proposed readme changes #794
|
|
@ -1,7 +1,11 @@
|
|||
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
# Spee.ch
|
||||
Spee.ch is a [NodeJS](https://nodejs.org) React web app that reads and publishes images, videos and other assets to and from the [LBRY](https://lbry.io/) blockchain.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
Succinctly, via spee.ch, you can have a user-friendly, custom-designed image and video hosting site that is backed by a decentralized network. Via just a set of config files, you can spin your entire site back up including assets, with no backing up necessary.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
spee.ch provides a user-friendly, custom-designed, image and video hosting site backed by a decentralized network and
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
blockchain ([LBRY](https://lbry.tech/)). Via just a small set of config files, you can spin your an entire spee.ch site back up including assets.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
For a completely open, unrestricted example of a spee.ch site, check out https://www.spee.ch.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
For a closed, custom-hosted and branded example, check out https://lbry.theantimedia.com/.
|
||||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
|
||||
## Installation
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences). Suggestions/comments:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup. I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
1) No need for `Succinctly`.
2) Mixing clauses (which a comma is missing) with a list greatly reduces legibility.
3) Can use subjects/nouns before prepositions for increased simplicity/legibility (Not a fan of `Via just` and `you` as the subject mid-sentence) e.g. `You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary. `
4) (Just my opinion) I will defend the Oxford comma until the day I die :stuck_out_tongue_closed_eyes:
Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.
I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/ Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about why this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well. I'm not a fan of my intro wording either :/
Still, the original wording doesn't convey enough about _why_ this is interesting. I'll try again, but I encourage you and @jessopb to try as well.
|
||||
I would suggest omitting some of the superfluous words and fix the grammar (or split up into more, separate, sentences).
Suggestions/comments:
Succinctly.Via justandyouas the subject mid-sentence) e.g.You can... with a set of config files. No backing up is necessary.Also might want to note the limitations of restoration with limited/no backup.