-98f6abe2eb07/go.mod h1:kDXzergiv9cbyO7IOYJZWg1U88JhDg3PB6klq9Hg2pA=
|
||||
github.com/tmc/grpc-websocket-proxy v0.0.0-20190109142713-0ad062ec5ee5/go.mod h1:ncp9v5uamzpCO7NfCPTXjqaC+bZgJeR0sMTm6dMHP7U=
|
||||
github.com/tv42/httpunix v0.0.0-20150427012821-b75d8614f926/go.mod h1:9ESjWnEqriFuLhtthL60Sar/7RFoluCcXsuvEwTV5KM=
|
||||
github.com/uber-go/atomic v1.3.2/go.mod h1:/Ct5t2lcmbJ4OSe/waGBoaVvVqtO0bmtfVNex1PFV8g=
|
||||
github.com/viant/assertly v0.4.8/go.mod h1:aGifi++jvCrUaklKEKT0BU95igDNaqkvz+49uaYMPRU=
|
||||
|
|
@ -383,15 +471,21 @@ github.com/volatiletech/null v8.0.0+incompatible h1:7wP8m5d/gZ6kW/9GnrLtMCRre2dl
|
|||
github.com/volatiletech/null v8.0.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:0wD98JzdqB+rLyZ70fN05VDbXbafIb0KU0MdVhCzmOQ=
|
||||
github.com/volatiletech/sqlboiler v3.4.0+incompatible h1:saQ6WxZ9wEJp33q3w/DHs7an7SYi1H7Yzf4/moxCbJU=
|
||||
github.com/volatiletech/sqlboiler v3.4.0+incompatible/go.mod h1:jLfDkkHWPbS2cWRLkyC20vQWaIQsASEY7gM7zSo11Yw=
|
||||
github.com/xiang90/probing v0.0.0-20190116061207-43a291ad63a2/go.mod h1:UETIi67q53MR2AWcXfiuqkDkRtnGDLqkBTpCHuJHxtU=
|
||||
github.com/xlab/treeprint v0.0.0-20180616005107-d6fb6747feb6/go.mod h1:ce1O1j6UtZfjr22oyGxGLbauSBp2YVXpARAosm7dHBg=
|
||||
github.com/ybbus/jsonrpc v0.0.0-20180411222309-2a548b7d822d/go.mod h1:XJrh1eMSzdIYFbM08flv0wp5G35eRniyeGut1z+LSiE=
|
||||
github.com/ziutek/mymysql v1.5.4/go.mod h1:LMSpPZ6DbqWFxNCHW77HeMg9I646SAhApZ/wKdgO/C0=
|
||||
go.etcd.io/bbolt v1.3.2/go.mod h1:IbVyRI1SCnLcuJnV2u8VeU0CEYM7e686BmAb1XKL+uU=
|
||||
go.opencensus.io v0.18.0/go.mod h1:vKdFvxhtzZ9onBp9VKHK8z/sRpBMnKAsufL7wlDrCOA=
|
||||
go.opencensus.io v0.21.0/go.mod h1:mSImk1erAIZhrmZN+AvHh14ztQfjbGwt4TtuofqLduU=
|
||||
go.opencensus.io v0.22.0/go.mod h1:+kGneAE2xo2IficOXnaByMWTGM9T73dGwxeWcUqIpI8=
|
||||
go.opencensus.io v0.22.2/go.mod h1:yxeiOL68Rb0Xd1ddK5vPZ/oVn4vY4Ynel7k9FzqtOIw=
|
||||
go.uber.org/atomic v1.3.2/go.mod h1:gD2HeocX3+yG+ygLZcrzQJaqmWj9AIm7n08wl/qW/PE=
|
||||
go.uber.org/atomic v1.4.0/go.mod h1:gD2HeocX3+yG+ygLZcrzQJaqmWj9AIm7n08wl/qW/PE=
|
||||
go.uber.org/atomic v1.5.1 h1:rsqfU5vBkVknbhUGbAUwQKR2H4ItV8tjJ+6kJX4cxHM=
|
||||
go.uber.org/atomic v1.5.1/go.mod h1:sABNBOSYdrvTF6hTgEIbc7YasKWGhgEQZyfxyTvoXHQ=
|
||||
go.uber.org/multierr v1.1.0/go.mod h1:wR5kodmAFQ0UK8QlbwjlSNy0Z68gJhDJUG5sjR94q/0=
|
||||
go.uber.org/zap v1.10.0/go.mod h1:vwi/ZaCAaUcBkycHslxD9B2zi4UTXhF60s6SWpuDF0Q=
|
||||
go4.org v0.0.0-20180809161055-417644f6feb5/go.mod h1:MkTOUMDaeVYJUOUsaDXIhWPZYa1yOyC1qaOBpL57BhE=
|
||||
golang.org/x/build v0.0.0-20190111050920-041ab4dc3f9d/go.mod h1:OWs+y06UdEOHN4y+MfF/py+xQ/tYqIWW03b70/CG9Rw=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20170930174604-9419663f5a44/go.mod h1:6SG95UA2DQfeDnfUPMdvaQW0Q7yPrPDi9nlGo2tz2b4=
|
||||
|
|
@ -400,6 +494,7 @@ golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20181029021203-45a5f77698d3/go.mod h1:6SG95UA2DQfeDnf
|
|||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20181030102418-4d3f4d9ffa16/go.mod h1:6SG95UA2DQfeDnfUPMdvaQW0Q7yPrPDi9nlGo2tz2b4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20190308221718-c2843e01d9a2/go.mod h1:djNgcEr1/C05ACkg1iLfiJU5Ep61QUkGW8qpdssI0+w=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20190313024323-a1f597ede03a/go.mod h1:djNgcEr1/C05ACkg1iLfiJU5Ep61QUkGW8qpdssI0+w=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20190510104115-cbcb75029529/go.mod h1:yigFU9vqHzYiE8UmvKecakEJjdnWj3jj499lnFckfCI=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20190605123033-f99c8df09eb5/go.mod h1:yigFU9vqHzYiE8UmvKecakEJjdnWj3jj499lnFckfCI=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20190701094942-4def268fd1a4/go.mod h1:yigFU9vqHzYiE8UmvKecakEJjdnWj3jj499lnFckfCI=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20190820162420-60c769a6c586/go.mod h1:yigFU9vqHzYiE8UmvKecakEJjdnWj3jj499lnFckfCI=
|
||||
|
|
@ -409,13 +504,26 @@ golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20200221231518-2aa609cf4a9d/go.mod h1:LzIPMQfyMNhhGPh
|
|||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20200622213623-75b288015ac9 h1:psW17arqaxU48Z5kZ0CQnkZWQJsqcURM6tKiBApRjXI=
|
||||
golang.org/x/crypto v0.0.0-20200622213623-75b288015ac9/go.mod h1:LzIPMQfyMNhhGPhUkYOs5KpL4U8rLKemX1yGLhDgUto=
|
||||
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20190121172915-509febef88a4/go.mod h1:CJ0aWSM057203Lf6IL+f9T1iT9GByDxfZKAQTCR3kQA=
|
||||
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20190306152737-a1d7652674e8/go.mod h1:CJ0aWSM057203Lf6IL+f9T1iT9GByDxfZKAQTCR3kQA=
|
||||
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20190510132918-efd6b22b2522/go.mod h1:ZjyILWgesfNpC6sMxTJOJm9Kp84zZh5NQWvqDGG3Qr8=
|
||||
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20190829153037-c13cbed26979/go.mod h1:86+5VVa7VpoJ4kLfm080zCjGlMRFzhUhsZKEZO7MGek=
|
||||
golang.org/x/exp v0.0.0-20191030013958-a1ab85dbe136/go.mod h1:JXzH8nQsPlswgeRAPE3MuO9GYsAcnJvJ4vnMwN/5qkY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/image v0.0.0-20190227222117-0694c2d4d067/go.mod h1:kZ7UVZpmo3dzQBMxlp+ypCbDeSB+sBbTgSJuh5dn5js=
|
||||
golang.org/x/image v0.0.0-20190802002840-cff245a6509b/go.mod h1:FeLwcggjj3mMvU+oOTbSwawSJRM1uh48EjtB4UJZlP0=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20180702182130-06c8688daad7/go.mod h1:UVdnD1Gm6xHRNCYTkRU2/jEulfH38KcIWyp/GAMgvoE=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20181026193005-c67002cb31c3/go.mod h1:UVdnD1Gm6xHRNCYTkRU2/jEulfH38KcIWyp/GAMgvoE=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20190227174305-5b3e6a55c961/go.mod h1:wehouNa3lNwaWXcvxsM5YxQ5yQlVC4a0KAMCusXpPoU=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20190301231843-5614ed5bae6f/go.mod h1:UVdnD1Gm6xHRNCYTkRU2/jEulfH38KcIWyp/GAMgvoE=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20190313153728-d0100b6bd8b3/go.mod h1:6SW0HCj/g11FgYtHlgUYUwCkIfeOF89ocIRzGO/8vkc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20190409202823-959b441ac422/go.mod h1:6SW0HCj/g11FgYtHlgUYUwCkIfeOF89ocIRzGO/8vkc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20190909230951-414d861bb4ac/go.mod h1:6SW0HCj/g11FgYtHlgUYUwCkIfeOF89ocIRzGO/8vkc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20190930215403-16217165b5de/go.mod h1:6SW0HCj/g11FgYtHlgUYUwCkIfeOF89ocIRzGO/8vkc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20191125180803-fdd1cda4f05f h1:J5lckAjkw6qYlOZNj90mLYNTEKDvWeuc1yieZ8qUzUE=
|
||||
golang.org/x/lint v0.0.0-20191125180803-fdd1cda4f05f/go.mod h1:5qLYkcX4OjUUV8bRuDixDT3tpyyb+LUpUlRWLxfhWrs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/mobile v0.0.0-20190312151609-d3739f865fa6/go.mod h1:z+o9i4GpDbdi3rU15maQ/Ox0txvL9dWGYEHz965HBQE=
|
||||
golang.org/x/mobile v0.0.0-20190719004257-d2bd2a29d028/go.mod h1:E/iHnbuqvinMTCcRqshq8CkpyQDoeVncDDYHnLhea+o=
|
||||
golang.org/x/mod v0.0.0-20190513183733-4bf6d317e70e/go.mod h1:mXi4GBBbnImb6dmsKGUJ2LatrhH/nqhxcFungHvyanc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/mod v0.1.0/go.mod h1:0QHyrYULN0/3qlju5TqG8bIK38QM8yzMo5ekMj3DlcY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/mod v0.1.1-0.20191105210325-c90efee705ee/go.mod h1:QqPTAvyqsEbceGzBzNggFXnrqF1CaUcvgkdR5Ot7KZg=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20180724234803-3673e40ba225/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20180826012351-8a410e7b638d/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
|
|
@ -425,11 +533,14 @@ golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20181029044818-c44066c5c816/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73r
|
|||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20181106065722-10aee1819953/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20181114220301-adae6a3d119a/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20181201002055-351d144fa1fc/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20181220203305-927f97764cc3/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190108225652-1e06a53dbb7e/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190213061140-3a22650c66bd/go.mod h1:mL1N/T3taQHkDXs73rZJwtUhF3w3ftmwwsq0BUmARs4=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190311183353-d8887717615a/go.mod h1:t9HGtf8HONx5eT2rtn7q6eTqICYqUVnKs3thJo3Qplg=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190313220215-9f648a60d977/go.mod h1:t9HGtf8HONx5eT2rtn7q6eTqICYqUVnKs3thJo3Qplg=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190404232315-eb5bcb51f2a3/go.mod h1:t9HGtf8HONx5eT2rtn7q6eTqICYqUVnKs3thJo3Qplg=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190501004415-9ce7a6920f09/go.mod h1:t9HGtf8HONx5eT2rtn7q6eTqICYqUVnKs3thJo3Qplg=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190503192946-f4e77d36d62c/go.mod h1:t9HGtf8HONx5eT2rtn7q6eTqICYqUVnKs3thJo3Qplg=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190603091049-60506f45cf65/go.mod h1:HSz+uSET+XFnRR8LxR5pz3Of3rY3CfYBVs4xY44aLks=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190620200207-3b0461eec859/go.mod h1:z5CRVTTTmAJ677TzLLGU+0bjPO0LkuOLi4/5GtJWs/s=
|
||||
golang.org/x/net v0.0.0-20190813141303-74dc4d7220e7/go.mod h1:z5CRVTTTmAJ677TzLLGU+0bjPO0LkuOLi4/5GtJWs/s=
|
||||
|
|
@ -442,6 +553,7 @@ golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.0.0-20180821212333-d2e6202438be/go.mod h1:N/0e6XlmueqKjAG
|
|||
golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.0.0-20181017192945-9dcd33a902f4/go.mod h1:N/0e6XlmueqKjAGxoOufVs8QHGRruUQn6yWY3a++T0U=
|
||||
golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.0.0-20181203162652-d668ce993890/go.mod h1:N/0e6XlmueqKjAGxoOufVs8QHGRruUQn6yWY3a++T0U=
|
||||
golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.0.0-20190226205417-e64efc72b421/go.mod h1:gOpvHmFTYa4IltrdGE7lF6nIHvwfUNPOp7c8zoXwtLw=
|
||||
golang.org/x/oauth2 v0.0.0-20190604053449-0f29369cfe45/go.mod h1:gOpvHmFTYa4IltrdGE7lF6nIHvwfUNPOp7c8zoXwtLw=
|
||||
golang.org/x/perf v0.0.0-20180704124530-6e6d33e29852/go.mod h1:JLpeXjPJfIyPr5TlbXLkXWLhP8nz10XfvxElABhCtcw=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sync v0.0.0-20180314180146-1d60e4601c6f/go.mod h1:RxMgew5VJxzue5/jJTE5uejpjVlOe/izrB70Jof72aM=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sync v0.0.0-20181108010431-42b317875d0f/go.mod h1:RxMgew5VJxzue5/jJTE5uejpjVlOe/izrB70Jof72aM=
|
||||
|
|
@ -458,13 +570,18 @@ golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20180905080454-ebe1bf3edb33/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5h
|
