This indicates that, eg, we have a public key for a key which may
be used as a pay-to-pubkey-hash. It generally means that we can
create a valid scriptSig except for missing private key(s) with
which to create signatures.
QT_NO_KEYWORDS prevents Qt from defining the `foreach`, `signals`,
`slots` and `emit` macros.
Avoid overlap between Qt macros and boost - for example #undef hackiness
in #6421.
To determine the default for `-par`, the number of script verification
threads, use [boost:🧵:physical_concurrency()](http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_58_0/doc/html/thread/thread_management.html#thread.thread_management.thread.physical_concurrency)
which counts only physical cores, not virtual cores.
Virtual cores are roughly a set of cached registers to avoid context
switches while threading, they cannot actually perform work, so spawning
a verification thread for them could even reduce efficiency and will put
undue load on the system.
Should fix issue #6358, as well as some other reported system overload
issues, especially on Intel processors.
The function was only introduced in boost 1.56, so provide a utility
function `GetNumCores` to fall back for older Boost versions.
- implement find_value() function for UniValue
- replace all Array/Value/Object types with UniValues, remove JSON Spirit to UniValue wrapper
- remove JSON Spirit sources
Previously due to an off-by-one error the wallet ignored
nLockTime-by-height transactions that would be valid in the next block
even though they are accepted into the mempool. The transactions
wouldn't show up until confirmed, nor would they be included in the
unconfirmed balance. Similar to the mempool behavior fix in 665bdd3b,
the wallet code was calling IsFinalTx() directly without taking into
account the fact that doing so tells you if the transaction could have
been mined in the *current* block, rather than the next block.
To fix this we strip IsFinalTx() of non-consensus-critical
functionality, removing the default arguments, and add CheckFinalTx() to
check if a transaction will be final in the next block.
ca5f688 [QT] don't colorize icons on win and mac (Jonas Schnelli)
7247d10 [QT] use alert icon with tooltip insted of "(out of sync)" text (Jonas Schnelli)
51c7c70 [QT] remove frame to avoid double-frame situation in sendcoinsentry.ui (Jonas Schnelli)
2a6b844 [QT] change transaction amount and height in overview page (Jonas Schnelli)
a8cdaf5 checkpoints: move the checkpoints enable boolean into main (Cory Fields)
11982d3 checkpoints: Decouple checkpoints from Params (Cory Fields)
6996823 checkpoints: make checkpoints a member of CChainParams (Cory Fields)
9f13a10 checkpoints: store mapCheckpoints in CCheckpointData rather than a pointer (Cory Fields)
- write "Bitcoins" uppercase
- replace secure/insecure for payment requests with
authenticated/unauthenticated
- change a translatable string for payment request expiry to match another
existing string to only get ONE resulting string to translate
According to Tor's extensions to the SOCKS protocol
(https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/socks-extensions.txt)
it is possible to perform stream isolation by providing authentication
to the proxy. Each set of credentials will create a new circuit,
which makes it harder to correlate connections.
This patch adds an option, `-proxyrandomize` (on by default) that randomizes
credentials for every outgoing connection, thus creating a new circuit.
2015-03-16 15:29:59 SOCKS5 Sending proxy authentication 3842137544:3256031132
Before and after was tested in Windows:
before:
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate : Payment server found
an invalid certificate: ("Microsoft Authenticode(tm) Root Authority")
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate : Payment server found
an invalid certificate: ()
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate : Payment server found
an invalid certificate: ()
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate : Payment server found
an invalid certificate: ()
after:
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate: Payment server found an
invalid certificate: "01" ("Microsoft Authenticode(tm) Root Authority")
() ()
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate: Payment server found an
invalid certificate: "01" () () ("Copyright (c) 1997 Microsoft Corp.",
"Microsoft Time Stamping Service Root", "Microsoft Corporation")
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate: Payment server found an
invalid certificate: "4a:19:d2:38:8c:82:59:1c:a5:5d:73:5f:15:5d:dc:a3" ()
() ("NO LIABILITY ACCEPTED, (c)97 VeriSign, Inc.", "VeriSign Time Stamping
Service Root", "VeriSign, Inc.")
