bring back test for picking oldest on dupe claims
This commit is contained in:
parent
56db631626
commit
1ed086e90f
1 changed files with 37 additions and 29 deletions
|
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||||
import tempfile
|
import tempfile
|
||||||
|
from binascii import unhexlify
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
from lbrynet.wallet.transaction import Transaction
|
from lbrynet.wallet.transaction import Transaction
|
||||||
from lbrynet.error import InsufficientFundsError
|
from lbrynet.error import InsufficientFundsError
|
||||||
|
@ -13,7 +14,7 @@ class ClaimCommands(CommandTestCase):
|
||||||
async def craft_claim(self, name, amount_dewies, claim_dict, address):
|
async def craft_claim(self, name, amount_dewies, claim_dict, address):
|
||||||
# FIXME: this is here mostly because publish has defensive code for situations that happens accidentally
|
# FIXME: this is here mostly because publish has defensive code for situations that happens accidentally
|
||||||
# However, it still happens... So, let's reproduce them.
|
# However, it still happens... So, let's reproduce them.
|
||||||
claim = ClaimDict.load_dict(claim_dict)
|
claim = Claim.load_bytes(claim_dict)
|
||||||
address = address or (await self.account.receiving.get_addresses(limit=1, only_usable=True))[0]
|
address = address or (await self.account.receiving.get_addresses(limit=1, only_usable=True))[0]
|
||||||
tx = await Transaction.claim(name, claim, amount_dewies, address, [self.account], self.account)
|
tx = await Transaction.claim(name, claim, amount_dewies, address, [self.account], self.account)
|
||||||
await self.broadcast(tx)
|
await self.broadcast(tx)
|
||||||
|
@ -214,16 +215,16 @@ class ClaimCommands(CommandTestCase):
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(len(empty['claims']), 0)
|
self.assertEqual(len(empty['claims']), 0)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async def test_abandoned_channel_with_signed_claims(self):
|
async def test_abandoned_channel_with_signed_claims(self):
|
||||||
channel = await self.out(self.daemon.jsonrpc_channel_new('@abc', "1.0"))
|
channel = await self.daemon.jsonrpc_channel_new('@abc', "1.0")
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(channel['success'])
|
self.assertTrue(channel['success'])
|
||||||
await self.confirm_tx(channel['tx']['txid'])
|
await self.confirm_tx(channel['tx'].id)
|
||||||
claim = await self.make_claim(amount='0.0001', name='on-channel-claim', channel_name='@abc')
|
orphan_claim = await self.make_claim(amount='0.0001', name='on-channel-claim', channel_name='@abc')
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(claim['success'])
|
self.assertTrue(orphan_claim['success'])
|
||||||
abandon = await self.out(self.daemon.jsonrpc_claim_abandon(txid=channel['tx']['txid'], nout=0, blocking=False))
|
abandon = await self.out(self.daemon.jsonrpc_claim_abandon(txid=channel['tx'].id, nout=0, blocking=False))
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(abandon['success'])
|
self.assertTrue(abandon['success'])
|
||||||
channel = await self.out(self.daemon.jsonrpc_channel_new('@abc', "1.0"))
|
channel = await self.daemon.jsonrpc_channel_new('@abc', "1.0")
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(channel['success'])
|
self.assertTrue(channel['success'])
|
||||||
await self.confirm_tx(channel['tx']['txid'])
|
await self.confirm_tx(channel['tx'].id)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Original channel doesnt exists anymore, so the signature is invalid. For invalid signatures, resolution is
|
# Original channel doesnt exists anymore, so the signature is invalid. For invalid signatures, resolution is
|
||||||
# only possible outside a channel
|
# only possible outside a channel
|
||||||
|
@ -232,39 +233,46 @@ class ClaimCommands(CommandTestCase):
|
||||||
response = await self.resolve('lbry://on-channel-claim')
|
response = await self.resolve('lbry://on-channel-claim')
|
||||||
self.assertIn('claim', response['lbry://on-channel-claim'])
|
self.assertIn('claim', response['lbry://on-channel-claim'])
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(response['lbry://on-channel-claim']['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
self.assertFalse(response['lbry://on-channel-claim']['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
||||||
direct_uri = 'lbry://on-channel-claim#' + claim['claim_id']
