LBRYCommunity/lbrycrd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 29 Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 32 Packages Wiki Activity

[refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Matt Corallo 2017-11-08 14:50:18 -05:00 committed by Suhas Daftuar
parent 5e78c5734b
commit 7721ad64f4
2 changed files with 9 additions and 16 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

3
src/consensus/tx_verify.cpp
View file

@ -172,8 +172,7 @@ bool Consensus::CheckTxInputs(const CTransaction& tx, CValidationState& state, c
// If prev is coinbase, check that it's matured
if (coin.IsCoinBase() && nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight < COINBASE_MATURITY) {
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MISSING_INPUTS, false,
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase", false,
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MISSING_INPUTS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-premature-spend-of-coinbase", false,
strprintf("tried to spend coinbase at depth %d", nSpendHeight - coin.nHeight));
}

22
src/validation.cpp
View file

@ -760,8 +760,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
const uint256 &hashAncestor = ancestorIt->GetTx().GetHash();
if (setConflicts.count(hashAncestor))
{
return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false,
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false,
return state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false, REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-spends-conflicting-tx", false,
strprintf("%s spends conflicting transaction %s",
hash.ToString(),
hashAncestor.ToString()));
@ -803,8 +802,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
CFeeRate oldFeeRate(mi->GetModifiedFee(), mi->GetTxSize());
if (newFeeRate <= oldFeeRate)
{
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; new feerate %s <= old feerate %s",
hash.ToString(),
newFeeRate.ToString(),
@ -832,8 +830,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
nConflictingSize += it->GetTxSize();
}
} else {
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "too many potential replacements", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s; too many potential replacements (%d > %d)\n",
hash.ToString(),
nConflictingCount,
@ -852,8 +849,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
// it's cheaper to just check if the new input refers to a
// tx that's in the mempool.
if (pool.exists(tx.vin[j].prevout.hash)) {
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false,
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_NONSTANDARD, "replacement-adds-unconfirmed", false,
strprintf("replacement %s adds unconfirmed input, idx %d",
hash.ToString(), j));
}
@ -865,8 +861,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
// transactions would not be paid for.
if (nModifiedFees < nConflictingFees)
{
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, less fees than conflicting txs; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(), FormatMoney(nModifiedFees), FormatMoney(nConflictingFees)));
}
@ -876,8 +871,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
CAmount nDeltaFees = nModifiedFees - nConflictingFees;
if (nDeltaFees < ::incrementalRelayFee.GetFee(nSize))
{
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false,
REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
return state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_MEMPOOL_POLICY, false, REJECT_INSUFFICIENTFEE, "insufficient fee", false,
strprintf("rejecting replacement %s, not enough additional fees to relay; %s < %s",
hash.ToString(),
FormatMoney(nDeltaFees),
@ -899,7 +893,7 @@ static bool AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker(const CChainParams& chainparams, CTxMemPool
!CheckInputs(tx, stateDummy, view, true, scriptVerifyFlags & ~SCRIPT_VERIFY_CLEANSTACK, true, false, txdata)) {
// Only the witness is missing, so the transaction itself may be fine.
state.DoS(0, ValidationInvalidReason::TX_WITNESS_MUTATED, false,
state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), true, state.GetDebugMessage());
state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), true, state.GetDebugMessage());
}
return false; // state filled in by CheckInputs
}
@ -1970,7 +1964,7 @@ bool CChainState::ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBl
// CheckTxInputs may return MISSING_INPUTS but we can't return that, as
// it's not defined for a block, so we reset the reason flag to CONSENSUS here.
state.DoS(100, ValidationInvalidReason::CONSENSUS, false,
state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage());
state.GetRejectCode(), state.GetRejectReason(), state.CorruptionPossible(), state.GetDebugMessage());
}
return error("%s: Consensus::CheckTxInputs: %s, %s", __func__, tx.GetHash().ToString(), FormatStateMessage(state));
}