0ba08020c9 Disconnect peers violating blocks-only mode (Suhas Daftuar)
937eba91e1 doc: improve comments relating to block-relay-only peers (Suhas Daftuar)
430f489027 Don't relay addr messages to block-relay-only peers (Suhas Daftuar)
3a5e885306 Add 2 outbound block-relay-only connections (Suhas Daftuar)
b83f51a4bb Add comment explaining intended use of m_tx_relay (Suhas Daftuar)
e75c39cd42 Check that tx_relay is initialized before access (Suhas Daftuar)
c4aa2ba822 [refactor] Change tx_relay structure to be unique_ptr (Suhas Daftuar)
4de0dbac9b [refactor] Move tx relay state to separate structure (Suhas Daftuar)
26a93bce29 Remove unused variable (Suhas Daftuar)
Pull request description:
Transaction relay is optimized for a combination of redundancy/robustness as well as bandwidth minimization -- as a result transaction relay leaks information that adversaries can use to infer the network topology.
Network topology is better kept private for (at least) two reasons:
(a) Knowledge of the network graph can make it easier to find the source IP of a given transaction.
(b) Knowledge of the network graph could be used to split a target node or nodes from the honest network (eg by knowing which peers to attack in order to achieve a network split).
We can eliminate the risks of (b) by separating block relay from transaction relay; inferring network connectivity from the relay of blocks/block headers is much more expensive for an adversary.
After this commit, bitcoind will make 2 additional outbound connections that are only used for block relay. (In the future, we might consider rotating our transaction-relay peers to help limit the effects of (a).)
ACKs for top commit:
sipa:
ACK 0ba08020c9
ajtowns:
ACK 0ba08020c9 -- code review, ran tests. ran it on mainnet for a couple of days with MAX_BLOCKS_ONLY_CONNECTIONS upped from 2 to 16 and didn't observe any unexpected behaviour: it disconnected a couple of peers that tried sending inv's, and it successfully did compact block relay with some block relay peers.
TheBlueMatt:
re-utACK 0ba08020c9. Pointed out that stats.fRelayTxes was sometimes uninitialized for blocksonly peers (though its not a big deal and only effects RPC), which has since been fixed here. Otherwise changes are pretty trivial so looks good.
jnewbery:
utACK 0ba08020c9
jamesob:
ACK 0ba08020c9
Tree-SHA512: 4c3629434472c7dd4125253417b1be41967a508c3cfec8af5a34cad685464fbebbb6558f0f8f5c0d4463e3ffa4fa3aabd58247692cb9ab8395f4993078b9bcdf
613de61a04 Add Create Wallet menu action (Andrew Chow)
9b41cbb28f Expose wallet creation to the GUI via WalletController (Andrew Chow)
78863e2900 Add CreateWalletDialog to create wallets from the GUI (Andrew Chow)
60adb21c7a Optionally allow AskPassphraseDialog to output the passphrase (Andrew Chow)
bc6d8a3662 gui: Refactor OpenWalletActivity (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a menu option to create a new wallet. When clicked, a `CreateWalletDialog` will be created and prompt the user to name the wallet and choose whether to disable private keys, make a blank wallet, and encrypt the wallet. If the wallet is encrypted, the wallet will be born encrypted with the wallet first created blank, then encrypted, and then a new HD seed generated and set.
To allow the newly created wallets to be encrypted, some changes to how encrypting a wallet works. Instead of encrypting and locking the wallet, the wallet will be encrypted and then unlocked. This is also an extra belt-and-suspenders check to make sure that encryption worked.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 613de61a04 - re-reviewed on macOS. I'm going to merge this now. It's had a stack of review, and as mentioned multiple times above, lets get this into `master` so it can get more testing pre `v0.19.0`.
Tree-SHA512: 3f22cc20b13703ffc90d366ae9133114832fea77f4f319da7fd85eb454f2f0bd5d7e1e6e20284dea2f370d8574f83b45669dcbbe506b994410d32e8e7a6fa877
5ce822efbe Conservatively accept RBF bumps bumping one tx at the package limits (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
Based on #15681, this adds support for some simple cases of RBF inside of large packages. Issue pointed out by sdaftuar in #15681, and this fix (or a broader one) is required ot make #15681 fully useful.
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which evict exactly one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
re-ACK 5ce822efbe
ajtowns:
ACK 5ce822efbe ; GetSizeWithDescendants is only change and makes sense
sipa:
Code review ACK 5ce822efbe. I haven't thought hard about the effect on potential DoS issues this policy change may have.
Tree-SHA512: 1cee3bc57393940a30206679eb60c3ec8cb4f4825d27d40d1f062c86bd22542dd5944fa5567601c74c8d9fd425333ed3e686195170925cfc68777e861844bd55
39034f1ee6 Refactor rawtransaction_util's SignTransaction to have previous tx parsing be separate (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
Currently the `SignTransaction` function has to handle both the actual signing and parsing of previous transaction data. This PR splits it so that `SignTransaction` only handles the signing itself and adds a `ParsePrevouts` function which handles parsing the prevtx information.
This allows for `SignTransaction` to just take any `SigningProvider`.
Split from #16341
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 39034f1ee6
instagibbs:
utACK 39034f1ee6
ryanofsky:
utACK 39034f1ee6. No change since previously reviewed b49bbb939be92a67ff77c3f7bca5bb94dd141906, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/16341#pullrequestreview-278610269 other than rebase with no conflicts.
Tree-SHA512: 09f7733e90691766bfb5cf0f20e913dbf270bd3b51abdcad966b24d110e562ed85fd3d0d1d7bbea61f903340060052ec73c4817b09aee0dc1f3916d781a9e40c
3109a1f948 refactor: Avoid locking cs_main in ProcessNewBlockHeaders (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Builds on #16774, this change avoids locking `cs_main` in `ProcessNewBlockHeaders` when the tip has changed - in this case the removed lock was necessary to just log a message.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 31be6d319fa122804f72fa813cec5ed041dd7e4aef3c1921124a1f03016925c43cd4d9a272d80093e77fa7600e3506ef47b7bb821afcbffe01e6be9bceb6dc00
- store_path() previously only worked for cross compilation packages, we
remove this assumption here
- Add CROSS_GCC_LIB variable which points to where gcc libs/headers are
located
- Add gcc libs/headers to our CROSS_*_PATH environment variables
- Check that all directories in CROSS_*_PATH are sane
442a87cc0a Add a test wallet_reorgsrestore (Antoine Riard)
40ede992d9 Modify wallet tx status if has been reorged out (Antoine Riard)
7e89994133 Remove SyncTransaction for conflicted txn in CWallet::BlockConnected (Antoine Riard)
a31be09bfd Encapsulate tx status in a Confirmation struct (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
While working on #15931, I've tried to rationalize tx state management to ease integration of block height tracking per-wallet tx. We currently rely on a combination of `hashBlock` and `nIndex` with magic value to determine tx confirmation, conflicted or abandoned state. It's hard to reason and error-prone. To solve that, we encapsulate these fields in a `TxConfirmation` struct and introduce a `TxState` member that we update accordingly at block connection/disconnection.
Following jnewbery [recommendation](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15931#discussion_r312576506), I've taken these changes in its own commit, and open a PR to get them first. It would ease review of aforementioned PR, but above all should ease fixing of long-term issues like :
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/7315 (but maybe we should abandon abandontransaction or relieve it to only free outpoints not track the transaction as abandoned in itself, need its own discussion)
* https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/8692 where we should cancel conflicted state of transactions chain smoothly
* `MarkConflicted` in `LoadToWallet` is likely useless if we track conflicts rights at block connection
Main changes of this PR to get right are tx update in `AddToWallet` and serialization/deserialization logic.
