Fixed one minor typo https://www.dictionary.com/e/judgement-vs-judgment/ #351

Closed
purifyyourhome wants to merge 1 commit from master into master

View file

@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ language is used within pull-request comments:
Reviewers should include the commit hash which they reviewed in their comments.
Project maintainers reserve the right to weigh the opinions of peer reviewers
using common sense judgement and also may weight based on meritocracy: Those
using common sense judgment and also may weight based on meritocracy: Those
that have demonstrated a deeper commitment and understanding towards the project
(over time) or have clear domain expertise may naturally have more weight, as
one would expect in all walks of life.
@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ of consensus critical code.
Where a patch set proposes to change the Bitcoin consensus, it must have been
discussed extensively on the mailing list and IRC, be accompanied by a widely
discussed BIP and have a generally widely perceived technical consensus of being
a worthwhile change based on the judgement of the maintainers.
a worthwhile change based on the judgment of the maintainers.
### Finding Reviewers