ccc27bdcd2 doc: Clarify -blocksdir usage (Daniel McNally)
Pull request description:
This PR attempts to clarify and correct the `-blocksdir` argument description and default value. `-blocksdir` does not refer to the full path to the actual `blocks` directory, but rather the root/parent directory which contains the `blocks` directory. Accordingly, the default value is `<datadir>` and not `<datadir>/blocks` - this behavior of defaulting to the datadir can also be seen in init.cpp:
```cpp
if (gArgs.IsArgSet("-blocksdir")) {
path = fs::system_complete(gArgs.GetArg("-blocksdir", ""));
if (!fs::is_directory(path)) {
path = "";
return path;
}
} else {
path = GetDataDir(false);
}
```
It also attempts to clarify that only the `.dat` files containing block data are impacted by `-blocksdir`, not the index files.
I believe this would close#12828.
ACKs for commit ccc27b:
hebasto:
utACK ccc27bdcd2
Tree-SHA512: 7b65f66b0579fd56e8c8cd4f9f22d6af56181817762a68deccd7fca51820ad82d9a0c48f5f1f012e746c67bcdae7af4555fad867cb620a9ca538d465c9d86c2b
bd63c1ed12 [docs] Update release-notes.md (Jon Atack)
96d32a7bc0 [docs] Update release-process.md (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Updates to `release-notes.md`:
- Write an introduction explaining how to use `release-notes.md` as a template for the release notes draft wiki for collaborative editing at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki, as seen for the 0.17.0 and 0.18.0 releases.
Updates to `release-process.md`:
- Create a release notes draft wiki at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki.
- As per http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-03-28.html#l-342, for the period during which the release notes are being edited on the wiki, the version on the branch should be wiped and replaced with a link to the wiki which should be used for all announcements until final.
- Before -final, remove the "Needs release note" label from relevant PRs/issues and merge the release notes from the wiki into the branch.
- Create a pinned meta-issue dedicated to testing the release candidate and communicate it in release announcements where useful. The former is done in practice (e.g. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/15555, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/14902) and the latter addresses the discussion here yesterday: https://x0f.org/web/statuses/101753569204220416.
- Reorganise the headers in the Branch Updates section.
- Update the version numbers in the examples.
- Adapt and merge in the updates in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15692.
ACKs for commit bd63c1:
Tree-SHA512: a436d6d0971bf00f081d4e2660c3b37a0f96913236c33934453387d63c11556a80e428b110f5629f07a6aa98e627f86c799d10c3f40e9f0c27b22275e04f6fa8
- Create a release notes draft wiki for collaborative editing at https://github.com/bitcoin-core/bitcoin-devwiki/wiki as seen for releases 0.17.0 and 0.18.0.
- As per http://www.erisian.com.au/bitcoin-core-dev/log-2019-03-28.html#l-342, for the period during which the notes are being edited on the wiki, the version on the branch should be wiped and replaced with a link to the wiki which should be used for all announcements until final.
- Before final, remove the "Needs release note" label from relevant PRs/issues and merge the release notes from the wiki into the branch.
- Create a pinned meta-issue dedicated to testing the release candidate and communicate it in release announcements where useful. The former is done in practice (e.g. #15555, #14902) and the latter addresses the discussion here: https://x0f.org/web/statuses/101753569204220416.
- Adapt and merge the updates in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15692.
- Update the version numbers in all the examples.
- Reorganise the headers in the Branch Updates section.
d20d756752 rpc: faster getblockstats using BlockUndo data (Felix Weis)
Pull request description:
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for `-txindex`, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
```
# 2018-11-25T16:36:19Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.99.0-edc715240-dirty (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 62% cpu 0.004 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.21s user 0.19s system 17% cpu 2.302 total
# 2018-11-25T16:39:17Z Bitcoin Core version v0.17.0 (release build)
seq 550100 550200 0.00s user 0.00s system 87% cpu 0.002 total
xargs -n1 src/bitcoin-cli getblockstats 0.24s user 0.22s system 0% cpu 3:19.42 total
```
ACKs for commit d20d75:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK d20d756752
Tree-SHA512: 5babc3eb8d2fee2cb23dc12f522656b80737a540cbf2b13390a8f388304c46c064cca76f896b46a6e2abae8cc582d28e1ab20dd4bb17ad6142f20630c2d30c54
Using undo data for a block (rev?????.dat) we can retrieve value information about prevouts and calculate the final transaction fee (rate). This approach is about 80x faster, drops the requirement for -txindex, and works for all non-pruned blocks.