ACKs for top commit:
meshcollider:
Light re-Code Review ACK 442a87cc0a
ryanofsky:
utACK 442a87cc0a. Changes since last review are switching from `hasChain` to `LockChain` and removing chain lock in `WalletBatch::LoadWallet` that's redundant with the new lock still added in `CWallet::LoadWallet`, and fixing python test race condition.
Tree-SHA512: 029209e006de0240436817204e69e548c5665e2b0721b214510e7aba7eba130a5eab441d3a1ad95bd6426114dd27390492c77bf4560a9610009b32cd0a1f72f7
2457aea83c Assert that the HRP is lowercase in Bech32::Encode (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
From BIP-173:
> The lowercase form is used when determining a character's value for checksum purposes.
> Encoders MUST always output an all lowercase Bech32 string. If an uppercase version of the encoding result is desired, (e.g.- for presentation purposes, or QR code use), then an uppercasing procedure can be performed external to the encoding process.
Currently if HRP contains uppercase characters, the checksum will be generated over these uppercase characters resulting in mixed-case output that will always be invalid even if the case is changed manually after encoding. This shouldn't happen because both prefix's `bc` and `tb` are lowercase currently, but we assert this condition anyway.
This is consistent also with the [C reference implementation](2b0aac650c/ref/c/segwit_addr.c (L59))
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 2457aea83c
Tree-SHA512: 24fcbbc2f315c72c550cc3d82b4332443eea6378fc73d571f98b87492604d023378dd102377c9e05467192cae6049606dee98e4c5688c8d5e4caac50c970284b
fae91a09c4 test: Remove incorrect and unused try-block in assert_debug_log (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This try block has accidentally been added by me in fa3e9f7627.
It was unused all the time, but commit 6011c9d72d added a `return` in the finally block, muting all exceptions.
This can be tested by adding an `assert False` after any `with ...assert_debug_log...:` line.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK fae91a09c4
ryanofsky:
utACK fae91a09c4. I didn't know returning inside a `finally` block would cancel pending exceptions or return values, but I guess this makes sense and is a good thing to be aware of.
Tree-SHA512: 47ed0165062060e9af055a3e92f1a529cd41d00476bfad64e3cd141ae084d22f926a343bb1257717e164e15459a59ab66aed198c95d18bf780d8cb0b76aa3298
3d0a82cff8 devtools: Accomodate block-style copyright blocks (Ben Woosley)
0ef0e51fe4 lint: Bump flake8 to 3.7.8 (Ben Woosley)
838920704a lint: Disable flake8 W504 warning (Ben Woosley)
b21680baf5 test/contrib: Fix invalid escapes in regex strings (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
This is a second go at #15221, fixing new lints in:
W504 line break after binary operator
W605 invalid escape sequence
F841 local variable 'e' is assigned to but never used
This time around:
* One commit per rule, for easier review
* I went with the PEP-8 style of breaking before binary operators
* I looked into the raw regex newline issue, and found that raw strings with newlines embedded do work appropriately. E.g. run `re.match(r" \n ", " \n ")` to check this for yourself. `re.MULTILINE` exists to modify `^` and `$` in multiline scenarios, but all of these searches are per-line.
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
ACK 3d0a82cff8 -- diff looks correct
Tree-SHA512: bea0c144cadd72e4adf2e9a4b4ee0535dd91a8e694206924cf8a389dc9253f364a717edfe9abda88108fbb67fda19b9e823f46822d7303c0aaa72e48909a6105
490da639cb Make lint-includes.sh work from any directory (Kristaps Kaupe)
Pull request description:
Before this change it works from root folder of bitcoin git repo, but if you do `cd test/lint; ./test-includes.sh`, you will have a lot of false positive messages like this:
```
Good job! The circular dependency "chainparamsbase -> util/system -> chainparamsbase" is no longer present.
Please remove it from EXPECTED_CIRCULAR_DEPENDENCIES in ./lint-circular-dependencies.sh
to make sure this circular dependency is not accidentally reintroduced.
Good job! The circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is no longer present.
Please remove it from EXPECTED_CIRCULAR_DEPENDENCIES in ./lint-circular-dependencies.sh
to make sure this circular dependency is not accidentally reintroduced.
```
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: 07fa69cb2883181dcee922191acac4b242722eeb2916cdffdc7163421302b22f3c9525aaf4c754a9dba1c307032c05285e38191d5c6aabc894321f8a27bbceaa
Accept RBF bumps of single transactions (ie which conflict with one
transaction) even when that transaction is a member of a package
which is currently at the package limit iff the new transaction
does not add any additional mempool dependencies from the original.
This could be made a bit looser in the future and still be safe,
but for now this fixes the case that a transaction which was
accepted by the carve-out rule will not be directly RBF'able.
If we set fRelay=false in our VERSION message, and a peer sends an INV or TX
message anyway, disconnect. Since we use fRelay=false to minimize bandwidth,
we should not tolerate remaining connected to a peer violating the protocol.
Transaction relay is primarily optimized for balancing redundancy/robustness
with bandwidth minimization -- as a result transaction relay leaks information
that adversaries can use to infer the network topology.
Network topology is better kept private for (at least) two reasons:
(a) Knowledge of the network graph can make it easier to find the source IP of
a given transaction.
(b) Knowledge of the network graph could be used to split a target node or
nodes from the honest network (eg by knowing which peers to attack in order to
achieve a network split).
We can eliminate the risks of (b) by separating block relay from transaction
relay; inferring network connectivity from the relay of blocks/block headers is
much more expensive for an adversary.
After this commit, bitcoind will make 2 additional outbound connections that
are only used for block relay. (In the future, we might consider rotating our
transaction-relay peers to help limit the effects of (a).)
dcc448e3d2 Avoid unnecessary "Synchronizing blockheaders" log messages (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
Fixes#16773
I'm not entirely sure why 16773 happend, but probably due to headers fallback in a compact block.
However, this PR should fix it and should have been included in #15615.
ACKs for top commit:
ajtowns:
ACK dcc448e3d2 ; code review only, haven't compiled or tested.
promag:
ACK dcc448e3d2.
TheBlueMatt:
utACK dcc448e3d2. Went and read how pindexBestHeader is handled and this code looks correct (worst case it breaks a LogPrint, so whatever). I also ran into this on #16762.
fanquake:
ACK dcc448e3d2
Tree-SHA512: f8cac3b6eb9d4e8fab53a535b55f9ea9b058e3ab6ade64801ebc56439ede4f54b5fee36d5d2b316966ab987b65b13ab9dc18849f345d08b81ecdf2722a3f5f5a
Flagged by flake8 v3.6.0, as W605, plus a few others identified
incidentally, e.g. 59ffecf66cf4d08c4b431e457b083878d66a3fd6.
Note that r"\n" matches to "\n" under re.match/search.
fa61365a13 wallet: Translate all initErrors in CreateWalletFromFile (MarcoFalke)
fa70d199d0 util: Make util/error bilingual_str (refactor) (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The translations are going to close in three days (#15940), so I am submitting this as a standalone pull request.
Those changes are part of a bugfix #16661, which includes a test. The first change (the refactor) is required, the second commit is not. I am happy to drop it, if needed.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
utACK fa61365a13
hebasto:
ACK fa61365a13, I have tested the code on Linux Mint 19.2.
Tree-SHA512: a7616cc38b9ffd301c6b915ea808a65815c3d97e9f57ec091772eb260e5cf0d75a13a6e4dfa3913e236833677c7929b9a748cb7d7a0e406d51749944b614e11b
057fac3453 gui: Update English source translation (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
072f37a7ed gui: Update transifex slug for 0.19 (Wladimir J. van der Laan)
Pull request description:
- Update transifex slug for 0.19
- Update English source translation
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK 057fac3453 - I see the same diff when running `make translate`.
Tree-SHA512: e6800011c2cc642b656d2a8fa652e94c665183424321eb4f1f3506e90a65f730794e5e9d49243538c0710c66fec1ed6f30e099dbc8a847e840817e894782866f
