fa86c8aec6 init: Remove dead code in LoadChainTip (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
`LoadChainTip` sets `::ChainActive()` based on `pcoinsTip`'s best block. `LoadChainTip` is never called when that block is null, so we can remove all code from within that method that is only executed when that block is null.
Fixes#15967 Inconsistent locking behavior in LoadChainTip
ACKs for commit fa86c8:
promag:
utACK fa86c8aec6.
practicalswift:
utACK fa86c8aec6
Empact:
utACK fa86c8aec6
laanwj:
utACK fa86c8aec6
ryanofsky:
utACK fa86c8aec6. LoadChainTip isn't called currently when pcoinsTip best block is null due to this line:
jamesob:
utACK fa86c8aec6
Tree-SHA512: 8961c0e579800a52038ac5655478468852faac055299b64d6cfdf0c213d3bf09669c4889467d09d93457f6c8b073967bb0475a137f77ddd3a3a3c03ad90001c4
01971da9bd docs: Add productivity notes for "dummy rebases" (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
When rebasing, we often want to do a "dummy rebase" whereby we are not rebasing over an updated master. This is because rebases can be confusing enough already, and we don't want to resolve upstream conflicts together with our local rebase conflicts due to fixup commits, commit rearrangements, and such. This productivity section details how to do such "dummy rebase"s.
ACKs for commit 01971d:
Tree-SHA512: 241a451cec01dc9a01a2286bdee1441cac6d28007f5b173345744d2abf436da916c3f2553ff0d1c5b3687055107b37872dda9529288645e4bae7b3cb46923b7e
8794a4b3ae QA: add test for HKDF HMAC_SHA256 L32 (Jonas Schnelli)
551d489416 Add HKDF HMAC_SHA256 L=32 implementations (Jonas Schnelli)
3b64f852e4 QA: add test for CKey::Negate() (Jonas Schnelli)
463921bb64 CKey: add method to negate the key (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
This adds a limited implementation of `HKDF` (defined by rfc5869) that supports only HMAC-SHA256 and length output of 32 bytes (will be required for v2 transport protocol).
This PR also includes a method to negate a private key which is useful to enforce public keys starting with 0x02 (or 0x03) (a requirement for the v2 transport protocol). The new `CKey::Negate()` method is pretty much a wrapper around `secp256k1_ec_privkey_negate()`.
Including tests.
This is a subset of #14032 and a pre-requirement for the v2 transport protocol.
ACKs for commit 8794a4:
Tree-SHA512: 5341929dfa29f5da766ec3612784baec6a3ad69972f08b5a985a8aafdae4dae36f104a2b888d1f5d1f33561456bd111f960d7e32c2cc4fd18e48358468f26c1a
fa8ced32a6 doc: Mention blocksonly in reduce-traffic.md, unhide option (MarcoFalke)
fa320de79f test: Add test for p2p_blocksonly (MarcoFalke)
fa3872e7b4 test: Format predicate source as multiline on error (MarcoFalke)
fa1dce7329 net: Rename ::fRelayTxes to ::g_relay_txes (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This is de-facto no longer hidden
ACKs for commit fa8ced:
jamesob:
utACK fa8ced32a6
Tree-SHA512: 474fbdee6cbd035ed9068a066b6056c1f909ec7520be0417820fcd1672ab3069b53f55c5147968978d9258fd3a3933fe1a9ef8e4f6e14fb6ebbd79701a0a1245
662d1171d9 Add option to create an encrypted wallet (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a new `passphrase` argument to `createwallet` which will create a wallet that is encrypted with that passphrase.
This is built on #15226 because it needs to first create an empty wallet, then encrypt the empty wallet and generate new keys that have only been stored in an encrypted state.
ACKs for commit 662d11:
laanwj:
utACK 662d1171d9
jnewbery:
Looks great. utACK 662d1171d9
Tree-SHA512: a53fc9a0f341eaec1614eb69abcf2d48eb4394bc89041ab69bfc05a63436ed37c65ad586c07fd37dc258ac7c7d5e4f7f93b4191407f5824bbf063b4c50894c4a
fa7e311e16 [doc] rpcwallet: Only fail rescan when blocks have been pruned (MarcoFalke)
aaaa57c2aa scripted-diff: Bump copyright headers in wallet (MarcoFalke)
faf3729242 wallet: Only fail rescan when blocks have actually been pruned (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This brings the behaviour of the import* calls closer to importmulti. After this change, the difference between importmulti and the other import* calls is
* that in importmulti you can "opt-out" of scanning early blocks by setting a later timestamp.
* that in importmulti the wallet will successfully import the data, but fail to rescan. Whereas in the other calls, the wallet will abort before importing the data.
ACKs for commit fa7e31:
promag:
utACK fa7e311e16.
jnewbery:
utACK fa7e311e16
Tree-SHA512: a57d52ffea94b64e0eb9b5d3a7a63031325833908297dd14eb0c5251ffea3b2113b131003f1db4e9599e014369165a57f107a7150bb65e4c791e5fe742f33cb8
f3b90f2e05 Run all lint scripts (Julian Fleischer)
Pull request description:
The description reads:
```
# This script runs all contrib/devtools/lint-*.sh files, and fails if any exit
# with a non-zero status code.
```
This runs all scripts and returns with a non-zero exit code if any failed.
ACKs for commit f3b90f:
Tree-SHA512: 4f1f6435855dd5074a38c5887be6f096ec66f4dbe8712bdfd5fed0c510f1b2c083b7318cf3bfbdcc85982429fb7b4309e57ce48cc11736c86376658ec7ffea8f
The description reads:
```
# This script runs all contrib/devtools/lint-*.sh files, and fails if any exit
# with a non-zero status code.
```
This runs all scripts and returns with a non-zero exit code if any failed.
c01c065b9d Do not construct out-of-bound pointers in SHA512/SHA1/RIPEMD160 code (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
This looks like an issue in the current SHA256/512 code, where a pointer outside of the area pointed to may be constructed (this is UB in theory, though in practice every supported platform treats pointers as integers).
I discovered this while investigating #14580. Sadly, it does not fix it.
ACKs for commit c01c06:
practicalswift:
utACK c01c065b9d
Tree-SHA512: 47660e00f164f38c36a1ab46e52dd91cd33cfda6a6048d67541c2f8e73c050d4d9d81b5c149bfad281212d52f204f57bebf5b19879dc7a6a5f48aa823fbc2c02
Also renames global methods for clarity:
- ::FlushStateToDisk() -> CChainState::ForceFlushStateToDisk()
- This performs an unconditional flush.
- ::PruneAndFlush() -> CChainState::PruneAndFlush()
along with DisconnectResult, and CBlockIndexWorkComparator.
The CChainState interface needs to be known to the rest of the system because
many global functions will move to CChainState methods. This is to allow
other parts of the system to be parameterized per chainstate instance
instead of assuming a single global.
1b05dff080 Fix portability issue with pthreads (grim-trigger)
Pull request description:
This change resolves the following issue:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15951
Only tested on OpenBSD 6.5/amd64
ACKs for commit 1b05df:
fanquake:
tACK 1b05dff. Tested on OpenBSD6.4 (`vagrant`).
laanwj:
utACK 1b05dff080
Tree-SHA512: af48581af32820d5adc9ae5abb44f8f1b592c323f86fe2484108b81629389f6ef347598f9a087aa6476ac553e59828cd7927bb4ab11dc70e7c9a944a92fc54ae
fad0ce59e9 tests: Fail if RPC has been added without tests (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Need to be run with --coverage
ACKs for commit fad0ce:
ryanofsky:
utACK fad0ce59e9. New comment in travis.yml is the only change since last review.
Tree-SHA512: b53632dfe9865ec06991bfcba2fd67238bebbb866b355f09624eaf233257b2bca902caac6c24abb358b2f4c1c43f28ca75e30982765911e1a117102df65276d9
The original ORCHID prefix was deprecated as of 2014-03, the new
ORCHIDv2 prefix was allocated by RFC7343 as of 2014-07. We did not
consider the original ORCHID prefix routable, and I don't see any reason
to consider the new one to be either.
f1a77b0c51 [docs] Add doxygen comment for CReserveKey (John Newbery)
37796b2dd4 [docs] Add doxygen comment for CKeyPool (John Newbery)
ef2d515af3 [wallet] move-only: move CReserveKey to be next to CKeyPool (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Docs/move-only
Adds doxygen comments for the CKeyPool and CReserveKey objects. The way these work is pretty confusing and it's easy to overlook details (eg https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15557#discussion_r271956393).
These are on the verbose side, but I think too much commenting is better than not enough. Happy to take feedback on what's an appropriate level.
ACKs for commit f1a77b:
jonatack:
Thanks, John. Re-ACK f1a77b0c51, doc-only changes with respect to previous review.
jb55:
ACK f1a77b0c51
Tree-SHA512: 8bc97c7029cd2e8d9bfd2d2144eeff73474c71eda5a9d10817e1578ca0b70da677252037d83143faaff1808e2193408a21a8a89d36049eac77fd313990f0b67b
a407b6fdf3 [tests] Make random seed logged and settable (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This allows tests which use randomness to be reproducibly run on failure.
ACKs for commit a407b6:
jonatack:
re-ACK a407b6fdf3
jb55:
great! utACK a407b6fdf3
Tree-SHA512: e1e89e6e76d11ddec71a8f0f077227e4b46303f80461b170900d3f95d4dcc4187b0d1decfd63562ea970aaaf530ef032a3e64ed1669aac29033d95161855fda3
f6bb11fd37 Add test for ArgsManager::GetChainName (Russell Yanofsky)
4b331159df Add unit test NextString, ForEachNoDup functions (Russell Yanofsky)
05bfee3451 util_SettingsMerge test cleanup (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
There was some test coverage previously, but it was limited and didn't test conflicting and negated arguments.
ACKs for commit f6bb11:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK f6bb11fd37
Tree-SHA512: d03596614dc48584c7a9440117b107c6abb23fd4c7fa15fb4015351ec3de08b2656bc956ce05310663675672343d7a6aff35421657f29172080c7005045680b0
ccc27bdcd2 doc: Clarify -blocksdir usage (Daniel McNally)
Pull request description:
This PR attempts to clarify and correct the `-blocksdir` argument description and default value. `-blocksdir` does not refer to the full path to the actual `blocks` directory, but rather the root/parent directory which contains the `blocks` directory. Accordingly, the default value is `<datadir>` and not `<datadir>/blocks` - this behavior of defaulting to the datadir can also be seen in init.cpp:
```cpp
if (gArgs.IsArgSet("-blocksdir")) {
path = fs::system_complete(gArgs.GetArg("-blocksdir", ""));
if (!fs::is_directory(path)) {
path = "";
return path;
}
} else {
path = GetDataDir(false);
}
```
It also attempts to clarify that only the `.dat` files containing block data are impacted by `-blocksdir`, not the index files.
I believe this would close#12828.
ACKs for commit ccc27b:
hebasto:
utACK ccc27bdcd2
Tree-SHA512: 7b65f66b0579fd56e8c8cd4f9f22d6af56181817762a68deccd7fca51820ad82d9a0c48f5f1f012e746c67bcdae7af4555fad867cb620a9ca538d465c9d86c2b
bd63c1ed12 [docs] Update release-notes.md (Jon Atack)
96d32a7bc0 [docs] Update release-process.md (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Updates to `release-notes.md`:
- Write an introduction explaining how to use `release-notes.md` as a template for the release notes draft wiki for collaborative editing at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki, as seen for the 0.17.0 and 0.18.0 releases.
Updates to `release-process.md`:
- Create a release notes draft wiki at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki.
- As per http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-03-28.html#l-342, for the period during which the release notes are being edited on the wiki, the version on the branch should be wiped and replaced with a link to the wiki which should be used for all announcements until final.
- Before -final, remove the "Needs release note" label from relevant PRs/issues and merge the release notes from the wiki into the branch.
- Create a pinned meta-issue dedicated to testing the release candidate and communicate it in release announcements where useful. The former is done in practice (e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15555, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14902) and the latter addresses the discussion here yesterday: https://x0f.org/web/statuses/101753569204220416.
- Reorganise the headers in the Branch Updates section.
- Update the version numbers in the examples.
- Adapt and merge in the updates in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15692.
ACKs for commit bd63c1:
Tree-SHA512: a436d6d0971bf00f081d4e2660c3b37a0f96913236c33934453387d63c11556a80e428b110f5629f07a6aa98e627f86c799d10c3f40e9f0c27b22275e04f6fa8
- Create a release notes draft wiki for collaborative editing at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki as seen for releases 0.17.0 and 0.18.0.
- As per http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-03-28.html#l-342, for the period during which the notes are being edited on the wiki, the version on the branch should be wiped and replaced with a link to the wiki which should be used for all announcements until final.
- Before final, remove the "Needs release note" label from relevant PRs/issues and merge the release notes from the wiki into the branch.
- Create a pinned meta-issue dedicated to testing the release candidate and communicate it in release announcements where useful. The former is done in practice (e.g. #15555, #14902) and the latter addresses the discussion here: https://x0f.org/web/statuses/101753569204220416.
- Adapt and merge the updates in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15692.
- Update the version numbers in all the examples.
- Reorganise the headers in the Branch Updates section.
d20d756752 rpc: faster getblockstats using BlockUndo data (Felix Weis)
Pull request description:
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for `-txindex`, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
```
# 2018-11-25T16:36:19Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.99.0-edc715240-dirty (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 62% cpu 0.004 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.21s user 0.19s system 17% cpu 2.302 total
# 2018-11-25T16:39:17Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.0 (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 87% cpu 0.002 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.24s user 0.22s system 0% cpu 3:19.42 total
```
ACKs for commit d20d75:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK d20d756752
Tree-SHA512: 5babc3eb8d2fee2cb23dc12f522656b80737a540cbf2b13390a8f388304c46c064cca76f896b46a6e2abae8cc582d28e1ab20dd4bb17ad6142f20630c2d30c54
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for -txindex, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