510c6532ba Extract ParseDescriptorRange (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
So as to be consistently informative when the checks fail, and
to protect against unintentional divergence among the checks.
ACKs for commit 510c65:
meshcollider:
Oh apologies, yes. Thanks :) utACK 510c6532ba
MarcoFalke:
utACK 510c6532ba
sipa:
utACK 510c6532ba
Tree-SHA512: b1f0792bfaa163890a20654a0fc2c4c4a996659916bf5f4a495662436b39326692a1a0c825caafd859e48c05f5dd1865c4f7c28092be5074edda3c94f94f9f8b
5c04814b2d Move non-linux source tarball to bitcoin-binaries (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Currently, if a user makes a non-linux (`--os=w`, `--os=m` or `--os=wm`) gitian building with the `gitian-build.py` script, source tarballs are not moved to the `bitcoin-binaries/${VERSION}` directory.
This PR fixes this bug.
~~In addition, the `src` subdirectory in the `gitian-builder/build/out` directory is no longer used as unnecessary.~~
ACKs for commit 5c0481:
fanquake:
utACK 5c04814
ken2812221:
utACK 5c04814b2d
Tree-SHA512: 8648b6cbf502c012b12642783870e37aea385bd5f4cba5cb577fee924c09685e9a117676be502e4d4783c7a8ab31a2bd495970eec42a42d78e86ac5d39323091
2dfe27517 Add ChaCha20 bench (Jonas Schnelli)
2bc2b8b49 Add ChaCha20 encryption option (XOR) (Jonas Schnelli)
Pull request description:
The current ChaCha20 implementation does not support message encryption (it can only output the keystream which is sufficient for the RNG).
This PR adds the actual XORing of the `plaintext` with the `keystream` in order to return the desired `ciphertext`.
Required for v2 message transport protocol.
ACKs for commit 2dfe27:
jnewbery:
Looks good. utACK 2dfe275171.
jnewbery:
utACK 2dfe275171
sipa:
utACK 2dfe275171
ryanofsky:
utACK 2dfe275171. Changes since last review are just renaming the Crypt method, adding comments, and simplifying the benchmark.
Tree-SHA512: 84bb234da2ca9fdc44bc29a786d9dd215520f81245270c1aef801ef66b6091b7793e2eb38ad6dbb084925245065c5dce9e5582f2d0fa220ab3e182d43412d5b5
fa193dc8e6 doc: Remove win32 from the release process (MarcoFalke)
faf666f814 Remove Windows 32 bit build (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The Windows 32 bit build has been removed from https://bitcoincore.org/en/download/, so unless there are complaints, we don't need to build it even
ACKs for commit fa193d:
fanquake:
utACK fa193dc8e6
Tree-SHA512: d6f2976a2e0c407698f720b00ac23ec4056626de4eff8621f4c5581120af0460afd1bdef72329cc0e7d92afca48d94ae5fce6777cb36bfabb60b8034ff08fd88
78e407ad0c GetKeyBirthTimes should return key ids, not destinations (Gregory Sanders)
70946e7fee Replace CScriptID and CKeyID in CTxDestination with dedicated types (Gregory Sanders)
Pull request description:
The current usage seems to be an overloading of meanings. `CScriptID` is used in the wallet as a lookup key, as well as a destination, and `CKeyID` likewise. Instead, have all destinations be dedicated types.
New types:
`CScriptID`->`ScriptHash`
`CKeyID`->`PKHash`
ACKs for commit 78e407:
ryanofsky:
utACK 78e407ad0c. Only changes are removing extra CScriptID()s and fixing the test case.
Sjors:
utACK 78e407a
meshcollider:
utACK 78e407ad0c
Tree-SHA512: 437f59fc3afb83a40540da3351507aef5aed44e3a7f15b01ddad6226854edeee762ff0b0ef336fe3654c4cd99a205cef175211de8b639abe1130c8a6313337b9
beda0dae95 Upgrade gitian image before signing (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The package upgrade in the Ubuntu repositories in the period between the building and the signing causes (particularly, using LXC) an error:
```
Creating package manifest
Could not download some packages, please run gbuild --upgrade
```
For example, the [`busybox-initramfs`](https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/busybox-initramfs) package was [upgraded](http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.27.2-2ubuntu3.2/changelog) from `1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3.1` to `1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3.2` on 2019-03-06.
This PR forces gitian image upgrade for the `--sign` command.