|
direct_uri = 'lbry://on-channel-claim#' + orphan_claim['claim_id']
|
||||||
response = await self.resolve(direct_uri)
|
response = await self.resolve(direct_uri)
|
||||||
self.assertIn('claim', response[direct_uri])
|
self.assertIn('claim', response[direct_uri])
|
||||||
self.assertFalse(response[direct_uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
self.assertFalse(response[direct_uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
||||||
|
await self.daemon.jsonrpc_claim_abandon(claim_id=orphan_claim['claim_id'])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
uri = 'lbry://@abc/on-channel-claim'
|
uri = 'lbry://@abc/on-channel-claim'
|
||||||
# now, claim something on this channel (it will update the invalid claim, but we save and forcefully restore)
|
# now, claim something on this channel (it will update the invalid claim, but we save and forcefully restore)
|
||||||
original_claim = await self.make_claim(amount='0.00000001', name='on-channel-claim', channel_name='@abc')
|
valid_claim = await self.make_claim(amount='0.00000001', name='on-channel-claim', channel_name='@abc')
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(original_claim['success'])
|
self.assertTrue(valid_claim['success'])
|
||||||
# resolves normally
|
# resolves normally
|
||||||
response = await self.resolve(uri)
|
response = await self.resolve(uri)
|
||||||
self.assertIn('claim', response[uri])
|
self.assertIn('claim', response[uri])
|
||||||
self.assertTrue(response[uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
self.assertTrue(response[uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# FIXME BEING FIXED -- doesnt happen on current sigs but on migrated ones
|
# ooops! claimed a valid conflict! (this happens on the wild, mostly by accident or race condition)
|
||||||
# tamper it, invalidating the signature
|
dupe_claim = Transaction(unhexlify(valid_claim['tx']['hex'])).outputs[valid_claim['output']['nout']].claim
|
||||||
#value = response[uri]['claim']['value'].copy()
|
dupe_claim.stream.hash = ''.join(reversed(dupe_claim.stream.hash))
|
||||||
#value['stream']['author'] = 'some troll'
|
address = response[uri]['claim']['address']
|
||||||
#address = response[uri]['claim']['address']
|
tx = await Transaction.claim(
|
||||||
#await self.craft_claim('on-channel-claim', 1, value, address)
|
'on-channel-claim', dupe_claim, 1,
|
||||||
# it resolves to the now only valid claim under the channel, ignoring the fake one
|
holding_address=address, funding_accounts=[self.account], change_account=self.account
|
||||||
#response = await self.resolve(uri)
|
)
|
||||||
#self.assertIn('claim', response[uri])
|
tx.outputs[0].sign(channel['output'])
|
||||||
#self.assertTrue(response[uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
await tx.sign([self.account])
|
||||||
|
await self.broadcast(tx)
|
||||||
|
await self.ledger.wait(tx)
|
||||||
|
await self.generate(1)
|
||||||
|
await self.ledger.wait(tx)
|
||||||
|
#await self.make_claim()craft_claim('on-channel-claim', 1, )
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## ooops! claimed a valid conflict! (this happens on the wild, mostly by accident or race condition)
|
# it still resolves! but to the older claim
|
||||||
#await self.craft_claim('on-channel-claim', 1, response[uri]['claim']['value'], address)
|
response = await self.resolve(uri)
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn('claim', response[uri])
|
||||||
## it still resolves! but to the older claim
|
self.assertTrue(response[uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
||||||
#response = await self.resolve(uri)
|
self.assertEqual(response[uri]['claim']['txid'], valid_claim['tx']['txid'])
|
||||||
#self.assertIn('claim', response[uri])
|
claims = (await self.daemon.jsonrpc_claim_list('on-channel-claim'))['claims']
|
||||||
#self.assertTrue(response[uri]['claim']['signature_is_valid'])
|
self.assertEqual(2, len(claims))
|
||||||
#self.assertEqual(response[uri]['claim']['txid'], original_claim['tx']['txid'])
|
signer_ids = set([claim['value'].signing_channel_id for claim in claims])
|
||||||
|
self.assertEqual({channel['claim_id']}, signer_ids)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
async def test_claim_list_by_channel(self):
|
async def test_claim_list_by_channel(self):
|
||||||
self.maxDiff = None
|
self.maxDiff = None
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue