lbrycrd

Normalization - Do we care about UCA versions

type: discussion

4

#255 by tiger5226 was closed 2019-05-07 21:43:40 +02:00

Normalization UX level discussion

type: discussion

21

#234 by kaykurokawa was closed 2018-11-29 12:41:58 +01:00

Description of Normalization Hard fork for discussion and review

type: discussion

6

#208 by kaykurokawa was closed 2019-02-13 17:07:51 +01:00

Discuss character normalization scheme

type: discussion

13

#204 by kaykurokawa was closed 2018-11-29 10:42:47 +01:00

mandatory code formatting complicates code reviews

needs: tech design

type: discussion

4

#200 by BrannonKing was closed 2019-10-29 21:21:58 +01:00

getclaimsintrie: insufficent info for sorting subclaims

needs: exploration

type: discussion

6

#196 by BrannonKing was closed 2019-09-06 22:28:49 +02:00

Run IsStandardTx on Regtest

type: discussion

2

#190 by eukreign was closed 2018-09-24 17:21:07 +02:00

Purchase Transactions (claim identifier in transactions)

49

#184 by kauffj was closed 2018-10-17 19:45:05 +02:00

Consider tuning ancestor/descendant size limit for our use case

needs: priority

type: discussion

3

#139 by shyba was closed 2018-12-05 21:01:32 +01:00

Larger than normal fees on some tipbot transactions

help wanted

type: discussion

2

#132 by tzarebczan was closed 2019-09-21 00:02:14 +02:00

Change algorithm to prevent ASICs from centralizing mining power.

icebox

level: 2

type: discussion

11

#85 by ghost was closed 2018-07-18 18:14:07 +02:00

Labels Milestones