Add code to enable a hardfork into witness support, in addition to
possible BIP9 fiddling.
Fix a bug in abandonclaim and abandonsupport that burns coins on
abandon, rather than sending to the intended destination.
This contains significant rebase / merge / testing work by Naut
<lbrynaut@protonmail.com>, Anthony Fieroni <bvbfan@abv.bg> and Brannon
King <countprimes@gmail.com>.
fdb3e8f8b2 Ignore old versionbit activations (Anthony Towns)
Pull request description:
PR 16060 removed the CSV and Segwit BIP9 softfork definitions and hard-coded ('buried') the activation heights. The versionbits code will warn users if an undefined softfork has been signalled in block header versions, and removing the CSV/Segwit definitions caused those warnings to be triggered.
Change the BIP 9 warning code to only check for unknown softforks after the segwit activation height.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
ajtowns:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2 for what it's worth
achow101:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
Sjors:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2. It makes the bit 0 warning go away in mainnet and testnet QT when a new block arrives. I think the code is clear enough.
jonatack:
ACK fdb3e8f8b2
Tree-SHA512: e6fd34e8902f8c7affb28e8951803e47d542710d5f1229000746656a37ee59d754439fc33e36b7eef87544262e5aac374645db91b74cb507e73514003ca7a67f
0c62e3aa73 New regression testing for CVE-2018-17144, CVE-2012-2459, and CVE-2010-5137. (lucash-dev)
38bfca6bb2 Added comments referencing multiple CVEs in tests and production code. (lucash-dev)
Pull request description:
This functional test includes two scenarios that test for regressions of vulnerabilities, but they are only briefly described. There are freely available documents explaining in detail the issues, but without explicit mentions, the developer trying to maintain the code needs an additional step of digging in commit history and PR conversations to figure it out.
Added comments to explicitly mention CVE-2018-17144 and CVE-2012-2459, for more complete documentation.
This improves developer experience by making understanding the tests easier.
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
ACK 0c62e3aa73, checked the CVE numbers, thanks for adding documentation
Tree-SHA512: 3ee05351745193b8b959e4a25d50f25a693b2d24b0732ed53cf7d5882df40b5dd0f1877bd5c69cffb921d4a7acf9deb3cc1160b96dc730d9b5984151ad06b7c9
This commit adds comments referencing multiple CVEs both in production and test code.
CVEs covered in this commit:
CVE-2010-5137
CVE-2010-5139
CVE-2010-5141
CVE-2012-1909
CVE-2012-2459
CVE-2012-3789
CVE-2018-17144
This is a first step towards cleaning up our DoS interface - make
validation return *why* something is invalid, and let net_processing
figure out what that implies in terms of banning/disconnection/etc.
Behavior change: peers will now be banned for providing blocks
with premature coinbase spends.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
* Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
points to 100.
* Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
instead of 10 DoS points.
* Many pre-segwit soft-fork errors now result in a ban.
Note: Transactions that violate soft-fork script flags since P2SH do not generally
result in a ban. Also, banning behavior for invalid blocks is dependent on
whether the node is validating with multiple script check threads, due to a long-
standing bug. That inconsistency is still present after this commit.
* Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
* Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
too far in the future continue to *not* result in a ban.
* Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Isolate the decision of whether to ban a peer to one place in the
code, rather than having it sprinkled throughout net_processing.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
CheckTransaction is a context-free function that does not require access
to the blockchain or mempool. Move it from src/consensus/tx_verify in
lib_server to a new unit src/consensus/tx_check in lib_consensus so that
it can be called by non-server libraries.
This commit moves P2SH activation back to the genesis block, with
a hardcoded exception for the one historical block in the chain that
violated this rule.
4e955c5 Near-Bugfix: Reestablish consensus check removed in 8d7849b (Jorge Timón)
3e8c916 Introduce CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins static wrapper in txmempool.cpp (Jorge Timón)
832e074 Optimization: Minimize the number of times it is checked that no money is created (Jorge Timón)
3f0ee3e Proper indentation for CheckTxInputs and other minor fixes (Jorge Timón)
Pull request description:
...is created by individual transactions to 2 places (but call only once in each):
- ConnectBlock ( before calculated fees per txs twice )
- AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker ( before called CheckTxInputs 4 times and calculated
fees per tx one extra time )
Also call tx.GetValueOut() only once per call of CheckTxInputs (instead of 2)
For more motivation:
~~https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1493~~https://github.com/jtimon/bitcoin/compare/0.13-consensus-inputs...jtimon:0.13-consensus-inputs-comments
EDIT: partially replaces #6445
Near-Bugfix as pointed out in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/8498#discussion_r124346132
Tree-SHA512: c71188e7c7c2425c9170ed7b803896755a92fd22f43b136eedaa6e554106696f0b10271d0ef0d0127c1eaafbc31d12eb19143df4f1b6882feecedf6ef05ea346
by individual transactions to 2 places (but call only once in each):
- ConnectBlock ( before calculated fees per txs twice )
- AcceptToMemoryPoolWorker ( before called CheckTxInputs 4 times and calculated
fees per tx one extra time )
Also call tx.GetValueOut() only once per call of CheckTxInputs (instead of 2)
- Move comment about transaction/block weight calculation so it applies not only to the GetBlockWeight function but also to GetTransactionWeight
- Fix comment in validation.cpp referencing future deployment of BIP113. It has already been deployed.
- The doc comment for BLOCK_DOWNLOAD_WINDOW wasn't updated since pruning was introduced, so it still refers to pruning as something that might happen in the future. A larger BLOCK_DOWNLOAD_WINDOW window would now, indeed, make pruning harder.
Some people keep thinking that MAX_BLOCK_BASE_SIZE is a separate
size limit from the weight limit when it fact it is superfluous,
and used in early tests before the witness data has been
validated or just to compute worst case sizes. The size checks
that use it would not behave any differently consensus wise
if they were eliminated completely.
Its correct value is not independently settable but is a function
of the weight limit and weight formula.
This patch just eliminates it and uses the scale factor as
required to compute the worse case constants.
It also moves the weight factor out of primitives into consensus,
which is a more logical place for it.