|||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20180909124046-d0be0721c37e/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5hshtkjS+E42TnysNCUPdjciGhY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20181026203630-95b1ffbd15a5/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5hshtkjS+E42TnysNCUPdjciGhY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20181029174526-d69651ed3497/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5hshtkjS+E42TnysNCUPdjciGhY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20181107165924-66b7b1311ac8/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5hshtkjS+E42TnysNCUPdjciGhY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20181116152217-5ac8a444bdc5/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5hshtkjS+E42TnysNCUPdjciGhY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190215142949-d0b11bdaac8a/go.mod h1:STP8DvDyc/dI5b8T5hshtkjS+E42TnysNCUPdjciGhY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190312061237-fead79001313/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190316082340-a2f829d7f35f/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190412213103-97732733099d/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190422165155-953cdadca894/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190502145724-3ef323f4f1fd/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190507160741-ecd444e8653b/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190520201301-c432e742b0af/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190606165138-5da285871e9c/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190624142023-c5567b49c5d0/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190813064441-fde4db37ae7a/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20190904154756-749cb33beabd/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/sys v0.0.0-20191005200804-aed5e4c7ecf9/go.mod h1:h1NjWce9XRLGQEsW7wpKNCjG9DtNlClVuFLEZdDNbEs=
|
||||
|
|
@ -484,19 +601,30 @@ golang.org/x/text v0.3.3 h1:cokOdA+Jmi5PJGXLlLllQSgYigAEfHXJAERHVMaCc2k=
|
|||
golang.org/x/text v0.3.3/go.mod h1:5Zoc/QRtKVWzQhOtBMvqHzDpF6irO9z98xDceosuGiQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/time v0.0.0-20180412165947-fbb02b2291d2/go.mod h1:tRJNPiyCQ0inRvYxbN9jk5I+vvW/OXSQhTDSoE431IQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/time v0.0.0-20181108054448-85acf8d2951c/go.mod h1:tRJNPiyCQ0inRvYxbN9jk5I+vvW/OXSQhTDSoE431IQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/time v0.0.0-20190308202827-9d24e82272b4/go.mod h1:tRJNPiyCQ0inRvYxbN9jk5I+vvW/OXSQhTDSoE431IQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/time v0.0.0-20190921001708-c4c64cad1fd0 h1:xQwXv67TxFo9nC1GJFyab5eq/5B590r6RlnL/G8Sz7w=
|
||||
golang.org/x/time v0.0.0-20190921001708-c4c64cad1fd0/go.mod h1:tRJNPiyCQ0inRvYxbN9jk5I+vvW/OXSQhTDSoE431IQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20180221164845-07fd8470d635/go.mod h1:n7NCudcB/nEzxVGmLbDWY5pfWTLqBcC2KZ6jyYvM4mQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20180828015842-6cd1fcedba52/go.mod h1:n7NCudcB/nEzxVGmLbDWY5pfWTLqBcC2KZ6jyYvM4mQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20180917221912-90fa682c2a6e/go.mod h1:n7NCudcB/nEzxVGmLbDWY5pfWTLqBcC2KZ6jyYvM4mQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20181030000716-a0a13e073c7b/go.mod h1:n7NCudcB/nEzxVGmLbDWY5pfWTLqBcC2KZ6jyYvM4mQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190114222345-bf090417da8b/go.mod h1:n7NCudcB/nEzxVGmLbDWY5pfWTLqBcC2KZ6jyYvM4mQ=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190226205152-f727befe758c/go.mod h1:9Yl7xja0Znq3iFh3HoIrodX9oNMXvdceNzlUR8zjMvY=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190311212946-11955173bddd/go.mod h1:LCzVGOaR6xXOjkQ3onu1FJEFr0SW1gC7cKk1uF8kGRs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190312151545-0bb0c0a6e846/go.mod h1:LCzVGOaR6xXOjkQ3onu1FJEFr0SW1gC7cKk1uF8kGRs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190312170243-e65039ee4138/go.mod h1:LCzVGOaR6xXOjkQ3onu1FJEFr0SW1gC7cKk1uF8kGRs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190328211700-ab21143f2384/go.mod h1:LCzVGOaR6xXOjkQ3onu1FJEFr0SW1gC7cKk1uF8kGRs=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190425150028-36563e24a262/go.mod h1:RgjU9mgBXZiqYHBnxXauZ1Gv1EHHAz9KjViQ78xBX0Q=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190506145303-2d16b83fe98c/go.mod h1:RgjU9mgBXZiqYHBnxXauZ1Gv1EHHAz9KjViQ78xBX0Q=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190524140312-2c0ae7006135/go.mod h1:RgjU9mgBXZiqYHBnxXauZ1Gv1EHHAz9KjViQ78xBX0Q=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190606124116-d0a3d012864b/go.mod h1:/rFqwRUd4F7ZHNgwSSTFct+R/Kf4OFW1sUzUTQQTgfc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190621195816-6e04913cbbac/go.mod h1:/rFqwRUd4F7ZHNgwSSTFct+R/Kf4OFW1sUzUTQQTgfc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190628153133-6cdbf07be9d0/go.mod h1:/rFqwRUd4F7ZHNgwSSTFct+R/Kf4OFW1sUzUTQQTgfc=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190816200558-6889da9d5479/go.mod h1:b+2E5dAYhXwXZwtnZ6UAqBI28+e2cm9otk0dWdXHAEo=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20190911174233-4f2ddba30aff/go.mod h1:b+2E5dAYhXwXZwtnZ6UAqBI28+e2cm9otk0dWdXHAEo=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191012152004-8de300cfc20a/go.mod h1:b+2E5dAYhXwXZwtnZ6UAqBI28+e2cm9otk0dWdXHAEo=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191029041327-9cc4af7d6b2c/go.mod h1:b+2E5dAYhXwXZwtnZ6UAqBI28+e2cm9otk0dWdXHAEo=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191112195655-aa38f8e97acc/go.mod h1:b+2E5dAYhXwXZwtnZ6UAqBI28+e2cm9otk0dWdXHAEo=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191125144606-a911d9008d1f/go.mod h1:b+2E5dAYhXwXZwtnZ6UAqBI28+e2cm9otk0dWdXHAEo=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191227053925-7b8e75db28f4 h1:Toz2IK7k8rbltAXwNAxKcn9OzqyNfMUhUNjz3sL0NMk=
|
||||
golang.org/x/tools v0.0.0-20191227053925-7b8e75db28f4/go.mod h1:TB2adYChydJhpapKDTa4BR/hXlZSLoq2Wpct/0txZ28=
|
||||
|
|
@ -507,10 +635,17 @@ golang.org/x/xerrors v0.0.0-20191204190536-9bdfabe68543/go.mod h1:I/5z698sn9Ka8T
|
|||
google.golang.org/api v0.0.0-20180910000450-7ca32eb868bf/go.mod h1:4mhQ8q/RsB7i+udVvVy5NUi08OU8ZlA0gRVgrF7VFY0=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.0.0-20181030000543-1d582fd0359e/go.mod h1:4mhQ8q/RsB7i+udVvVy5NUi08OU8ZlA0gRVgrF7VFY0=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.1.0/go.mod h1:UGEZY7KEX120AnNLIHFMKIo4obdJhkp2tPbaPlQx13Y=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.4.0/go.mod h1:8k5glujaEP+g9n7WNsDg8QP6cUVNI86fCNMcbazEtwE=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.7.0/go.mod h1:WtwebWUNSVBH/HAw79HIFXZNqEvBhG+Ra+ax0hx3E3M=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.8.0/go.mod h1:o4eAsZoiT+ibD93RtjEohWalFOjRDx6CVaqeizhEnKg=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.9.0/go.mod h1:o4eAsZoiT+ibD93RtjEohWalFOjRDx6CVaqeizhEnKg=
|
||||
google.golang.org/api v0.13.0/go.mod h1:iLdEw5Ide6rF15KTC1Kkl0iskquN2gFfn9o9XIsbkAI=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.1.0/go.mod h1:EbEs0AVv82hx2wNQdGPgUI5lhzA/G0D9YwlJXL52JkM=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.2.0/go.mod h1:xpcJRLb0r/rnEns0DIKYYv+WjYCduHsrkT7/EB5XEv4=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.3.0/go.mod h1:xpcJRLb0r/rnEns0DIKYYv+WjYCduHsrkT7/EB5XEv4=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.4.0/go.mod h1:xpcJRLb0r/rnEns0DIKYYv+WjYCduHsrkT7/EB5XEv4=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.5.0/go.mod h1:xpcJRLb0r/rnEns0DIKYYv+WjYCduHsrkT7/EB5XEv4=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.1/go.mod h1:i06prIuMbXzDqacNJfV5OdTW448YApPu5ww/cMBSeb0=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.2 h1:j8RI1yW0SkI+paT6uGwMlrMI/6zwYA6/CFil8rxOzGI=
|
||||
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.2/go.mod h1:i06prIuMbXzDqacNJfV5OdTW448YApPu5ww/cMBSeb0=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20180817151627-c66870c02cf8/go.mod h1:JiN7NxoALGmiZfu7CAH4rXhgtRTLTxftemlI0sWmxmc=
|
||||
|
|
@ -519,13 +654,21 @@ google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20181004005441-af9cb2a35e7f/go.mod h1:JiN7NxoA
|
|||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20181029155118-b69ba1387ce2/go.mod h1:JiN7NxoALGmiZfu7CAH4rXhgtRTLTxftemlI0sWmxmc=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20181202183823-bd91e49a0898/go.mod h1:7Ep/1NZk928CDR8SjdVbjWNpdIf6nzjE3BTgJDr2Atg=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190306203927-b5d61aea6440/go.mod h1:VzzqZJRnGkLBvHegQrXjBqPurQTc5/KpmUdxsrq26oE=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190307195333-5fe7a883aa19/go.mod h1:VzzqZJRnGkLBvHegQrXjBqPurQTc5/KpmUdxsrq26oE=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190418145605-e7d98fc518a7/go.mod h1:VzzqZJRnGkLBvHegQrXjBqPurQTc5/KpmUdxsrq26oE=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190425155659-357c62f0e4bb/go.mod h1:VzzqZJRnGkLBvHegQrXjBqPurQTc5/KpmUdxsrq26oE=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190502173448-54afdca5d873/go.mod h1:VzzqZJRnGkLBvHegQrXjBqPurQTc5/KpmUdxsrq26oE=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190801165951-fa694d86fc64/go.mod h1:DMBHOl98Agz4BDEuKkezgsaosCRResVns1a3J2ZsMNc=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190819201941-24fa4b261c55/go.mod h1:DMBHOl98Agz4BDEuKkezgsaosCRResVns1a3J2ZsMNc=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20190911173649-1774047e7e51/go.mod h1:IbNlFCBrqXvoKpeg0TB2l7cyZUmoaFKYIwrEpbDKLA8=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20191009194640-548a555dbc03/go.mod h1:n3cpQtvxv34hfy77yVDNjmbRyujviMdxYliBSkLhpCc=
|
||||
google.golang.org/genproto v0.0.0-20191108220845-16a3f7862a1a/go.mod h1:n3cpQtvxv34hfy77yVDNjmbRyujviMdxYliBSkLhpCc=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.14.0/go.mod h1:yo6s7OP7yaDglbqo1J04qKzAhqBH6lvTonzMVmEdcZw=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.16.0/go.mod h1:0JHn/cJsOMiMfNA9+DeHDlAU7KAAB5GDlYFpa9MZMio=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.17.0/go.mod h1:6QZJwpn2B+Zp71q/5VxRsJ6NXXVCE5NRUHRo+f3cWCs=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.19.0/go.mod h1:mqu4LbDTu4XGKhr4mRzUsmM4RtVoemTSY81AxZiDr8c=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.20.1/go.mod h1:10oTOabMzJvdu6/UiuZezV6QK5dSlG84ov/aaiqXj38=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.21.1/go.mod h1:oYelfM1adQP15Ek0mdvEgi9Df8B9CZIaU1084ijfRaM=
|
||||
google.golang.org/grpc v1.24.0/go.mod h1:XDChyiUovWa60DnaeDeZmSW86xtLtjtZbwvSiRnRtcA=
|
||||
google.golang.org/protobuf v0.0.0-20200109180630-ec00e32a8dfd/go.mod h1:DFci5gLYBciE7Vtevhsrf46CRTquxDuWsQurQQe4oz8=
|
||||
