175 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
175 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
# Case Guide and FAQ
|
||
|
||
## Summary
|
||
|
||
The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a complaint against LBRY Inc alleging that all
|
||
distributions of LBRY Credits by LBRY Inc are unregistered securities offerings. This claim is both
|
||
devoid of fact and a tremendous threat to the entire cryptocurrency industry.
|
||
|
||
The LBRY network is decentralized and not at risk. For users of the LBRY protocol and apps, your
|
||
channels, content, and token holdings are not at risk. Even in an unlikely scenario in which LBRY
|
||
Inc loses, the LBRY protocol will live on and work on it will continue.
|
||
|
||
LBRY Inc has been preparing to fight this case for three full years, which is how long the SEC has
|
||
been investigating this matter. We wanted to tell you sooner, but transparency in ongoing
|
||
investigations is not welcomed by the SEC.
|
||
|
||
## Frequently Asked Questions
|
||
|
||
### Are my LBRY Credits safe?
|
||
|
||
Yes, all of your Credits remain yours and remain usable even after the SEC’s complaint is filed and
|
||
regardless of the outcome.
|
||
|
||
If you want to ensure you have complete control over your Credits, channels, and content,
|
||
download [LBRY Desktop](https://lbry.com/get).
|
||
|
||
### Is the LBRY network in danger?
|
||
|
||
The LBRY network is robust and decentralized, and far harder to disrupt than LBRY Inc. Hundreds of
|
||
people across six continents contributed to LBRY last year (c’mon Antarctica!). Even in the scenario
|
||
that LBRY Inc is literally destroyed by the SEC as a result of this lawsuit, the LBRY project will
|
||
continue.
|
||
|
||
### What are the specific charges?
|
||
|
||
Simply put, the SEC believes that the LBRY Credits are securities and should have been registered
|
||
with the SEC prior to selling. This case is about overregulation. The SEC is not
|
||
alleging fraud and is not charging any individuals.
|
||
|
||
However, the SEC believes that, at a minimum, the following transactions were unregistered
|
||
securities offerings:
|
||
|
||
- $10,000 worth of Credit sales to Shapeshift in July of 2016 to facilitate distribution to their
|
||
users.
|
||
- Several hundred thousand dollars worth of Credit sales to Flipside Crypto in 2017 and 2018,
|
||
despite Flipside explicitly saying they’re for use on the network.
|
||
- Several million dollars worth of Credit sales on exchanges, over a period of several years, only
|
||
after the LBRY protocol was completely functional and had been in use for over a year, and always a small portion of private sales.
|
||
|
||
At times, the SEC has made representations that even tipping $.25 worth of Credits for a clever GIF
|
||
is an unregistered security transaction that must be registered and tracked. However, it’s unclear
|
||
at this time if the SEC will continue to make this allegation in court.
|
||
|
||
A full table of sales is available in Appendix A. All of our Credit use has been diligently tracked
|
||
at [lbry.com/credit-reports](https://lbry.com/credit-reports).
|
||
|
||
### What defenses will LBRY Inc assert to defeat the lawsuit?
|
||
|
||
We do not believe that the LBRY token is a security subject to SEC regulation. The LBRY Credit is a
|
||
commodity that facilitates the LBRY protocol which thereby allows individuals to publish content,
|
||
purchase content, tip creators, and boost content on the decentralized LBRY protocol.
|
||
|
||
The SEC claims that the LBRY Credits lack sufficient utility and are not purchased for reasons of
|
||
usage, which contradicts the facts and history of experience on the LBRY platform. The SEC’s
|
||
position is that if something has value and someone buys it and the market sets the price, then it’s
|
||
an investment contract and hence a security.
|
||
|
||
### Has anyone alleged harm or damages?
|
||
|
||
Despite LBRY being used by millions of people, to our knowledge, not a single person has alleged
|
||
harm or damage as a result of purchasing LBRY Credits.
|
||
|
||
### Who is LBRY Inc represented by?
|
||
|
||
LBRY has hired one of the best law firms in the blockchain space -- [Perkins Coie](https://www.perkinscoie.com/en/).
|
||
Keith Miller and Adam Schuman will represent us at trial. Keith is a former SEC enforcement
|
||
lawyer, and Adam is a former federal prosecutor. Keith and Adam have been named by *Business Insider*
|
||
as two of the top 20 cryptocurrency lawyers in the country.
|
||
|
||
### What’s the timeline?
|
||
|
||
LBRY Inc has been under investigation for three years, since May of 2018.
|
||
|
||
The SEC repeatedly requested documents from LBRY Inc at times doing so in overbearing and costly
|
||
ways that could jeopardize the survival of LBRY Inc If it’s true that LBRY Inc violated the law in
|
||
the ways the SEC alleges, all of the relevant facts were clearly known to the SEC by the fall of
|
||
2018. We’re glad to finally be getting through this painful process and finally to be allowed to
|
||
express our positions to the public and in Court.
