LBRYCommunity/wallet-sync-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 11 Pull requests Projects Releases 2 Packages Wiki Activity

Don't care about various error checking TODOS in test client

Browse source 
Creator of real implementation will obviously know to do this, looking at the server implementation to see what errors come out.
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Krol 2022-08-25 15:17:01 -04:00
parent f244dab036
commit aac7ef713e
1 changed files with 0 additions and 10 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

10
test_client/test_client.py
View file

@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ import secrets
WalletState = namedtuple('WalletState', ['sequence', 'encrypted_wallet'])
class LBRYSDK():
# TODO - error checking
@staticmethod
def get_wallet(wallet_id, password):
response = requests.post('http://localhost:5279', json.dumps({
@ -30,7 +29,6 @@ class LBRYSDK():
}))
return response.json()['result']
# TODO - error checking
@staticmethod
def update_wallet(wallet_id, password, data):
response = requests.post('http://localhost:5279', json.dumps({
@ -43,7 +41,6 @@ class LBRYSDK():
}))
return response.json()['result']['data']
# TODO - error checking
@staticmethod
def set_preference(wallet_id, key, value):
response = requests.post('http://localhost:5279', json.dumps({
@ -56,7 +53,6 @@ class LBRYSDK():
}))
return response.json()['result']
# TODO - error checking
@staticmethod
def get_preferences(wallet_id):
response = requests.post('http://localhost:5279', json.dumps({
@ -450,8 +446,6 @@ class Client():
# Returns: status
def get_remote_wallet(self):
# TODO - Do try/catch for other calls I guess. I needed it here in
# particular for the README
try:
new_wallet_state, hmac = self.wallet_sync_api.get_wallet(self.auth_token)
except Exception:
@ -589,11 +583,9 @@ class Client():
return "Failure"
def set_preference(self, key, value):
# TODO - error checking
return LBRYSDK.set_preference(self.wallet_id, key, value)
def get_preferences(self):
# TODO - error checking
return LBRYSDK.get_preferences(self.wallet_id)
def has_unsynced_local_changes(self):
@ -608,7 +600,6 @@ class Client():
self.lbry_sdk_last_synced_hash = ""
def update_local_encrypted_wallet(self, encrypted_wallet):
# TODO - error checking
return LBRYSDK.update_wallet(self.wallet_id, self.root_password, encrypted_wallet)
def get_local_encrypted_wallet(self, sync_password):
@ -622,5 +613,4 @@ class Client():
# between the KDFs. The question is, is it safe to use the same root
# password on two two different KDFs like this?
# TODO - error checking
return LBRYSDK.get_wallet(self.wallet_id, sync_password)