fix takeover edge case

if a claim with a higher value than that of a claim taking over a name exists but isn't yet activated, activate it early and have it take over the name
This commit is contained in:
Jack Robison 2021-05-25 18:06:33 -04:00 committed by Victor Shyba
parent b6e4cb9102
commit d69180da71
4 changed files with 160 additions and 95 deletions

View file

@ -206,6 +206,10 @@ class BlockProcessor:
self.history_cache = {}
self.status_server = StatusServer()
#################################
# attributes used for calculating stake activations and takeovers per block
#################################
# txo to pending claim
self.pending_claims: typing.Dict[Tuple[int, int], StagedClaimtrieItem] = {}
# claim hash to pending claim txo
@ -572,10 +576,10 @@ class BlockProcessor:
ops.extend(self._abandon(spent_claims))
return ops
def _get_pending_claim_amount(self, name: str, claim_hash: bytes) -> int:
def _get_pending_claim_amount(self, name: str, claim_hash: bytes, height=None) -> int:
if (name, claim_hash) in self.staged_activated_claim:
return self.staged_activated_claim[(name, claim_hash)]
return self.db._get_active_amount(claim_hash, ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, self.height + 1)
return self.db._get_active_amount(claim_hash, ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, height or (self.height + 1))
def _get_pending_claim_name(self, claim_hash: bytes) -> Optional[str]:
assert claim_hash is not None
@ -585,16 +589,16 @@ class BlockProcessor:
if claim_info:
return claim_info[1].name
def _get_pending_supported_amount(self, claim_hash: bytes) -> int:
amount = self.db._get_active_amount(claim_hash, ACTIVATED_SUPPORT_TXO_TYPE, self.height + 1) or 0
def _get_pending_supported_amount(self, claim_hash: bytes, height: Optional[int] = None) -> int:
amount = self.db._get_active_amount(claim_hash, ACTIVATED_SUPPORT_TXO_TYPE, height or (self.height + 1)) or 0
if claim_hash in self.staged_activated_support:
amount += sum(self.staged_activated_support[claim_hash])
if claim_hash in self.removed_active_support:
return amount - sum(self.removed_active_support[claim_hash])
return amount
def _get_pending_effective_amount(self, name: str, claim_hash: bytes) -> int:
claim_amount = self._get_pending_claim_amount(name, claim_hash)
def _get_pending_effective_amount(self, name: str, claim_hash: bytes, height: Optional[int] = None) -> int:
claim_amount = self._get_pending_claim_amount(name, claim_hash, height=height)
support_amount = self._get_pending_supported_amount(claim_hash)
return claim_amount + support_amount
@ -611,6 +615,36 @@ class BlockProcessor:
_controlling = controlling_claims[_name]
return _controlling
def get_delayed_activate_ops(name: str, claim_hash: bytes, is_new_claim: bool, tx_num: int, nout: int,
amount: int, is_support: bool) -> List['RevertableOp']:
controlling = get_controlling(name)
nothing_is_controlling = not controlling
staged_is_controlling = False if not controlling else claim_hash == controlling.claim_hash
controlling_is_abandoned = False if not controlling else \
controlling.claim_hash in names_with_abandoned_controlling_claims
if nothing_is_controlling or staged_is_controlling or controlling_is_abandoned:
delay = 0
elif is_new_claim:
delay = self.coin.get_delay_for_name(height - controlling.height)
else:
controlling_effective_amount = self._get_pending_effective_amount(name, controlling.claim_hash)
staged_effective_amount = self._get_pending_effective_amount(name, claim_hash)
staged_update_could_cause_takeover = staged_effective_amount > controlling_effective_amount
delay = 0 if not staged_update_could_cause_takeover else self.coin.get_delay_for_name(
height - controlling.height
)
if delay == 0: # if delay was 0 it needs to be considered for takeovers
activated_at_height[PendingActivationValue(claim_hash, name)].append(
PendingActivationKey(
height, ACTIVATED_SUPPORT_TXO_TYPE if is_support else ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, tx_num, nout
)
)
return StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_SUPPORT_TXO_TYPE if is_support else ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, claim_hash, tx_num, nout,
height + delay, name, amount
).get_activate_ops()
ops = []
names_with_abandoned_controlling_claims: List[str] = []
@ -648,28 +682,8 @@ class BlockProcessor:
# prepare to activate or delay activation of the pending claims being added this block
for (tx_num, nout), staged in self.pending_claims.items():