|
||
|
||
The trial will likely not be resolved in 2021.
|
||
|
||
### What’s the cost been to LBRY Inc?
|
||
|
||
LBRY Inc has spent more than $1,000,000 on legal fees and several thousand hours of team member
|
||
time (a similar or greater value) on this case. This has been a substantial burden to bear as a
|
||
small start-up and is extremely chilling to an innovative industry. If it takes several million
|
||
dollars in legal fees just to begin, blockchain becomes much less accessible.
|
||
|
||
### Why is this case unusual compared to other cases the SEC has brought?
|
||
|
||
There are several facts about this case that are unusual to past cases:
|
||
|
||
- The SEC is not alleging fraud.
|
||
- LBRY Inc conducted no Initial Coin Offering (ICO).
|
||
- LBRY Inc did not breach any fiduciary duties.
|
||
- LBRY Inc at no time indicated that LBRY Credits were an investment, and consistently discouraged
|
||
purchasing Credits for this purpose.
|
||
- LBRY Inc did not sell any tokens until after they could be used on a functional network, a
|
||
previously stated key element by the SEC in how they assess token transactions.
|
||
|
||
### Did LBRY Inc make an attempt to settle?
|
||
|
||
Yes. The SEC declined to offer any terms that would have made it viable for U.S. citizens to
|
||
exchange tokens or to allow LBRY Inc to continue to operate. We were willing to give them a pound of
|
||
flesh, but they were only interested in our head.
|
||
|
||
### Did LBRY Inc ask how to operate legally?
|
||
|
||
We repeatedly asked the SEC for guidance on how it would be possible to run the company legally. The
|
||
SEC said that they could not tell us how to operate legally, but could only tell us that we were
|
||
breaking the law.
|
||
|
||
### What are the implications for the blockchain and tech industry?
|
||
|
||
The implications of this case are extremely dire for the blockchain and technology industry in the
|
||
United States. The SEC is alleging that any entity that transfers a blockchain token while
|
||
simultaneously working or funding work on it is performing a security offering. Under that standard,
|
||
every blockchain technology that is actively developed faces existential threat, so long as that
|
||
development is either funded by a token holder, even if indirectly, or if the developers themselves hold the token.
|
||
|
||
This case is also chilling for the start-up scene in the United States more generally. We’ve acted
|
||
in extremely good-faith, attempted to follow all the rules, and complied with the SEC at every turn.
|
||
We would be hesitant to start another company in the United States in any cutting-edge field, as
|
||
cutting-edge fields frequently have unclear regulations.
|
||
|
||
### Why are they charging LBRY Inc when there are many other companies with worse facts, or that are outright frauds and scams?
|
||
|
||
We would love to know the actual answer to this question. Our best guess is that by acting in such a
|
||
radically transparent manner, we made ourselves an easy target. We fear that the SEC is more intent
|
||
on rigid and overly strict enforcement of their interpretation of the rules, than seeking to find
|
||
constructive solutions that promote innovation and business within a reasonable regulatory
|
||
framework.
|
||
|
||
Consider an apathetic enforcer whose job review is simply “how many enforcements did you produce”. Are they more incentivized to go after what is at-hand, or what is actually wrong?
|
||
|
||
### Will LBRY Credit distribution, rewards program, or anything else change as a result of this case?
|
||
|
||
At this time, we do not expect any of these programs to change. Some exchanges may choose to no
|
||
longer allow U.S. customers to exchange LBRY Credits. We do not expect any other changes until the
|
||
case is resolved.
|
||
|
||
### Where can I view the full complaint?
|
||
|
||
This section will be updated with a link once it’s been made public.
|
||
|
||
### How can I schedule an interview or request a quote?
|
||
|
||
Email [press@lbry.com](mailto:press@lbry.com).
|
||
|
||
### How can I support LBRY Inc in this case?
|
||
|
||
- [Share this story](/#share) on social media, in your own words, using the tag #helplbrysavecrypto.
|
||
Or you can just share a link to [helplbrysavecrypto.com](https://helplbrysavecrypto.com/).
|
||
- Sign the [petition](/#petition).
|
||
- [Donate](/#donate) to our defense fund.
|
||
- If you’re involved in one of the hundreds of other blockchain companies being investigated by the
|
||
SEC, tell your story. **The SEC doesn’t want you to talk because your silence helps them.**
|
||
By talking, we can coordinate our response. Until one of us wins, we’ll continue to be
|
||
digested, bit by bit.
|
||
|
||
### How can I stay up-to-date on this case?
|
||
|
||
- Follow #helplbrysavecrypto on social media and [@lbrycom](https://twitter.com/lbrycom) on twitter.
|
||
- Updates will be posted to the [@lbry](https://odysee.com/@lbry) channel on LBRY.
|
||
- Subscribe for updates below 👇
|