proposed readme changes #794
52
README.md
|
|
@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
|
|||
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
# Spee.ch
|
||||
Spee.ch is a [NodeJS](https://nodejs.org) React web app that reads and publishes images and videos to and from the [LBRY](https://lbry.io/) blockchain.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
You can create your own custom version of spee.ch by installing this code base and then creating your own custom components and styles to override the defaults. (More details/guide on how to do that coming soon.)
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
spee.ch provides a user-friendly, custom-designed, image and video hosting site backed by a decentralized network and
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
blockchain ([LBRY](https://lbry.tech/)). Via just a small set of config files, you can spin your an entire spee.ch site back up including assets.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* [chainquery](https://github.com/lbryio/chainquery) - a normalized database of the blockchain data. We've provided credentials to use a public chainquery service. You can also install it on your own server to avoid being affected by the commons.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* [lbrynet](https://github.com/lbryio/lbry) - a daemon that handles your wallet and transactions.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
For a completely open, unrestricted example of a spee.ch site, check out https://www.spee.ch.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
## Install
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
For a closed, custom-hosted and branded example, check out https://lbry.theantimedia.com/.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
### Ubuntu Step by Step
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
[Ubuntu Install Guide](./docs/ubuntuinstall.md)
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
## Installation
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
### Quickstart Overview
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
### Ubuntu Step-by-Step
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
[Step-by-step Ubuntu Install Guide](./docs/ubuntuinstall.md)
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
### Full Instructions
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Get some information ready:
|
||||
* mysqlusername
|
||||
|
|
@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* domainname or 'http://localhost'
|
||||
* speechport = 3000
|
||||
|
||||
#### Install and Set Up System Dependencies:
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
#### Install and Set Up Dependencies
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* Firewall open ports
|
||||
* 22
|
||||
* 80
|
||||
|
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* _note: even running on http://localhost, you must redirect http or https to port 3000_
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#### Clone a spee.ch repo (choose one)
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
#### Clone spee.ch
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* release version for stable production
|
||||
```
|
||||
$ git clone -b release https://github.com/lbryio/spee.ch.git
|
||||
|
|
@ -95,8 +95,8 @@ Check out the [customization guide](https://github.com/lbryio/spee.ch/blob/readm
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
#### (optional) add custom components and update the styles
|
||||
|
||||
* Create custom components by creating React components in `site/custom/src/` (further instructions coming soon)
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* Update the CSS by changing the files in `site/custom/scss` (further instructions and refactor coming soon)
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* Create custom components by creating React components in `site/custom/src/`
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* Update or override the CSS by changing the files in `site/custom/scss`
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
#### (optional) install your own chainquery
|
||||
Instructions are coming at [lbry-docker] to install your own chainquery instance using docker-compose. This will require 50GB of preferably SSD space and at least 10 minutes to download, possibly much longer.
|
||||
|
|
@ -222,7 +222,8 @@ Spee.ch also runs a sync tool, which decodes blocks from the `LBRY` blockchain a
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* To run only tests that do not require LBC, run `npm run test:no-lbc`
|
||||
|
||||
### URL formats
|
||||
Spee.ch has a few types of URL formats that return different assets from the LBRY network. Below is a list of all possible URLs for the content on spee.ch
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
Spee.ch has a few types of URL formats that return different assets from the LBRY network. Below is a list of all possible URLs for the content on spee.ch. You can learn more about LBRY URLs [here](https://lbry.tech/resources/uri).
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* retrieve the controlling `LBRY` claim:
|
||||
* https://spee.ch/`claim`
|
||||
* https://spee.ch/`claim`.`ext` (serve)
|
||||
|
|
@ -240,22 +241,17 @@ Spee.ch has a few types of URL formats that return different assets from the LBR
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* https://spee.ch/`@channel`:`channel_id`/`claim`
|
||||
* https://spee.ch/`@channel`:`channel_id`/`claim`.`ext` (serve)
|
||||
|
||||
### Dependencies
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* [chainquery](https://github.com/lbryio/chainquery) - a normalized database of the blockchain data. We've provided credentials to use a public chainquery service. You can also install it on your own server to avoid being affected by the commons.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
* [lbrynet](https://github.com/lbryio/lbry) - a daemon that handles your wallet and transactions.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
### Bugs
|
||||
If you find a bug or experience a problem, please report your issue here on GitHub and find us in the lbry discord!
|
||||
|
||||
### Issue tags in this repo
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
#### level 1
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
Issues that anyone with basic web development can handle; little-to-no experience with the spee.ch codebase is required.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
#### level 2
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
Familiarity with web apps is required, but little-to-no familiarity with the lbry daemon is necessary
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
#### level 3
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
Familiarity with the spee.ch code base and how the lbry daemon functions is required
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
#### level 4
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
Issues with lbry (e.g. the spee.ch wallet, lbrynet configuration, etc.) that require strong familiarity with the lbry daemon and/or network to fix. Generally these issues are best suited for the `lbry` `protocol team` but are reported in this repo because they are part of the spee.ch implementation
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
This project is MIT licensed. For the full license, see [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
Succinctly.Via justandyouas the subject mid-sentence) e.g.You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary.Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.