Confirm scrypt parameters; remove comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed8b22363e
commit
dbfdff167b
1 changed files with 4 additions and 7 deletions
|
@ -201,14 +201,11 @@ def derive_secrets(root_password, salt):
|
||||||
# TODO - wallet_id in the salt? (with domain etc if we go that way)
|
# TODO - wallet_id in the salt? (with domain etc if we go that way)
|
||||||
# But, we probably want random salt anyway for each domain, who cares
|
# But, we probably want random salt anyway for each domain, who cares
|
||||||
#
|
#
|
||||||
# TODO - save scrypt parameters with the keys so we can change parameters
|
# 2017 Scrypt parameters: https://words.filippo.io/the-scrypt-parameters/
|
||||||
# and still read old keys?
|
|
||||||
#
|
#
|
||||||
# https://stackoverflow.com/a/12581268
|
# There's recommendations for interactive use, and stronger recommendations
|
||||||
# Per this, there's an optimal for interactive use, and there's a stronger
|
# for sensitive storage. Going with the latter since we're storing
|
||||||
# optimal for sensitive storage. Going with the latter since we're storing
|
# encrypted stuff on a server.
|
||||||
# encrypted stuff on a server. That said, that's based on presentation
|
|
||||||
# slides from 2009. Maybe I should go even more secure?
|
|
||||||
scrypt_n = 1<<20
|
scrypt_n = 1<<20
|
||||||
scrypt_r = 8
|
scrypt_r = 8
|
||||||
scrypt_p = 1
|
scrypt_p = 1
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue