RC fixes #2473
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
accessibility
app-parity
area: creator
area: daemon
area: design
area: devops
area: discovery
area: docs
area: installer
area: internal
area: livestream
area: performance
area: proposal
area: reposts
area: rewards
area: search
area: security
area: subscriptions
area: sync
area: ux
area: viewer
area: wallet
BEAMER
channel
comments
community PR
consider soon
core team
css
dependencies
electron
Epic
feature request
first-timers-only
good first issue
hacktoberfest
help wanted
hub-dependent
icebox
Invalid
level: 0
level: 1
level: 2
level: 3
level: 4
merge when green
needs: exploration
needs: grooming
needs: priority
needs: repro
needs: tech design
notifications
odysee
on hold
playlists
priority: blocker
priority: high
priority: low
priority: medium
protocol dependent
recsys
redesign
regression
resilience
sdk dependent
Tom's Wishlist
trending
type: bug
type: discussion
type: improvement
type: new feature
type: refactor
type: task
type: testing
unplanned
windows
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: LBRYCommunity/lbry-desktop#2473
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "fixes"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Changes
Some small changes requested
It looks like 9090 appears in several places in the code. Since we have to DRY break for pragmatic reasons here, the best way to handle this is:
inject WEBPACK_PORT into string
I believe that
thumbnailColorClass += (initializer % 15)
or something close to this is equivalent to the entireswitch
I believe you can have multiple supports in a single transaction. Should supports also be indexed by outpoint rather than txid?
@ -3,3 +3,3 @@
.channel__cover {
.channel-cover {
background-image: linear-gradient(to right, $lbry-indigo-4, $lbry-cyan-5 80%);
thank you
Good point. Yeah, we probably should use it. Is this a blocker? RC testing has been using it. I can update after the releasedecided to do it now https://github.com/lbryio/lbry-redux/pull/145
Yep.
initializer % 4
one small non-blocking objection
@ -89,3 +89,3 @@
...buildLink(PAGES.TRANSACTIONS, 'Transactions', ICONS.TRANSACTIONS),
...buildLink(PAGES.TRANSACTIONS, __('Transactions'), ICONS.TRANSACTIONS),
},
{
ty for this
Heh, I think you changed this class because I complained, but I'd argue these aren't "help" items either.
card__label
,card__action-label
? or something like this? it's fine if the classes are styled exactly the same, but usinghelp
when it is not "help" will render future style evolution harder