beda0dae95 Upgrade gitian image before signing (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
The package upgrade in the Ubuntu repositories in the period between the building and the signing causes (particularly, using LXC) an error:
```
Creating package manifest
Could not download some packages, please run gbuild --upgrade
```
For example, the [`busybox-initramfs`](https://packages.ubuntu.com/bionic/busybox-initramfs) package was [upgraded](http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/main/b/busybox/busybox_1.27.2-2ubuntu3.2/changelog) from `1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3.1` to `1:1.27.2-2ubuntu3.2` on 2019-03-06.
This PR forces gitian image upgrade for the `--sign` command.
Ref:
[devrandom/gitian-builder/target-bin/grab-packages.sh](04ab7c1218/target-bin/grab-packages.sh)
```
#!/bin/sh
# Get an installed package manifest
set -e
cd /var/cache/apt/archives
# make sure all packages with installed versions are downloaded
# (except for held packages, which may not be available for download)
dpkg-query -W -f '${Status}\t${Package}=${Version}\n' | grep -v ^hold | cut -f2- | xargs -n 50 apt-get install -q --reinstall -y -d > /tmp/download.log
grep "cannot be downloaded" /tmp/download.log && { echo Could not download some packages, please run gbuild --upgrade 1>&2 ; exit 1 ; }
sha256sum *.deb | sort --key 2
```
ACKs for commit beda0d:
laanwj:
utACK beda0dae95
fanquake:
utACK beda0da
Tree-SHA512: e2e3b3e3719e098d266ceec39bd69b950344a4eb2f43ae6ad3e696add70f743b363cc83676e339f7caa207d6478029869a8af01fe1f6d5690d2857003f7d8ce8
e0bb279999 Doc: remove text about txes always relayed from -whitelist (David A. Harding)
Pull request description:
Updates text since -whitelistforcerelay was set to false by default in PR #15193.
ACKs for commit e0bb27:
fanquake:
utACK e0bb279
MarcoFalke:
utACK e0bb279999
Tree-SHA512: cf0c9321d72692d573039a04f8f1d048cbdf67ed86cc781523dabd3c45d2731b788f53749e6bb29d7da1ab44eb04030f352469b20489bb2a26c2c38fb61f6489
62d50ef308 Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main) (practicalswift)
Pull request description:
This PR adds compile-time checking for negative locking requirements that follow from the run-time locking requirement `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)` in `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)`.
Changes:
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `CChainState::ActivateBestChain(…)`, `CChainState:: InvalidateBlock(…)` and `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(…)` which all call `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `InvalidateBlock(…)` which calls `CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
* Add `LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main)` to `RewindBlockIndex(…)` which calls `CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...)` which in turn calls `LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...)` which does `AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)`
ACKs for commit 62d50e:
MarcoFalke:
utACK 62d50ef308
Tree-SHA512: 73d092ccd08c851ae3c5d60370c369fc030c5793f5507e2faccb6f91c851ddc0ce059fbea3899f2856330d7a8c78f2ac6a2988e8268b03154f946be9e60e3be1
a3592c91a2 .gitignore: Don't ignore depends patches (Carl Dong)
Pull request description:
Ignoring patches might be useful for those who use `git format-patch` often, but in our depends folder we **_want_** to keep track of our patches.
ACKs for commit a3592c:
practicalswift:
utACK a3592c91a2
laanwj:
utACK a3592c91a2
jonasschnelli:
utACK a3592c91a2
fanquake:
utACK a3592c9
Tree-SHA512: 439479cc2ff05335c3d21551a23b34ef2f8a4d0eb05085d2422c2c8d7d7035f529b83dc4056f18cb96234d6fa74075adaa14f0e5fb4c99e6189a4af9078fd28e
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::InvalidateBlock(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
Add LOCKS_EXCLUDED(cs_main) to functions calling CChainState::RewindBlockIndex(...) which calls LimitValidationInterfaceQueue(...) which in turn does AssertLockNotHeld(cs_main)
486c1eea86 refactoring: remove unused chainActive (James O'Beirne)
631940aab2 scripted-diff: replace chainActive -> ::ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
a3a609079c refactoring: introduce unused ChainActive() (James O'Beirne)
1b6e6fcfd2 rename: CChainState.chainActive -> m_chain (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the assumeutxo project:
Parent PR: #15606
Issue: #15605
Specification: https://github.com/jamesob/assumeutxo-docs/tree/2019-04-proposal/proposal
---
This change refactors the `chainActive` reference into a `::ChainActive()` call. It also distinguishes `CChainState`'s `CChain` data member as `m_chain` instead of the current `chainActive`, which makes it easily confused with the global data.
The active chain must be obtained via function because its reference will be swapped at some point during runtime after loading a UTXO snapshot.
This change, though lengthy, should be pretty easy to review since most of it is contained within a scripted-diff. Once merged, the parent PR should be easier to review.
ACKs for commit 486c1e:
Sjors:
utACK 486c1ee
promag:
utACK 486c1ee.
practicalswift:
utACK 486c1eea86
Tree-SHA512: 06ed8f9e77f2d25fc9bea0ba86436d80dbbce90a1e8be23e37ec4eeb26060483e60b4a5c4fba679cb1867f61e3921c24abeb9cabdfb4d0a9b1c4ddd77b17456a
d2eee87928 Lift prevector default vals to the member declaration (Ben Woosley)
Pull request description:
I overlooked this possibility in #14028
ACKs for commit d2eee8:
promag:
utACK d2eee87, change looks good because members are always initialized.
251Labs:
utACK d2eee87 nice one.
ken2812221:
utACK d2eee87928
practicalswift:
utACK d2eee87928
scravy:
utACK d2eee87928
Tree-SHA512: f2726bae1cf892fd680cf8571027bcdc2e42ba567eaa901fb5fb5423b4d11b29e745e0163d82cb513d8c81399cc85933a16ed66d4a30829382d4721ffc41dc97
7b29ec277b [tests] Comment for why logging config is set as command-line args. (John Newbery)
ba534ccd56 [tests] log thread names by default in functional tests (John Newbery)
Pull request description:
More detailed logs are better
ACKs for commit 7b29ec:
jamesob:
utACK 7b29ec277b
Tree-SHA512: 327cfedb7b7bf32f7ce1e2de5f70c7092041a8e868e14285a79176277c6cf47ebea27027f68787332f8ad21c7f64d2640dd21813eda5b2bd0e5208a65364a879
b6c748f849 doc: Add release notes for 15730 (João Barbosa)
d3e8458365 rpc: Show scanning details in getwalletinfo (João Barbosa)
90e27abe37 wallet: Track current scanning progress (João Barbosa)
2ee811e693 wallet: Track scanning duration (João Barbosa)
Pull request description:
Closes#15724.
ACKs for commit b6c748:
MarcoFalke:
re-utACK b6c748f849 (Only change since my last review is rebase, adding release notes, and returning false instead of null)
laanwj:
utACK b6c748f849
jonatack:
ACK b6c748f849, only changes appear to be rebase for https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15730#discussion_r280030617 and release notes.
Tree-SHA512: 8ee98f971c15f66ce8138fc92c55e51abc9faf01866a31ac7ce2ad766aa2bb88559eabee3b5815d645c84cdf1c19dc35ec03f31461e39bc5f6040edec0b87116
facfb4111d rpc: Deprecate getunconfirmedbalance and getwalletinfo balances (MarcoFalke)
999931cf8f rpc: Add getbalances RPC (MarcoFalke)
fad13e925e rpcwallet: Make helper methods const on CWallet (MarcoFalke)
fad40ec915 wallet: Use IsValidNumArgs in getwalletinfo rpc (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This exposes the `CWallet::GetBalance()` struct over RPC.
In the future, incorrectly named rpcs such as `getunconfirmedbalance` or rpcs redundant to this such as `getbalance` could be removed.
ACKs for commit facfb4:
jnewbery:
utACK facfb4111d
Tree-SHA512: 1f54fedce55df9a8ea82d2b6265354b39a956072621876ebaee2355aac0e23c7b64340c3279502415598c095858529e18b50789be956250aafda1cd3a8d948a5
00d110463a Install bitcoin-wallet manpage. (Daniel Kraft)
Pull request description:
This change marks the already-existing `bitcoin-wallet.1` manpage file for installation together with the others. Previously, only `bitcoind.1`, `bitcoin-cli.1`, `bitcoin-tx.1` and `bitcoin-qt.1` would be installed.
ACKs for commit 00d110:
laanwj:
utACK 00d110463a
practicalswift:
utACK 00d110463a
Tree-SHA512: ca846e414548f1dc774f460edca2e17d7d619c7e6f0d18db0c58c09e04f9d43c6964fcf2bacb5b1eae94de9c5fdda86abf258ef6b78b0f693715d070dfc10f08
fc929842c2 GUI: Move QRImageWidget to its own file-pair (Luke Dashjr)
77851ab682 GUI: Refactor actual QR code rendering into new QRImageWidget::setQR (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
For at least QR-code based pairing of mobile wallets with nodes, it will be desirable to render QR codes even without wallet support.
Therefore, this prepares by moving the QRImageWidget out of a wallet-specific file into its own `qrencoder` file-pair.
ACKs for commit fc9298:
laanwj:
utACK fc929842c2
jonasschnelli:
utACK fc929842c2
Tree-SHA512: 95529a38c0573a4b3f1253fb5f11ca07a5b3a9840ec24acc7d87270212f3c9f7c5b186d9274d297517a3b80494f38a57574fb9730b1574db01688539b987bd91
0ff1c2a838 Separate reason for premature spends (coinbase/locktime) (Suhas Daftuar)
54470e767b Assert validation reasons are contextually correct (Suhas Daftuar)
2120c31521 [refactor] Update some comments in validation.cpp as we arent doing DoS there (Matt Corallo)
12dbdd7a41 [refactor] Drop unused state.DoS(), state.GetDoS(), state.CorruptionPossible() (Matt Corallo)
aa502b88d1 scripted-diff: Remove DoS calls to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
7721ad64f4 [refactor] Prep for scripted-diff by removing some \ns which annoy sed. (Matt Corallo)
5e78c5734b Allow use of state.Invalid() for all reasons (Matt Corallo)
6b34bc6b6f Fix handling of invalid headers (Suhas Daftuar)
ef54b486d5 [refactor] Use Reasons directly instead of DoS codes (Matt Corallo)
9ab2a0412e CorruptionPossible -> BLOCK_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
6e55b292b0 CorruptionPossible -> TX_WITNESS_MUTATED (Matt Corallo)
7df16e70e6 LookupBlockIndex -> CACHED_INVALID (Matt Corallo)
c8b0d22698 [refactor] Drop redundant nDoS, corruptionPossible, SetCorruptionPossible (Matt Corallo)
34477ccd39 [refactor] Add useful-for-dos "reason" field to CValidationState (Matt Corallo)
6a7f8777a0 Ban all peers for all block script failures (Suhas Daftuar)
7b999103e2 Clean up banning levels (Matt Corallo)
b8b4c80146 [refactor] drop IsInvalid(nDoSOut) (Matt Corallo)
8818729013 [refactor] Refactor misbehavior ban decisions to MaybePunishNode() (Matt Corallo)
00e11e61c0 [refactor] rename stateDummy -> orphan_state (Matt Corallo)
f34fa719cf Drop obsolete sigops comment (Matt Corallo)
Pull request description:
This is a rebase of #11639 with some fixes for the last few comments which were not yet addressed.
The original PR text, with some strikethroughs of text that is no longer correct:
> This cleans up an old main-carryover - it made sense that main could decide what DoS scores to assign things because the DoS scores were handled in a different part of main, but now validation is telling net_processing what DoS scores to assign to different things, which is utter nonsense. Instead, we replace CValidationState's nDoS and CorruptionPossible with a general ValidationInvalidReason, which net_processing can handle as it sees fit. I keep the behavior changes here to a minimum, but in the future we can utilize these changes for other smarter behavior, such as disconnecting/preferring to rotate outbound peers based on them providing things which are invalid due to SOFT_FORK because we shouldn't ban for such cases.
>
> This is somewhat complementary with, though obviously conflicts heavily with #11523, which added enums in place of DoS scores, as well as a few other cleanups (which are still relevant).
>
> Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
>
> Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
> points to 100.
> Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
> instead of 10 DoS points.
> ~~BIP68-violation no longer results in a ban as it is SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Non-SegWit SigOp violation no longer results in a ban as it
> considers P2SH sigops and is thus SOFT_FORK.~~
> ~~Any script violation in a block no longer results in a ban as
> it may be the result of a SOFT_FORK. This should likely be
> fixed in the future by differentiating between them.~~
> Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
> Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
> too far in the future continue to not result in a ban.
> Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
> ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Note: The change to ban all peers for consensus violations is actually NOT the change I'd like to make -- I'd prefer to only ban outbound peers in those situations. The current behavior is a bit of a mess, however, and so in the interests of advancing this PR I tried to keep the changes to a minimum. I plan to revisit the behavior in a followup PR.
EDIT: One reviewer suggested I add some additional context for this PR:
> The goal of this work was to make net_processing aware of the actual reasons for validation failures, rather than just deal with opaque numbers instructing it to do something.
>
> In the future, I'd like to make it so that we use more context to decide how to punish a peer. One example is to differentiate inbound and outbound peer misbehaviors. Another potential example is if we'd treat RECENT_CONSENSUS_CHANGE failures differently (ie after the next consensus change is implemented), and perhaps again we'd want to treat some peers differently than others.
ACKs for commit 0ff1c2:
jnewbery:
utACK 0ff1c2a838
ryanofsky:
utACK 0ff1c2a838. Only change is dropping the first commit (f3883a321bf4ab289edcd9754b12cae3a648b175), and dropping the temporary `assert(level == GetDoS())` that was in 35ee77f2832eaffce30042e00785c310c5540cdc (now c8b0d22698)
Tree-SHA512: e915a411100876398af5463d0a885920e44d473467bb6af991ef2e8f2681db6c1209bb60f848bd154be72d460f039b5653df20a6840352c5f7ea5486d9f777a3
fa08c5cb99 test_runner: Move pruning back to extended (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
This reverts fafb55e2c2, since the test is still too slow to run with asan enabled on a network hdd
ACKs for commit fa08c5:
jnewbery:
utACK fa08c5cb99
jonasschnelli:
utACK fa08c5cb99
Tree-SHA512: de16786b9d507a72210805c3e9eef360e5fc3d4bc3a81f7175b6cc70d1bc426cde7ac97bc0d1a0d4e0813067e1e251c2dd49256552cc6b52446b475251b7c32b
Though at the moment ChainActive() simply references `g_chainstate.m_chain`,
doing this change now clears the way for multiple chainstate usage and allows
us to script the diff.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l "chainActive" | grep -E '(h|cpp)$' | xargs sed -i '/chainActive =/b; /extern CChain& chainActive/b; s/\(::\)\{0,1\}chainActive/::ChainActive()/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
This can't be a scripted-diff due to the confusion of the global
chainActive and the CChainState member of the same name.
This specific rename makes the following chainActive -> ::ChainActive() diff
scriptable.
This change marks the already-existing bitcoin-wallet.1 manpage file for
installation together with the others. Previously, only bitcoind.1,
bitcoin-cli.1, bitcoin-tx.1 and bitcoin-qt.1 would be installed.
faea56400d rpc: Add lock annotations to block{,header}ToJSON (MarcoFalke)
fab00a5cb9 rpc: Serialize in getblock without cs_main (MarcoFalke)
fa1c3591ad rpc: Use IsValidNumArgs in getblock (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No need to hold cs_main when serializing a struct to json
Fixes: #15925
ACKs for commit faea56:
jnewbery:
utACK faea56400d
jonasschnelli:
utACK faea56400d
Tree-SHA512: 005d378cda1e6024e9f5142f99a8adbefe202cd7bfeaafee55eb909e8990a3790aa27fcf5dd16119cc9afe9dc8bd30f660de40233316781669be166bac3018e7
This is a first step towards cleaning up our DoS interface - make
validation return *why* something is invalid, and let net_processing
figure out what that implies in terms of banning/disconnection/etc.
Behavior change: peers will now be banned for providing blocks
with premature coinbase spends.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
Compared with previous bans, the following changes are made:
* Txn with empty vin/vout or null prevouts move from 10 DoS
points to 100.
* Loose transactions with a dependency loop now result in a ban
instead of 10 DoS points.
* Many pre-segwit soft-fork errors now result in a ban.
Note: Transactions that violate soft-fork script flags since P2SH do not generally
result in a ban. Also, banning behavior for invalid blocks is dependent on
whether the node is validating with multiple script check threads, due to a long-
standing bug. That inconsistency is still present after this commit.
* Proof of work failure moves from 50 DoS points to a ban.
* Blocks with timestamps under MTP now result in a ban, blocks
too far in the future continue to *not* result in a ban.
* Inclusion of non-final transactions in a block now results in a
ban instead of 10 DoS points.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Isolate the decision of whether to ban a peer to one place in the
code, rather than having it sprinkled throughout net_processing.
Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
John Newbery <john@johnnewbery.com>
This comment was confusing and incorrect when first added ("invalid rather than
merely non-standard" has the opposite meaning of what is actually the case),
and was also not updated after segwit with the correct variable names.
Delete it since the code reads just fine on its own.
Co-authored by: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
Suhas Daftuar <sdaftuar@gmail.com>