google.golang.org/protobuf v0.0.0-20200221191635-4d8936d0db64/go.mod h1:kwYJMbMJ01Woi6D6+Kah6886xMZcty6N08ah7+eCXa0=
|
||||
|
|
@ -534,10 +677,12 @@ google.golang.org/protobuf v1.20.1-0.20200309200217-e05f789c0967/go.mod h1:A+miE
|
|||
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.21.0/go.mod h1:47Nbq4nVaFHyn7ilMalzfO3qCViNmqZ2kzikPIcrTAo=
|
||||
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.23.0 h1:4MY060fB1DLGMB/7MBTLnwQUY6+F09GEiz6SsrNqyzM=
|
||||
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.23.0/go.mod h1:EGpADcykh3NcUnDUJcl1+ZksZNG86OlYog2l/sGQquU=
|
||||
gopkg.in/alecthomas/kingpin.v2 v2.2.6/go.mod h1:FMv+mEhP44yOT+4EoQTLFTRgOQ1FBLkstjWtayDeSgw=
|
||||
gopkg.in/check.v1 v0.0.0-20161208181325-20d25e280405/go.mod h1:Co6ibVJAznAaIkqp8huTwlJQCZ016jof/cbN4VW5Yz0=
|
||||
gopkg.in/check.v1 v1.0.0-20180628173108-788fd7840127/go.mod h1:Co6ibVJAznAaIkqp8huTwlJQCZ016jof/cbN4VW5Yz0=
|
||||
gopkg.in/check.v1 v1.0.0-20190902080502-41f04d3bba15 h1:YR8cESwS4TdDjEe65xsg0ogRM/Nc3DYOhEAlW+xobZo=
|
||||
gopkg.in/check.v1 v1.0.0-20190902080502-41f04d3bba15/go.mod h1:Co6ibVJAznAaIkqp8huTwlJQCZ016jof/cbN4VW5Yz0=
|
||||
gopkg.in/errgo.v2 v2.1.0/go.mod h1:hNsd1EY+bozCKY1Ytp96fpM3vjJbqLJn88ws8XvfDNI=
|
||||
gopkg.in/fsnotify.v1 v1.4.7 h1:xOHLXZwVvI9hhs+cLKq5+I5onOuwQLhQwiu63xxlHs4=
|
||||
gopkg.in/fsnotify.v1 v1.4.7/go.mod h1:Tz8NjZHkW78fSQdbUxIjBTcgA1z1m8ZHf0WmKUhAMys=
|
||||
gopkg.in/gorp.v1 v1.7.1/go.mod h1:Wo3h+DBQZIxATwftsglhdD/62zRFPhGhTiu5jUJmCaw=
|
||||
|
|
@ -545,10 +690,14 @@ gopkg.in/inf.v0 v0.9.1/go.mod h1:cWUDdTG/fYaXco+Dcufb5Vnc6Gp2YChqWtbxRZE0mXw=
|
|||
gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.41.0/go.mod h1:pNLf8WUiyNEtQjuu5G5vTm06TEv9tsIgeAvK8hOrP4k=
|
||||
gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.48.0 h1:URjZc+8ugRY5mL5uUeQH/a63JcHwdX9xZaWvmNWD7z8=
|
||||
gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.48.0/go.mod h1:pNLf8WUiyNEtQjuu5G5vTm06TEv9tsIgeAvK8hOrP4k=
|
||||
gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.51.0 h1:AQvPpx3LzTDM0AjnIRlVFwFFGC+npRopjZxLJj6gdno=
|
||||
gopkg.in/ini.v1 v1.51.0/go.mod h1:pNLf8WUiyNEtQjuu5G5vTm06TEv9tsIgeAvK8hOrP4k=
|
||||
gopkg.in/nullbio/null.v6 v6.0.0-20161116030900-40264a2e6b79 h1:FpCr9V8wuOei4BAen+93HtVJ+XSi+KPbaPKm0Vj5R64=
|
||||
gopkg.in/nullbio/null.v6 v6.0.0-20161116030900-40264a2e6b79/go.mod h1:gWkaRU7CoXpezCBWfWjm3999QqS+1pYPXGbqQCTMzo8=
|
||||
gopkg.in/resty.v1 v1.12.0/go.mod h1:mDo4pnntr5jdWRML875a/NmxYqAlA73dVijT2AXvQQo=
|
||||
gopkg.in/tomb.v1 v1.0.0-20141024135613-dd632973f1e7 h1:uRGJdciOHaEIrze2W8Q3AKkepLTh2hOroT7a+7czfdQ=
|
||||
gopkg.in/tomb.v1 v1.0.0-20141024135613-dd632973f1e7/go.mod h1:dt/ZhP58zS4L8KSrWDmTeBkI65Dw0HsyUHuEVlX15mw=
|
||||
gopkg.in/yaml.v2 v2.0.0-20170812160011-eb3733d160e7/go.mod h1:JAlM8MvJe8wmxCU4Bli9HhUf9+ttbYbLASfIpnQbh74=
|
||||
gopkg.in/yaml.v2 v2.2.1/go.mod h1:hI93XBmqTisBFMUTm0b8Fm+jr3Dg1NNxqwp+5A1VGuI=
|
||||
gopkg.in/yaml.v2 v2.2.2/go.mod h1:hI93XBmqTisBFMUTm0b8Fm+jr3Dg1NNxqwp+5A1VGuI=
|
||||
gopkg.in/yaml.v2 v2.2.4 h1:/eiJrUcujPVeJ3xlSWaiNi3uSVmDGBK1pDHUHAnao1I=
|
||||
|
|
@ -561,7 +710,10 @@ grpc.go4.org v0.0.0-20170609214715-11d0a25b4919/go.mod h1:77eQGdRu53HpSqPFJFmuJd
|
|||
honnef.co/go/tools v0.0.0-20180728063816-88497007e858/go.mod h1:rf3lG4BRIbNafJWhAfAdb/ePZxsR/4RtNHQocxwk9r4=
|
||||
honnef.co/go/tools v0.0.0-20190102054323-c2f93a96b099/go.mod h1:rf3lG4BRIbNafJWhAfAdb/ePZxsR/4RtNHQocxwk9r4=
|
||||
honnef.co/go/tools v0.0.0-20190106161140-3f1c8253044a/go.mod h1:rf3lG4BRIbNafJWhAfAdb/ePZxsR/4RtNHQocxwk9r4=
|
||||
honnef.co/go/tools v0.0.0-20190418001031-e561f6794a2a/go.mod h1:rf3lG4BRIbNafJWhAfAdb/ePZxsR/4RtNHQocxwk9r4=
|
||||
honnef.co/go/tools v0.0.0-20190523083050-ea95bdfd59fc/go.mod h1:rf3lG4BRIbNafJWhAfAdb/ePZxsR/4RtNHQocxwk9r4=
|
||||
honnef.co/go/tools v0.0.1-2019.2.3/go.mod h1:a3bituU0lyd329TUQxRnasdCoJDkEUEAqEt0JzvZhAg=
|
||||
rsc.io/binaryregexp v0.2.0/go.mod h1:qTv7/COck+e2FymRvadv62gMdZztPaShugOCi3I+8D8=
|
||||
rsc.io/goversion v1.0.0/go.mod h1:Eih9y/uIBS3ulggl7KNJ09xGSLcuNaLgmvvqa07sgfo=
|
||||
rsc.io/quote/v3 v3.1.0/go.mod h1:yEA65RcK8LyAZtP9Kv3t0HmxON59tX3rD+tICJqUlj0=
|
||||
rsc.io/sampler v1.3.0/go.mod h1:T1hPZKmBbMNahiBKFy5HrXp6adAjACjK9JXDnKaTXpA=
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ func (s *Server) Start(address string) error {
|
|||
log.Println("HTTP3 peer listening on " + address)
|
||||
quicConf := &quic.Config{
|
||||
HandshakeTimeout: 4 * time.Second,
|
||||
MaxIdleTimeout: 10 * time.Second,
|
||||
MaxIdleTimeout: 20 * time.Second,
|
||||
}
|
||||
r := mux.NewRouter()
|
||||
r.HandleFunc("/get/{hash}", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ func NewStore(opts StoreOpts) *Store {
|
|||
func (p *Store) getClient() (*Client, error) {
|
||||
var qconf quic.Config
|
||||
qconf.HandshakeTimeout = 4 * time.Second
|
||||
qconf.MaxIdleTimeout = 10 * time.Second
|
||||
qconf.MaxIdleTimeout = 20 * time.Second
|
||||
pool, err := x509.SystemCertPool()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import (
|
|||
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/extras/errors"
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/stream"
|
||||
log "github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/reflector.go/internal/metrics"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
|