GUI: ReportInvalidCertificate: Payment server found an
invalid certificate: "e4:9e:fd:f3:3a:e8:0e:cf:a5:11:3e:19:a4:24:02:32" ()
() ("Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority")
721cb55 GUI: Display label rather than address on popups (Luke Dashjr)
e96028c GUI: Clarify terminology; use "Label" heading for labels row, and "Node/Service" rather than [IP] "Address" (Luke Dashjr)
5983a4e Add a NODE_GETUTXO service bit and document NODE_NETWORK. Stop translating the NODE_* names as they are technical and cannot be translated. (Mike Hearn)
1d9b378 qa/rpc-tests/wallet: Tests for sendmany (Luke Dashjr)
40a7573 rpcwallet/sendmany: Just take an array of addresses to subtract fees from, rather than an Object with all values being identical (Luke Dashjr)
292623a Subtract fee from amount (Cozz Lovan)
90a43c1 [Qt] Code-movement-only: Format confirmation message in sendcoinsdialog (Cozz Lovan)
. Closes the bug from commit e179eb3d9b
("bitcoin-qt -help" did not show any message)
. Move all the options in init.cpp (there were already some
options related to bitcoin-qt)
6cb4a52 [Qt, Linux] honor current network when creating autostart link (Philip Kaufmann)
9673c35 [Qt, Win] honor current network when creating autostart link (Philip Kaufmann)
These dialogs will be something that people occasionally open, not keep
open during their session, so just popping it up in a sensible place
is good enough. Remembering only creates potential issues, like spawning
it outside the current screen area.
On Ubuntu this causes the dialogs to be positioned in the
middle of the main dialog, so I didn't add code for that. YMMV.
Inspired by github pull #5777 by @L-Cranston-Shadow
This makes it easier for us to replace it if desired, since it's now only in
one spot. Also, it avoids the openssl include from allocators.h, which
essentially forced openssl to be included from every compilation unit.
Bitcoin amounts are stored as uint64 in the protobuf messages (see
paymentrequest.proto), but CAmount is defined as int64_t. Because
of that we need to verify that single and accumulated amounts are
in a valid range and no variable overflow has happened.
- fixes#5624 (#5622)
Thanks @SergioDemianLerner for reporting that issue and also supplying us
with a possible solution.
- add static verifyAmount() function to PaymentServer and move the logging
on error into the function
- also add a unit test to paymentservertests.cpp
Note that this will also require translation changes in Transifex for the key
"A fee higher than %1 is considered an insanely high fee." which is now
"A fee higher than %1 is considered an absurdly high fee."
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
The default font changed again.
The real fix is to compile qt against a >= 10.8 sdk, but this is simple enough
to backport to 0.10 to avoid having to do that there.
Note: NSAppKitVersionNumber is a double and there's no official value for
NSAppKitVersionNumber10_10. Since == isn't reliable for doubles, use Apple's
guidelines for testing versions here:
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/releasenotes/AppKit/RN-AppKit/
Chinese and Japanese fonts have been hard-coded as well, otherwise they fail to
show up at all.
- now logs if -rootcertificates="" was used to disable payment request
authentication via X.509 certificates
- also logs which file is used as trusted root cert, if -rootcertificates
is set
- this is based on #4122 (which can be closed)
Currently a payment request is only checked for expiration upon receipt.
It should be checked again immediately before sending coins to prevent
the user from paying to an expired invoice which would then require a
customer service interaction.
- add static verifyExpired() function to PaymentServer to be able to use
the same validation code in GUI and unit-testing code
- extend unit tests to use that function and also add an unit test which
overflows, because payment requests allow expires as uint64, whereas we
use int64_t for verification of expired payment requests
- verify that payment request network matches client network
- add static verifyNetwork() function to PaymentServer to be able to use
the same validation code in GUI and unit-testing code
- add a second PaymentRequest Test CA certificate to paymentrequestdata.h
(serial number f0:da:97:e4:38:d7:64:16) as caCert2_BASE64
- rename existing Test CA certificate to caCert1_BASE64
- rename existing payment request data to know they belong to
caCert1_BASE64
- update comments to reflect the changes and add a missing comment to one
of the payment requests
b468e81 Qt: Clarify sign/verify dialog text to specifically state that these messages only prove one receives with the address in question, and makes no claim to sender of transactions (Luke Dashjr)
- it is helpful to be able to test and verify payment request processing
by allowing self signed root certificates (e.g. generated by Gavins
"certificate authority in a box")
- This option is just shown in the UI options, if -help-debug is enabled.
- before it was possible to use the steps to change e.g. amouns of
authenticated or unauthenticated payment requests (AmountSpinBox is
already set to read-only here) - this is now fixed
- also move the reimplemented stepEnabled() function to the
protected section of our class, where it belongs (see Qt doc)
856e862 namespace: drop most boost namespaces and a few header cleanups (Cory Fields)
9b1ab86 namespace: drop boost::assign altogether here (Cory Fields)
a324199 namespace: remove boost namespace pollution (Cory Fields)
Instead of using a fixed-width font in a label, which virtually
guarentees a horizontal scrollbar, use a proper text-document
that can re-layout based on user input.
If uint256() constructor takes a string, uint256(0) will become
dangerous when uint256 does not take integers anymore (it will go
through std::string(const char*) making a NULL string, and the explicit
keyword is no help).
