proposed readme changes #794
48
README.md
|
|
@ -1,19 +1,15 @@
|
||||||
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
# Spee.ch
|
# Spee.ch
|
||||||
Spee.ch is a [NodeJS](https://nodejs.org) React web app that reads and publishes images and videos to and from the [LBRY](https://lbry.io/) blockchain.
|
Spee.ch is a [NodeJS](https://nodejs.org) React web app that reads and publishes images, videos and other assets to and from the [LBRY](https://lbry.io/) blockchain.
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
You can create your own custom version of spee.ch by installing this code base and then creating your own custom components and styles to override the defaults. (More details/guide on how to do that coming soon.)
|
Succinctly, via spee.ch, you can have a user-friendly, custom-designed image and video hosting site that is backed by a decentralized network. Via just a set of config files, you can spin your entire site back up including assets, with no backing up necessary.
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
## Installation
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* [chainquery](https://github.com/lbryio/chainquery) - a normalized database of the blockchain data. We've provided credentials to use a public chainquery service. You can also install it on your own server to avoid being affected by the commons.
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* [lbrynet](https://github.com/lbryio/lbry) - a daemon that handles your wallet and transactions.
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
## Install
|
### Ubuntu Step-by-Step
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Ubuntu Step by Step
|
[Step-by-step Ubuntu Install Guide](./docs/ubuntuinstall.md)
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
[Ubuntu Install Guide](./docs/ubuntuinstall.md)
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Quickstart Overview
|
### Full Instructions
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Get some information ready:
|
#### Get some information ready:
|
||||||
* mysqlusername
|
* mysqlusername
|
||||||
|
|
@ -21,7 +17,7 @@ Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* domainname or 'http://localhost'
|
* domainname or 'http://localhost'
|
||||||
* speechport = 3000
|
* speechport = 3000
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Install and Set Up System Dependencies:
|
#### Install and Set Up Dependencies
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* Firewall open ports
|
* Firewall open ports
|
||||||
* 22
|
* 22
|
||||||
* 80
|
* 80
|
||||||
|
|
@ -49,7 +45,7 @@ Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* _note: even running on http://localhost, you must redirect http or https to port 3000_
|
* _note: even running on http://localhost, you must redirect http or https to port 3000_
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
#### Clone a spee.ch repo (choose one)
|
#### Clone spee.ch
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* release version for stable production
|
* release version for stable production
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
$ git clone -b release https://github.com/lbryio/spee.ch.git
|
$ git clone -b release https://github.com/lbryio/spee.ch.git
|
||||||
|
|
@ -95,8 +91,8 @@ Check out the [customization guide](https://github.com/lbryio/spee.ch/blob/readm
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
#### (optional) add custom components and update the styles
|
#### (optional) add custom components and update the styles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Create custom components by creating React components in `site/custom/src/` (further instructions coming soon)
|
* Create custom components by creating React components in `site/custom/src/`
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* Update the CSS by changing the files in `site/custom/scss` (further instructions and refactor coming soon)
|
* Update or override the CSS by changing the files in `site/custom/scss`
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
#### (optional) install your own chainquery
|
#### (optional) install your own chainquery
|
||||||
Instructions are coming at [lbry-docker] to install your own chainquery instance using docker-compose. This will require 50GB of preferably SSD space and at least 10 minutes to download, possibly much longer.
|
Instructions are coming at [lbry-docker] to install your own chainquery instance using docker-compose. This will require 50GB of preferably SSD space and at least 10 minutes to download, possibly much longer.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -222,7 +218,8 @@ Spee.ch also runs a sync tool, which decodes blocks from the `LBRY` blockchain a
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* To run only tests that do not require LBC, run `npm run test:no-lbc`
|
* To run only tests that do not require LBC, run `npm run test:no-lbc`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### URL formats
|
### URL formats
|
||||||
Spee.ch has a few types of URL formats that return different assets from the LBRY network. Below is a list of all possible URLs for the content on spee.ch
|
Spee.ch has a few types of URL formats that return different assets from the LBRY network. Below is a list of all possible URLs for the content on spee.ch. You can learn more about LBRY URLs [here](https://lbry.tech/resources/uri).
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* retrieve the controlling `LBRY` claim:
|
* retrieve the controlling `LBRY` claim:
|
||||||
* https://spee.ch/`claim`
|
* https://spee.ch/`claim`
|
||||||
* https://spee.ch/`claim`.`ext` (serve)
|
* https://spee.ch/`claim`.`ext` (serve)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -240,22 +237,17 @@ Spee.ch has a few types of URL formats that return different assets from the LBR
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
* https://spee.ch/`@channel`:`channel_id`/`claim`
|
* https://spee.ch/`@channel`:`channel_id`/`claim`
|
||||||
* https://spee.ch/`@channel`:`channel_id`/`claim`.`ext` (serve)
|
* https://spee.ch/`@channel`:`channel_id`/`claim`.`ext` (serve)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Dependencies
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
Spee.ch depends on two other lbry technologies:
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
* [chainquery](https://github.com/lbryio/chainquery) - a normalized database of the blockchain data. We've provided credentials to use a public chainquery service. You can also install it on your own server to avoid being affected by the commons.
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
* [lbrynet](https://github.com/lbryio/lbry) - a daemon that handles your wallet and transactions.
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
### Bugs
|
### Bugs
|
||||||
If you find a bug or experience a problem, please report your issue here on GitHub and find us in the lbry discord!
|
If you find a bug or experience a problem, please report your issue here on GitHub and find us in the lbry discord!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Issue tags in this repo
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
#### level 1
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
Issues that anyone with basic web development can handle; little-to-no experience with the spee.ch codebase is required.
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
#### level 2
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
Familiarity with web apps is required, but little-to-no familiarity with the lbry daemon is necessary
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
#### level 3
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
Familiarity with the spee.ch code base and how the lbry daemon functions is required
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
#### level 4
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
Issues with lbry (e.g. the spee.ch wallet, lbrynet configuration, etc.) that require strong familiarity with the lbry daemon and/or network to fix. Generally these issues are best suited for the `lbry` `protocol team` but are reported in this repo because they are part of the spee.ch implementation
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
## License
|
## License
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This project is MIT licensed. For the full license, see [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|
This project is MIT licensed. For the full license, see [LICENSE](LICENSE).
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
|||||||
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
Succinctly.Via justandyouas the subject mid-sentence) e.g.You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary.Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.