12d1b77f7e [tests] Fixed intermittent failure in p2p_sendheaders.py. (lmanners)
Pull request description:
Added handling for the case where headers are announced over more than one message.
refs #12453
Tree-SHA512: 2c5b48ff019089b86e358181ba170d3aac09d4ae41ec79c2718e0ee83705860501bbcb8fd94d0f5c4f86c0d54a96781a967716621bb8c5ecc991b39af3cec506
09c6699900 [qa] Handle disconnect_node race (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
Tree-SHA512: 3078cea0006fcb507c812004a777c505eb1e9dda7c6df12dbbe72395a73ff6f6760f597b6492054f5487b34534417ddef5fbad30553c135c288c4b7cfce79223
4d4185a4f0 Make gArgs aware of the arguments (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Instead of each binary generating and printing it's own help string, have gArgs know what the args are and generate the help string.
This is the first commit of #13112 pulled out.
Tree-SHA512: d794c872b834bc56c78d947549f9cf046a8174984ab0c7b4ba06bc51d36dca11a4ed88afafe76bb4f776cdba042e17e30b9c2ed7b195bef7df77a1327823f989
Several tests call disconnect_nodes() on each node-pair in rapid
succession, resulting in a race condition if a node disconnects a peer
in-between the calculation of the nodeid's to disconnect and the
invocation of the disconnectnode rpc call. Handle this.
a2f678d Bugfix: the end of a reorged chain is invalid when connect fails (Pieter Wuille)
Pull request description:
Introduced in 4e0eed88ac
When an invalid block is found during a reorg, we know the last of the blocks in the was-to-be-connected chain is invalid, but not necessarily the first. As `vpIndexToConnect` is ordered in decreasing height, the end of the reorg is the front of the vector, and not the back.
This only affected the warning system.
Tree-SHA512: ddf749f8a78083811a5a17152723f545c1463768d09dc9832ec3682e803a3c106fb768de9fa91c03aa95e644d4e41361a7e4ee791940fd7d51cdefea90de31fc
beee49b [tests] Allow stderr to be tested against specified string (John Newbery)
e503671 [Tests] Use LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_=1 in tests (John Newbery)
c22ce8a [Tests] Write stdout/stderr to datadir instead of temp file. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
**Due to a merge conflict, this is now based on #10267. Please review that PR first!**
Subset of #12379 now that parts of that PR have been merged.
#12362 was only observed when running the functional tests locally because:
- by defatul libc logs to `/dev/tty` instead of stderr
- the functional tests only check for substring inclusion in stderr when we're expecting bitcoind to fail.
This PR tightens our checking of stderr and will cause tests to fail if there is any unexpected message in stderr:
- commit *Write stdout/stderr to datadir instead of temp file* writes stderr to a file in the datadir instead of a temporary file. This helps with debugging in the case of failure.
- commit *Use LIBC_FATAL_STDERR=1 in tests* ensures that libc failures are logged to stderr instead of the terminal.
commit *Assert that bitcoind stdout is empty on shutdown* asserts that stderr is empty on bitcoind shutdown.
Tree-SHA512: 21111030e667b3b686f2a7625c2b625ebcfb6998e1cccb4f3932e8b5d21fb514b19a73ac971595d049343430e9a63155986a7f5648cad55b8f36f3c58b1c7048
By default, libc will print fatal errors to /dev/tty instead of stderr.
Adding the LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_ to the environment variables allows
us to catch libc errors in stderr and test for them.
fac1e1f qa: Remove unused option --srcdir (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `srcdir` option was both unused and misleading; It should have been called `builddir`. So remove it.
Tree-SHA512: 2c24dcf2aa82219158b8cbbf03dd3f0f51f805f1f5f670faa1fd59e5a8d60fda120ffddadeccb058d8d3f20583b4952be7afd2df6bbefb9367d35c0f0a9fda3c
891beb0 [test] fundrawtransaction: lock watch-only shared address (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
`self.nodes[0]` creates an address which is watch-only-shared with `self.nodes[3]`. If `nodes[0]` spends the associated UTXO during any of its sends later, the watchonly test will fail, as `nodes[3]` now has insufficient funds.
I ran into this in #12257 and this commit is in that PR as well, but I figured I'd split it out (and remove from there once/if merged).
Tree-SHA512: d04a04b1ecebe82127cccd47c1b3de311bf07f4b51dff80db20ea2f142e1d5c4a85ed6180c5c0b081d550e238c742e119b953f60f487deac5a3f3536e1a8d9fe
18c0b84 [bitcoin-11004] creating another jobs for the CHECK_DOC=1, separated from the core jobs (Grady Laksmono)
Pull request description:
Configure a new Travis job that runs against PRs, and only runs the `CHECK_DOC` tests. At the same time, the `CHECK_DOC` stuff in the existing job would be removed.
Fixes#11004
Tree-SHA512: 6e1ed0a0742f2f141ac40c666538d4c0d5eab5766a2f2364ba6d940a9be6c93a28970a4191b0641a61e25fe87e3af2367e51a43f3bc930f819be2a2c54326b1d
25b7ab9 doc: Add release notes for -includeconf (Karl-Johan Alm)
0f0badd test: Test includeconf parameter. (Karl-Johan Alm)
629ff8c -includeconf=<path> support in config handler, for including external configuration files (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
Fixes: #10071.
Done:
- adds `-includeconf=<path>`, where `<path>` is relative to `datadir` or to the path of the file being read, if in a file
- protects against circular includes
- updates help docs
~~~Thoughts:~~~
- ~~~I am not sure how to test this in a neat manner. Feedback on this would be nice. Will dig/think though.~~~
Tree-SHA512: cb31f1b2f69fbc0890d264948eb2e501ac05cf12f5e06a5942f9c1539eb15ea8dc3cae817f4073aecb2fcc21d0386747f14f89d990772003a76e2a6d25642553
f30e9be4c1 RPC Docs: gettxout*: clarify bestblock and unspent counts (David A. Harding)
Pull request description:
Expounds on two things I've seen confuse inexperienced users:
- transactions/outputs in `gettxoutsetinfo`: a user thought this was the total number of transactions or outputs ever seen on the chain, whereas it's only the number in the UTXO.
- bestblock in `gettxout`: a user thought this was the block that included the output, not realizing it was the tip of the current best block chain. I also copied this text to `gettxoutsetinfo` for congruency. I skimmed other uses of "bestblock" in the RPC docs and they seemed clear to me.
Tree-SHA512: c2161c497bef5fe15ee9f1e2a4413fa099b5baa36205ba1ba4b3822885b3ccd1badb9c118a0334f47ba6fa7fff5818ac359cfac6a1108c6847a876b1a251bb7c
Introduced in 4e0eed88ac
When an invalid block is found during a reorg, we know the last of the blocks in
the was-to-be-connected chain is invalid, but not necessarily the first. As
vpIndexToConnect is ordered in decreasing height, the end of the reorg is the
front of the vector, and not the back.
This only affected the warning system.
ab3f4dd tests: Add test for 64-bit PE, modify 32-bit test results (Chun Kuan Lee)
Pull request description:
9a75d29b6f change the error result from `PIE` to `DYNAMIC_BASE`. And there are no test for 64-bit, so I made one
Tree-SHA512: 9d5643dadf4d9fc34ea32d94655bfb98eec2f7bc2820b4b0f525d5acf1cd22f3acf38bf8904dda4f50fd9ca5a5e56d566a392e6f804eea6e50e03cba40048621
16be13345 Fix rescanblockchain rpc to property report progress (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
Previously it assumed tip in all cases. This also extracts a RescanVerificationProgress helper object whose role is to manage reporting, in order to simplify ScanForWalletTransactions - more lines in total, but much simpler to follow the core logic.
Tree-SHA512: 5ebed0c56fae4ccfe613ff1d7082cb6da5a86635a8993ed3af70b500a4ea43074121aea9219b2f0321fbfeb7efcb964bdc2199297a64ca0fa85d9d07aa637d40
ddebde7 Add Windows shutdown handler (Chun Kuan Lee)
Pull request description:
Exit properly when clicked the red X of Windows Console
Tree-SHA512: f030edd08868390662b42abfa1dc6bd702166c6c19f5b1f8e7482e202451e79fb6f37ea672c26c2eb0d32c367bfca86160fbee624696c53828f280b7070be6a0
20ce5af Print a log message if we fail to shrink the debug log file (practicalswift)
29c9bdc Handle unsuccessful fseek(...):s (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Handle unsuccessful `fseek(...)`:s.
**Note to reviewers:** What is the most appropriate course of actions for each of these unsuccessful `fseek(...)`:s?
Tree-SHA512: 5b3d82dbdd15d434d3f08dcb4df62888da4df8541d2586f56a4e529083005f6782c39e10645acd1ec403da83061bbfd8dbf2dddc66e09268d410ad0918c61876
43f3dec00 Remove enum specifier (to avoid re-declare scoped enum as unscoped) (donaloconnor)
Pull request description:
MSVC fails to compile with the changes made in #10742
The problem is enum types were changed to scoped (`enum class`) but in some places `enum` as an unscoped is used.
This is a very simple fix and I've tested it.
Edit: Had to remove enum altogether - `enum class` doesn't compile on clang.
Tree-SHA512: 13e21666243585a133c74c81249a1fa4098d6b7aa3cda06be871fa017c0ad9bb7b0725f801160b9d31678448d668718197941fd84702ebdef15128c27d92cd70
fad63eb [logging] Don't incorrectly log that REJECT messages are unknown. (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
Reject messages are logged to debug.log if NET debug logging is enabled.
Because of the way the `ProcessMessages()` function is structured,
processing for REJECT messages will also drop through to the default
branch and incorrectly log `Unknown command "reject" from peer-?`. Fix
that by exiting from `ProcessMessages()` early.
without this PR:
```
2018-05-03T17:37:00.930600Z received: reject (21 bytes) peer=0
2018-05-03T17:37:00.930620Z Reject message code 16: spammy spam
2018-05-03T17:37:00.930656Z Unknown command "reject" from peer=0
```
with this PR:
```
2018-05-03T17:35:04.751246Z received: reject (21 bytes) peer=0
2018-05-03T17:35:04.751274Z Reject message code 16: spammy spam
```
Tree-SHA512: 5c84c98433ab99e0db2dd481f9c2db6f87ff0d39022ff317a791737e918714bbcb4a23e81118212ed8e594ebcf098ab7f52f7fd5e21ebc3f07b1efb279b9b30b
cbba1d2da4 Add compile time checking for all ::mempool.cs runtime locking assertions (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Add compile time checking for `::mempool.cs` runtime locking assertions.
This PR is a subset of #12665. The PR was broken up to make reviewing easier.
The intention is that literally all `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED`/`LOCKS_EXCLUDED`:s added in this PR should follow either directly or indirectly from `AssertLockHeld(…)`/`AssertLockNotHeld(…)`:s already existing in the repo.
Consider the case where function `A(…)` contains `AssertLockHeld(cs_foo)` (without
first locking `cs_foo` in `A`), and that `B(…)` calls `A(…)` (without first locking `cs_main`):
* It _directly_ follows that: `A(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
* It _indirectly_ follows that: `B(…)` should have an `EXCLUSIVE_LOCKS_REQUIRED(cs_foo)` annotation.
Tree-SHA512: 1b5ec1cfca6be67edd1298fea1a52b5572ce833dd4ad05c4583f753c2d3229402663373675df87e950151d5c41aeb3ee02f0ad935ed83fe2f45ca8e4d55d901e
c3f34d06be Make it clear which functions that are intended to be translation unit local (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Make it clear which functions that are intended to be translation unit local.
Do not share functions that are meant to be translation unit local with other translation units. Use internal linkage for those consistently.
Tree-SHA512: 05eebd233d5cfbf6116724eec3a99b465bf534ca220f2b6f5e56341a7da41387454d3cb6ceadd8ab6714a5df94069e4ad0dcab8801ccc7e8949be7199a19fb53
a508091c59 doc: Mention good first issue list in CONTRIBUTING.md (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Tree-SHA512: a954cda62d6dc8ab78809565be392a1c9f55c543e8d5c1a5a8588c0062e1a11bd4968991646e4aa5bd9b9761b1765fde4ceab8fea7a973148122ff249d728b92
Reject messages are logged to debug.log if NET debug logging is enabled.
Because of the way the `ProcessMessages()` function is structured,
processing for REJECT messages will also drop through to the default
branch and incorrectly log `Unknown command "reject" from peer-?`. Fix
that by exiting from `ProcessMessages()` early.
without this PR:
```
2018-05-03T17:37:00.930600Z received: reject (21 bytes) peer=0
2018-05-03T17:37:00.930620Z Reject message code 16: spammy spam
2018-05-03T17:37:00.930656Z Unknown command "reject" from peer=0
```
with this PR:
```
2018-05-03T17:35:04.751246Z received: reject (21 bytes) peer=0
2018-05-03T17:35:04.751274Z Reject message code 16: spammy spam
```
CWallet::ScanForWalletTransactions did not previously take into account
pindexStop when calculating progress.
Renamed progress vars to progress_*.
rescanblockchain is the only rpc that uses this parameter.
a59dac3 refactor: Avoid extra lookups of mapAddressBook in listunspent RPC (João Barbosa)
d76962e rpc: Reduce cs_main lock in listunspent (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
On my system, where the wallet has 10000 unspents, the `cs_main` lock duration changed from 191ms to 36ms. The loop that generates the response takes around 155ms. So, the lock duration is reduced to around 20%.
Tree-SHA512: ddaae591f39da59a9d1a8e9ffe773d857687789476f566ca273d310ad531da6dacff80cac69f3334c601c251ac7c5ed4136656c725aa3d611c6bbf734111946e
1e46d8a Get rid of ambiguous OutputType::NONE value (Russell Yanofsky)
Pull request description:
Based on suggestion by @sipa https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12119#issuecomment-357982763
After #12119, the NONE output type was overloaded to refer to either an output type that couldn't be parsed, or to an automatic change output mode. This change drops the NONE enum and uses a simple bool to indicate parse failure, and a new CHANGE_AUTO enum to refer the change output type.
This change is almost a pure refactoring except it makes RPCs reject empty string ("") address types instead of treating them like they were unset. This simplifies the parsing code a little bit and could prevent RPC usage mistakes. It's noted in the release notes.
Follows up #12408 by @MarcoFalke
Followups for future PRs:
- [ ] Add explicit support for specifying "auto" in `ParseOutputType` as suggested by promag and sipa: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#issuecomment-374799567 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969481
- [ ] Add wallet `AddressChangeType` method to complement `TransactionChangeType`: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/12729#discussion_r175969618.
Tree-SHA512: 8b08b272bcb177a0a9e556dcd965840a7fe601ef83ca97938b879c9b1a33b5b3f96939e1bceef11ba7c644ac21bfd6c1dbc6ca715cd1da4ace50475240e4ee48
3fdc5fe Make sure initialization occurs in the constructor (practicalswift)
1e7813e Remove redundant initializations from the constructor (practicalswift)
f131872 Initialize non-static class members where they are defined (practicalswift)
73bc1b7 Initialize editStatus and autoCompleter. Previously not initialized where defined or in constructor. (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
Initialize variables previously neither defined where defined nor in constructor:
* `editStatus`
* `autoCompleter`
Also; initialize non-static class members where they are defined in accordance with developer notes.
Tree-SHA512: 84f0cb87ec8394ed7641bfa0731be2ec72e6a920e00ae206ff89e2e7c960358f603c52878311b24601a33aa7cba6ea4f9a78a8ade88112dea0f41efb08e84e25
4b75dcf devtools: Make linter check LogPrint calls (MarcoFalke)
ff2ad2d Add missing newlines to LogPrint debug logging (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
~~Don't we have a linter that should catch these?~~
Tree-SHA512: 1a58eca01ded9c1719e943c09447deeb59bb06dba00528cf460eefe857fdf95b42671fbdebc87cdd2f51e931e86942d06587ffd097cbb0d8dd9eb7a0ba17a8f0