Ref:
[devrandom/gitian-builder/target-bin/grab-packages.sh](04ab7c1218/target-bin/grab-packages.sh)
```
#!/bin/sh
# Get an installed package manifest
set -e
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
# make sure all packages with installed versions are downloaded
# (except for held packages, which may not be available for download)
dpkg-query -W -f '${Status}\t${Package}=${Version}\n' | grep -v ^hold | cut -f2- | xargs -n 50 apt-get install -q --reinstall -y -d > /tmp/download.log
grep "cannot be downloaded" /tmp/download.log && { echo Could not download some packages, please run gbuild --upgrade 1>&2 ; exit 1 ; }
sha256sum *.deb | sort --key 2
```
ACKs for commit beda0d:
laanwj:
utACK beda0dae95
fanquake:
utACK beda0da
Tree-SHA512: e2e3b3e3719e098d266ceec39bd69b950344a4eb2f43ae6ad3e696add70f743b363cc83676e339f7caa207d6478029869a8af01fe1f6d5690d2857003f7d8ce8
e0bb279999 Doc: remove text about txes always relayed from -whitelist (David A. Harding)
Pull request description:
Updates text since -whitelistforcerelay was set to false by default in PR #15193.
ACKs for commit e0bb27:
fanquake:
utACK e0bb279
MarcoFalke:
utACK e0bb279999
Tree-SHA512: cf0c9321d72692d573039a04f8f1d048cbdf67ed86cc781523dabd3c45d2731b788f53749e6bb29d7da1ab44eb04030f352469b20489bb2a26c2c38fb61f6489
62d50ef308 Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This PR adds compile-time checking for negative locking requirements that follow from the run-time locking requirement `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)` in `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)`.
Changes:
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `CChainState::ActivateBestChain(…)`, `CChainState:: InvalidateBlock(…)` and `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(…)` which all call `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `InvalidateBlock(…)` which calls `CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `RewindBlockIndex(…)` which calls `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
ACKs for commit 62d50e:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 62d50ef308
Tree-SHA512: 73d092ccd08c851ae3c5d60370c369fc030c5793f5507e2faccb6f91c851ddc0ce059fbea3899f2856330d7a8c78f2ac6a2988e8268b03154f946be9e60e3be1
a3592c91a2 .gitignore: Don't ignore depends patches (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Ignoring patches might be useful for those who use `git format-patch` often, but in our depends folder we **_want_** to keep track of our patches.
ACKs for commit a3592c:
practicalswift:
utACK a3592c91a2
laanwj:
utACK a3592c91a2
jonasschnelli:
utACK a3592c91a2
fanquake:
utACK a3592c9
Tree-SHA512: 439479cc2ff05335c3d21551a23b34ef2f8a4d0eb05085d2422c2c8d7d7035f529b83dc4056f18cb96234d6fa74075adaa14f0e5fb4c99e6189a4af9078fd28e
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
486c1eea86 refactoring: remove unused chainActive (James O'Beirne)
631940aab2 scripted-diff: replace chainActive -> ::ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
a3a609079c refactoring: introduce unused ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
1b6e6fcfd2 rename: CChainState.chainActive -> m_chain (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the assumeutxo project:
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
---
This change refactors the `chainActive` reference into a `::ChainActive()` call. It also distinguishes `CChainState`'s `CChain` data member as `m_chain` instead of the current `chainActive`, which makes it easily confused with the global data.
The active chain must be obtained via function because its reference will be swapped at some point during runtime after loading a UTXO snapshot.
This change, though lengthy, should be pretty easy to review since most of it is contained within a scripted-diff. Once merged, the parent PR should be easier to review.
ACKs for commit 486c1e:
Sjors:
utACK 486c1ee
promag:
utACK 486c1ee.
practicalswift:
utACK 486c1eea86
Tree-SHA512: 06ed8f9e77f2d25fc9bea0ba86436d80dbbce90a1e8be23e37ec4eeb26060483e60b4a5c4fba679cb1867f61e3921c24abeb9cabdfb4d0a9b1c4ddd77b17456a
Remove testcase generating code from util_SettingsMerge so it can be reused in
new tests.
The hash value expected in util_SettingsMerge changes as a result of this, but
only because the testcases are generated in a different order, not because any
cases are added or removed. It is possible to verify this with:
SETTINGS_MERGE_TEST_OUT=new.txt test/test_bitcoin --run_test=util_tests/util_SettingsMerge
git checkout HEAD~1
make test/test_bitcoin
SETTINGS_MERGE_TEST_OUT=old.txt test/test_bitcoin --run_test=util_tests/util_SettingsMerge
diff -u <(sort old.txt) <(sort new.txt)
The new output is a little more readable, with simpler testcases sorted first.
Followup to #15869. Treat "-wallet" as the network-specific argument in test
instead of "-server", to make test output clearer and be more consistent with
bitcoind. Update embedded hash to match changed output from this.
d2eee87928 Lift prevector default vals to the member declaration (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
I overlooked this possibility in #14028
ACKs for commit d2eee8:
promag:
utACK d2eee87, change looks good because members are always initialized.
251Labs:
utACK d2eee87 nice one.
ken2812221:
utACK d2eee87928
practicalswift:
utACK d2eee87928
scravy:
utACK d2eee87928
Tree-SHA512: f2726bae1cf892fd680cf8571027bcdc2e42ba567eaa901fb5fb5423b4d11b29e745e0163d82cb513d8c81399cc85933a16ed66d4a30829382d4721ffc41dc97
7b29ec277b [tests] Comment for why logging config is set as command-line args. (John Newbery)
ba534ccd56 [tests] log thread names by default in functional tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
More detailed logs are better
ACKs for commit 7b29ec:
jamesob:
utACK 7b29ec277b
Tree-SHA512: 327cfedb7b7bf32f7ce1e2de5f70c7092041a8e868e14285a79176277c6cf47ebea27027f68787332f8ad21c7f64d2640dd21813eda5b2bd0e5208a65364a879
b6c748f849 doc: Add release notes for 15730 (João Barbosa)
d3e8458365 rpc: Show scanning details in getwalletinfo (João Barbosa)
90e27abe37 wallet: Track current scanning progress (João Barbosa)
2ee811e693 wallet: Track scanning duration (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Closes#15724.
ACKs for commit b6c748:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK b6c748f849 (Only change since my last review is rebase, adding release notes, and returning false instead of null)
laanwj:
utACK b6c748f849
jonatack:
ACK b6c748f849, only changes appear to be rebase for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15730#discussion_r280030617 and release notes.
Tree-SHA512: 8ee98f971c15f66ce8138fc92c55e51abc9faf01866a31ac7ce2ad766aa2bb88559eabee3b5815d645c84cdf1c19dc35ec03f31461e39bc5f6040edec0b87116
facfb4111d rpc: Deprecate getunconfirmedbalance and getwalletinfo balances (MarcoFalke)
999931cf8f rpc: Add getbalances RPC (MarcoFalke)
fad13e925e rpcwallet: Make helper methods const on CWallet (MarcoFalke)
fad40ec915 wallet: Use IsValidNumArgs in getwalletinfo rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes the `CWallet::GetBalance()` struct over RPC.
In the future, incorrectly named rpcs such as `getunconfirmedbalance` or rpcs redundant to this such as `getbalance` could be removed.
ACKs for commit facfb4:
jnewbery:
utACK facfb4111d
Tree-SHA512: 1f54fedce55df9a8ea82d2b6265354b39a956072621876ebaee2355aac0e23c7b64340c3279502415598c095858529e18b50789be956250aafda1cd3a8d948a5
00d110463a Install bitcoin-wallet manpage. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This change marks the already-existing `bitcoin-wallet.1` manpage file for installation together with the others. Previously, only `bitcoind.1`, `bitcoin-cli.1`, `bitcoin-tx.1` and `bitcoin-qt.1` would be installed.
ACKs for commit 00d110:
laanwj:
utACK 00d110463a
practicalswift:
utACK 00d110463a
Tree-SHA512: ca846e414548f1dc774f460edca2e17d7d619c7e6f0d18db0c58c09e04f9d43c6964fcf2bacb5b1eae94de9c5fdda86abf258ef6b78b0f693715d070dfc10f08
fc929842c2 GUI: Move QRImageWidget to its own file-pair (Luke Dashjr)
77851ab682 GUI: Refactor actual QR code rendering into new QRImageWidget::setQR (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
For at least QR-code based pairing of mobile wallets with nodes, it will be desirable to render QR codes even without wallet support.
Therefore, this prepares by moving the QRImageWidget out of a wallet-specific file into its own `qrencoder` file-pair.
ACKs for commit fc9298:
laanwj:
utACK fc929842c2
jonasschnelli:
utACK fc929842c2
Tree-SHA512: 95529a38c0573a4b3f1253fb5f11ca07a5b3a9840ec24acc7d87270212f3c9f7c5b186d9274d297517a3b80494f38a57574fb9730b1574db01688539b987bd91
0ff1c2a838 Separate reason for premature spends (coinbase/locktime) (Suhas Daftuar)
54470e767b Assert validation reasons are contextually correct (Suhas Daftuar)
2120c31521 [refactor] Update some comments in validation.cpp as we arent doing DoS there (Matt Corallo)
12dbdd7a41 [refactor] Drop unused state.DoS(), state.GetDoS(), state.CorruptionPossible() (Matt Corallo)
aa502b88d1 scripted-diff: Remove DoS calls to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
7721ad64f4 [refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed. (Matt Corallo)
5e78c5734b Allow use of state.Invalid() for all reasons (Matt Corallo)
6b34bc6b6f Fix handling of invalid headers (Suhas Daftuar)
ef54b486d5 [refactor] Use Reasons directly instead of DoS codes (Matt Corallo)
9ab2a0412e CorruptionPossible -> BLOCK_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
6e55b292b0 CorruptionPossible -> TX_WITNESS_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
7df16e70e6 LookupBlockIndex -> CACHED_INVALID (Matt Corallo)
c8b0d22698 [refactor] Drop redundant nDoS, corruptionPossible, SetCorruptionPossible (Matt Corallo)
34477ccd39 [refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
6a7f8777a0 Ban all peers for all block script failures (Suhas Daftuar)
7b999103e2 Clean up banning levels (Matt Corallo)
b8b4c80146 [refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut) (Matt Corallo)
8818729013 [refactor] Refactor misbehavior ban decisions to MaybePunishNode() (Matt Corallo)
00e11e61c0 [refactor] rename stateDummy -> orphan_state (Matt Corallo)
f34fa719cf Drop obsolete sigops comment (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This is a rebase of #11639 with some fixes for the last few comments which were not yet addressed.
The original PR text, with some strikethroughs of text that is no longer correct:
> This cleans up an old main-carryover - it made sense that main could decide what DoS scores to assign things because the DoS scores were handled in a different part of main, but now validation is telling net_processing what DoS scores to assign to different things, which is utter nonsense. Instead, we replace CValidationState's nDoS and CorruptionPossible with a general ValidationInvalidReason, which net_processing can handle as it sees fit. I keep the behavior changes here to a minimum, but in the future we can utilize these changes for other smarter behavior, such as disconnecting/preferring to rotate outbound peers based on them providing things which are invalid due to SOFT_FORK because we shouldn't ban for such cases.
>
> This is somewhat complementary with, though obviously conflicts heavily with #11523, which added enums in place of DoS scores, as well as a few other cleanups (which are still relevant).
>
> Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
>
> Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
> points to 100.
> Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
> instead of 10 DoS points.
> ~~BIP68-violation no longer results in a ban as it is SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Non-SegWit SigOp violation no longer results in a ban as it
> considers P2SH sigops and is thus SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Any script violation in a block no longer results in a ban as
> it may be the result of a SOFT_FORK. This should likely be
> fixed in the future by differentiating between them.~~
> Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
> Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
> too far in the future continue to not result in a ban.
> Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
> ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Note: The change to ban all peers for consensus violations is actually NOT the change I'd like to make -- I'd prefer to only ban outbound peers in those situations. The current behavior is a bit of a mess, however, and so in the interests of advancing this PR I tried to keep the changes to a minimum. I plan to revisit the behavior in a followup PR.
EDIT: One reviewer suggested I add some additional context for this PR:
> The goal of this work was to make net_processing aware of the actual reasons for validation failures, rather than just deal with opaque numbers instructing it to do something.
>
> In the future, I'd like to make it so that we use more context to decide how to punish a peer. One example is to differentiate inbound and outbound peer misbehaviors. Another potential example is if we'd treat RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE failures differently (ie after the next consensus change is implemented), and perhaps again we'd want to treat some peers differently than others.
ACKs for commit 0ff1c2:
jnewbery:
utACK 0ff1c2a838
ryanofsky:
utACK 0ff1c2a838. Only change is dropping the first commit (f3883a321bf4ab289edcd9754b12cae3a648b175), and dropping the temporary `assert(level == GetDoS())` that was in 35ee77f2832eaffce30042e00785c310c5540cdc (now c8b0d22698)
Tree-SHA512: e915a411100876398af5463d0a885920e44d473467bb6af991ef2e8f2681db6c1209bb60f848bd154be72d460f039b5653df20a6840352c5f7ea5486d9f777a3