controlling = get_controlling(staged.name)
delay = 0
if not controlling or staged.claim_hash == controlling.claim_hash or \
controlling.claim_hash in names_with_abandoned_controlling_claims:
pass
else:
controlling_effective_amount = self._get_pending_effective_amount(staged.name, controlling.claim_hash)
amount = self._get_pending_effective_amount(staged.name, staged.claim_hash)
delay = 0
# if this is an OP_CLAIM or the amount appears to trigger a takeover, delay
if not staged.is_update or (amount > controlling_effective_amount):
delay = self.coin.get_delay_for_name(height - controlling.height)
ops.extend(
StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, staged.claim_hash, staged.tx_num, staged.position,
height + delay, staged.name, staged.amount
).get_activate_ops()
)
if delay == 0: # if delay was 0 it needs to be considered for takeovers
activated_at_height[PendingActivationValue(staged.claim_hash, staged.name)].append(
PendingActivationKey(height, ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, tx_num, nout)
)
ops.extend(get_delayed_activate_ops(staged.name, staged.claim_hash, not staged.is_update, tx_num, nout,
staged.amount, is_support=False))
# and the supports
for (tx_num, nout), (claim_hash, amount) in self.pending_support_txos.items():
@ -677,29 +691,13 @@ class BlockProcessor:
continue
elif claim_hash in self.pending_claim_txos:
name = self.pending_claims[self.pending_claim_txos[claim_hash]].name
is_update = self.pending_claims[self.pending_claim_txos[claim_hash]].is_update
staged_is_new_claim = not self.pending_claims[self.pending_claim_txos[claim_hash]].is_update
else:
k, v = self.db.get_claim_txo(claim_hash)
name = v.name
is_update = (v.root_tx_num, v.root_position) != (k.tx_num, k.position)
controlling = get_controlling(name)
delay = 0
if not controlling or claim_hash == controlling.claim_hash:
pass
elif not is_update or self._get_pending_effective_amount(staged.name,
claim_hash) > self._get_pending_effective_amount(staged.name, controlling.claim_hash):
delay = self.coin.get_delay_for_name(height - controlling.height)
if delay == 0:
activated_at_height[PendingActivationValue(claim_hash, name)].append(
PendingActivationKey(height + delay, ACTIVATED_SUPPORT_TXO_TYPE, tx_num, nout)
)
ops.extend(
StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_SUPPORT_TXO_TYPE, claim_hash, tx_num, nout,
height + delay, name, amount
).get_activate_ops()
)
staged_is_new_claim = (v.root_tx_num, v.root_position) == (k.tx_num, k.position)
ops.extend(get_delayed_activate_ops(name, claim_hash, staged_is_new_claim, tx_num, nout, amount,
is_support=True))
# add the activation/delayed-activation ops
for activated, activated_txos in activated_at_height.items():
@ -774,30 +772,79 @@ class BlockProcessor:
controlling = get_controlling(need_takeover)
ops.extend(get_remove_name_ops(need_takeover, controlling.claim_hash, controlling.height))
# process takeovers from the combined newly added and previously scheduled claims
# scan for possible takeovers out of the accumulated activations, of these make sure there
# aren't any future activations for the taken over names with yet higher amounts, if there are
# these need to get activated now and take over instead. for example:
# claim A is winning for 0.1 for long enough for a > 1 takeover delay
# claim B is made for 0.2
# a block later, claim C is made for 0.3, it will schedule to activate 1 (or rarely 2) block(s) after B
# upon the delayed activation of B, we need to detect to activate C and make it take over early instead
future_activations = defaultdict(dict)
for activated, activated_txos in self.db.get_future_activated(height).items():
# uses the pending effective amount for the future activation height, not the current height
future_effective_amount = self._get_pending_effective_amount(
activated.name, activated.claim_hash, activated_txos[-1].height + 1
)
v = future_effective_amount, activated, activated_txos[-1]
future_activations[activated.name][activated.claim_hash] = v
# process takeovers
checked_names = set()
for name, activated in self.pending_activated.items():
checked_names.add(name)
if name in names_with_abandoned_controlling_claims:
print(f'\tabandoned {name} need takeover')
controlling = controlling_claims[name]
amounts = {
claim_hash: self._get_pending_effective_amount(name, claim_hash)
for claim_hash in activated.keys() if claim_hash not in self.staged_pending_abandoned
}
# if there is a controlling claim include it in the amounts to ensure it remains the max
if controlling and controlling.claim_hash not in self.staged_pending_abandoned:
amounts[controlling.claim_hash] = self._get_pending_effective_amount(name, controlling.claim_hash)
winning = max(amounts, key=lambda x: amounts[x])
if not controlling or (winning != controlling.claim_hash and
winning_claim_hash = max(amounts, key=lambda x: amounts[x])
if not controlling or (winning_claim_hash != controlling.claim_hash and
name in names_with_abandoned_controlling_claims) or \
((winning != controlling.claim_hash) and (amounts[winning] > amounts[controlling.claim_hash])):
if (name, winning) in need_reactivate_if_takes_over:
previous_pending_activate = need_reactivate_if_takes_over[(name, winning)]
amount = self.db.get_claim_txo_amount(
winning, previous_pending_activate.tx_num, previous_pending_activate.position
((winning_claim_hash != controlling.claim_hash) and (amounts[winning_claim_hash] > amounts[controlling.claim_hash])):
amounts_with_future_activations = {claim_hash: amount for claim_hash, amount in amounts.items()}
amounts_with_future_activations.update(
{
claim_hash: effective_amount
for claim_hash, (effective_amount, _, _) in future_activations[name].items()
}
)
if winning in self.pending_claim_txos:
tx_num, position = self.pending_claim_txos[winning]
winning_including_future_activations = max(
amounts_with_future_activations, key=lambda x: amounts_with_future_activations[x]
)
if winning_claim_hash != winning_including_future_activations:
print(f"\ttakeover of {name} by {winning_claim_hash.hex()} triggered early activation and "
f"takeover by {winning_including_future_activations.hex()} at {height}")
_, v, k = future_activations[name][winning_including_future_activations]
amount = self._get_pending_claim_amount(
name, winning_including_future_activations, k.height + 1
)
ops.extend(
StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, winning_including_future_activations, k.tx_num,
k.position, k.height, name, amount
).get_remove_activate_ops()
)
ops.extend(
StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, winning_including_future_activations, k.tx_num,
k.position, height, name, amount
).get_activate_ops()
)
ops.extend(get_takeover_name_ops(name, winning_including_future_activations, height))
elif not controlling or (winning_claim_hash != controlling.claim_hash and
name in names_with_abandoned_controlling_claims) or \
((winning_claim_hash != controlling.claim_hash) and (amounts[winning_claim_hash] > amounts[controlling.claim_hash])):
print(f"\ttakeover {name} by {winning_claim_hash.hex()} at {height}")
if (name, winning_claim_hash) in need_reactivate_if_takes_over:
previous_pending_activate = need_reactivate_if_takes_over[(name, winning_claim_hash)]
amount = self.db.get_claim_txo_amount(
winning_claim_hash, previous_pending_activate.tx_num, previous_pending_activate.position
)
if winning_claim_hash in self.pending_claim_txos:
tx_num, position = self.pending_claim_txos[winning_claim_hash]
amount = self.pending_claims[(tx_num, position)].amount
else:
tx_num, position = previous_pending_activate.tx_num, previous_pending_activate.position
@ -805,21 +852,18 @@ class BlockProcessor:
# the claim had a pending activation in the future, move it to now
ops.extend(
StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, winning, tx_num,
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, winning_claim_hash, tx_num,
position, previous_pending_activate.height, name, amount
).get_remove_activate_ops()
)
ops.extend(
StagedActivation(
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, winning, tx_num,
ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE, winning_claim_hash, tx_num,
position, height, name, amount
).get_activate_ops()
)
ops.extend(get_takeover_name_ops(name, winning, height))
else:
ops.extend(get_takeover_name_ops(name, winning, height))
elif winning == controlling.claim_hash:
ops.extend(get_takeover_name_ops(name, winning_claim_hash, height))
elif winning_claim_hash == controlling.claim_hash:
print("\tstill winning")
pass
else:
@ -871,9 +915,6 @@ class BlockProcessor:
append_hashX_by_tx = hashXs_by_tx.append
hashX_from_script = self.coin.hashX_from_script
zero_delay_claims: typing.Dict[Tuple[str, bytes], Tuple[int, int]] = {}
abandoned_or_expired_controlling = set()
for tx, tx_hash in txs:
spent_claims = {}

