fix watch

This commit is contained in:
Alex Grintsvayg 2018-11-02 13:45:03 -04:00
parent 00263e4ff9
commit e7d0832e0f
4 changed files with 10 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
index.html: index.md style.css index.html: index.md head.html
./bin/gh-md-toc --insert index.md ./bin/gh-md-toc --insert index.md
./bin/mmark-linux-amd64 -head head.html -html index.md > index.html ./bin/mmark-linux-amd64 -head head.html -html index.md > index.html

View file

@ -83,6 +83,8 @@
## Table of Contents ## Table of Contents
<!-- this TOC is only here for github or js-challenged browsers -->
<!--ts--> <!--ts-->
* [Introduction](#introduction) * [Introduction](#introduction)
* [Overview](#overview) * [Overview](#overview)
@ -119,7 +121,7 @@
* [Claim Sequence](#claim-sequence-1) * [Claim Sequence](#claim-sequence-1)
* [Bid Position](#bid-position-1) * [Bid Position](#bid-position-1)
* [ChannelName and ClaimName](#channelname-and-claimname) * [ChannelName and ClaimName](#channelname-and-claimname)
* [Examples](#examples) * [Examples {#url-resolution-examples}](#examples-url-resolution-examples)
* [Design Notes](#design-notes) * [Design Notes](#design-notes)
* [Transactions](#transactions) * [Transactions](#transactions)
* [Operations and Opcodes](#operations-and-opcodes) * [Operations and Opcodes](#operations-and-opcodes)
@ -592,7 +594,7 @@ Char ::= #x9 | #xA | #xD | [#x20-#xD7FF] | [#xE000-#xFFFD] | [#x10000-#x10FFFF]
<p>Technically, if multiple claims for the same name exist inside the same channel, they are resolved via the same resolution rules applied entirely within the sub-scope of the channel. Pragmatically, it rarely makes sense for channels to use the same name twice and support for this functionality may be unreliable in current tooling.</p> <p>Technically, if multiple claims for the same name exist inside the same channel, they are resolved via the same resolution rules applied entirely within the sub-scope of the channel. Pragmatically, it rarely makes sense for channels to use the same name twice and support for this functionality may be unreliable in current tooling.</p>
<h5 id="examples">Examples</h5> <h5 id="url-resolution-examples">Examples</h5>
<p>Suppose the following names were claimed in the following order:</p> <p>Suppose the following names were claimed in the following order:</p>

View file

@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ A> For more technical information about LBRY, visit [lbry.tech](https://lbry.tec
## Table of Contents ## Table of Contents
<!-- this TOC is only here for github or js-challenged browsers -->
<!--ts--> <!--ts-->
* [Introduction](#introduction) * [Introduction](#introduction)
* [Overview](#overview) * [Overview](#overview)
@ -69,7 +71,7 @@ A> For more technical information about LBRY, visit [lbry.tech](https://lbry.tec
* [Claim Sequence](#claim-sequence-1) * [Claim Sequence](#claim-sequence-1)
* [Bid Position](#bid-position-1) * [Bid Position](#bid-position-1)
* [ChannelName and ClaimName](#channelname-and-claimname) * [ChannelName and ClaimName](#channelname-and-claimname)
* [Examples](#examples) * [Examples {#url-resolution-examples}](#examples-url-resolution-examples)
* [Design Notes](#design-notes) * [Design Notes](#design-notes)
* [Transactions](#transactions) * [Transactions](#transactions)
* [Operations and Opcodes](#operations-and-opcodes) * [Operations and Opcodes](#operations-and-opcodes)
@ -546,7 +548,7 @@ If both a channel name and a claim name is present, resolution happens in two st
Technically, if multiple claims for the same name exist inside the same channel, they are resolved via the same resolution rules applied entirely within the sub-scope of the channel. Pragmatically, it rarely makes sense for channels to use the same name twice and support for this functionality may be unreliable in current tooling. Technically, if multiple claims for the same name exist inside the same channel, they are resolved via the same resolution rules applied entirely within the sub-scope of the channel. Pragmatically, it rarely makes sense for channels to use the same name twice and support for this functionality may be unreliable in current tooling.
##### Examples ##### Examples {#url-resolution-examples}
Suppose the following names were claimed in the following order: Suppose the following names were claimed in the following order:

View file

@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
#!/bin/bash #!/bin/bash
./bin/reflex --decoration=none --start-service=true --inverse-regex='index\.html' -- sh -c "make" ./bin/reflex --decoration=none --start-service=true --glob='*' --inverse-regex='index\.html' -- sh -c "make"