@ -62,9 +63,15 @@ func (c *CachingStore) Get(hash string) (stream.Blob, error) {
|
|||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return nil, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
err = c.cache.Put(hash, blob)
|
||||
return blob, err
|
||||
// there is no need to wait for the blob to be stored before we return it
|
||||
// TODO: however this should be refactored to limit the amount of routines that the process can spawn to avoid a possible DoS
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
err = c.cache.Put(hash, blob)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
log.Errorf("error saving blob to underlying cache: %s", err.Error())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
return blob, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Put stores the blob in the origin and the cache
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ func TestCachingStore_CacheMiss(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
if !bytes.Equal(b, res) {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected Get() to return %s, got %s", string(b), string(res))
|
||||
}
|
||||
time.Sleep(10 * time.Millisecond) //storing to cache is done async so let's give it some time
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
has, err := cache.Has(hash)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,15 +14,16 @@ import (
|
|||
|
||||
// DBBackedStore is a store that's backed by a DB. The DB contains data about what's in the store.
|
||||
type DBBackedStore struct {
|
||||
blobs BlobStore
|
||||
db *db.SQL
|
||||
blockedMu sync.RWMutex
|
||||
blocked map[string]bool
|
||||
blobs BlobStore
|
||||
db *db.SQL
|
||||
blockedMu sync.RWMutex
|
||||
blocked map[string]bool
|
||||
deleteOnMiss bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// NewDBBackedStore returns an initialized store pointer.
|
||||
func NewDBBackedStore(blobs BlobStore, db *db.SQL) *DBBackedStore {
|
||||
return &DBBackedStore{blobs: blobs, db: db}
|
||||
func NewDBBackedStore(blobs BlobStore, db *db.SQL, deleteOnMiss bool) *DBBackedStore {
|
||||
return &DBBackedStore{blobs: blobs, db: db, deleteOnMiss: deleteOnMiss}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const nameDBBacked = "db-backed"
|
||||
|
|
@ -44,6 +45,16 @@ func (d *DBBackedStore) Get(hash string) (stream.Blob, error) {
|
|||
if !has {
|
||||
return nil, ErrBlobNotFound
|
||||
}
|
||||
if d.deleteOnMiss {
|
||||
b, err := d.blobs.Get(hash)
|
||||
if err != nil && errors.Is(err, ErrBlobNotFound) {
|
||||
e2 := d.Delete(hash)
|
||||
if e2 != nil {
|
||||
log.Errorf("error while deleting blob from db: %s", errors.FullTrace(err))
|
||||
}
|
||||
return b, err
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return d.blobs.Get(hash)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
123
store/lfuda.go
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
|
|||
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
package store
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
import (
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
"github.com/bparli/lfuda-go"
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/extras/errors"
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/stream"
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/reflector.go/internal/metrics"
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
"github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// LRUStore adds a max cache size and LRU eviction to a BlobStore
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
type LFUDAStore struct {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
if this is very similar to LRUStore, maybe we need a generic EvictionStrategy struct of some sort if this is very similar to LRUStore, maybe we need a generic EvictionStrategy struct of some sort
|
||||
// underlying store
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
store BlobStore
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// lfuda implementation
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
lfuda *lfuda.Cache
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// NewLRUStore initialize a new LRUStore
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func NewLFUDAStore(component string, store BlobStore, maxSize float64) *LFUDAStore {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
lfuda := lfuda.NewGDSFWithEvict(maxSize, func(key interface{}, value interface{}) {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
metrics.CacheLRUEvictCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(store.Name(), component)).Inc()
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
_ = store.Delete(key.(string)) // TODO: log this error. may happen if underlying entry is gone but cache entry still there
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
l := &LFUDAStore{
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
store: store,
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
lfuda: lfuda,
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if lstr, ok := store.(lister); ok {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
err := l.loadExisting(lstr, int(maxSize))
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
panic(err) // TODO: what should happen here? panic? return nil? just keep going?
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return l
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
const nameLFUDA = "lfuda"
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Name is the cache type name
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) Name() string { return nameLFUDA }
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Has returns whether the blob is in the store, without updating the recent-ness.
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) Has(hash string) (bool, error) {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return l.lfuda.Contains(hash), nil
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Get returns the blob or an error if the blob doesn't exist.
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) Get(hash string) (stream.Blob, error) {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
_, has := l.lfuda.Get(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if !has {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return nil, errors.Err(ErrBlobNotFound)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
blob, err := l.store.Get(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if errors.Is(err, ErrBlobNotFound) {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Blob disappeared from underlying store
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
l.lfuda.Remove(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return blob, err
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Put stores the blob. Following LFUDA rules it's not guaranteed that a SET will store the value!!!
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
👍 for the comment :+1: for the comment
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) Put(hash string, blob stream.Blob) error {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
l.lfuda.Set(hash, true)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
has, _ := l.Has(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if has {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
err := l.store.Put(hash, blob)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return err
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// PutSD stores the sd blob. Following LFUDA rules it's not guaranteed that a SET will store the value!!!
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) PutSD(hash string, blob stream.Blob) error {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
why are Put and PutSD implemented differently? why are Put and PutSD implemented differently?
|
||||
l.lfuda.Set(hash, true)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
has, _ := l.Has(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if has {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
err := l.store.PutSD(hash, blob)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return err
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Delete deletes the blob from the store
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) Delete(hash string) error {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
err := l.store.Delete(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return err
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// This must come after store.Delete()
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// Remove triggers onEvict function, which also tries to delete blob from store
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// We need to delete it manually first so any errors can be propagated up
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
l.lfuda.Remove(hash)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
// loadExisting imports existing blobs from the underlying store into the LRU cache
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
func (l *LFUDAStore) loadExisting(store lister, maxItems int) error {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
stuff like this makes me even more confident that LRU and LFUDA should be less copy-pasted and more the same object with an eviction strategy selector stuff like this makes me even more confident that LRU and LFUDA should be less copy-pasted and more the same object with an eviction strategy selector
|
||||
logrus.Infof("loading at most %d items", maxItems)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
existing, err := store.list()
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return err
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
logrus.Infof("read %d files from disk", len(existing))
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
added := 0
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
for _, h := range existing {
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
l.lfuda.Set(h, true)
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
added++
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
if maxItems > 0 && added >= maxItems { // underlying cache is bigger than the cache
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
return nil
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
seems weird to do this. why not an actual seems weird to do this. why not an actual `bool`, or an empty struct?
the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM. I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool the reason I did this was because the library wasn't treating a bool as a 1byte type and it would waste a lot of RAM.
I since worked with the developer of the library to address this so i believe we can go back to using a bool
|
||||
136
store/lfuda_test.go
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
|||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
package store
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
import (
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"io/ioutil"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"os"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"reflect"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/extras/errors"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
const cacheMaxSize = 3
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
func getTestLFUDAStore() (*LFUDAStore, *MemStore) {
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
m := NewMemStore()
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
return NewLFUDAStore("test", m, cacheMaxSize), m
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
func TestFUDAStore_Eviction(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
lfuda, mem := getTestLFUDAStore()
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
b := []byte("x")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err := lfuda.Put("one", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("two", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("three", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("four", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("five", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("five", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("four", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Put("two", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
_, err = lfuda.Get("five")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
check the blob value too? check the blob value too?
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
_, err = lfuda.Get("four")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
_, err = lfuda.Get("two")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, cacheMaxBlobs, len(mem.Debug()))
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
for k, v := range map[string]bool{
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"one": false,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"two": true,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"three": false,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"four": true,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"five": true,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"six": false,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
} {
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
has, err := lfuda.Has(k)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, v, has)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
lfuda.Get("two") // touch so it stays in cache
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
lfuda.Get("five") // touch so it stays in cache
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
lfuda.Put("six", b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, cacheMaxBlobs, len(mem.Debug()))
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
for k, v := range map[string]bool{
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"one": false,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"two": true,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"three": false,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"four": false,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"five": true,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
"six": true,
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
} {
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
has, err := lfuda.Has(k)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, v, has)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Delete("six")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Delete("five")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = lfuda.Delete("two")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, 0, len(mem.Debug()))
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
func TestFUDAStore_UnderlyingBlobMissing(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
lfuda, mem := getTestLFUDAStore()
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
hash := "hash"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
b := []byte("this is a blob of stuff")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err := lfuda.Put(hash, b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = mem.Delete(hash)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
// hash still exists in lru
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.True(t, lfuda.lfuda.Contains(hash))
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
blob, err := lfuda.Get(hash)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Nil(t, blob)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.True(t, errors.Is(err, ErrBlobNotFound), "expected (%s) %s, got (%s) %s",
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
reflect.TypeOf(ErrBlobNotFound).String(), ErrBlobNotFound.Error(),
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
reflect.TypeOf(err).String(), err.Error())
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
// lru.Get() removes hash if underlying store doesn't have it
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.False(t, lfuda.lfuda.Contains(hash))
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
func TestFUDAStore_loadExisting(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
tmpDir, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "reflector_test_*")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
defer os.RemoveAll(tmpDir)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
d := NewDiskStore(tmpDir, 2)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
hash := "hash"
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
b := []byte("this is a blob of stuff")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
err = d.Put(hash, b)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
existing, err := d.list()
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(existing), "blob should exist in cache")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, hash, existing[0])
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
lfuda := NewLFUDAStore("test", d, 3) // lru should load existing blobs when it's created
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond) // async load so let's wait...
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
has, err := lfuda.Has(hash)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
assert.True(t, has, "hash should be loaded from disk store but it's not")
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
use use `t.Log()` insteade
ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement ah right, this can actually be removed. it was a debug statement
|
||||
33
store/lru.go
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ import (
|
|||
"github.com/lbryio/reflector.go/internal/metrics"
|
||||
|
||||
golru "github.com/hashicorp/golang-lru"
|
||||
"github.com/sirupsen/logrus"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// LRUStore adds a max cache size and LRU eviction to a BlobStore
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,33 +19,36 @@ type LRUStore struct {
|
|||
|
||||
// NewLRUStore initialize a new LRUStore
|
||||
func NewLRUStore(component string, store BlobStore, maxItems int) *LRUStore {
|
||||
l := &LRUStore{
|
||||
store: store,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
lru, err := golru.NewWithEvict(maxItems, func(key interface{}, value interface{}) {
|
||||
metrics.CacheLRUEvictCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(store.Name(), component)).Inc()
|
||||
metrics.CacheLRUEvictCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(l.Name(), component)).Inc()
|
||||
_ = store.Delete(key.(string)) // TODO: log this error. may happen if underlying entry is gone but cache entry still there
|
||||
})
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
panic(err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
l := &LRUStore{
|
||||
store: store,
|
||||
lru: lru,
|
||||
}
|
||||
l.lru = lru
|
||||
|
||||
if lstr, ok := store.(lister); ok {
|
||||
err = l.loadExisting(lstr, maxItems)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
panic(err) // TODO: what should happen here? panic? return nil? just keep going?
|
||||
go func() {
|
||||
if lstr, ok := store.(lister); ok {
|
||||
err = l.loadExisting(lstr, maxItems)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
panic(err) // TODO: what should happen here? panic? return nil? just keep going?
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
return l
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const nameLRU = "lru"
|
||||
|
||||
// Name is the cache type name
|
||||
func (l *LRUStore) Name() string { return nameLRU }
|
||||
func (l *LRUStore) Name() string {
|
||||
return "lru_" + l.store.Name()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
this should at least be an option, and ideally should have a way to notify that load finished. also needs clean shutdown this should at least be an option, and ideally should have a way to notify that load finished.
also needs clean shutdown
can I argue that a clean shutdown here doesn't matter? or is it just bad? can I argue that a clean shutdown here doesn't matter? or is it just bad?
If you have a big cache, start this and immediately press If you have a big cache, start this and immediately press `Ctrl+C`, what will happen? My guess is it probably won't shut down and will annoyingly keep running in the foreground.
YES! this was in the back of my mind but i forgot about it. i think there's even a TODO in the code. thanks for catching it YES! this was in the back of my mind but i forgot about it. i think there's even a TODO in the code. thanks for catching it
@andybeletsky IIRC as long as the main thread returns, all routines are automatically killed in GO. I'll have to test that but I think a ctrl+c would kill it right away @andybeletsky IIRC as long as the main thread returns, all routines are automatically killed in GO. I'll have to test that but I think a ctrl+c would kill it right away
|
||||
// Has returns whether the blob is in the store, without updating the recent-ness.
|
||||
func (l *LRUStore) Has(hash string) (bool, error) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -103,11 +107,12 @@ func (l *LRUStore) Delete(hash string) error {
|
|||
|
||||
// loadExisting imports existing blobs from the underlying store into the LRU cache
|
||||
func (l *LRUStore) loadExisting(store lister, maxItems int) error {
|
||||
logrus.Infof("loading at most %d items", maxItems)
|
||||
existing, err := store.list()
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
return err
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
logrus.Infof("read %d files from disk", len(existing))
|
||||
added := 0
|
||||
for _, h := range existing {
|
||||
l.lru.Add(h, true)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import (
|
|||
"os"
|
||||
"reflect"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/lbryio/lbry.go/v2/extras/errors"
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -114,7 +115,8 @@ func TestLRUStore_loadExisting(t *testing.T) {
|
|||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(existing), "blob should exist in cache")
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, hash, existing[0])
|
||||
|
||||
lru := NewLRUStore("test", d, 3) // lru should load existing blobs when it's created
|
||||
lru := NewLRUStore("test", d, 3) // lru should load existing blobs when it's created
|
||||
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond) // async load so let's wait...
|
||||
has, err := lru.Has(hash)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
assert.True(t, has, "hash should be loaded from disk store but it's not")
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -32,8 +32,8 @@ func (s *singleflightStore) Name() string {
|
|||
// Get ensures that only one request per hash is sent to the origin at a time,
|
||||
// thereby protecting against https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thundering_herd_problem
|
||||
func (s *singleflightStore) Get(hash string) (stream.Blob, error) {
|
||||
metrics.CacheWaitingRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.BlobStore.Name(), s.component)).Inc()
|
||||
defer metrics.CacheWaitingRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.BlobStore.Name(), s.component)).Dec()
|
||||
metrics.CacheWaitingRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.Name(), s.component)).Inc()
|
||||
defer metrics.CacheWaitingRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.Name(), s.component)).Dec()
|
||||
|
||||
blob, err, _ := s.sf.Do(hash, s.getter(hash))
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
|
|
@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ func (s *singleflightStore) Get(hash string) (stream.Blob, error) {
|
|||
// only one getter per hash will be executing at a time
|
||||
func (s *singleflightStore) getter(hash string) func() (interface{}, error) {
|
||||
return func() (interface{}, error) {
|
||||
metrics.CacheOriginRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.BlobStore.Name(), s.component)).Inc()
|
||||
defer metrics.CacheOriginRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.BlobStore.Name(), s.component)).Dec()
|
||||
metrics.CacheOriginRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.Name(), s.component)).Inc()
|
||||
defer metrics.CacheOriginRequestsCount.With(metrics.CacheLabels(s.Name(), s.component)).Dec()
|
||||
|
||||
start := time.Now()
|
||||
blob, err := s.BlobStore.Get(hash)
|
||||
|
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ func (s *singleflightStore) getter(hash string) func() (interface{}, error) {
|
|||
|
||||
rate := float64(len(blob)) / 1024 / 1024 / time.Since(start).Seconds()
|
||||
metrics.CacheRetrievalSpeed.With(map[string]string{
|
||||
metrics.LabelCacheType: s.BlobStore.Name(),
|
||||
metrics.LabelCacheType: s.Name(),
|
||||
metrics.LabelComponent: s.component,
|
||||
metrics.LabelSource: "origin",
|
||||
}).Set(rate)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ func AllFiles(startDir string, basename bool) ([]string, error) {
|
|||
walkerWG.Done()
|
||||
goroutineLimiter <- struct{}{}
|
||||
}()
|
||||
|
||||
err = godirwalk.Walk(filepath.Join(startDir, dir), &godirwalk.Options{
|
||||
Unsorted: true, // faster this way
|
||||
Callback: func(osPathname string, de *godirwalk.Dirent) error {
|
||||
|
|
@ -84,6 +83,5 @@ func AllFiles(startDir string, basename bool) ([]string, error) {
|
|||
|
||||
close(pathChan)
|
||||
pathWG.Wait()
|
||||
|
||||
return paths, nil
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
need a way to do these sync or async. at the very least, an option for the cache. ideally, some process of notifying when writes finish.