View file

@ -5,11 +5,6 @@ from lbry.wallet.server.db import DB_PREFIXES
from lbry.wallet.server.db.prefixes import Prefixes, ClaimTakeoverValue
def length_encoded_name(name: str) -> bytes:
encoded = name.encode('utf-8')
return len(encoded).to_bytes(2, byteorder='big') + encoded
@ -96,7 +91,6 @@ def get_remove_name_ops(name: str, claim_hash: bytes, height: int) -> typing.Lis
def get_takeover_name_ops(name: str, claim_hash: bytes, takeover_height: int,
previous_winning: Optional[ClaimTakeoverValue] = None):
if previous_winning:
# print(f"takeover previously owned {name} - {claim_hash.hex()} at {takeover_height}")
return [
RevertableDelete(
*Prefixes.claim_takeover.pack_item(
@ -109,7 +103,6 @@ def get_takeover_name_ops(name: str, claim_hash: bytes, takeover_height: int,
)
)
]
# print(f"takeover {name} - {claim_hash[::-1].hex()} at {takeover_height}")
return [
RevertablePut(
*Prefixes.claim_takeover.pack_item(

View file

@ -464,6 +464,16 @@ class LevelDB:
activated[v].append(k)
return activated
def get_future_activated(self, height: int) -> DefaultDict[PendingActivationValue, List[PendingActivationKey]]:
activated = defaultdict(list)
for i in range(self.coin.maxTakeoverDelay):
prefix = Prefixes.pending_activation.pack_partial_key(height+1+i, ACTIVATED_CLAIM_TXO_TYPE)
for _k, _v in self.db.iterator(prefix=prefix):
k = Prefixes.pending_activation.unpack_key(_k)
v = Prefixes.pending_activation.unpack_value(_v)
activated[v].append(k)
return activated
async def _read_tx_counts(self):
if self.tx_counts is not None:
return

View file

@ -434,6 +434,27 @@ class ResolveClaimTakeovers(BaseResolveTestCase):
await self.assertNoClaimForName(name)
await self._test_activation_delay()
async def test_early_takeover(self):
name = 'derp'
# block 207
first_claim_id = (await self.stream_create(name, '0.1', allow_duplicate_name=True))['outputs'][0]['claim_id']
await self.assertMatchClaimIsWinning(name, first_claim_id)
await self.generate(96)
# block 304, activates at 307
second_claim_id = (await self.stream_create(name, '0.2', allow_duplicate_name=True))['outputs'][0]['claim_id']
# block 305, activates at 308 (but gets triggered early by the takeover by the second claim)
third_claim_id = (await self.stream_create(name, '0.3', allow_duplicate_name=True))['outputs'][0]['claim_id']
self.assertNotEqual(first_claim_id, second_claim_id)
# takeover should not have happened yet
await self.assertMatchClaimIsWinning(name, first_claim_id)
await self.generate(1)
await self.assertMatchClaimIsWinning(name, first_claim_id)
await self.generate(1)
await self.assertMatchClaimIsWinning(name, third_claim_id)
await self.generate(1)
await self.assertMatchClaimIsWinning(name, third_claim_id)
async def test_block_takeover_with_delay_1_support(self):
name = 'derp'
# initially claim the name