assertEquals() -> assertEqual()
This commit is contained in:
parent
24a872885a
commit
fbdbcc8070
12 changed files with 117 additions and 117 deletions
|
@ -35,6 +35,6 @@ class TestPeerExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
# run the network long enough for two failures to happen
|
||||
self.pump_clock(constants.checkRefreshInterval * 3)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(get_nodes_with_stale_contacts()), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(get_nodes_with_stale_contacts()), 0)
|
||||
self.verify_all_nodes_are_routable()
|
||||
self.verify_all_nodes_are_pingable()
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
self.node.ping = fake_ping
|
||||
# Make sure the contact was added
|
||||
self.failIf(self.remote_contact not in self.node.contacts,
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.remote_contact not in self.node.contacts,
|
||||
'Contact not added to fake node (error in test code)')
|
||||
self.node.start_listening()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
# See if the contact was removed due to the timeout
|
||||
def check_removed_contact():
|
||||
self.failIf(self.remote_contact in self.node.contacts,
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.remote_contact in self.node.contacts,
|
||||
'Contact was not removed after RPC timeout; check exception types.')
|
||||
|
||||
df.addCallback(lambda _: reset_values())
|
||||
|
@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
self._reactor.advance(2)
|
||||
yield df
|
||||
|
||||
self.failIf(self.error, self.error)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.error, self.error)
|
||||
# The list of sent RPC messages should be empty at this stage
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.node._protocol._sentMessages), 0,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.node._protocol._sentMessages), 0,
|
||||
'The protocol is still waiting for a RPC result, '
|
||||
'but the transaction is already done!')
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -154,9 +154,9 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
df.addCallback(handleResult)
|
||||
df.addErrback(handleError)
|
||||
self._reactor.pump([1 for _ in range(10)])
|
||||
self.failIf(self.error, self.error)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.error, self.error)
|
||||
# The list of sent RPC messages should be empty at this stage
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.node._protocol._sentMessages), 0,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.node._protocol._sentMessages), 0,
|
||||
'The protocol is still waiting for a RPC result, '
|
||||
'but the transaction is already done!')
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -175,21 +175,21 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
d = self.remote_contact.findValue(fake_blob)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
find_value_response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue('protocolVersion' not in find_value_response)
|
||||
|
||||
self.remote_node.findValue = original_findvalue
|
||||
d = self.remote_contact.findValue(fake_blob)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
find_value_response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue('protocolVersion' not in find_value_response)
|
||||
|
||||
self.remote_node.findValue = findValue
|
||||
d = self.remote_contact.findValue(fake_blob)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
find_value_response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue('protocolVersion' not in find_value_response)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
|
@ -227,16 +227,16 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
d = self.remote_contact.findValue(fake_blob)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
find_value_response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue('protocolVersion' not in find_value_response)
|
||||
token = find_value_response['token']
|
||||
d = self.remote_contact.store(fake_blob, token, 3333, self.node.node_id, 0)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response, "OK")
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response, "OK")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self.remote_node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(fake_blob))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(self.remote_node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.remote_node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def testStoreFromPre_0_20_0_Node(self):
|
||||
|
@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
d = us_from_them.findValue(fake_blob)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
find_value_response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue('protocolVersion' not in find_value_response)
|
||||
token = find_value_response['token']
|
||||
us_from_them.update_protocol_version(0)
|
||||
|
@ -262,8 +262,8 @@ class KademliaProtocolTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
)
|
||||
self._reactor.advance(3)
|
||||
response = yield d
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response, "OK")
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response, "OK")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.remote_contact.protocolVersion, 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self.node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(fake_blob))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(self.node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertIs(self.node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()[0], self.remote_contact)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -23,16 +23,16 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
|
||||
# verify the nodes we think stored it did actually store it
|
||||
storing_nodes = [node for node in all_nodes if node.node_id.encode('hex') in storing_node_ids]
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(storing_nodes), len(storing_node_ids))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(storing_nodes), constants.k)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(storing_nodes), len(storing_node_ids))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(storing_nodes), constants.k)
|
||||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertTrue(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(map(lambda contact: (contact.id, contact.address, contact.port),
|
||||
self.assertEqual(map(lambda contact: (contact.id, contact.address, contact.port),
|
||||
node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), [(announcing_node.node_id,
|
||||
announcing_node.externalIP,
|
||||
announcing_node.port)])
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 1)
|
||||
expanded_peers = []
|
||||
for peer in datastore_result:
|
||||
host = ".".join([str(ord(d)) for d in peer[:4]])
|
||||
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
peer_node_id = peer[6:]
|
||||
if (host, port, peer_node_id) not in expanded_peers:
|
||||
expanded_peers.append((peer_node_id, host, port))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(expanded_peers[0],
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expanded_peers[0],
|
||||
(announcing_node.node_id, announcing_node.externalIP, announcing_node.peerPort))
|
||||
|
||||
# verify the announced blob expires in the storing nodes datastores
|
||||
|
@ -49,16 +49,16 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blob_hash in node._dataStore._dict) # the looping call shouldn't have removed it yet
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
self.pump_clock(constants.checkRefreshInterval + 1) # tick the clock forward (so the nodes refresh)
|
||||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blob_hash not in node._dataStore._dict) # the looping call should have fired
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
|
@ -73,16 +73,16 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
|
||||
# verify the nodes we think stored it did actually store it
|
||||
storing_nodes = [node for node in all_nodes if node.node_id.encode('hex') in storing_node_ids]
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(storing_nodes), len(storing_node_ids))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(storing_nodes), constants.k)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(storing_nodes), len(storing_node_ids))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(storing_nodes), constants.k)
|
||||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertTrue(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(map(lambda contact: (contact.id, contact.address, contact.port),
|
||||
self.assertEqual(map(lambda contact: (contact.id, contact.address, contact.port),
|
||||
node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), [(announcing_node.node_id,
|
||||
announcing_node.externalIP,
|
||||
announcing_node.port)])
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 1)
|
||||
expanded_peers = []
|
||||
for peer in datastore_result:
|
||||
host = ".".join([str(ord(d)) for d in peer[:4]])
|
||||
|
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
peer_node_id = peer[6:]
|
||||
if (host, port, peer_node_id) not in expanded_peers:
|
||||
expanded_peers.append((peer_node_id, host, port))
|
||||
self.assertEquals(expanded_peers[0],
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expanded_peers[0],
|
||||
(announcing_node.node_id, announcing_node.externalIP, announcing_node.peerPort))
|
||||
|
||||
self.pump_clock(constants.checkRefreshInterval*2)
|
||||
|
@ -107,8 +107,8 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blob_hash in node._dataStore._dict)
|
||||
|
||||
# # bring the announcing node back online
|
||||
|
@ -123,8 +123,8 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertTrue(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blob_hash in node._dataStore._dict)
|
||||
|
||||
# verify the announced blob expires in the storing nodes datastores
|
||||
|
@ -132,14 +132,14 @@ class TestStoreExpiration(TestKademliaBase):
|
|||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blob_hash in node._dataStore._dict) # the looping call shouldn't have removed it yet
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 1)
|
||||
|
||||
self.pump_clock(constants.checkRefreshInterval + 1) # tick the clock forward (so the nodes refresh)
|
||||
for node in storing_nodes:
|
||||
self.assertFalse(node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(blob_hash))
|
||||
datastore_result = node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(blob_hash)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(datastore_result), 0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(node._dataStore.getStoringContacts()), 0)
|
||||
self.assertTrue(blob_hash not in node._dataStore._dict) # the looping call should have fired
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ class AvailabilityWeightedStrategyTests(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
offer2 = strategy.make_offer(peer, blobs)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEquals(offer1.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(offer1.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(offer2.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_accept_zero_and_persist_if_accepted(self):
|
||||
|
@ -101,13 +101,13 @@ class AvailabilityWeightedStrategyTests(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
response2 = host_strategy.respond_to_offer(offer, client, blobs)
|
||||
client_strategy.update_accepted_offers(host, response2)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response1.is_too_low, False)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response1.is_accepted, True)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response1.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response1.is_too_low, False)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response1.is_accepted, True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response1.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response2.is_too_low, False)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response2.is_accepted, True)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(response2.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response2.is_too_low, False)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response2.is_accepted, True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(response2.rate, 0.0)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_how_many_turns_before_accept_with_similar_rate_settings(self):
|
||||
base_rates = [0.0001 * n for n in range(1, 10)]
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ class TestLogger(trial.unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# traceback will depend on the system the test is being run on
|
||||
# but hopefully these two tests are good enough
|
||||
d = self.triggerErrback()
|
||||
d.addCallback(lambda _: self.assertEquals(expected_first_line, output_lines()[0]))
|
||||
d.addCallback(lambda _: self.assertEqual(expected_first_line, output_lines()[0]))
|
||||
d.addCallback(lambda _: self.assertEqual(10, len(output_lines())))
|
||||
return d
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -30,13 +30,13 @@ class ContactOperatorsTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
def testBoolean(self):
|
||||
""" Test "equals" and "not equals" comparisons """
|
||||
self.failIfEqual(
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(
|
||||
self.firstContact, self.secondContact,
|
||||
'Contacts with different IDs should not be equal.')
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.firstContact, self.firstContactDifferentValues,
|
||||
'Contacts with same IDs should be equal, even if their other values differ.')
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.secondContact, self.secondContactCopy,
|
||||
'Different copies of the same Contact instance should be equal')
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ class ContactOperatorsTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
""" Test comparisons with non-Contact and non-str types """
|
||||
msg = '"{}" operator: Contact object should not be equal to {} type'
|
||||
for item in (123, [1, 2, 3], {'key': 'value'}):
|
||||
self.failIfEqual(
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(
|
||||
self.firstContact, item,
|
||||
msg.format('eq', type(item).__name__))
|
||||
self.failUnless(
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
self.firstContact != item,
|
||||
msg.format('ne', type(item).__name__))
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ class BencodeTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
""" Tests the bencode encoder """
|
||||
for value, encodedValue in self.cases:
|
||||
result = self.encoding.encode(value)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result, encodedValue,
|
||||
'Value "%s" not correctly encoded! Expected "%s", got "%s"' %
|
||||
(value, encodedValue, result))
|
||||
|
@ -38,10 +38,10 @@ class BencodeTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
""" Tests the bencode decoder """
|
||||
for value, encodedValue in self.cases:
|
||||
result = self.encoding.decode(encodedValue)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
result, value,
|
||||
'Value "%s" not correctly decoded! Expected "%s", got "%s"' %
|
||||
(encodedValue, value, result))
|
||||
for encodedValue in self.badDecoderCases:
|
||||
self.failUnlessRaises(
|
||||
self.assertRaises(
|
||||
lbrynet.dht.encoding.DecodeError, self.encoding.decode, encodedValue)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -40,19 +40,19 @@ class KBucketTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
for i in range(constants.k):
|
||||
tmpContact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(generate_id(), next(self.address_generator), 4444, 0, None)
|
||||
self.kbucket.addContact(tmpContact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.kbucket._contacts[i],
|
||||
tmpContact,
|
||||
"Contact in position %d not the same as the newly-added contact" % i)
|
||||
|
||||
# Test if contact is not added to full list
|
||||
tmpContact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(generate_id(), next(self.address_generator), 4444, 0, None)
|
||||
self.failUnlessRaises(kbucket.BucketFull, self.kbucket.addContact, tmpContact)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(kbucket.BucketFull, self.kbucket.addContact, tmpContact)
|
||||
|
||||
# Test if an existing contact is updated correctly if added again
|
||||
existingContact = self.kbucket._contacts[0]
|
||||
self.kbucket.addContact(existingContact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
self.kbucket._contacts.index(existingContact),
|
||||
len(self.kbucket._contacts)-1,
|
||||
'Contact not correctly updated; it should be at the end of the list of contacts')
|
||||
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ class KBucketTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
def testGetContacts(self):
|
||||
# try and get 2 contacts from empty list
|
||||
result = self.kbucket.getContacts(2)
|
||||
self.failIf(len(result) != 0, "Returned list should be empty; returned list length: %d" %
|
||||
self.assertFalse(len(result) != 0, "Returned list should be empty; returned list length: %d" %
|
||||
(len(result)))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -83,36 +83,36 @@ class KBucketTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# try to get too many contacts
|
||||
# requested count greater than bucket size; should return at most k contacts
|
||||
contacts = self.kbucket.getContacts(constants.k+3)
|
||||
self.failUnless(len(contacts) <= constants.k,
|
||||
self.assertTrue(len(contacts) <= constants.k,
|
||||
'Returned list should not have more than k entries!')
|
||||
|
||||
# verify returned contacts in list
|
||||
for node_id, i in zip(node_ids, range(constants.k-2)):
|
||||
self.failIf(self.kbucket._contacts[i].id != node_id,
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.kbucket._contacts[i].id != node_id,
|
||||
"Contact in position %s not same as added contact" % (str(i)))
|
||||
|
||||
# try to get too many contacts
|
||||
# requested count one greater than number of contacts
|
||||
if constants.k >= 2:
|
||||
result = self.kbucket.getContacts(constants.k-1)
|
||||
self.failIf(len(result) != constants.k-2,
|
||||
self.assertFalse(len(result) != constants.k-2,
|
||||
"Too many contacts in returned list %s - should be %s" %
|
||||
(len(result), constants.k-2))
|
||||
else:
|
||||
result = self.kbucket.getContacts(constants.k-1)
|
||||
# if the count is <= 0, it should return all of it's contats
|
||||
self.failIf(len(result) != constants.k,
|
||||
self.assertFalse(len(result) != constants.k,
|
||||
"Too many contacts in returned list %s - should be %s" %
|
||||
(len(result), constants.k-2))
|
||||
result = self.kbucket.getContacts(constants.k-3)
|
||||
self.failIf(len(result) != constants.k-3,
|
||||
self.assertFalse(len(result) != constants.k-3,
|
||||
"Too many contacts in returned list %s - should be %s" %
|
||||
(len(result), constants.k-3))
|
||||
|
||||
def testRemoveContact(self):
|
||||
# try remove contact from empty list
|
||||
rmContact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(generate_id(), next(self.address_generator), 4444, 0, None)
|
||||
self.failUnlessRaises(ValueError, self.kbucket.removeContact, rmContact)
|
||||
self.assertRaises(ValueError, self.kbucket.removeContact, rmContact)
|
||||
|
||||
# Add couple contacts
|
||||
for i in range(constants.k-2):
|
||||
|
@ -122,4 +122,4 @@ class KBucketTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# try remove contact from empty list
|
||||
self.kbucket.addContact(rmContact)
|
||||
result = self.kbucket.removeContact(rmContact)
|
||||
self.failIf(rmContact in self.kbucket._contacts, "Could not remove contact from bucket")
|
||||
self.assertFalse(rmContact in self.kbucket._contacts, "Could not remove contact from bucket")
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ class DefaultFormatTranslatorTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
'127.0.0.1', 1921)]})
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.translator = DefaultFormat()
|
||||
self.failUnless(
|
||||
self.assertTrue(
|
||||
isinstance(self.translator, MessageTranslator),
|
||||
'Translator class must inherit from entangled.kademlia.msgformat.MessageTranslator!')
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ class DefaultFormatTranslatorTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
""" Tests translation from a Message object to a primitive """
|
||||
for msg, msgPrimitive in self.cases:
|
||||
translatedObj = self.translator.toPrimitive(msg)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(translatedObj), len(msgPrimitive),
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(translatedObj), len(msgPrimitive),
|
||||
"Translated object does not match example object's size")
|
||||
for key in msgPrimitive:
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
translatedObj[key], msgPrimitive[key],
|
||||
'Message object type %s not translated correctly into primitive on '
|
||||
'key "%s"; expected "%s", got "%s"' %
|
||||
|
@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ class DefaultFormatTranslatorTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
""" Tests translation from a primitive to a Message object """
|
||||
for msg, msgPrimitive in self.cases:
|
||||
translatedObj = self.translator.fromPrimitive(msgPrimitive)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
type(translatedObj), type(msg),
|
||||
'Message type incorrectly translated; expected "%s", got "%s"' %
|
||||
(type(msg), type(translatedObj)))
|
||||
for key in msg.__dict__:
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(
|
||||
self.assertEqual(
|
||||
msg.__dict__[key], translatedObj.__dict__[key],
|
||||
'Message instance variable "%s" not translated correctly; '
|
||||
'expected "%s", got "%s"' %
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ class NodeIDTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
def testAutoCreatedID(self):
|
||||
""" Tests if a new node has a valid node ID """
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(type(self.node.node_id), bytes, 'Node does not have a valid ID')
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.node.node_id), 48, 'Node ID length is incorrect! '
|
||||
self.assertEqual(type(self.node.node_id), bytes, 'Node does not have a valid ID')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.node.node_id), 48, 'Node ID length is incorrect! '
|
||||
'Expected 384 bits, got %d bits.' %
|
||||
(len(self.node.node_id) * 8))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ class NodeIDTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
for i in range(100):
|
||||
newID = self.node._generateID()
|
||||
# ugly uniqueness test
|
||||
self.failIf(newID in generatedIDs, 'Generated ID #%d not unique!' % (i+1))
|
||||
self.assertFalse(newID in generatedIDs, 'Generated ID #%d not unique!' % (i+1))
|
||||
generatedIDs.append(newID)
|
||||
|
||||
def testKeyLength(self):
|
||||
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ class NodeIDTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
for i in range(20):
|
||||
id = self.node._generateID()
|
||||
# Key length: 20 bytes == 160 bits
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(id), 48,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(id), 48,
|
||||
'Length of generated ID is incorrect! Expected 384 bits, '
|
||||
'got %d bits.' % (len(id)*8))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -68,9 +68,9 @@ class NodeDataTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
for key, value in self.cases:
|
||||
expected_result = self.contact.compact_ip() + struct.pack('>H', value) + \
|
||||
self.contact.id
|
||||
self.failUnless(self.node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(key),
|
||||
self.assertTrue(self.node._dataStore.hasPeersForBlob(key),
|
||||
'Stored key not found in node\'s DataStore: "%s"' % key)
|
||||
self.failUnless(expected_result in self.node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(key),
|
||||
self.assertTrue(expected_result in self.node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(key),
|
||||
'Stored val not found in node\'s DataStore: key:"%s" port:"%s" %s'
|
||||
% (key, value, self.node._dataStore.getPeersForBlob(key)))
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ class NodeContactTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
yield self.node.addContact(contact)
|
||||
# ...and request the closest nodes to it using FIND_NODE
|
||||
closestNodes = self.node._routingTable.findCloseNodes(contactID, constants.k)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(closestNodes), 1, 'Wrong amount of contacts returned; '
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(closestNodes), 1, 'Wrong amount of contacts returned; '
|
||||
'expected 1, got %d' % len(closestNodes))
|
||||
self.failUnless(contact in closestNodes, 'Added contact not found by issueing '
|
||||
self.assertTrue(contact in closestNodes, 'Added contact not found by issueing '
|
||||
'_findCloseNodes()')
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
|
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ class NodeContactTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# ...and request the closest nodes to it using FIND_NODE
|
||||
closestNodes = self.node._routingTable.findCloseNodes(self.node.node_id,
|
||||
constants.k)
|
||||
self.failIf(contact in closestNodes, 'Node added itself as a contact')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(contact in closestNodes, 'Node added itself as a contact')
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# class FakeRPCProtocol(protocol.DatagramProtocol):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
for test in basicTestList:
|
||||
result = Distance(test[0])(test[1])
|
||||
self.failIf(result != test[2], 'Result of _distance() should be %s but %s returned' %
|
||||
self.assertFalse(result != test[2], 'Result of _distance() should be %s but %s returned' %
|
||||
(test[2], result))
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
|
@ -51,9 +51,9 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
# ...and request the closest nodes to it (will retrieve it)
|
||||
closestNodes = self.routingTable.findCloseNodes(contactID)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(closestNodes), 1, 'Wrong amount of contacts returned; expected 1,'
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(closestNodes), 1, 'Wrong amount of contacts returned; expected 1,'
|
||||
' got %d' % len(closestNodes))
|
||||
self.failUnless(contact in closestNodes, 'Added contact not found by issueing '
|
||||
self.assertTrue(contact in closestNodes, 'Added contact not found by issueing '
|
||||
'_findCloseNodes()')
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
|
@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
# ...and get it again
|
||||
sameContact = self.routingTable.getContact(contactID)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(contact, sameContact, 'getContact() should return the same contact')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(contact, sameContact, 'getContact() should return the same contact')
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def testAddParentNodeAsContact(self):
|
||||
|
@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
# ...and request the closest nodes to it using FIND_NODE
|
||||
closestNodes = self.routingTable.findCloseNodes(self.nodeID, constants.k)
|
||||
self.failIf(contact in closestNodes, 'Node added itself as a contact')
|
||||
self.assertFalse(contact in closestNodes, 'Node added itself as a contact')
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def testRemoveContact(self):
|
||||
|
@ -94,15 +94,15 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# Now add it...
|
||||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
# Verify addition
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]), 1, 'Contact not added properly')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]), 1, 'Contact not added properly')
|
||||
# Now remove it
|
||||
self.routingTable.removeContact(contact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]), 0, 'Contact not removed properly')
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]), 0, 'Contact not removed properly')
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def testSplitBucket(self):
|
||||
""" Tests if the the routing table correctly dynamically splits k-buckets """
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[0].rangeMax, 2**384,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[0].rangeMax, 2**384,
|
||||
'Initial k-bucket range should be 0 <= range < 2**384')
|
||||
# Add k contacts
|
||||
for i in range(constants.k):
|
||||
|
@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
nodeID = h.digest()
|
||||
contact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(nodeID, '127.0.0.1', 9182, self.protocol)
|
||||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 1,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 1,
|
||||
'Only k nodes have been added; the first k-bucket should now '
|
||||
'be full, but should not yet be split')
|
||||
# Now add 1 more contact
|
||||
|
@ -120,15 +120,15 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
nodeID = h.digest()
|
||||
contact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(nodeID, '127.0.0.1', 9182, self.protocol)
|
||||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 2,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 2,
|
||||
'k+1 nodes have been added; the first k-bucket should have been '
|
||||
'split into two new buckets')
|
||||
self.failIfEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[0].rangeMax, 2**384,
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[0].rangeMax, 2**384,
|
||||
'K-bucket was split, but its range was not properly adjusted')
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[1].rangeMax, 2**384,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[1].rangeMax, 2**384,
|
||||
'K-bucket was split, but the second (new) bucket\'s '
|
||||
'max range was not set properly')
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[0].rangeMax,
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.routingTable._buckets[0].rangeMax,
|
||||
self.routingTable._buckets[1].rangeMin,
|
||||
'K-bucket was split, but the min/max ranges were '
|
||||
'not divided properly')
|
||||
|
@ -159,9 +159,9 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
# self.assertEquals(nodeID, node_ids[i].decode('hex'))
|
||||
contact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(unhexlify(nodeID), '127.0.0.1', 9182, self.protocol)
|
||||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 2)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]._contacts), 8)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[1]._contacts), 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]._contacts), 8)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[1]._contacts), 2)
|
||||
|
||||
# try adding a contact who is further from us than the k'th known contact
|
||||
nodeID = b'020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000'
|
||||
|
@ -169,11 +169,11 @@ class TreeRoutingTableTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
contact = self.contact_manager.make_contact(nodeID, '127.0.0.1', 9182, self.protocol)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(self.routingTable._shouldSplit(self.routingTable._kbucketIndex(contact.id), contact.id))
|
||||
yield self.routingTable.addContact(contact)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 2)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]._contacts), 8)
|
||||
self.failUnlessEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[1]._contacts), 2)
|
||||
self.failIf(contact in self.routingTable._buckets[0]._contacts)
|
||||
self.failIf(contact in self.routingTable._buckets[1]._contacts)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets), 2)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[0]._contacts), 8)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len(self.routingTable._buckets[1]._contacts), 2)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(contact in self.routingTable._buckets[0]._contacts)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(contact in self.routingTable._buckets[1]._contacts)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# class KeyErrorFixedTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ class TestCostEst(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
correct_result = 4.5
|
||||
daemon = get_test_daemon(generous=True, with_fee=True)
|
||||
result = yield daemon.get_est_cost("test", size)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(result, correct_result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, correct_result)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_fee_and_ungenerous_data(self):
|
||||
|
@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ class TestCostEst(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
correct_result = size / 10 ** 6 * data_rate + fake_fee_amount
|
||||
daemon = get_test_daemon(generous=False, with_fee=True)
|
||||
result = yield daemon.get_est_cost("test", size)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(result, correct_result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, correct_result)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_generous_data_and_no_fee(self):
|
||||
|
@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ class TestCostEst(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
correct_result = 0.0
|
||||
daemon = get_test_daemon(generous=True)
|
||||
result = yield daemon.get_est_cost("test", size)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(result, correct_result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, correct_result)
|
||||
|
||||
@defer.inlineCallbacks
|
||||
def test_ungenerous_data_and_no_fee(self):
|
||||
|
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ class TestCostEst(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
correct_result = size / 10 ** 6 * data_rate
|
||||
daemon = get_test_daemon(generous=False)
|
||||
result = yield daemon.get_est_cost("test", size)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(result, correct_result)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(result, correct_result)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class TestJsonRpc(unittest.TestCase):
|
||||
|
@ -174,37 +174,37 @@ class TestFileListSorting(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
sort_options = ['points_paid']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.test_points_paid, [f['points_paid'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.test_points_paid, [f['points_paid'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_by_points_paid_ascending(self):
|
||||
sort_options = ['points_paid,asc']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.test_points_paid, [f['points_paid'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.test_points_paid, [f['points_paid'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_by_points_paid_descending(self):
|
||||
sort_options = ['points_paid, desc']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(list(reversed(self.test_points_paid)), [f['points_paid'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list(reversed(self.test_points_paid)), [f['points_paid'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_by_file_name_no_direction_specified(self):
|
||||
sort_options = ['file_name']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.test_file_names, [f['file_name'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.test_file_names, [f['file_name'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_by_file_name_ascending(self):
|
||||
sort_options = ['file_name,asc']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.test_file_names, [f['file_name'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.test_file_names, [f['file_name'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_by_file_name_descending(self):
|
||||
sort_options = ['file_name,desc']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(list(reversed(self.test_file_names)), [f['file_name'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list(reversed(self.test_file_names)), [f['file_name'] for f in file_list])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_sort_by_multiple_criteria(self):
|
||||
expected = [
|
||||
|
@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ class TestFileListSorting(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
sort_options = ['file_name,asc', 'points_paid,desc']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(expected, map(format_result, file_list))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected, map(format_result, file_list))
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that the list is not sorted as expected when sorted only by file_name.
|
||||
sort_options = ['file_name,asc']
|
||||
|
@ -250,13 +250,13 @@ class TestFileListSorting(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
sort_options = ['metadata.author']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(self.test_authors, extract_authors(file_list))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.test_authors, extract_authors(file_list))
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that the list matches the expected in reverse when sorting in descending order.
|
||||
sort_options = ['metadata.author,desc']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
file_list = self.successResultOf(deferred)
|
||||
self.assertEquals(list(reversed(self.test_authors)), extract_authors(file_list))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(list(reversed(self.test_authors)), extract_authors(file_list))
|
||||
|
||||
# Check that the list is not sorted as expected when not sorted at all.
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list)
|
||||
|
@ -269,14 +269,14 @@ class TestFileListSorting(unittest.TestCase):
|
|||
failure_assertion = self.assertFailure(deferred, Exception)
|
||||
exception = self.successResultOf(failure_assertion)
|
||||
expected_message = 'Failed to get "meta.author", key "meta" was not found.'
|
||||
self.assertEquals(expected_message, exception.message)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected_message, exception.message)
|
||||
|
||||
sort_options = ['metadata.foo.bar']
|
||||
deferred = defer.maybeDeferred(self.test_daemon.jsonrpc_file_list, sort=sort_options)
|
||||
failure_assertion = self.assertFailure(deferred, Exception)
|
||||
exception = self.successResultOf(failure_assertion)
|
||||
expected_message = 'Failed to get "metadata.foo.bar", key "foo" was not found.'
|
||||
self.assertEquals(expected_message, exception.message)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected_message, exception.message)
|
||||
|
||||
def _get_fake_lbry_files(self):
|
||||
return [self._get_fake_lbry_file() for _ in range(10)]
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue