17d178fb94 doc: add release-notes for getmempoolentry weight field addition (fanquake)
9c9cc2bd20 qa: Add RPC tests for weight in mempool entry (Daniel Edgecumbe)
54aaa7883c RPC: add weight to mempool entry output (Daniel Edgecumbe)
Pull request description:
Rebase of #14649 (which itself was a rebase of #11256).
Squash the two test related commits, and swapped out `size` usage for `vsize`.
Added a commit with release notes.
ACKs for top commit:
emilengler:
Concept ACK 17d178f
instagibbs:
utACK 17d178fb94
meshcollider:
utACK 17d178fb94
Tree-SHA512: 1d354c9837e0ad0afa40325de9329b9e62688d5eab4d9e1cf9b46d8ae29d08f42d903ab37a41751c2ea8f9034231b21095881b1f5d911cb542b8b06bc85dc7cd
b6e9ff8996 build: Remove src/obj directory from repository (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
This directory is automatically created by the build process (in the build target directory, see #16588) and doesn't need to be in the repository nor in the tarballs.
Move associated ignore directive to top-level `.gitignore` file.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
Concept ACK b6e9ff8996
Tree-SHA512: 5f3f5a0e8f19ecf925eb16cab327c3023b8512731bbaad5875828da7a25fdda1b77f6fbd06c002a383913627dc9b552f09ad27c57bcf0cb020ed3b1f506e5fef
ffea41f530 Enable all tests in feature_config_args.py (Hennadii Stepanov)
66f5c17f8a Use CheckDataDirOption() for code uniformity (Hennadii Stepanov)
7e33a18a34 Fix datadir handling in bitcoin-cli (Hennadii Stepanov)
b28dada374 Fix datadir handling in bitcoin-qt (Hennadii Stepanov)
50824093bb Fix datadir handling in bitcoind (Hennadii Stepanov)
740d41ce9f Add CheckDataDirOption() function (Hennadii Stepanov)
c1f325126c Return absolute path early in AbsPathForConfigVal (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Fix#15240, see: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15240#issuecomment-487353760Fix#15745
Fix broken `feature_config_args.py` tests (disabled by MarcoFalke@fabe28a0cdcfa13e0e595a0905e3642a960d3077). All test are enabled now.
This PR is alternative to #13621.
User's `$HOME` directory is not touched unnecessarily now.
~To make reviewing easier only `bitcoind` code is modified (neither `bitcoin-cli` nor `bitcoin-qt`).~
Refs:
- https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15745#issuecomment-479852569 by **laanwj**
- #16220
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 4a4cda10e0b67c8f374da0c9567003d2b566d948e7f8550fe246868b5794c15010e88ea206009480b9cd2f737f310a15e984f920730448f99a895893bed351df
20ea9ef6ce [doc] mention whitelist is inbound, and applies to blocksonly (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
* `-whitelist` only impacts inbound nodes (see #9923). This is obvious in the context of allowing those nodes to connect to you, but there are additional whitelist features where this is less obvious, such as mempool relay behavior.
* `whitelistrelay` (on by default) explains that `-blocksonly` makes an exception for transactions from whitelisted nodes, but it wasn't documented (nor obvious imo) the other way around. See also https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15984#issuecomment-490645552
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 03e363a5da5d81ad147d1c7e38bf11114df8bb89bdd66fb551520b25f810efa886ec6e649d3b435c4935e0ae4f39bb718bc7bb5778b9de6aa0b71e970a431af8
3b05f0f70f Reformat p2p_permissions.py (nicolas.dorier)
ce7eac3cb0 [Fix] The default whitelistrelay should be true (nicolas.dorier)
Pull request description:
I thought `whitelistrelay` default was `false` when it is `true`.
The root of the issue come from the fact that all references to `DEFAULT_` are not in the scope of this file, so hard coding of default values are used everywhere in `net.cpp`. I think that in a separate PR we should fix that more fundamentally everywhere.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 3b05f0f70f.
Sjors:
re-ACK 3b05f0f70f
Tree-SHA512: f4a75f986fa2adf1a5f1c91605e0d261f7ac5ac8535fb05437d83b8392dbcf5cc1a47d755adcf8ad8dc67a88de28060187200fd3ce06545261a5c7ec0fea831a
Some failure conditions implicitly fail by failing some other check.
But the error messages are more helpful if they say explicitly what
actually caused the failure, so add those as failure conditions and
errors.
d117f4541d Add test for setban (nicolas.dorier)
dc7529abf0 [Fix] Allow connection of a noban banned peer (nicolas.dorier)
Pull request description:
Reported by @MarcoFalke on https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16248#discussion_r314026195
The bug would mean that if the peer connecting to you is banned, but whitelisted without specific permissions, it would not be able to connect to the node.
The solution is just to move the same line below.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
Agree inline is more clear. utACK d117f45
MarcoFalke:
ACK d117f4541d
Tree-SHA512: 0fed39acb1e8db67bb0bf4c4de3ad034ae776f38d55bd661f1ae0e1a4c6becaf1824ab46ed8279f2f31df3f4b29ff56461d8b167d3e9cece62cfe58b5a912811
fa27c55b05 util: Move ResolveErrMsg to util/error (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Pull request https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16248#discussion_r314035862 duplicated the body of this util function. The whole point of the util function is to be shared, so do that here as a fixup to #16248
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
utACK fa27c55
ryanofsky:
utACK fa27c55b05
Tree-SHA512: e2b25ae05082fe9d0ee94bdc7d51f801bd9f78e8fc2b141e9a313e008dbb8a77653fe876e111c802c676859c6b76c37a673d1f8cfbe7ad25607a5ffcffde19fd
390874c722 qt: Remove menu icons (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
Remove the icons from the application menu. Why remove?
- They are inconsistently applied, some actions had icons, some newer ones don't. Good luck coming up with a sensible icon for everything
- Menu icons don't seem to have a place in modern UI: for example, GNOME, MacOS have stopped showing these a long time ago (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16584#issuecomment-521195090)
- Less bikeshedding opportunity about "what should the icon for this be"
Removed icons:
```
/icons/quit res/icons/quit.png
/icons/about res/icons/about.png
/icons/about_qt res/icons/about_qt.png
/icons/options res/icons/configure.png
/icons/key res/icons/key.png
/icons/verify res/icons/verify.png (also .svg)
/icons/debugwindow res/icons/debugwindow.png
/icons/open res/icons/open.png
/icons/info res/icons/info.png
/icons/filesave res/icons/filesave.png
```
I checked that these icons are used nowhere else.
Removed from the menu not removed from the repository, because still referenced by other parts of the code:
```
/icons/lock_closed
/icons/edit
/icons/address-book
/icons/send
```
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 390874c722 -- diff looks correct
l2a5b1:
ACK 390874c722 - Bitcoin Core has a very simple application menu. As long as the menu items describe their actions clearly and unambiguously then the icons alongside the label are redundant and offer very little value, if anything at all.
kallewoof:
ACK 390874c722
jonasschnelli:
utACK 390874c722
Tree-SHA512: dd1c52bed3bc6fb9359d5ea1b229a023dafaf813ae640775cbb433b9886bbc11a7d6a4306bac350b26d45fca9b495e4468630f2a32e185570e05f16a3ce45b47
72eaab073b tests: functional watch-only wallet tests (William Casarin)
72ffbdc579 doc: add release note for include_watchonly default changes (William Casarin)
003a3c73c0 rpcwallet: document include_watchonly default for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
a50d9e6c0b rpcwallet: default include_watchonly to true for watchonly wallets (William Casarin)
Pull request description:
Right now it's a bit annoying to deal with watchonly wallets, many rpc commands have an `include_watchonly` argument that needs to be explicitly set.
Wallets created with `createwallet` can have a `disable_private_keys` parameter, for those wallets we already know that they are watchonly, so there's no reason to have to explicitly ask for it for every command. Instead we check this wallet flag when the `include_watchonly` parameter isn't set.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
Code review ACK 72eaab073b
Sjors:
ACK 72eaab073b
promag:
ACK 72eaab073b, code review only, didn't look closely to the test.
kallewoof:
ACK 72eaab073b
fanquake:
ACK 72eaab073b - I've looked over the changes, they make sense to me. Compiled and ran the tests etc.
Tree-SHA512: d3646b55e97f386594d7efc994f0712f3888475c6a5dc7f131ac9f8c49bf5d4677182b88f42b34152abe1ad101ecadd152b4c20e9d3c1267190db36f77ab8bd7
6576a8765f doc: Improve versionbits.h documentation (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
While reviewing burying of BIP 9 deployments, seen that versionbits.h wasn't that much documented. This is an attempt to improve it. It can be useful, given after burying this code isn't going to be used anymore and isn't straightforward at first sight.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK 6576a8765f
ajtowns:
ACK 6576a8765f
fanquake:
ACK 6576a8765f
Tree-SHA512: 906463e0b22b988f89d77f798bf94d294f70467d29975088b87384764fb5d0dd1350be67562cc264656f61f1eada2cba20f99c0d797d1d7f90203c269e34c714
e78aaf41f4 [docs] Add release notes for burying bip 9 soft fork deployments (John Newbery)
8319e738f9 [tests] Add coverage for the content of getblockchaininfo.softforks (James O'Beirne)
0328dcdcfc [Consensus] Bury segwit deployment (John Newbery)
1c93b9b31c [Consensus] Bury CSV deployment height (John Newbery)
3862e473f0 [rpc] Tidy up reporting of buried and ongoing softforks (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
This hardcodes CSV and segwit activation heights, similar to the BIP 90 buried deployments for BIPs 34, 65 and 66.
CSV and segwit have been active for over 18 months. Hardcoding the activation height is a code simplification, makes it easier to understand segwit activation status, and reduces technical debt.
This was originally attempted by jl2012 in #11398 and again by me in #12360.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK e78aaf41f4 ; checked diff to previous acked commit, checked tests still work
ariard:
ACK e78aaf4, check diff, run the tests again and successfully activated csv/segwit heights on mainnet as expected.
MarcoFalke:
ACK e78aaf41f4 (still didn't check if the mainnet block heights are correct, but the code looks good now)
Tree-SHA512: 7e951829106e21a81725f7d3e236eddbb59349189740907bb47e33f5dbf95c43753ac1231f47ae7bee85c8c81b2146afcdfdc11deb1503947f23093a9c399912
582d2cd747 Cover UTXO set access with lock annotations (James O'Beirne)
5693530685 refactor: have CCoins* data managed under CChainState (James O'Beirne)
fae6ab6aed refactor: pcoinsTip -> CChainState::CoinsTip() (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11):
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
---
This change encapsulates UTXO set data within CChainState instances, removing global data `pcoinsTip` and `pcoinsviewdb`. This is necessary if we want to maintain multiple chainstates with their own rendering of the UTXO set.
We introduce a class CoinsViews which consolidates the construction of a CCoins* hierarchy.
This commit could be broken into smaller pieces, but it would require more ephemeral diffs to, e.g., temporarily change CCoinsViewDB's constructor invocations.
ACKs for top commit:
Sjors:
reACK 582d2cd747
MarcoFalke:
ACK 582d2cd747
Tree-SHA512: ec9d904fe5dca8cd2dc4b7916daa5d8bab30856dd4645987300f905e0a19f9919fce4f9d1ff03eda982943ca73e6e9a746be6cf53b46510de36e8c81a1eafba1
i.e. any CoinsViews members. Adds a lock acquisition to `gettxoutsetinfo` RPC
to comply with added annotations.
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
This change encapsulates UTXO set data within CChainState instances, removing
global data `pcoinsTip` and `pcoinsviewdb`. This is necessary if we want to
maintain multiple chainstates with their own rendering of the UTXO set.
We introduce a class CoinsViews which consolidates the construction of a
CCoins* hierarchy. Construction of its various pieces (db, coinscatcher,
in-memory cache) is split up so that we avoid flushing bad state to disk if
startup is interrupted.
We also introduce `CChainState::CanFlushToDisk()` which tells us when it is
safe to flush the chainstate based on this partial construction.
This commit could be broken into smaller pieces, but it would require more
ephemeral diffs to, e.g., temporarily change CCoinsViewDB's constructor
invocations.
Other changes:
- A parameter has been added to the CCoinsViewDB constructor that allows the
name of the corresponding leveldb directory to be specified.
Thanks to Russell Yanofsky and Marco Falke for helpful feedback.
a2714a5c69 Give QApplication dummy arguments (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
QApplication takes the command line arguments and parses them itself for some [built in command line arguments](https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qapplication.html#QApplication) that it has. We don't want any of those built in arguments, so instead give it dummy arguments.
To test, you can use the `-reverse` option. Without this patch, everything will appear right-to-left; things that were on the left side will be on the right and everything is right aligned.
After this patch, `-reverse` will now give a startup error since we do not support this argument.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK a2714a5c69
hebasto:
ACK a2714a5c69
fanquake:
ACK a2714a5c69 - Have tested that arguments like `-reverse` are no longer being passed through and result in an error.
Tree-SHA512: 983bd948ca6999f895b6662b58c37e33af7ed61fdd600c6b4623febb87ec06a92c66e3b3300783530110cc711902793ef82d751d7f563696c4c3a8416b2b1f51
c5b404e8f1 Add functional tests for flexible whitebind/list (nicolas.dorier)
d541fa3918 Replace the use of fWhitelisted by permission checks (nicolas.dorier)
ecd5cf7ea4 Do not disconnect peer for asking mempool if it has NO_BAN permission (nicolas.dorier)
e5b26deaaa Make whitebind/whitelist permissions more flexible (nicolas.dorier)
Pull request description:
# Motivation
In 0.19, bloom filter will be disabled by default. I tried to make [a PR](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16176) to enable bloom filter for whitelisted peers regardless of `-peerbloomfilters`.
Bloom filter have non existent privacy and server can omit filter's matches. However, both problems are completely irrelevant when you connect to your own node. If you connect to your own node, bloom filters are the most bandwidth efficient way to synchronize your light client without the need of some middleware like Electrum.
It is also a superior alternative to BIP157 as it does not require to maintain an additional index and it would work well on pruned nodes.
When I attempted to allow bloom filters for whitelisted peer, my proposal has been NACKed in favor of [a more flexible approach](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16176#issuecomment-500762907) which should allow node operator to set fine grained permissions instead of a global `whitelisted` attribute.
Doing so will also make follow up idea very easy to implement in a backward compatible way.
# Implementation details
The PR propose a new format for `--white{list,bind}`. I added a way to specify permissions granted to inbound connection matching `white{list,bind}`.
The following permissions exists:
* ForceRelay
* Relay
* NoBan
* BloomFilter
* Mempool
Example:
* `-whitelist=bloomfilter@127.0.0.1/32`.
* `-whitebind=bloomfilter,relay,noban@127.0.0.1:10020`.
If no permissions are specified, `NoBan | Mempool` is assumed. (making this PR backward compatible)
When we receive an inbound connection, we calculate the effective permissions for this peer by fetching the permissions granted from `whitelist` and add to it the permissions granted from `whitebind`.
To keep backward compatibility, if no permissions are specified in `white{list,bind}` (e.g. `--whitelist=127.0.0.1`) then parameters `-whitelistforcerelay` and `-whiterelay` will add the permissions `ForceRelay` and `Relay` to the inbound node.
`-whitelistforcerelay` and `-whiterelay` are ignored if the permissions flags are explicitly set in `white{bind,list}`.
# Follow up idea
Based on this PR, other changes become quite easy to code in a trivially review-able, backward compatible way:
* Changing `connect` at rpc and config file level to understand the permissions flags.
* Changing the permissions of a peer at RPC level.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
re-ACK c5b404e8f1
Tree-SHA512: adfefb373d09e68cae401247c8fc64034e305694cdef104bdcdacb9f1704277bd53b18f52a2427a5cffdbc77bda410d221aed252bc2ece698ffbb9cf1b830577
This directory is automatically created by the build process (in the
build target directory, see #16588) and doesn't need to be in the
repository nor in the tarballs.
Move associated ignore directive to top-level `.gitignore` file.
7cd069d8ef Add test for AddTimeData (Martin Zumsande)
Pull request description:
`AddTimeData()` has poor test coverage but interesting logic (including a bug turned into a feature). This PR adds a unit test for it.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 7cd069d8ef, thanks for adding a test
Tree-SHA512: 8228f9027e52ed534411d595c7e45cf4edeee9757f26f5141fbcfae3fc6f598a8cea7f734bb8f55238857a37ad2f2d518e859e1fe8c106c0712da976792ac132
fa4ee0ddf1 build: Remove unused src/obj-test folder (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
I believe this is no longer used after we switched from a makefile to autotools
ACKs for top commit:
emilengler:
Concept ACK fa4ee0ddf1
Tree-SHA512: cbedd3e65afc4de93b16500a0ff2e8778eb94e0224409d9a8d7cfc14cf22087471d260e63ba8d1322afdef5930d6c26fb64060e9e1b23876132cb9cdc35dce2c
14f7eec3bd rpc: Fix getblocktemplate CLI example (#16594) (Emil Engler)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16594.
I didn't found any other syntax error in the code.
Correct me if I'm wrong
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 14f7eec3bd
Tree-SHA512: 2137df2de07df2df9ffbe9e4b4ebb100bb40a36234aba01a6f65b00026f578a7a9040ac99936b4052531d72435e6e04f771beb8d6be51a9b072f93e88f1ecc01
2e68ffaf20 [doc] descriptor: explain GetPubKey() usage with cached public key (Sjors Provoost)
2290269759 scripted-diff: rename DescriptorImpl m_script_arg to m_subdescriptor_arg (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
I found the name `m_script_arg` to be confusing while reviewing https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/14646#discussion_r240677238. @sipa let me know if `m_subdescriptor_arg` is completely wrong.
I also added an explanation of why we call `GetPubKey` when we don't ask it for a public key.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2e68ffaf20
Tree-SHA512: 06698e9a91cdda93c043a82732793f0ad3cd91daa2513565953e9fa048d5573322fb534e9d0ea9ab736e6366be5921e2b8699c4f4b3693edab48039aaae06f78
This combines reporting of buried (formally ISM) softfork deployments
and BIP9 versionbits softfork deployments into one JSON object in the
getblockchaininfo return object.
0481fa2584 util: refactor upper/lowercase functions (Karl-Johan Alm)
Pull request description:
This includes renaming Downcase() to ToLower() and make it return a string rather than modify referenced arg.
Also adds ToUpper() string version.
Additionally, it clarifies that the locale independency of the case functions is a *feature* and not a limitation. I interpreted it as the latter and rewrote code to be locale-aware before realizing this.
This is done in preparation for #11413 and as a general refactor. I don't think the optimization that the pre-refactor state gave warrants the unwieldy usage.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0481fa2584 from me
practicalswift:
ACK 0481fa2584 -- diff looks correct
l2a5b1:
ACK 0481fa2 - Although, I think @luke-jr's [feedback](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16566#issuecomment-519580760) is spot on; `Downcase` is just an artifact of `ParseNetwork`, which has been happily downcasing `net` via a string argument for over 7 years; and I do recommend to add `ToLower` *when* somebody actually needs it in new work, there is no point in keeping a trivial utility function if it is not appreciated.
promag:
ACK 0481fa2584.
Tree-SHA512: 9b834ecc1b97db043e261bcbc59e42372e11e2fb9a6943688f18a835bf5c9205f68e4614f58e90ba260d1b8f0e060c6f67b390b62436c21b56891db23bc41628
6285a318d7 Remove redundant WalletController::addWallet slot (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
~~Fix #15453.~~ It is fixed by https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16348#issuecomment-509308347
The _only_ reason of these lines on master (8c69fae944)
2679bb8919/src/qt/walletcontroller.cpp (L121-L128)
is to `Q_EMIT walletAdded(wallet_model);` in a thread-safe manner;
This PR makes this in a line of code:
1b83875006/src/qt/walletcontroller.cpp (L121)
EDITED:
To establish the ownership of a new `WalletModel` object is not necessary on the master (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16349#discussion_r301679192 by **promag**).
But:
> it's good habit to set ownership
And I agree. It is a safe practice.
ACKs for top commit:
promag:
ACK 6285a318d7.
jonasschnelli:
utACK 6285a318d7
ryanofsky:
utACK 6285a318d7. Only change since last review is rebasing and restoring a deleted comment. I do think the comments I suggested last review would be better than this one, but this is at least better than before.
Tree-SHA512: 90370cb1fe853b84dd16c3781ba4f97f3f4deca56bba0203e457f37b3220fd13228cf8495fd882ff18b7c782c27544cc2e7a88aaec5b69b9ef6d8626bdaaf332
