proposed readme changes #794

Merged

kauffj merged 2 commits from readme-tweaks into master

2018-12-04 17:36:12 +01:00

kauffj commented

2018-11-30 17:27:02 +01:00

(Migrated from github.com)

No description provided.

jessopb (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2018-11-30 17:27:02 +01:00

skhameneh (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2018-12-01 01:07:25 +01:00

skhameneh (Migrated from github.com) left a comment

Looks good, not a fan of the intro wording

README.md

skhameneh (Migrated from github.com) commented

2018-12-01 01:00:54 +01:00

I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).

Suggestions/comments:

No need for Succinctly.
Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of Via just and you as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary.
(Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die 😝

Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.

I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments: 1) No need for `Succinctly`. 2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility. 3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. ` 4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes: Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.

kauffj (Migrated from github.com) reviewed 2018-12-03 16:48:23 +01:00

README.md

kauffj (Migrated from github.com) commented

2018-12-03 16:48:23 +01:00

I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/

Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.

I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.

No reviewers

jessopb

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: LBRYCommunity/spee.ch#794

No description provided.